RACISM IN THE FEDERAL COURT NO DEMOCRAT WILL ADDRESS OR SPEAK ON THIS BUT MANY LATINOS AND CAUCASIANS ARE SPEAKING UP BUT NOTHING IS BEING DONE YET!
I AM PRAYING AND PLEADING TO ALL OF MY X FOLLOWERS, TICK TOCK, FACEBOOK ETC TO MAKE THIS A VIRAL PLEA FOR HELP GETTING THESE SENIOR CITIZEN SISTERS BACK INTO THEIR HOME ASAP. #1LOVEALL
First of all, I want to commend and shout out the members in Law Enforcement doing their part making sure the legal playing field is level, I thank God and you guys and women for all you do.
Not one Democratic Judge caught up in the web actually think nobody is reading or paying attention because of their positions and skin color, many need to keep this in mind Alderman Edward Burke never imagined being indicted or convicted and look at where he is at.
Here is a case where a Federal Judge whom President Biden appointed to be a Federal Judge, she hates senior citizens especially if they are of color, I believe in the saying "Birds of a Feather" Flock Together"
The Democratic Party will never appoint or stand behind any Black or Colored judge whom they feel may be an asset to ethnic groups of Color or sadly now Senior Citizens it is a given that mostly judges of a racist or Bias demeanor are specific chosen to keep the status quo of maintaining JIM CROW LAWS be enforced in Illinois at all times.
Most Federal Judges in the Federal Court of Illinois especially in the Seventh Circuit do not accept the Black or Brown Man as being a Man Equal in accordance with the United States Constitution and now it appears unfortunately Senior Citizens of Color as African American women are grossly resented.
Let me give you vivid example when this case was before Judge Feinerman, he used his robe unlawfully to cite laws that were not germane to the legal issues relating to the Illegal Foreclosure, we filed a Motion to Disqualify him now read how he kept the case and denied it himself.
A- “Plaintiff does not set forth legitimate grounds for Disqualifying District Judge Feinerman” (Denied June 10, 2021).
B- That Judge Feinerman did
everything in his unlawful authority as a “Private Citizen” “Trespassed upon
the Laws” The U.S.
Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94
S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a
state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes
into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in
that case stripped of his official or representative character and is
subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual
conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from
responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
The judge then acts not as a
judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
1.)
FACT- That Judge Feinerman violated the aforementioned Model of
Judicial Conduct Canon 3E (1990) “Motions containing allegations of
an appearance of partiality should be decided by another judge. Avoiding the
appearance of impropriety is "as important to developing public confidence
in the judiciary as avoiding impropriety itself. United States v. Hollister,
746 F.2d 420, 425-26 (8th Cir. 1984)”.
A- That said pleadings taken from
the Motion for Reconsideration filed in the District Court, (June 28, 2021) that is subject to the Appeal
11.)
That because US Bank realized
they have been DEFEATED with the unimpeachable Complaint filed in Federal Court
did not attempt or try to finagle themselves out of the TRUTHFUL PLEADINGS,
thereby admitting pursuant to Fed. Rule
56.1.
12.) That said Judge set up a status hearing date on May
21, 2021 for June 19, 2021 at 9:15 am, he indicated in his order. Initial
Status Report shall be filed by 7/12/2021.
13.) Plaintiff is
the only litigator, that complied with said Order and filed said Motion for
Summary Judgment et al. June 16, 2021.
14.) That
allegedly said Judge in a fit of rage acting in his own volition as a “Private
Citizen” one can easily infer from the foregoing document, DENIED said
Summary Judgment. On June 22, 2021, Motion for Summary Judgment is denied for
failure to comply with Local Rule 56.1, The motion Hearing set for 7/19/2021 is
stricken.
A-
That said Judge Denied Appellant’s valid Summary Judgment when
the Appellee has admitted to every assertion via Summary Judgments in the
Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and District Courts and because of the color
of the Appellants skin, Judges become “Private Citizens” making sure
Corruption, Violence and all acts of Terror and Fraud gets passed in their
courts.
B-
2.)
That every judge in the
Seventh Circuit closed their eyes
to every valid complaint, motions and affidavits Summary Judgments said
Petitioner put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of
judges committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States
Constitution engaging in “WAR”
against the United States Constitution making every order rendered against the
Petitioner. If a judge does not fully
comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S.
200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act
or acts of treason;
WHAT IS WORSE IT WAS LEARNED DEC 10, 2025, NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED STAMPED DEC. 26, 2024 WAS NEVER DOCKETED CERTAIN CLERKS IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT WERE ORDERED NOT TO DOCKET UNTIL $1000.00 WAS PAID AS A SANCTION
NO JUDGES NAMES WERE RECORDED ON THIS DOCUMENT BUT THE SUPERVISING CLERK AND OFFICAL CLERKS IN THOMAS G. BRUTON'S OFFICE MADE IT CLEAR ONCE THE $1000.00 WAS PAID THE RECORD WILL BE DOCKETED, BUT THE FOLLOWING MOTION WAS ALLOWED TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS.
Allegedly Frank H. Easterbrook who is still active, Michael S. Kanne Deceased, , Michael Y. Scudder still active were the judges on the case but if judges are engaging in Civil Rights Violations covering up egregious crimes of other judges how can JUSTICE BE SOUGHT IN AN ENVIRONMENT SIMILAR TO WHEN THE KU KLUX KLAN AND OTHER RACIST NATIONALISTS REIN TERROR ON BLACK AND BROWN COMMUNITIES
THE RACIST JUDGES TRYING TO PROTECT US BANK DON'T WANT NOBODY TO KNOW, THAT THE CASE WAS OVER WHEN THE ILLINOIS STATE APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMED THE VACATING OF THE FORECLOSURE
HERE IS A BLACK HISTORY FACT! BLACK/COLORED DEMOCRATS MOST ARE APPOINTED OR ELECTED IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ONLY TO KEEP THEIR ETHNIC GROUPS OPPRESSED AND MOUTHS SHUT AT THE INJUSTICES PERPETRATED BY RACIST POLITICAL MEN IN THE MACHINE
BECAUSE DEMOCRATS ARE AWARE THAT CERTAIN REPUBLICANS HATE BLACKS AS MUCH AS THEY DO EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM HAS ADMITTED TO THE VERACITY OF ALL PLEADINGS PUT BEFORE THE COURTS
On Jan. 2, 2024 this matter was presented before Judge Chivira:
MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND
RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLICIT
IN THIS CHILD SUPPORT SCAM OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE FRAUDULENTLY
FALSIFYING COURT DOCUMENTS CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5
TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT AND THE CTA NOT REINSTATING HIM BACK TO
WORK BECAUSE THEY DESTROYED HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS TRYING TO COVER-UP JUDGES
ALLOWING EXTORTION OF HIS WAGES TO POLICE OFFICER & JUDGE MANUFACTURING AN
UNLAWFUL WARRANT IN THIS CONSPIRACY AND IS SEEKING $50 MILLION DOLLARS
w/AFFIDAVIT
Unbeknown to Judge Chivira, she was never removed from the matter
meaning that she always had JURISDICTION, Pursuant to Rule 23.6 Substitution
of Judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure (C) Orders granting a
substitution of judge shall be accompanied by an order transferring the case to
the presiding judge of the division or district in which the case is then pending
for reassignment.
1.) Please see attached February
20, 2024 Court Order emailed to me not signed by the Acting Presiding Judge
Regina Scannicchio.
2.) Judge Maritza Martinez
mistook me for one of the INFERIOR NEGROS she may be accustomed to dealing with
assumed the Jurisdiction of the Presiding Judge of which she had no authority
and stated to me via ZOOM, “they asked me to preside over this matter on
your request to get a new judge” March 27 at 10:10 am via Zoom and had
me to swear in her clandestine hearing.
3.) She honestly admitted not
having Judicial Authority but a Personal Fraternal Authority on the behest of doing
what “THEY” told her to do.
IT IS A FACT! In my experience the Latinos/Certain Caucasians have demonstrated
more integrity and support than any Negro in this City.
Hoping this email receives you in great health and spirits.
Respectfully Submitted,
By:
_________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
CC Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Judge Derico mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov
Jaime Barcus jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov
ccc.domrelcr3006@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise
L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Attorney General Cook County Sheriff’s
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United
As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust } States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al. } the Northern District of
Plaintiffs –Appellees } Illinois, Eastern Division
V }
No. 24 cv 12195 } No.
}
Monzella Y. Johnson }
Defendant-Appellant } Judge April Perry
THIS WAS FILED STAMPED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS JAN 10, 2025
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION PROHIBITING ALTISOURCE, COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS OR ANY PERSON FROM REMOVING SAID POSSESSIONS OF 61 YEARS FROM HOME DUE TO MORTGAGE FRAUD ON THE COURT, JUDICIAL COMPLAINT FILED ON THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AS SHE BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” UPHOLDING ALL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IGNORING THE FACTS OF CASE BEING CLOSED AS THE RECORD DEMONSTRATES HOW A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010 AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011, CORROBORATES HOW CERTAIN JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS HAVE INDUCED RELIANCE ON THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO ILLEGALLY EVICT APPELLANTS FROM THEIR HOME ON “FRAUDULENT” DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, VIOLATING SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE & ISSUE A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES WITH A BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER WHERE A SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT ABOUT THE FACTS OF THIS CASE AS PARTICULARIZED PURSUANT TO FED RULE CIV P 8, 9, REQUIRE THAT APPELLANT’S TO PARTICULARIZE THEIR ALLEGATIONS OF “FRAUD ON THE COURT” IN AS SHORT, PLAIN, AND DIRECT A WAY AS IS REASONABLE DEFENDANTS ARE HOMELESS DUE TO THIS TERRORIST ILLEGAL EVICTION AS SENIOR CITIZENS CULMINATIING INTO A HATE CRIME BY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES AND PERSONNEL
1.) That the Honorable District Court received unopposed Emergency Motions accompanied with affidavits with court orders reflecting eviction being a Civil Rights violations and not State issues, Pembaur v. Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986)
A- The District Court ignored all evidence in Appellant’s Motion with Affidavit detailing Unprecedented acts of Conspiracy (Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a), the Emergency Motions were presented in a Legally sufficient manner and demonstrated a Prima Facie showing of Civil Rights unlawful acts lodged at appellant (64) and the amazing part is “all” Appellee’s have admitted to every gregarious Unconstitutional act by not objecting or submitting any counter-affidavits to the courts, thereby relying on members of said chain conspiracy to save them and protect them keeping them “above” the Law.
B- The District Court Engaged in an organized conspiracy violating Section IV of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, that said Democrats in the judiciary is punishing the Appellants for speaking up and fighting against the tyranny and corruption in the courts as they systematically closed their eyes to the mayhem and injustices as the Domestic Terrorists have litigiously bullied and demonstrated the Democratic Political Machine do not honor or uphold Equal Protection or Civil Rights laws to Senior Citizens, Black or Brown Citizens of Illinois, Chicago.
C- The District Court deliberately abused the adversarial process, a fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are to be conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of cases without an adversarial proceeding, In re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination (Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A. 2d 220 (1977).
D- The District Court Judge engaged in a Terrorist Act against the Appellant violating their Civil Rights prohibiting them equal access to the courts, due to their ethnicity as an African American, Black, Brown Senior Citizen Women, (Pro Se litigant).
E- The District Court demonstrated a multitude of deliberate Improprieties in an attempt to aid and assist said Appellee’s named in the Affidavits, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for Denying a legally sufficient Motions served on Appellee’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rptr. 880 (1983)
F- The Federal citations warrants removal from their positions, Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline, Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898, 122 Cal. Rptr. 778 (1975).
2.) That the Democratic Judiciary as “Official Policy” makers the standard set forth in Monell establishing municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. 1983, municipal liability may be imposed for a single decision by municipal policy makers under appropriate circumstances; if the decision to adopt a particular course of action is directed by those who establish governmental policy, the municipality is equally responsible whether that action is to be taken only once or repeatedly.
a. “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
b. Appellant filed a Complaint against the Clerk of Cook County for allowing a Court Order backdated to Nov 21, 2024 and entered into the database after Dec 23, 2024, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Delivered Dec 30, 2024, but the Sheriff filed and Affidavit alleging an eviction order was entered but no record in the data system.
c. The Recorder of Deeds have Appellant’s property recorded 5/21/2024 with the Appellate Court Affirming Vacating Foreclosure, Ex B.
d. The Recorder of Deeds have a plethora of “Fraudulent” entries 12/26/ 2024 Assigning a Mortgage, Ex C.
e. The Recorder of Deeds have over 30 entries for Dec 26, 2024, Releasing, Mortgage and Assignment of said property as if this was some type of Ponzi scheme, using Appellant’s property as bait, Ex D and an Email from Altisource in El Paso, Texas of Jan 9, 2025, “BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE DISPOSAL OF THESE ITEMS. I WOULD LIKE TO OFFER YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO REMOVE YOUR PERSONAL BELONGINGS”, Ex E.
f. Finally, Unbeknownst to the Appellees and alleged Domestic Terrorists, Appellants had placed their property in a Quick Claim Deed Trust 9/23/24 and it was recorded 10/16/24 as Ex F.
The United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
3.) That on Oct 29, 2024, Respondent had the 9 Page Memorandum Opinion and Order from Caucasian Judge of Jewish ethnicity VACATED the FORECLOSURE June 3, 2010, hereto attached Receipt and Certified Order as Ex 1.
A- That no Negro Democratic judge, or mostly Irish or of Polish ethnicity will ever rule in favor of the Respondents due to the Judiciary being RACIST & CORRUPT many will go along to get along said case is 16 years old and the Paternity case is almost 40 years old, with over 50 Democratic judges involved, this is how Lynchings are done in this City or State replacing the ROPES by invoking unjust applications of the laws and recruiting Inferior Colored People to use their ethnicity as Jim Crow Laws are still being Enforced in Illinois Courts.
B- That Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. An INNOCENT MAN was DISMISSED from a Paternity Case fraught with “Fraudulent” allegations by the only Person of Irish Ethnicity, Former States Attorney and Mayor Richard J. Daley Dismissed Sept 17, 1987, (85 D 068184) and has never been served or had any paternity tests as Democrats undermined the same legal system using Inferior Negros and Colored or Racist Democrats to undermine the same laws by REMANDING HIM into Custody 5 times for allegedly owing child support on (88 D 079012) a case that was DISMISSED and worse they had to back date the age of the adult woman, as Racist Asst States Attys “Fraudulently” manufactured documents to make Tycee Hightower a minor to justify bringing him into the courts illegally for not making any child support payments to a Police Officer knowing, that he is not the biological father.
4.) That the Appellate Court AFFIRMED, Ex 1, hereto attached as Ex A by unanimous decision of the APPELLATE FULL COURT.
5.) That a Complaint was filed before the Federal Agency CFPB hereto attached as Gr Ex 2, where US Bank on Page 4, Par 1 US Bank “Responded the Complaint does not belong to them”.
6.) That Page 5, Lines 21-22 July 30, 2024, PHH notified said Federal Agency via that “If you would like to know more about the foreclosure status, contact the foreclosure attorney et al.”
7.) That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”
8.) That PHH Mortgage sent a letter Oct 18, 2024, from Ajitpal Janjue, Consumer Account Analyst, hereto attached as Gr Ex 3, Par 2, Since Potestivo & Associates, P.C. is not authorized to obtain information about this account, all communication regarding this request will be sent to the primary account holder this address.
A- Pursuant to PHH of Ex 3, Par the Primary Account Holder is Monzella Johnson, Marcia Johnson 5217 S. Ingleside Ave, Chicago, Ill. 60615-4307.
B-
9.) That Respondent dispatched an email to judge Derico and Courtesy Copies to all parties, hereto attached Ex 4, Oct 15, 2034 at 11:33am Respondent’s Official Response to the Oct 9. 2024 et al.
That FRAUD was committed Inducing Reliance on the Cook County Sheriff’s Department U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality. -Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
10.) That from the EVICTION UNIT, 10/16/2024 said letter was immediately mailed saying FINAL NOTICE That because of the above, hereto attached, Gr Ex 5, Motion to Disqualify Democratic Judge Michael A. Forti Instanter for “Cause” Perjury & Vacate September 19, 2024 Court Order Due to Hate Bias Prejudice Pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-1001 (a) (2,3) Trying to Cover-Up The States Attorney is and Has Been Representing A Police Officer Illegally on a case Richard J. Daley Dismissed Sept. 17, 1987 with total Corroboration of Democratic Judges in Cook County not Following any Rules of Illinois Civil Procedures or in accordance to Illinois Statutes but as Private Citizens et al. ; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
A- That Page 4, Par D reflects how Blacks and certain Hispanics are REWARDED within the DEMOCRATIC PARTY, That the Political Machine rewarded every Black or Colored person who participated in the creation or falsification of any documents or kept their mouths shut or snitched on those trying to help him against the Respondent for the alleged Ku Klux Klan judges and attorneys Lester Barclay is the President of the CTA, William Stewart Boyd became a judge and a monster!, Iris Chavira allegedly received a judicial position not qualified one bit, etc. but as long as Black and certain Hispanics destroy their own ethnic groups, they will be rewarded a position in the Democratic Party.
B- That Page 8 Par B, Anytime a racist Irish have the audacity to say to an innocent man “today is your lucky day, I can’t LOCK YOU UP anymore” judge Timothy P. Murphy or a Polacca David E. Haracz tells you, “I know that you are not the BIOLOGICAL FATHER, I’m just the BILL COLLECTOR” or the other polacca Ronald Bartkowicz issues a BOGUS WARRANT as a former CTA attorney trying to help keep his racist Brethren from being discovered at the CTA (admit to everything as being accurate in the Motion to Disqualify him and compliments the Motion and asks the Respondent “How did you know, that I use to work for the CTA?”) who stole said wages while off work injured on duty and to cover-up all of the illegal wage garnishees sent to her racist Irish attorney representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower-Belmer, there is a huge problem in the judiciary, A HETEROSEXUAL FREEMAN OR WOMAN cannot receive Equal Justice or Equal Protection within the laws OF THIS CITY OR STATE, when these racist hateful individuals have found a way to circumvent the United States Constitution and still enforce Jim Crow laws which has been outlawed by the U.S. Supreme Court as demonstrated though out this case. #JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2012/08/chronology-of-unlawful-contempt-charges.html? A Certified Affidavit Notarized ignored by racist States Attorney Dick Devine.
g. To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
11.) That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
12.) Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Respondent’s Pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280., in that all attorneys and Bank Associates were relying on the judges to put their careers on the line saving every racist Bank Personnel as demonstrated in this matter.
a. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
13.) The Cook County Sheriff’s CANCELED the Eviction 4/24/2024, but never did an Attorney file any legal documents in the Circuit Court of Cook County to Vacate the Eviction Cancellation.
14.) One can easily infer, That on Oct. 16, 2024 someone received a financial kickback causing the manufacturing of the Cook County Eviction Unit to mail out a FINAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, where the evidence demonstrated by the Preponderance of the Evidence legal standards Negro Judge Fredrenna Lyle nor James T. Derico ever had any jurisdiction to ENTER ANY ORDERS, due to them acting as “Private Citizens” in this Terrorist Mortgage Fraud Criminal Conspiracy” in viciously trying to have Respondents who are senior citizens illegally EVICTED FROM THEIR HOME.
a. That the signed Court Order as of June 2, 2010, by Cook County Judge Gillespie “THIS COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VACATES THE JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE FOR LACK OF A PROPER AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT”
The Affidavit that the Appellees presented to the Court of Cook County was an AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
15.) Finally, in your documents Page 66, 67 of the PDF, The Judicial Sales (filed in the Recorder of Deeds with Karen Yarborough) Pamela Murphy-Boylan, President CEO of the Judicial Sales states that the property was sold Nov 21, 2021 for ZERO MONEY with no CITY or REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES, and Deed to Property was illegally Transferred and a Notary illegally attesting to crimes, due to a plethora of operatives engaging in a sophisticated Mortgage Fraud Scheme that has now been CORROBORATED AND ADMITTED TO BY PHH REPRESENTATIVES WITH THEIR INVALID DOCUMENTS.
16.) In replying to Page 2 Par 1, YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT, NO AGREEMENT AND NO FORECLOSURE SALE, THE WHOLE TRANSACTION IS FRAUDLULENT COMPRISED OF A PLETHORA OF CRIMINAL ELEMENTS AND ALTISOURCE HAD SOMEONE TO BREAK IN OUR HOME ONCE AND CHANGED OUR LOCKS LOCKING US OUT OF OUR HOUSE AND KEEPS TRESPASSING BY PLACING DOCUMENTS ON OUR PROPERTY AS SENIOR CITIZENS AND FED UP AND AS A RETIRED POLICE OFFICER, IT APPEARS NOBODY IS GOING TO BE SATISFIED UNTIL SOMEBODY IS IN A BODY BAG.
17.) The question is how money was paid to the Negro judges selling out their ethnic groups trying to undo what qualified Caucasian Judges did correctly?
IT APPEARS THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A SOPHISTICATED WAY OF STEALING HOMES AND IT IS BEING COVERED-UP BY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES.
1.) That Judge Lyle never had jurisdiction and violated the very laws violating her Oath “ENGAGED IN TREASON OFFENSES, (MAY 5, 2021) ENTERED AN ORDER 2 YEARS SEVEN MONTHS LATER TO U.S. BANK from her other Order Vacating Court Orders she never had jurisdiction.
2.) Judge Robert Adrian, a veteran judge in downstate Quincy, Illinois, faced removal from the bench due to his controversial actions. In 2022, he reversed a guilty ruling against a young man in a sexual assault case. The Illinois Courts Commission issued a rare decision, stating that Adrian attempted to circumvent the state’s mandatory minimum sentencing law during a sentencing hearing for Drew Clinton, who was previously found guilty of sexually assaulting 16-year-old Cameron Vaughan at a 2021 graduation party. Adrian justified his reversal by claiming that the Adams County prosecutor had “totally failed” to prove Clinton’s guilt, but the commission saw this as a subterfuge. They concluded that the judge intentionally circumvented the law to satisfy his personal belief about a just sentence, resulting in the reversal of the criminal defendant’s conviction1.
h. Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
i. “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232
j. “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
1.) That all parties acted as “PRIVATE CITIZENS” and engaged in numerous “TREASON OFFENSES”, “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” as Judge Lyle aided and abetted in numerous crimes using her robe trying to help said Plaintiffs
Seventh Circuit Overturns $44.7 Million Jury Verdict Against City in Shooting Incident
Wednesday, February 24, 2021 Julie Tappendorf
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a jury verdict against the City of Chicago awarding $44.7 million in damages relating to a shooting involving an off-duty police officer. First Midwest Bank as Guardian v. City of Chicago.
According to the court opinion, the plaintiff claimed that a Chicago police officer shot his friend during an argument when the two had been drinking. The friend suffered traumatic brain and other injuries. The friend sued the City of Chicago seeking damages for the shooting, arguing that the City was responsible for the officer's conduct. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the City's failure to have an "early warning system" to identify officers who might engage in misconduct, failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers who engage in misconduct, and the "code of silence" among police officers contributed to the shooting incident. The City argued that the officer was off duty and not acting under "color of state law" at the time of the shooting, so the City was not liable under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. The case made its way to a jury which found the City of Chicago liable and awarded $44.7 million in damages to the plaintiff. The jury found that two of the City's policies - its failure to maintain an adequate early warning system and failure to adequately investigate and discipline officers - caused the officer to shoot his friend.
The City appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed the jury verdict and award. The appeals court found that although the injuries suffered by plaintiff from the shooting incident were grievous, the City was not responsible for the officer's actions, where the officer was acting as a private citizen and not as a City police officer. The Seventh Circuit noted that Section 1983 imposes liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right. Since none of the plaintiff's federal rights were violated, the court of appeals overturned the jury verdict against the City of Chicago.
a. Jim Crow Laws are being managed and instituted by the Black Gate Keepers within the Democratic Party many of the alleged Black leaders are mere figureheads enforcing the same hate and discriminatory doctrines of the fraternal hate organization, that which many of the Blacks and certain Brown persons have accepted being Inferior to Anglo-Saxons doing whatever they are told by keeping their mouths shut, keeping their eyes closed to any crimes perpetrated by certain Caucasians and ears deaf to any person of color complaining about any aspect of injustices and in this case Lyle is making sure said women being First Responders, senior citizens retired Civil Servants, Police Officer and Educator from the Chicago Board of Education not receive any avenue of justice forsaking her own career protecting corrupt Anglo-Saxons. .
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Appellant respectfully Prays for the Relief
1. For an Order Granting the Stay of Execution of Altisource, Cook County Sheriff’s from removing any personal effects from the 5217 S. Ingleside property Instanter until said matter is finally adjudicated on appeal.
2. For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;
3. For an Order issuing a Mandatory Injunction on the Enforcement of all Foreclosures Prohibit the Evictions of any persons until a Special Prosecutor is appointed to investigate all parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.
A- That said Attorneys Law Firms and Judges be referred for Law Licenses be REVOKED INSTANTER for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and brought before the Grand Jury for additional Charges.
4. For an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Attorneys, and State employees involved in this matter;
5. For an Order Having the U.S. Marshall’s Instanter to effect Notice and Service on all judges and Altisource personnel in El Paso Texas making sure none of the personal effects are affected as a means of retaliation for the enforcement of this matter.
6. For the entry of an Order awarding to your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, } Appeal from the United
As TRUSTEE for securitized Trust } States District Court for
2006-NC3, et al. } the Northern District of
Plaintiffs –Appellees } Illinois, Eastern Division
V }
No. 24 cv 12195 } No.
}
Monzella Y. Johnson }
Defendant-Appellant } Judge April Perry
NOTICE OF
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION PROHIBITING ALTISOURCE, COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS OR ANY PERSON FROM REMOVING SAID POSSESSIONS OF 61 YEARS FROM HOME DUE TO MORTGAGE FRAUD ON THE COURT, JUDICIAL COMPLAINT FILED ON THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AS SHE BECAME A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” UPHOLDING ALL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IGNORING THE FACTS OF CASE BEING CLOSED AS THE RECORD DEMONSTRATES HOW A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010 AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011, CORROBORATES HOW CERTAIN JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS HAVE INDUCED RELIANCE ON THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS TO ILLEGALLY EVICT APPELLANTS FROM THEIR HOME ON “FRAUDULENT” DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, VIOLATING SECTION 42 USC 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE & ISSUE A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES WITH A BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER WHERE A SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT ABOUT THE FACTS OF THIS CASE AS PARTICULARIZED PURSUANT TO FED RULE CIV P 8, 9, REQUIRE THAT APPELLANT’S TO PARTICULARIZE THEIR ALLEGATIONS OF “FRAUD ON THE COURT” IN AS SHORT, PLAIN, AND DIRECT A WAY AS IS REASONABLE DEFENDANTS ARE HOMELESS DUE TO THIS TERRORIST ILLEGAL EVICTION AS SENIOR CITIZENS CULMINATIING INTO A HATE CRIME BY DEMOCRATIC JUDGES AND PERSONNEL
NOW COMES the Moving Party, Monzella Y. Johnson (“Appellant”), hereby properly Noticing the Appellees with this Motion and all of its attachments to all parties Noticed in the Certificate of Service except Cook County Sheriff’s Police per Directive to email them first {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedures}:
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
5217 S. Ingleside Ave
Chicago, Il 60615
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Please be advised that on Jan 10, 202, Appellant has filed before this Court of Appeals, Emergency Motion for Stay of Execution et al;
I have caused Courtesy Copies to be had on all of the following via electronic service email/regular mail except Cook County Judges per the Directive of the Cook County Sheriff’s Police; whereby, United States Marshall’s have to provide Service and Notice.
To:
Clerk of the Circuit Court
courtclerk@cookcountycourt.com Attorney General
50 West Washington, Suite 1001 Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov
Chicago, Ill. 60601 555 West Monroe Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County Sheriff’s
Tom Dart
50 West Washington, Suite 702
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Chg. IL 60601
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
To: Hon Michael A. Forti CCC.DomRelCR3004@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Hon. Andrea Webber CCC.DomRelCRCL06@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Maritza Martinez CCC.DomRelCR3006@cookcountyil.gov
Hon Derico mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov
Jaime Barcus jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov
sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Eileen Burke timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
The Crusader Newspaper Group State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain Illinois State Police
sfountain@chicagocrusader.com
Chicago Police Superintendent, 3510 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago Ill. 60653
Email CLEARPATH@chicagopolice.org
Dir. FBI, Hon Mayor Brandon
Special Agent in Charge (FBI) City Hall 7th floor
Chicago, IL. 60601
2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60608
President/CEO Rick Aneshansel US Bank Natl. Assoc. rick.aneshansel@usbank.com
Registered Agent: Grace A. Gorka US Bank Natl. Assoc.
190 S. LaSalle,
grace.gorka@usbank.com ggorka@usbank.com
Chg. IL 60603
JSC_General@atgf.com Pamela Murphy-Boylan President CEO of the (TJSC)
RPerdew@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
simon.feng@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
pmal@potestivolaw.com Potestivo Law Firm
chicagodocket@lockelord.com Lord & Locke Law Firm
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal
ipleadings@potestivolaw.com
bthompson@potestivolaw.com
223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite 610
Chicago, IL. 60606
________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Monzella Y. Johnson
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
AFFIDAVIT
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted Notary
____________________
Monzella Y. Johnson
Frogishtwo65@gmail.com
Chicago, Il 60615
