A LOOK AT HOW A POLICE OFFICER USED HER BADGE AND INFLUENCE RECRUITING SOME OF THE MOST RACIST CORRUPT JUDGES AND ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS TO HELP HER IN THE MOST SOPHISTICATED EXTORTION OPERATION USING THE CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM AS A VEHICLE TO MAKE HER CRIMES A SUCCESS.
Filed April 18th, 2024 at 12:07 pm
Everyone in the Political Machine is aware of this case and how this Police Officer now have in her back pocket a former Assistant States Attorney in Iris Y. Chivira as a Corrupt County judge who finagled herself into the position by having an alleged Clerk with incredible influence and authority to put her on the ballot unopposed when the Bar Associations found her unfit to be a Judge when she was an attorney.
This case is the Blueprint on how (to Destroy/Criminalize the Black/Colored Freeman using psychological legal warfare) cases are "FIXED" and covered-up here in Illinois courts not since the readings of the Diary of Anne Frank hiding from the Nazis for 2 years before being captured is a telling chronicles insurmountable hate and injustices exhibited on American soil where Migrants are afforded more rights as our laws have delved back before Dred Scott March 1857 "It stated, that because Scott was Black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue."
A-
Police Officer Francoise L.B. Hightower figured
since her mother is a White Woman realizes how White Men Hate Men of Color used
her lies and vicious schemes to embrace all of them thinking she was going to
get a payout from any judgment from IBC Wonder Bread who went bankrupt to
prevent from paying the Defendant & others from a Federal Discrimination
Class Action Lawsuit or from the CTA where the CTA owes him 29 years of Back
Pay because he is still a CTA employee since March 1987 but was never
reinstated from a work-related injury Dec 1, 1994 everybody has been trying to
steal from him ever since he left her along but she has been a STALKER FROM
HELL coming after him for money he never owed her but her daughter is her
BIOLOGICAL FATHERS CHILD., so in her pathetic sick mind she is trying to punish
him for leaving her along it was her who stated that her father was in love
with her and wanted her to have a baby but claimed to have loved the Defendant
and wanted him to marry her flee to Paris with her grandmother helping her
escape her father, Her father bragged how all of his daughters had “Good
Pussy” in a Braggadocio manner making it clear he was sleeping with them in
front of her and her mother, Defendant did the right thing and moved on with
his life but Francoise and her army of Reprobated Demons are still trying to
bully and intimidate him and use terrorists tactics to try and take from him monies
that none of them will ever have.
B- Anytime a racist Irish have the audacity to say to an
innocent man “today is your lucky day, I can’t LOCK YOU UP anymore” or a
Polaca tells you, “I know that you are not the BIOLOGICAL FATHER, I’m just
the BILL COLLECTOR” or the other Polaca issues a BOGUS WARRANT as a former
CTA attorney trying to help keep his racist Brethren from being discovered at
the CTA (admit to everything as being accurate in the Motion to Disqualify him
and compliments the Motion and asks the Respondent “How did you know, that I
use to work for the CTA?”) who stole said wages while off work injured on
duty and to cover-up all of the illegal wage garnishees sent to her racist
Irish attorney representing Police Officer Francoise Louise Barbara
Hightower-Belmer. #JudicialCorruption in Chicago,
Illinois how to fix cases... https://unlawful1.blogspot.com/2012/08/chronology-of-unlawful-contempt-charges.html? A Certified Affidavit Notarized ignored by racist States
Attorney Dick Devine.
C- Appellant was not nor any family member born or any family members had criminal backgrounds, father was a self employed Locksmith, mother was a State employee where she later retired from a University.
Appellant did not experience the lifestyle of existing on
Welfare, being incarcerated for not making unlawful child support payments,
until all of the aforementioned recorded in said Brief took place;
Appellant is a Certified Full-Time Chicago Transit Authority
Employee not allowed to return to work, due to powerful corrupt white men
controlling the City;
Appellant was Accepted to Attend Northwestern Law school;
Appellant was Accepted and Passed the Police Exam scored in
top 13%, Chicago Police Commander was not able to vouch for him attending the
Police Academy due to the aforementioned Paternity matter;
Appellant worked as High School Business Instructor/Disciplinarian;
Appellant worked in the Cook County Sheriff’s Dept lost that
job due to the aforementioned paternity matter.
Appellant worked as a Truck driver with two bread companies,
terminated unlawfully from IBC someone embezzled approximately $50, 000.00, of
his disability payments while receiving welfare with a work-related injury;
Appellant is an Academian no Prisoner, Deadbeat dad or any
other negative connotation described of a Black,
If an individual has no aspiration beyond his present
situation, his presence shall remain the same, an individual is in his Heart
what he or she thinks himself to be and out of his “heart” flows the issues of
life.
The truth about her venereal disease came out in a secret court hearing Meehan told the Deputies not to let anyone from the public into the court only States Attorneys, this is when, I officially learned how judges "FIX" cases from the Deputies.
B- Judge Meehan heard testimony of John Patterson III Francoise’s physician alter medical records to reflect the child was born premature.
C- Meehan “Trespassed upon the Laws” ordered the Respondent to pay Francoise’s attorney Joseph V. Roddy legal fees despite testimony from Francoise having had gonorrhea and received medicine from her physician prescribing medicine for her and her partner, Respondent never had any disease from her, but she had testified Respondent was the only person she had sex with, and the child was allegedly born with an infection.
D- Judge Meehan ordered the Respondent never to see the child because he knew the child was not his but ordered him to pay child support for his racist Irish buddy Joseph V Roddy.
2.
That Judge Ronald Bartkowicz a
former CTA attorney presided over the Hightower case where he “Trespassed upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason” signed a Bogus Warrant
against the Respondent for an Order of Protection in favor of Francoise.
Respondent had not seen or communicated with Francoise.
A- That Ronald Bartkowicz threatened the Respondent in open court, stated if “he ever tried to be reinstated back to the CTA he was going to have him locked up because CTA said you are not an employee they fired you.”
B- That the Cook County Sheriff Deputy informed the Respondent Fuck him and what he said he is working with the CTA he was an attorney and should not be on this case, Respondent was shocked and scared because he had no idea what was going on and why a warrant was ever issued.
C-
That the Respondent filed a Motion to Disqualify Ronald
Bartkowicz due to the conflict, said judge was shocked asked him how did he
know? And told him that everything he said in his motion was in fact true and ordered the Deputies to take his Motion, Respondent was being defensive and hesitant and explained it was his only copy, the Sheriff gestured to him just give him the documents so that he could leave the court room.
D- That judge Morgan Hamilton during this time who had a self-hate for her own skin color and would do anything to protect a corrupt white judge wrote on a court order “that Respondent left a cloud of mistrust by the Cook County Sheriff claiming he was a CTA employee” as she was trying to protect Ronald Bartkowicz, she never asked me anything but went along with whatever racist white men did.
3.
That Judge David E. Haracz a former
Legal Aid attorney who “Trespassed upon
the Laws” engaged in “Treason”
was a Supervisor at the time Respondent was seeking their support they had
turned him down for any representation stating because there were too many
judges on the case.
A- That Judge Haracz stated, “He realize this may not be his child he is just the bill collector, he has to get money from him some kind of way”
B- That the Respondent presented documents establishing the fact he was a certified CTA employee, Haracz stated, “you know, you are an employee you were telling the truth all along, you know, you are really smart, I mean really really smart” In a startling, dumbfounded manner.
C- That Haracz placed the Respondent in Contempt of Court for Allegedly owing child support, Respondent had to pay monies from his welfare payments and was sent to jail.
D- That during this time never did Haracz or Murphy ever have a court file on the Respondent it was the States Attorney always providing documents, Respondent repeatedly refuted the allegations with numerous motions but was ignored and denied.
E- Respondent was in Court because the Illinois Department of Public Aid was representing Francoise an active Police Officer when her daughter was a grown woman, and the Respondent was on Public Aid with his family.
F- That Murphy had the audacity to say in front of the Respondent and Norgren “Today is your lucky day, I can’t lock you up anymore.”
G- Respondent was on welfare with his wife and children and the judges were forcing him to pay his welfare money to pay child support.
H- That while everyone was falsifying and “Trespassing upon the Laws” trying to
help Francoise in these “Heinous Diabolical Nefarious Acts” she notified school
officials at Bogan High School in Chicago 79th Pulaski that “she did not know who the father was of her
daughter “IF ANY REPORTER WAS TO GO TO THE SCHOOL, THE RECORDS WOULD REFLECT "FATHER UNKNOWN"
4. That Judge Leida J. Santiago-
Gonzalez she was on the bench cussing, I don’t know who the fuck he think he is
referring to the Respondent he will be going to jail, Respondent felt like he
was about to have a bile movement but nothing was coming out he fell to the
floor, he couldn’t see but was able to hear somebody shouted he is having an
anxiety attack call the paramedics, the judge said his ass better be having
something, someone provided something to smell and gave him some water, the
Deputies comforted him said he didn’t need to go to the hospital try to breathe
and get yourself together, they helped him up as he walked out the court never to see that racist hateful Hispanic Witch!
A-
Respondent never got the opportunity to stand before
the judge.
Respondent has prepared Briefs before the Appellate Court, Supreme Court of Illinois, Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit, and Prepared Writ of Mandamuses/Supervisory Orders before the Illinois Supreme Court, Brief Memorandums before the Court of Appeals, Summary Judgments in all Circuits of Legal authority and has have not had one attorney, law firms, Corporation Counsels, States Attorneys, or Attorney Generals to ever submit anything to IMPEACH the veracity of any and all PLEADINGS he has factually presented to the courts.
There is not a Cook County Judge/Appellate Judge/ or Illinois Supreme Court Justice whom Respondent has appeared before has the legal aptitude or applicable experience presenting or preparing any of the aforementioned documents, that has been diligently presented so they all systematically denied every valid claim put before their tribunals.
Respondent has been described as an Anomaly in the legal arena many lawyers can't use the traditional "Good ol Boy" cookie cutter one size fits all because whatever is attempted to cover-up or deleted or "fraudulently attempted is expeditiously uncovered revealing other areas of criminal acts not supposed to be revealed exposing other parties engaging in criminal acts, that which is why the RICO statute was ever created.
The Democratic Party has insurgents within the Political Machine acting and operating under the same doctrines of the KU KLUX KLAN oppressing and Destroying the Black and Colored families by disenfranchising the families with migrant policies when the bottom line is to keep the laws of Jim Crow effective and unabated in Illinois.
1.
See that is why, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was
enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of
all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War,
none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.
The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on
March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the
enactment of legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In
the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States. We have more than 2 Cook County judges in violation of this section.
“Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy…. Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al., In the year 2024 we have Blacks, Hispanics and some Republicans sharing the same Political Hate acting as the new Ku Klux Klan.
2. “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynchings and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”) Lynchings are done differently as opposed to using ropes, water hose and violence, the new approach is the egregious Unequal Misapplications of the Laws interpretating laws that are not germane or related to the Complaints or matters before the courts as so many judges simply dismiss cases in attempts to uphold their Brethren involved in these criminal acts.
3. Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States… We have Black or Hispanic elected Officials who are simply puppets or figureheads within the Party/Machine who are sponsored by the insurgents unable to finance their own campaign for elections who must do whatever they are told acting as Political Slaves because they lack the independence to act on their own because of their allegiance to whom their sponsor is likened to a Slave master no slave could ever raise up against their master who is feeding an beating them like a child or helpless servant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK
COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
MOTION TO
VACATE COURT ORDER BEING VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA
MARTINEZ NOT HAVING JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
POLICE/JUDICIAL COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR
POSITIONS DUE TO ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Respondent Movant in this cause, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and states, as follows;
1.) That Pursuant to Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514, 528 (2001) “Pro Se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures”
2.) That Respondent, he has never filed a frivolous motion in any court but is up against a plethora of incompetent “Private Citizens” who are upholding Tyranny, Racism, Corruption and Prima Facie Hate at him for understanding the laws and its applications than so many of them due to their Political or Fraternal or sexual Orientation him being a Heterosexual Freeman.
3.) That on Jan. 2, 2024 Judge Chivira was in receipt of said Summary Judgment and was never legally recused from this matter upon Motion to Disqualify her (filed Dec. 26, 2024)
4.) That Clerks and judges demonstrated a malingering attempt to undermine the Respondent or Judge by emailing to him a blank court order from the Presiding judge Regina Scannicchio (Feb. 20, 2024) not signed, hereto attached, Ex A.
Page 1 of 10
5.) That Judge Maritza Martinez was unaware of Rule 23.6 Substitution of Judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure (C) Orders granting a substitution of judge shall be accompanied by an order transferring the case to the presiding judge of the division or district in which the case is then pending for reassignment.
6.)
Judge Martinez became a willing participant in this “Organized
Conspiracy” by assuming jurisdiction on said matter becoming now a defacto
attorney and coconspirator, “Private Citizen” for the State Officials who have
already admitted to taking part in a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights
Violations.
A- Judge Martinez stated “they asked me to preside over this matter on your request to get a new judge” March 27 at 10:10 am via Zoom and had me to swear in her clandestine hearing.
B- It is clear Judge Martinez was operating under the authority of another alleged Terrorist cell within the Democratic Party/Political Machine
C- She honestly admitted not having Judicial Authority but a Personal Fraternal Authority on the behest of doing what “THEY” told her to do.
7.) That on April 16, 2024, Judge Chivira appeared on the 9:00 call and acknowledged the Respondent and stated she was going to call his case at 9:30 am but she had him sitting frivolously knowing Francoise nor the Assistant States Attorney were going to appear.
8.)
She stated, “that the Clerk’s did not file said Motion
in the Database” even though, I had a file stamped copy she stated for me to
return to the 8th floor and let them know that it was not filed.
A- Judge Chivira made it clear she was continuing the case until next Tuesday April 23rd at 9:05.
B- The computer reflects that Judge Chivira continued this matter to May 28, 2024 on State’s Attorney Motion/Continuances at 9:05 am, hereto attached, Gr Ex B, a Printout from the Electronic Docket
C- FOR THE RECORD PER GR EX B, Respondent never had MANILOW AND GOLDMAN as his attorneys they were made up to make it look like he had legal representation when all of these unlawful acts were taking place on behalf of Police Officer Francoise and when her biological Police officer father was alive.
9.)
She appeared not to either understand what she was looking at
or was pretending via zoom because it was filed as she said under the Notice of
Filing.
10.) Respondent emailed (April 17, 2024, 11:08 am) Judge Chivira and Chief Judge hereto attached, Ex C explaining he never received a Court Order nobody responded.
A- “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st Dist. 1964)
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. —U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil
that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues. -Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of
criminality. -Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford
Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury.
Page 3 of 10
Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
11.)
The
United States Supreme Court acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook
County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest
judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine
federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey
v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other
judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3 &
4, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who
have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded
as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a
recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain
Page 4 of 10
matters before them. They acted without any
jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.
A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
B- The Seventh Circuit failed to institute a law stating to EXECUTE, or LIFE IN PRISON or any other related penalty for those who are complicit in these said crimes, so many who are the majority in control and controlling inferior people have put Blacks on the front line as PAWNS, in the event the government learns of this successful coup, they will apprehend all Inferior Blacks first.
C- That every person regardless to their color, sexuality or Political/Fraternal associations who became complicit in any enumerated acts should be sentenced/executed in the same like manner as if they were the original perpetrators
History shows that it does not matter who is in power... those who have not learned to do for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than they did in the beginning.
"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary." Carter G. Woodson, 1933
a.
To
show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the
alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either
because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
b.
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
12.) That the word Political Machine is a buzz word for Ku Klux Klan or any Racist Insurrectionist Order and an excuse Justifying the unlawful applications of Jim Crow Laws still being ENFORCED which are Outlawed by the United
Page 5 of 10
States Supreme Court but the Apartheid Racist Terrorist
Applications of those laws have been systematically circumvented by recruiting
the necessary inferior Blacks and Hateful Anglo-Saxons or any other ethnic race
willing to continually inflict GENOCIDE, TYRANNY, MASS
DESTRUCTION on any ethnic group they deem inferior as demonstrated throughout
all documents.
13.)
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said,
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps
to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without
protesting against it is really cooperating with it
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Defendant respectfully Prays
for the Relief
1. For an Order Vacating and
Disqualifying Judge Chivira Instanter for the Criminal Acts of Trespassing upon
the Laws on For an Order transferring
certain parts of this matter to a Judge in the Federal venue due to Corruption and Fraud;
2. For
an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of
this matter;
3. For an Order issuing a
Mandatory Injunction of HFS/Child Support Enforcement to Prohibit said unit
from prosecuting any more cases until an investigation is had ascertaining all
parties involved in said Criminal Enterprise.
A-
That said ASA Harris and the Caucasian
ASA on the Nov 14, 2023 be referred for Law License be REVOKED INSTANTER
for violations of Ethics RPC 3.3 and every other ASA
involved.
4. For an Order investigating
the Clerks who was responsible for ascertaining the names of other Attorneys
not Recommended to be judges who bypassed the proper legal requirements and
finagled their way to the Cook County Ballot.
5. For
an Order on Rule to Show Cause of Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of all Assistant
States Attorneys, Clerks and State employees involved in this matter;
6. For an Order assigning this matter away from the LGBTQ/Irish/Polish/American African Americans because many judges and CTA employees and Clerks of that union has displayed Terrorist Hate
Page 6 of 10
at the Respondent due to his Heterosexual Outspoken Whistle Blower disposition,
he doesn’t care about them but they have demonstrated diabolical resentment and
hate at him.
A- It is apparent alleged Blow
Jobs or physical copulation, or Females Licking another Female or whatever they
do to achieve satisfaction in Chambers or whatever govt offices to be performed
on the subjects whom they are subordinate to demonstrates a CONFLICT OF
INTERESTS, TYRANNY, APARTHEID in a sexual and racial terrorist manner.
7. For the entry of an Order
awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief
necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly
just;
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928
decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead
v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of
conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is
imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it,
"if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it
invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare
that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to
declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction
of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious
doctrine this court should resolutely set its
face."
________Joe Louis Lawrence_________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
IN RE
)
)
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Iris Y. Chivira
Petitioner
)
) Cal 41
VS
)
) No. 88 D 079012
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent
) Room CL-12
NOTICE OF
MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER BEING
VOID/A NULLITY (MARCH 27, 2024) DUE TO JUDGE MARITZA MARTINEZ NOT HAVING
JURISDICTION AND INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE STATE POLICE/JUDICIAL
COMMISSION TO FORCIBLY REMOVE JUDGE (S) INSTANTER FROM THEIR POSITIONS DUE TO
ADMISSIONS OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FILED DEC 4, 2023) Local Rule 56.1 The rule is very clear that
"all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving
party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the
opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
WITH AFFIDAVIT
Please be advised that on April 18, 2024 Respondent has filed
before this Domestic Relations Division
Motion to Vacate Court Order of March 27, 2024 et al; and will present said
legally sufficient instrument before Judge Chivira via Martinez , 2024
in her stead at 9:30 am in room via Zoom
Zoom Link
Meeting ID: 84376080114
Password: 086627
Dial In Number: 312-626-6799
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Defendant,
certify that I have on this day deposited said Notice and Motion to all parties
recorded in said Notice via regular mail/electronic delivery.
Governor JB Pritzker gov.casework@illinois.gov
Page 8 of 10
To: Hon. Iris Y. Chivira CCC.DomRelCRCL12@cookcountyil.gov
Judge Derico mfmlcalendar56@cookcountyil.gov
Jaime Barcus jaime.barcas@cookcountyil.gov
ccc.domrelcr3006@cookcountyil.gov
Francoise
L.B. Hightower-Belmer 1152 West 102nd Street Chg. Il. 60643-2353
Cook County State’s Attorney Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim
Foxx
timothy.evans@cookcountyil.gov
statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov
Attorney General Cook County Sheriff’s
Kwame Raoul alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov
Tom Dart
email CCSO@ccsheriff.org
Potestivo & Ass., PC
Bryan G. Thompson, Poulami Mal pmal@potestivolaw.com
press@cookcountyil.gov bthompson@potestivolaw.com
ilrb.filing@illinois.gov,
alexandrina.shrove@ilag.gov,
oig.referrals@illinois.gov
rwillis@laboradvocates.com,
jodi.mar@illinois.gov,
helen.j.kim@illinois.gov,
lashonda.channel@illinois.gov,
brianna.klein@illinois.gov,
kimberly.stevens@illinois.gov,
anna.hamburg-gal@illinois.gov,
khill@atu241chicago.org,
frogishtwo65@gmail.com,
The Crusader Newspaper Group
Managing Editor Sharon Fountain
State Police isp.contact@illinois.gov
Illinois State Police
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence,
Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings
enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted
Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
Page 10 of 10
