"Corruption Racism and Sexism is Running the Illinois and Cook County Courts"

Nobody can blame Alderman Edward Burke who has been Indicted and Convicted for his roles in government corruption.

Here is a case where these Hispanic Judges realize Black People in authority have no Power and are merely FIGUREHEADS, decided to act like female KU KLUX KLANSMEN or SPANISH GANG MEMBERS have merged with some Domestic Terrorists in the Democratic Party and "FIX" a case thinking they were going to get away with the crime simply because of my skin color.

Judges seems to be assigned or appointed based upon their criminal aspirations, I can count on my hands of some of truly qualified judges with integrity and in this case no judge has any competent understanding of the rules or legal procedures it's like kangaroo court.

Many of the Colored judges are worse than the racist Caucasian judges that they have replaced and is probably why so many criminals are being re-released back into society because in actuality many of them are thugs and criminally minded and is using their robes or political authority to expand their ambitions thinking they can out fox the FBI or anyone trying to investigate them.

On Dec 26, 2023, the following Motion was filed. which means LEGALLY she no longer had any JURISDICTION on this matter and another judge had to get involved.

RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION INSTANTER OF JUDGE FOR “CAUSE” HATE BIAS PREJUDICE PURSUANT to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2,3) ILLINOIS BAR & 12 BAR ASSOCIATIONS FOUND ATTORNEY NOT RECOMMENDED TO BE ON THE BALLOT FOR JUDGE BUT SHE WAS PLACED ON COOK COUNTY BALLOT UNLAWFULLY UNOPPOSED INDUCED THE SUPREME COURT AND PUBLIC CITIZENS & BECAME A JUDGE “PRIVATE CITIZEN” ENGAGING IN AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES MAKING HER ORDER  VOID/NULLITY DUE TO PETITIONER & ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS ADMITTING/CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES IN SAID CONSPIRACY AND JUDGE BEING A FORMER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY TRIED TO USE HER UNLAWFUL AUTHORITY IN COVERING-UP CRIMES OF OTHER ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS UNLAWFUL INVOLVEMENT VACATE ORDER  w/AFFIDAVIT

   Now comes Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification Instanter et al;

1.      That the ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL EVALUATIONS-COOK COUNTY 2022 GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATES SEEKING TO FILL JUDICIAL VACANCIES IRIS Y. CHAVIRA ---NOT RECOMMENDED

Alliance Evaluation Results

The Alliance of Bar Associations includes 12 bar associations that work collaboratively to evaluate judicial candidates, but publish independent recommendations.

Brown Vacancy

·   Bar Association Approval Key:

 

·   High (>7 Bars Approve)

 

·   Low (<5 Bars Approve)

 

·   Results Pending

                                          ALL BARS FOUND HER NOT RECOMMENDED

             Iris Y. Chivira declined to participate in the judicial evaluation process. Pursuant to ISBA guidelines, Ms. Iris Y. Chavira is found to be NOT RECOMMENDED for election to the Circuit Court of Cook County. 

2.      That the 14th SUBCIRCUIT BROWN VACANCY CHAVIRA IS RUNNING UNOPPOSED IN THE PRIMARY. DISCRIMINATING AGAINST QUALIFIED ATTORNEYS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE BALLOT RUNNING AGAINST HER, VISIT injusticewatch.org/judges.

 

A-    That Iris Y. Chivira finagled herself “FRAUDULENTLY” by getting on the Cook County Ballot UNOPPOSED, with the assistance of other Corrupt Clerks in Cook County bypassing the integrity process by DISCRIMINATING against QUALIFIED or OVERLYQUALIFID CANDIDATES from being Cook County judges. INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

 

     In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

3.      That because of her allegiance to whoever placed her on the Cook County ballot unopposed, she acted as a “Private Citizen” by unlawfully signing a Court Order Nov. 29, 2023 as Ex A, the States Attorney having admitted to all facts recorded in said Motion to Zero Out Child Support et al.  88 D 079012  .

 

4.      That on Nov 14, 2023, Judge Chavira informed the Caucasian Assistant States Attorney that, she thought this was her case via Zoom, the ASA informed the judge, that she didn’t think, they were involved and complained the Motion was over 13 pages (which made no sense) 

A-    Judge Chivira asked if Francoise had been sent a copy, said reply was yes, and informed the judge that electronic service was emailed to statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov, the judge said that is not the correct email and the Caucasian ASA provided sao.csed@cookcountyil.gov.

 

B-    That most importantly Judge Chivira requested to see Respondent’s face and directed him on how to navigate his phone so she can see him, Respondent was in a Parking lot at Advocate on 26^th King Drive, he took his Mom to her Medical Appointment and this was his first time being on Zoom.

As of today, May 24, 2024, Chivira got one of her people obviously of the same sexist fraternity to pretend she had authority to rule on the above Motion at no point did the PRESIDING JUDGE REGINA SCANNICCHIO ever sign any court orders removing Chivira from the case and reassigning it to Judge Maritza Martinez.

These judges are aware how the racist Irish and Polish ethnic individuals feel about men of Color and the extent many of them are willing to exhaust recruiting many of the African Americans in positions only as FIGUREHEADS decided to jump on the bandwagon and try the same racist tactics by trying to "fuck" over me and violate my Civil Rights because of my Masculine Heterosexual disposition and having Color in my skin is showing everyone reading this post on this blog how cases are "FIXED" in Cook County, Illinois Courts.

But what these women didn't realize because none of them have the legal aptitude to wear a judicial robe with respect or any type of integrity, so a LEGAL TRAP was set up going after the Ku Klux Klan and Puppet Inferior Black judges see the following SUMMARY JUDGMENT was filed Dec. 4, 2023.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ILLINOIS/FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLICIT IN THIS CHILD SUPPORT SCAM OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE FRAUDULENTLY FALSIFYING COURT DOCUMENTS CAUSING RESPONDENT TO BE REMANDED INTO CUSTODY 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT AND THE CTA NOT REINSTATING HIM BACK TO WORK BECAUSE THEY DESTROYED HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS TRYING TO COVER-UP JUDGES ALLOWING EXTORTION OF HIS WAGES TO POLICE OFFICER & JUDGE MANUFACTURING AN UNLAWFUL WARRANT IN THIS CONSPIRACY AND IS SEEKING $50 MILLION DOLLARS w/AFFIDAVIT

Defendant was job security for all of the racist, inferior intellectually challenged attorneys that was deployed to take him on litigiously so as to demonstrate “White Supremacy” is how Chicago is governed and ran in the United States of America, under the Democratic Machine no man of color was to provide for his family only Welfare, no man of color was to have a job only Welfare, no man of color was to have an education if it looks as if you have some intellect, the Wrath of Racism will be deployed against anyone who won’t succumb to their JIM CROW tactics as demonstrated in this case.

Not one judge or States Attorney (Kim Foxx) or Chief Judge (Timothy Calvin Evans) ever opened their mouths to DENOUNCE these horrific TERRORISTS ACTS, keep in mind Judge Chivira is still the Cook County Judge.

So, on Feb 9, 2024, the following DEFAULT MOTION was FILED.

                  MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FRAUD

                             OF $50 MILLION DOLLARS

        Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se. in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support of Motion for Default Judgment due to “Fraud” of $50 Million Dollars.

          

1.                That pursuant to Motions accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Petition to Zero out Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct et al. (filed Oct 26, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5156-4056-3301-7893- 63 delivered Oct. 28, 2023 at 2:52 pm in the mailbox. 

 

2.           That pursuant to Motions accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Re Notice Petition to Zero out Child Support due to Assistant States Attorneys Prosecutorial Misconduct et al. (filed Nov. 15, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5103-6771-3319-6315- 97 delivered Nov 16, 2023 at 2:01pm in the mailbox.  

 

3.           That pursuant to Judge Chivira a former Assistant States Attorney tried to pretend she was not an attorney for the States Attorney used her unlawful authority and acted as a “Private Citizen” by violating the Civil Rights of the Respondent Denied said valid aforementioned Motion that was properly agreed upon by the ASA via not objecting or denying any of the Pleadings.

 

4.           That pursuant to a Summary Motion accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (filed Dec 4, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5103-6773-3338-5864- 63 delivered Dec. 6, 2023 at 11:10 am in the mailbox. 

 

5.            That pursuant to a Motion for Disqualification Instanter of Judge for Cause et al.  accompanied by Affidavits said Plaintiff and the States Attorney failed to respond to said  Motion  (filed Dec 26, 2023) served on the Petitioners via electronically and mailed via Priority Tracking #9505-5116-1093-3360-0084- 14 delivered Dec. 28, 2023 at 12:40 pm in the mailbox. 

 

6.           That Colored judges are promoted and Appointed on their abilities as Democrats Oppressing ethnic groups of Color hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration Vacate (Feb 5. 2024 Order) Eviction & Rule to Show Cause et al.

 

7.            That said judge of Color is following the exact Terrorist Apartheid ways of Negros Judge Freddrenna Lyle as she came behind highly qualified judges who Vacated a Foreclosure/ and  Sale of said home in 2009 and affirmed by the Appellate Court 2010 she allowed racist bank attorneys of the worse kind to still come after said home illegally making it 14 years + as judge Freddrenna Lyle allegedly was paid very well by Bank Officials and was PROMOTED to the Appellate Court for her egregious crimes on senior citizens of Color not fearing any admonishments because her crimes were on ethnic groups of her hue and not of Irish or Polish ethnicity.

 

8.            That hereto attached Gr Ex B,  4 Re Noticed Motions filed Feb. 7, 2024 demonstrating the due-diligence said Retired Senior Citizens who is having to deplete their pensions and savings fighting to keep their home as heartless judges and racism working intimately in said Diabolical Mortgage Foreclosure Criminal Conspiracy.   

That on April 16, 2024, Judge Chivira told me the above Motion was not properly filed in the database and implied the Black Women in the Domestic Relations Division did not file it correctly and had the matter continued until May 28, 2024, but never ever sent me any court orders, and dismissed the case April 23, 2024.

So, the following Motion was filed April 18, 2024. 

MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1  The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

WITH AFFIDAVIT

 

I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel  Pro Se, Respondent Movant in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

 

1.)   That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

 

2.)    That Respondent, he has never filed a frivolous motion in any court but is up against a plethora of incompetent “Private Citizens” who are upholding Tyranny, Racism, Corruption and Prima Facie Hate at him for understanding the laws and its applications than so many of them due to their Political or Fraternal or sexual Orientation him being a Heterosexual Freeman.   

 

3.)     That on Jan. 2, 2024 Judge Chivira was in receipt of said Summary Judgment and was never legally recused from this matter upon Motion to Disqualify her (filed Dec. 26, 2024)

 

4.)    That Clerks and judges demonstrated a malingering attempt to undermine the Respondent or Judge by emailing to him a blank court order from the Presiding judge Regina Scannicchio (Feb. 20, 2024) not signed, hereto attached, Ex A.

 

5.)  That Judge Maritza Martinez was unaware of Rule 23.6 Substitution of Judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure (C) Orders granting a substitution of judge shall be accompanied by an order transferring the case to the presiding judge of the division or district in which the case is then pending for reassignment.

  

6.)    Judge Martinez became a willing participant in this “Organized Conspiracy” by assuming jurisdiction on said matter becoming now a defacto attorney and coconspirator, “Private Citizen” for the State Officials who have already admitted to taking part in a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights Violations.

A-    Judge Martinez stated “they asked me to preside over this matter on your request to get a new judge” March 27 at 10:10 am via Zoom and had me to swear in her clandestine hearing.

 

B-    It is clear Judge Martinez was operating under the authority of another alleged Terrorist cell within the Democratic Party/Political Machine

 

C-   She honestly admitted not having Judicial Authority but a Personal Fraternal Authority on the behest of doing what “THEY” told her to do.

 

7.)     That on April 16, 2024, Judge Chivira appeared on the 9:00 call and acknowledged the Respondent and stated she was going to call his case at 9:30 am but she had him sitting frivolously knowing Francoise nor the Assistant States Attorney were going to appear.

 

8.)    She stated, “that the Clerk’s did not file said Motion in the Database” even though, I had a file stamped copy she stated for me to return to the 8^th floor and let them know that it was not filed.

Re: 88D079012--C01240217 HIGHTOWER, FRANCOIS v. LAWRENCE, JOSEPH2

Yahoo/Inbox

• 

  Nancy Houston (Chief Judge's Office) 

  From:nancy.houston@cookcountyil.gov

  To:Maritza Martinez (Judiciary),Iris Chavira (Judiciary),Joelouis565@yahoo.com,sao.csed@cookcountysao.org,B. Marshall Hilmes

  Cc:DRDivOrders Cal97 (Circuit Court),CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office)

  Wed, May 22 at 8:26 AM

  
  

  ---

  From: Maritza Martinez (Judiciary) <Maritza.Martinez@cookcountyil.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 8:15 AM
  To: Nancy Houston (Chief Judge's Office) <nancy.houston@cookcountyil.gov>
  Subject: Fwd: 1988D079012

   

  This caption is wrong 

  
  

  Judge Maritza Martinez

  ---

  From: Maritza Martinez (Judiciary) <Maritza.Martinez@cookcountyil.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 10:30:09 AM
  To: Iris Chavira (Judiciary) <Iris.Chavira@cookcountyil.gov>
  Subject: Re: 1988D079012

   

  Any Tuesday at 9 am after the July 4th week is perfect. Zoom. 

  
  

  Judge Maritza Martinez

  ---

  From: Iris Chavira (Judiciary) <Iris.Chavira@cookcountyil.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 10:28:25 AM
  To: Maritza Martinez (Judiciary) <Maritza.Martinez@cookcountyil.gov>
  Subject: 1988D079012

   

  Hi Maritza,

  
  

  I'm sending Joseph Lawrence back to you. Is there a date / time you prefer for status?

  
  

  Thanks,

  
  

  Judge Iris Y. Chavira

  Domestic Relations Division

  Richard J. Daley Center

  50 W. Washington

  Chicago, IL 60602

  (312) 603-1249
• 

  Joe Louis 

  From:joelouis565@yahoo.com

  To:Maritza Martinez (Judiciary),Iris Chavira (Judiciary),sao.csed@cookcountysao.org,B. Marshall Hilmes,Nancy Houston (Chief Judge's Office)

  Cc:DRDivOrders Cal97 (Circuit Court),CCC DomRelCR3006 (Chief Judge's Office),The State of Illinois,Jaime Barcas (Chief Judge's Office)

  Wed, May 22 at 11:57 PM

  To the Judicial Council/Law Enforcement Officials:

  
  

  As per my conversation with Jaime Barcus this morning near and around 9:45 am it was quite apparent that she obviously was not accustomed to communicating with a real Man of Color with not only intelligence but a comprehensible understanding of how to articulate the laws to her.

  
  

  The question was how can an order be ascertained demonstrating whether the Presiding judge received an order from judge Chivira because she is either Racist or Sexist if not both, she is consistently demonstrating Bias on this case where she was the Assistant States Attorney helping out Police Officer Francoise Hightower by framing me for her biological father's child conceived out of incest, this judge is using her robe obstructing justice by entering court orders dismissing my Default April 23, 2024 when a Motion was filed April 18, 2024 because she continued the matter to May 28, 2024.

  
  

  Jaime requested said court order and Motion to Vacate Court Order Being Void/A Nullity hereto attached and was gone for a while and returned by 10:40 am during this time Cook County Sheriff Ms Navarro, greeted me to see if, I needed any help, two pleasant African American clocked in and asked if I needed any help, a Maintenance woman cleaning the ladies bathroom spoke and asked if I had been helped ?

  
  

  Then a Caucasian gentleman walked out the office to the men's bathroom put his head down as he walked in the direction of where I was sitting on the heater near the window then finally a Caucasian woman of an Amazon statute with a very cold or callous mannerism going to the lady's bathroom.

  
  

  Jaime said, "I can't give you any legal advice" and returned the documents which didn't make any sense because never at any time was any legal information sought, so the question was asked how is it Judge Martinez has jurisdiction to hear any case regarding judge Chivira when the Presiding Judge Regina Scannucchio never signed a court order granting her the authority but a blank court order was emailed to me? and at no time is the Presiding Judge involved.

  
  

  The look on Jaime's face was like looking at a Deer in headlights, she became lighter and said let me check on this, I stayed until 11:40, she never had the respect, courtesy or decency to return because she knew that her colleagues were engaging in RACIST, TERRORISTS, CRIMINAL OBSTRUTION OF JUSTICE CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.  

  
  

  At least every racist Ku Klux Klan acting Irish or Polaca who were judges against me admitted they were racist and told me that, I was telling the TRUTH, but because of my skin color, I was to have a sponsor or union representative who was basically Caucasian speaking on my behalf Black judges would never rule in my favor because they have to do what they are told.

  
  

  Judge Chivira and Martinez are acting like street thugs wearing robes--Because the Presiding judge never signed a court order for Martinez to even remotely get involved and criminally conspire with Chivira makes them "Private Citizens" operating in their own personal manner because these women allegedly knew many of the Black women or women like the Hispanic judges caught up in this mess have a vicious HATE for HETEROSEXUAL INTELLIGENT MEN like, the Respondent and the extent how low they are willing to stoop violating their oaths and forsaking their careers to prove their hate and sexist positions.  

  
  

  Judge Chivira and Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower aka Frankie has legally admitted to all of the Pleadings in said Summary Judgment, so Martinez lack jurisdiction to schedule any hearings seeking to save her Hispanic colleague who is using her judicial robe to commit crimes and obstruct justice so as to aid and assist criminals and law breakers as mentioned in the aforementioned case.

  
  

  Wherefore Respondent Prays that a Judge of qualified jurisdiction God Fearing and of a Heterosexual disposition where the computer generates the proper judge to preside over this matter.

  
  

  2) Members of Law Enforcement invoke authority and jurisdiction to ascertain all judges with vigor by removing them from their positions who are using their robes in the cover-up or commission of crimes.

  
  

  Respectfully submitted,

  
  

  Joe Louis

  Download all attachments as a zip file

  • Motion for Summary Judgment Judge Chivira.docx

    64.1kB
  • Motion to Vacate March 27 Order of Maritza Martinez.doc

    107.5kB

 

HOW TO STEAL HOMES IN CHICAGO IN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES WHERE ALLEGEDLY US BANK IS FINANCING THE CORRUPTION NOBODY SEES THIS BECAUSE THESE SENIOR CITIZENS ARE NOT ILLEGAL OR MIGRANTS.

BECAUSE THESE ARE SENIOR CITIZENS RETIRED AS FIRST RESPONDERS THIS CASE IS THE BLUEPRINT ON HOW BLACK, COLORED PUBLIC OFFICIALS, JUDGES OR ALDERMEN KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT AS TERRORISTS' HAVE TAKEN SEIZE OF THIS CITY AND COURTS.

MOST OF THE POLITICIANS THINK MANY OF THE CITIZENS ARE EITHER STUPID OR TOO HIGH TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON IN THIS CITY SO MANY OF THEM HAVE NO FEAR BECAUSE "IN THEIR MINDS" NOBODY WILL READ THIS POST. 

THERE IS A CAVEAT TO THIS US BANK ALLEGEDLY HAS EMPLOYEES WORKING IN THE CREDIT DEPARTMENT REPORTING FALSE INFORMATION TO CREDIT BUREAUS THAT IS OUTDATED AND OR FROM CARDS REPLACED AND ASSIGNED NEW NUMBERS.

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CREDIT CARDS AND BAD CREDIT WITH US BANK ? 

IT MAY NOT BE YOU AT ALL THIS BANK HAS A WAY OF DESTROYING AN INNOCENT MAN'S CREDIT SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION.  

To:Kenneth Ditkowsky,Lanre Amu Railroaded by ARDC

Cc:ABA Commission On Racial and Ethnic Diversity In the Profession,ABA Commission On Law and Aging,Key Phillip-s,Tina McDaniel,Teresa Collins

Mon, May 13 at 8:00 AM

Dear Bro Lanre O. Amu, Professor Ken and Esteem Colleagues: 

I need to your thoughts on this case Bro Lanre got his law license taken away basically for telling the truth!

If the Ku Klux Klan or any other racist insurgents along with some of the worse Negros who have allowed themselves to be used and recruited to enable Jim Crow and other Terrorists Laws to be enforced in all of the courts and state agencies.

What other state have criminals or so many unqualified people working as judges that don't know a DAMN thing about the rules or the applicable standards of the laws?

It looks like so many basically cheated, lied or purchased their law education, I can literally count on one hand the number of judges, I have stood before who actually understood their profession as judges, so compensate for so many of their incompetence knowing the laws they have allegedly clerks, Maintenace workers or whoever they can prostitute by whoring out to delete records, pretend to be a judge by allegedly stealing stationery and deny valid claims before the courts or in Bro Lanre case get racist personnel from the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinarian Commission to unlawfully suspend his law license for basically telling the TRUTH!

 

MOTION TO CERTIFY COURT ORDER OF MAY 8, 2024 AS BEING RULED ON BY JUDGE NATHANIEL HOWSE, JR. DUE TO JUDGE RULING IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT WHEN HE WAS IN THE 5^TH DIVISION WITH JUDGES JAMES R. EPSTEIN, JOSEPH R. GORDON (JUNE 3, 2010) ALLEGEDLY BECAUSE THIS IS THE SIGNATURE STAMP USED ON SAID ORDER DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE APPELLATE COURT HAD JURISDICTION WHERE COURT ORDER MAY BE THE SUBJECT OF INTERNAL FRAUD AND IS VOID/NULLITY & REQUESTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPELLEE NEVER FILED AN APPEARANCE AND THE ORDER DOES NOT ADDRESS BEING SENT TO ANY ATTORNEYS ONLY THE APPELLANT AND APPELLATE COURT STAFF WHICH CORROBORATES EGREGIOUS FRAUD WARRANTING JUDICIAL COUNCIL TO INVOKE JURISDICTION of ILLINOIS COURTS COMMISSION BECAUSE THIS IS SIMILAR TO JUDGE ROBERT ADRIAN WHO WAS REMOVED FROM THE BENCH FOR REVERSING HIS DECISION OF FELONY SEXUAL ASSAULT WHERE HE ORIGINALLY FOUND THE SAME PERSON GUILTY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT REINSTATING MOTION QUASHING EVICTION AFFIDAVIT OF APRIL 24, 2024, PURSUANT TO RULE 305, “STAY OF JUDGMENTS PENDING APPEAL” DUE TO FRAUD AND STAY OF EVICTION DUE TO “ORGANIZED” CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE FRAUD INVOLVING JUDGES NOT A PART OF THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS BUT “PRIVATE CITIZENS” INSTANTER w/AFFIDAVIT

As a Descendent from Nelson Mandela, I always wondered how he endured so much fighting Apartheid in South Africa, hell living in the United States we have so many Negros who want to go back and be slaves and live in oppression and we have racist Caucasians who think they are Modern Day Slave Masters controlling the Political Plantation.

My mother shared with me on the above captioned Motion, the reason why they chose to use the Judges signature stamp is because they know how certain Blacks feel about other free minded persons of Color you see they didn't use the signature of a Caucasian because as inferior as so many of them are they know better not to involved them only their ethnic groups.

Your thoughts Professor Ken,

Joe Louis

 

• image.pdf

  2.7MB

Here is 10 Pages out of 24 on how judges help certain Bank Attorneys steal the homes of Senior Citizens of Color or Black Americans many of the black judges who help in the facilitation of these crimes seems to think as long as the crimes are on Black or Colored People--Massa white persons who controls the Blacks/Colored in their positions or sponsored them for the appointments will never admonish them because they are not stealing from the Caucasian ethnic groups.

THIS IS WHAT A BLACK OR COLORED SENIOR CITIZEN WHO HAVE RETIRED HAVE TO EXPECT IF THEY OWN ANY HOME IN CHICAGO.

Every Judge who have used their ethnicity to aid and abet in numerous criminal acts helping racist whites steal from Blacks and Colored people don't realize is that when the Feds or the Laws come down not one white person will be helping any of the Black judges, I can hear so many saying, I did this for you Massa, the Caucasians will respond by telling them, "I DIDN'T TELL YOU TO DO ANYTHING FOR ME" 

The real Blacks or Colored persons who should be wearing robes or holding meaningful positions within are EXCLUDED so that the unqualified Puppets, Spineless individuals can assume the positions who have sold out and are basically the new breed of slaves, they are Political Slaves doing whatever the Machine tells them to do.

I have been in the courts fighting to clear my name since 1989 after having at least 9-12 attorneys not to mention about 4-6 law firms never ever have I appeared before a Black Judge with any integrity or understanding of the laws, the Black woman was worse.

It seems like the worse of the Blacks are the ones who excel not anyone else this is why so many people collectively have a resentment to them being in certain positions of authority.

NOBODY FEARS BLACK AUTHORITY BECAUSE EVERYBODY KNOWS THEY HAVE SOLD OUT---THEY ARE THE TYPE WHO NEEDS AN INDEPENDENT MINDED CAUCASIAN TO TELL THEM WHAT AND WHEN TO DO WHATEVER IS NEEDED TO BE DONE

IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE OTHER PAGES LET ME KNOW AND I WILL MAKE PART 2 MOST PEOPLE DON'T READ ANYTHING FOR THEMSELVES ANYWAY, SO IT IS THOSE VERY INFERIOR PEOPLE WHO DON'T EXPECT "YOU" OR ANYBODY ELSE TO READ HOW CASES ARE "FIXED" BUT THE LOW-DOWN EXTENT MANY HAVE RESORTED TO JUST TO BE ACCEPTED BY PEOPLE WHO DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THEM.

SO TIFFANY HENYARD IN DOLTON IS ONLY EMULATING WHAT THE BLACKS ARE DOING HERE IN CHICAGO BUT MANY HERE IN THIS CITY IS FAR WORSE THAN HER SO THE SAME FBI LOOKING INTO HER CORRUPT ANTICS NEED TO LOOK AT THIS CASE.     

             

                                              1-24-0568

                            APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT

                                                    FIRST DISTRICT

                         FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY

                                        DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

________________________________________________________________________

 

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) Trial Court  2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                

Plaintiff-Appellee     )

                                                                                 )  Division No. 2       

V.                                                                              ) Hon James T. Derico

                                                                                 )                                                                                   )    

                                                                                 )

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )                                               

  Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                              Defendant-Appellant  )

  ______________________________________________________________________                                                                                                                                  

MOTION QUASHING EVICTION AFFIDAVIT OF APRIL 24, 2024, PURSUANT TO RULE 305, “STAY OF JUDGMENTS PENDING APPEAL” DUE TO FRAUD AND STAY OF EVICTION DUE TO “ORGANIZED” CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE FRAUD INVOLVING JUDGES NOT A PART OF THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS BUT “PRIVATE CITIZENS” INSTANTER w/AFFIDAVIT

 

A-    “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,    1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

 

 

I am Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se, Respondent Movant in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;

 

 

 

                           

1.)    That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

 

2.)    That Respondent due-diligently learned that on April 24, 2024 an Affidavit was filed in the Electronic data system, hereto attached Gr Ex I, Sheriff’s Eviction Affidavit filed.

 

3.)    That Pursuant to Vigus V. Obannon,  Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512., hereto attached, Gr Ex II, Motion to Vacate Court Order Being Void/Nullity ( March 27, 2024) Due to Judge Martiza Not Having Jurisdiction et al.

A-    That certain judges within the Democratic Party are allegedly affiliated with a Terrorist Cell with their own Political Ambitions invoking Tyranny and Mayhem in the Courts.

 

B-    That said Appellees have admitted to Pleadings via Summary Judgments, Affidavits, Uncontested Documents corroborated with Transcripts/Affidavits still certain judges ruled in favor of Tyranny and Corruption

 

C-    That Said Appellees is making a BLANKET STATEMENT in their “Brazen” attempt to steal Appellant’s home, that Black or Colored judges have no authority over them and that Black or Colored judges are to do what they are told due to the ethnic make-up of the Perpetrator’s.

 

D-    That Black/Colored judges have demonstrated an INFERIOR disposition never admonishing Caucasians due to self-hate and a willingness to sacrifice their careers by being INDICTED/PROSECUTED for their roles in upholding Insurrectional Crimes derived from “Jim Crow Laws” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court; whereby, only a qualified Caucasian not affiliated to the Political Machine is the only person who can effectively rule on this matter as demonstrated in prior rulings.

 

E-     That Par 3 of Gr Ex II further amplifies the systemic Hate and or Racism in that because Black Officials aware of the aforementioned crimes are standing back keeping their mouths shut, said Latinos are taking advantage and inciting their own racial spin by contributing to the Hate and is benefitting from the Racism by seeking advancement or secured employment in the judicial arena.

4.)    That Respondent received Gr Ex A an Appellate Order from the 5^th Div Dec 30, 2011, Affirming the 9 Page Memorandum Order hereto attached, from Judge Gillespie #1 and #2 of Page 9 of her June 3, 2010 Order states “That Defendants Monzella Johnson and Marcia Johnson’s Motion to Vacate the November 3, 2009 sale is GRANTED and the sale is VACATED Motion to Vacate the Judgment of Foreclosure entered on June 3, 2009 is GRANTED because of the Insufficient Affidavit of Proof”

 

5.)     That Par #5 states “That neither party shall file any pleadings without prior leave of the court.”

 

6.)    Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

 

7.)     That the Appellate Court’s Order Page 5 Par 14, Page 6, states “The Court’s decision to vacate the June 2009 foreclosure judgment and subsequent foreclosure sale was actually based on one of the issues defendants raise here, namely that the affidavit plaintiff was required to file in order to support the foreclosure judgment was “wholly insufficient”. We affirm the trial court’s order.

A-    That the Plaintiff’s never requested Leave of the Court pursuant to #5 of Par 2.

 

B-     That the Plaintiff’s never complied with Judge Gillespie’s Order of Par 1 nor did they comply with the Affirming of the Appellate Court pursuant to Par 4 hereto attached, Caucasian Presiding Judge Pamela H. Gillespie VACATING FORECLOSURE/SALE JUNE 2009, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, 9 PAGES.  

 

C-    That First District Appellate Court Judges, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr. James R. Epstein and Joseph Gordon AFFIRMED Judge Gillespie’s Court Decision, Dec 30, 2011.

 

 That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. To comply with these rules, Plaintiff in specific detail outlined each judicial proceeding complained of, alleged specific facts that make those proceedings "fraudulent" or otherwise improper, and named the particular judges, parties and other individuals involved and the extent of their involvement in each claim of "fraudulent" or otherwise improper conduct. 

 

That Judge Lyle realizing, she never had jurisdiction acted as a “Private Citizen”  violated the Civil Rights of Colored People with the understanding knowing that the Illinois Judicial system is racist towards people of Color demonstrated her amplified role as a co-conspirator to all Terrorist Acts by entering a Court Order VOID/ A NULLITY VACATING THE SALE OF RESPONDENT’S HOME et al, (Oct. 29, 2018) for the same Plaintiff’s.

    

That Judge Lyle never had jurisdiction and violated the very laws violating her Oath  “ENGAGED IN TREASON OFFENSES, (MAY 5, 2021) ENTERED AN ORDER 2 YEARS SEVEN MONTHS LATER TO U.S. BANK from her other Order Vacating;

 

Judge Robert Adrian, a veteran judge in downstate Quincy, Illinois, faced removal from the bench due to his controversial actions. In 2022, he reversed a guilty ruling against a young man in a sexual assault case. The Illinois Courts Commission issued a rare decision, stating that Adrian attempted to circumvent the state’s mandatory minimum sentencing law during a sentencing hearing for Drew Clinton, who was previously found guilty of sexually assaulting 16-year-old Cameron Vaughan at a 2021 graduation party. Adrian justified his reversal by claiming that the Adams County prosecutor had “totally failed” to prove Clinton’s guilt, but the commission saw this as a subterfuge. They concluded that the judge intentionally circumvented the law to satisfy his personal belief about a just sentence, resulting in the reversal of the criminal defendant’s conviction¹.

A-   Whereby Inducing Reliance on this court now before Judge Derico because his March 1, 2024 Court Order DENYING said Motion for Reconsideration et al. is predicated on the egregious actions of Mortgage Fraud of Judge Lyle entering Court Orders where she never had jurisdiction.

 

B-     That Judge Lyle  Entered a VOID ORDER / A NULLITY Granted the Plaintiff’ a Default Judgment Dec 6, 2017, and Ordered the Confirmation Sale (8 years after the judgment of Judge Gillespie) of said property ignoring every criminal act said attorneys and she was complicit in said “Organized Criminal Conspiracy”

 

That said EGREGIOUS CALLOUS disposition towards senior citizens fighting to remain in their home from an OVERT ACT of Mortgage Fraud is no different from a thug in the streets carjacking and robbing them and shooting them even though they have complied with the criminals, in this matter Respondents have adhered to Steinbrecher v Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001), “Pro se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 & 4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.   

8.)  That every attorney Plaintiff has retained has violated all of RPC 3.3 and the Ethics

            All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

 

            RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule states:

(a)  In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:

(1)  make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

 

(2)  fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

 

(3)  fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

 

(4)  Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

 

(5)  participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should know the evidence is false ;

 

(6)  counsel or assist the client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;

 

(7)  engage in other illegal conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;

 

(8)  fail to disclose the identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;

 

(9)  intentionally degrade a witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning that person which are not relevant to the case;

 

(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;

 

9.)         That no Judge seems to understand or know their Oaths to the Bench, In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:

 

'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'"

 

In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:

 

'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'"

Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...".

 

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

 

Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason.

 

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. 

The United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

10.)                        That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2014/12/blacklivesdontmatter-judgemikva-never.html?spref=tw

 

A-     That said case (88 D 079012) they had to recruit a judge from the juvenile division because no judge in the Daley Center aka (Babylon, Hell, etc.) wanted to have any dealings with the Respondent, Judge Mikva told the Respondent “he had a Gift, he can tell a story using the laws and she understood everything he was saying, in that his pleadings were unique not the way law school teaches students how to plead.”

 

B-    In Re                                1-23-1065

                                                            FIRST DIVISION

                         APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT

                                                    FIRST DISTRICT

                                               )      

Joe Louis Lawrence                                             )   Petition For Review Of The Order

                                                                             )   Of The Illinois Labor Relations

    Petitioner-Appellant                                        )   Board State Panel

                                                                             )

                                                                             )

                      VS                                                  )

                                                                             )           ILRB Nos. L-CB-23-004

                                                                             )

                                                                             )

The Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel )

Lynne O. Sneed, Charles E. Anderson, Angela   )

C. Thomas, Kimberly Faith Stevens, in her         )

Official Capacity as Executive Director  Of The )

Illinois Labor Relations Board,                            )

A.T.U Local 241, President Keith Hill;               )

                                                                              )

          Respondents-Appellees                              ) 

 Appellant filed a MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND VACATE THE FEB 28, DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION DUE TO JUDGE TERRANCE LAVINE OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & ACTED AS A “PRIVATE CITIZEN” DENIED EVERY MOTION PETITIONER FILED AND ORDERED THE CLERKS IN THE APPELLATE COURT NOT TO ACCEPT HIS MOTIONS DUE TO THEM BEING FRIVOLOUS SAID CLERKS WERE IN FACT INTIMIDATED BECAUSE OF HIS JUDICIAL STATUS PETITIONER NEVER WAS SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT A BRIEF BECAUSE THE LABOR BOARD NEVER HAD A RECORD OR INVESTIGATED THE CTA OR ATU LOCAL 241 IL 4^TH DISTRICT JUDGES LISA HOLDER WHITE, CAVANAGH AND KNECHT IN RE CITY OF SULLIVAN V THE ILL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CREATED A PRECEDENT IN THE LAWS THAT WAS EGREGIOUSLY IGNORED BECAUSE OF PETITIONER’S SKIN COLOR AND PRO SE STATUS (filed March 1, 2024 at 9:51am) and was DENIED immediately at 1:54pm before any judge received it. )

 

        1. Allegedly a Clerk impersonated a Judge and MaryAnn Kaya emailed Ex 3.

 

C-    That upon the filing of the aforementioned Motion and leaving the building security and a State Marshall requested he wait while he was the elevator and on the first floor informed him he was not allowed to ever enter the Bilandic Building, hereto attached Gr 2 an Order signed by judges with no explanation of any alleged crime, the Order is dated Sept. 22, 2023 and he informed the Marshalls and building security, he was not aware and never received any email to this fact and he only received a court order two days ago is the only reason, he was in the building, hereto attached Ex 3, Court Order  dated Feb 28, 2024 with judges names typed not signed, but on Gr Ex 2 they are signed.

 

D-    That because no attorney in any of the courts were able to manipulate the laws and defeat the Plaintiff acting Pro Se in his behalf and said attorneys and law firms concurred by agreeing to everything, to what he has asserted in his pleadings as being TRUTHFUL by not Objecting or Denying to anything recorded in his Pleadings accompanied via Affidavits, judges resented him because of his skin color and the fact they could not suspend any law license in an attempt to stop him from particularizing the “Fraudulent Criminal Civil Rights Violations of judges, so they became “Private Citizens” pursuant to Section 1983 imposing liability only when a municipality has violated a federal right.

 

11.)                        That Respondent’s had Attorney Joseph P. Harris (LAW LICENSES SUSPENDED) as their attorney in this foreclosure matter and egregious false charges were levied against him in the same manner they were levied against Attorney Lanre Amu By Jonathan Bilyk Dec 17, 2013

    

 

12.)                        That when you complain of Mortgage Fraud or about the judges involved you get your law license suspended and now if you are a Pro se person of Color defending yourself against corrupt or racist judges, they enter Orders keeping you out of the very building you need to go into for further relief being the Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois where Judge Lyle is now a part of.

 

13.)                         That as Pro Se senior citizens, there is not a scintilla of falsity in any of said pleadings showing Judge Lyle ever had jurisdiction to ALLOW any EVICTION BY THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS  from their home of over 60 years.

 

A-    Respondent filed a Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Report of Sale (Court Order Being Void/ A Nullity) And Distribution, Confirming Sale and Eviction Order, And for a Personal Deficiency Judgment, Order Finding Personal Deficiency Due to Judge Lyle & Other Attorneys/Judges Complicit in a Criminal Enterprise of Mortgage Fraud Affidavit of PHH Mortgage Corp. Corroborating Their Involvement Stealing Home Warranting A Rule to Show Cause Remanding All Parties Instanter Into Custody w/ Body Attachment & Disqualifying Judge Lyle Instanter  (April 25, 2022) in the  Circuit Court of Cook County detailing a Plethora of Criminal Enterprise Actions.

 

B-    That Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Monzella Y. Johnson’s Motion Striking/Objecting Approving Sale (Court Order Being a Void/Nullity) And Distribution et al. (Interpreted as a Motion To Vacate The Order Approving Sale For Not Receiving Notice) (filed June 24, 2022)

 

C-    That Respondent knowing that the Plaintiffs were not going to file any reply or comply with judge Lyle’s court order, so Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion Pursuant to all State of Illinois and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit seeking $33 Million Dollars for the number of years they have been frivolously before the courts FRAUDULENTLY 14 YEARS (Filed June 2, 2022).

 

D-    RESPONDENT’S REPLY MOTION STRIKING PETITIONER’S RESPONSE MOTION TO MONZELLA Y. JOHNSON’S MOTION STRIKING/OBJECTING APPROVING SALE (COURT ORDER BEING A VOID/NULLITY) AND DISTRIBUTION ET AL. (INTERPRETED AS A MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER APPROVING SALE FOR NOT RECEIVING NOTICE-WARRANTING A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES & DISQUALIFYING JUDGE LYLE INSTANTER w/AFFIDAVIT (filed June 30, 2022).