CRAIN'S BUSINESS ARTICLE RE SUPERVOUCHERS JULY 28, 2014 POOR FAMILIES RENT IN PRICIEST BUILDINGS WAS MISLEADING:

IN THEORY THE PROGRAM WAS SUPPOSE TO PLACE QUALIFIED FAMILIES THAT MET SPECIFIC CRITERIA S GOOD CREDIT SCORES NO CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS ETC., BUT THE REALITY IS THAT CHA AND VARIOUS BUILDINGS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST PERSONS OF COLOR PROHIBITING THEM FROM MOVING IN AREAS THAT WERE DESCRIBED AS OPPORTUNITY AREAS;

THE SUPERVOUCHER'S ARE IN THE HANDS OF CORRUPT POLITICAL CONNECTED PERSONS WHO DECIDE WHERE THEY WANT PERSONS OF COLOR TO LIVE; THEREBY, KEEPING CHICAGO SEGREGATED!    

                                                        Chicago Housing Authority

                                                            60 East Van Buren

                                                             Chicago, Ill. 60605

Attention:

Team A Madam May

Fax 312 786-6609

                                                                                                              August 3, 2014

Voucher #9727767

            NOTICE OF OFFICIAL COMPLAINT RE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN CHA VOUCHER PROGRAM VIOLATION OF HEARING OFFICERS DIRECTIVE & MOBILITY VOUCHER FRAUD

Dear Madam:

Pursuant to Hearing Officer Fredrick H. Bates (June 11, 2014) DIRECTIVE CHA has circumvented the officers ruling by continuing to retaliate and obstruct any success of Complainant moving in any opportunity area.

That said Mobility program appears to be a front operation disguised to yield the appearance they are placing families like the Complainant in opportunity areas when in actuality whites are placed in units with vouchers, hereto attached, Quote from Streeter Place hand delivered to Candace of the Mobility program, July 31, 2014, for Melanie Toney;

When Complainant was in the other Mobility (2858 North Diversey) program which appeared to be a little better, CHA officials directed Rose Peoples to misrepresent Complainant to prevent him from moving in Streeterville (345 E. Ohio) and directed him to seek residence in Auburn Gresham!

   

A-    Melanie never responded or attempted to set up negotiations of the rents, thereby, validating the veracity said program is used to deter qualified families like the Complainant from moving into opportunity areas said obstructions are implemented so as to allow the 90 day time allotted in which to locate a unit; otherwise, the voucher will expire if a unit is not located forcing families and Complainant to move in gang crime infested areas;

B-    This is how families are systematically removed from the voucher program unlawfully as CHA attempted with my case but was unsuccessful, Hearing Officer reinstated said voucher blacks are the only persons losing their vouchers in this manner never is their whites seeking to have vouchers reinstated, allegedly this is how vouchers are sold allegedly for $1500.00 by removing qualified families from the program illegally!

C-    Leasing Agents questioned the integrity and legitimacy of the program in that they never provided documentation showing Complainant was in the Mobility program;

D-    Emailed sent (July 14, 2014) seeking Chief Hearing Officer and Hearing Officer jurisdiction CHA staff received the email along with 53 other persons nobody replied;

E-     Christine Klepper sent an email stating that the rent in Streeterville is too high, June 11, 2014; her reply, “ YOU SHOULD CONSIDER SOMETHING LESS EXPENSIVE”  

  

An email was sent to Jessie of Mobility (July 15, 2014) Verification of Units in Mobility et al; Melanie received word from CHA to move forward on 121 Chestnut;

An email was sent to Melanie Toney describing said credit scores of 716, (July 10, 2014) and continuous obstructions;

An email was sent to Melanie Toney regarding Voucher Discrimination (July 30, 2014) no reply;

Alby contributed to the Chicago Crain article (July 28, 2014) “Poor Families use supervouchers to rent in cities priciest buildings” is most suspicious because Melanie,

Jessie and Chris Klepper said they had no knowledge of any African Americans being accepted in those units, implies that whites are taking advantage of vouchers using them in opportunity areas, while members of Mobility were steering me to move in Englewood away from opportunity areas because CHA’s Mobility program is an unlawful front disguised to steal money from the Federal government; hereto attached, April 14, 2014 article “Woman alleges housing voucher discrimination in pricey Chicago buildings;

The Chicago’s Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under law issued a report that found rampant racial discrimination in housing;

A-    New report reveals pervasive discrimination in housing voucher program, (April 1, 2014)

 

Congressman Aaron Schock issued a press release (July 28, 2014) Investigation into Chicago Housing Authority “Supervoucher” program.

CHA settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against former CHA CEO Charles Woodyard for $99,000.00 but is continuously discriminating against the Complainant in heinous manners because they have so many politicians in their back pockets and have no regard for the laws.

A-    CHA allegedly had a maintenance person or secretary to impersonate the position of a Commissioner of the City of Chicago Human Relations as they prepared the document and tried to Dismiss the Racial Discrimination Charges against CHA and 345 East Ohio, (March 18, 2014) case #13 H-73 so as to demonstrate their incompetence a signature was required but because of the plethora of “FRAUD” involved they were hoping nobody paid attention to the fraud;

B-    Reliable sources indicate some heavy personnel in CHA are affiliated with individuals in a Bogus paternity case 88 D 079012 in which white racist politically connected judges tried protecting one another with court orders never signed as favors not realizing, I was never the father of a woman’s child who was impregnated by another man, they thought destroying the original court file 85 D 068184 with a court signature DISMISSING the paternity suit made fraud a success;

C-    The person involved is providing Jr. on CHA documents and works in personnel only Jr. is not recorded on any of Complainant’s license or legal documents, now where did Jr. Come from?  

                                                                                  Respectfully submitted

                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence

CC Chg. FBI (Corey B. Nelson), OIG (HUD), Cong Aaron Schock, Crain’s Business, Alby Gallun, WBEZ, Natalie Moore, Sec of Housing, Julian Castro, Media

Woman alleges housing voucher discrimination in pricey Chicago buildings

April 14, 2014

By: Natalie Moore

Tiara is a African-American mother of two small children who longed for a better Chicago public school for her six-year-old son.
Last year, Tiara decided to move out of Bronzeville and began searching for apartments in the pricey River North area.

But when she mentioned she had a housing choice voucher, or Section 8, landlords told Tiara they wouldn’t take her voucher. A few places said “yes” over the phone. So she’d arrive on time, with a paycheck stub and a rental deposit. But no matter -- Tiara says those places rejected her too.

(Courtesy of the CHA)

CHA Opportunity Area Map

Tiara is painfully shy and asked that her last name not be used. As she recounted her story, Tiara dabbed her teary eyes with a tissue.

• New report reveals pervasive discrimination in housing voucher program

“I’ve never experienced anything like this. I couldn’t believe it. It still took me awhile to like really come to the fact that I was discriminated against. That hurt so bad,” she said.
Tiara filed complaints against four property owners and management companies with the Chicago Commission on Human Relations. The complaints are currently under review.

Tiara’s allegations aren’t occurring in a vacuum. Earlier this month, the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law issued a report that found rampant racial discrimination in housing.

Tens of thousands of Chicago families rent in the private market using a housing voucher. Renters with vouchers only have to pay a portion of their rent. The Chicago Housing Authority administers the program and picks up the rest. CHA has been criticized for putting families in poor segregated neighborhoods in the city.
In 2011, the public housing agency started a mobility program. In very limited cases, CHA will pay more in rent if a family moves to so-called “opportunity areas.” About 10 percent of voucher holders are in this program.

Opportunity areas are communities with fewer than 20 percent in poverty and low-subsidized housing saturation. That’s how Tiara was able to consider high rises with monthly rents upwards of $3,000 a month.

“It allows families an opportunity to explore areas of the city that they might not otherwise be familiar with,” said Mary Howard, executive vice president of resident services for CHA.
Many neighborhoods with the highest number of vouchers also have the highest poverty and crime rates in the city.

“Families that live in opportunity areas on average have higher earnings than those that do not live in opportunity areas,” Howard said. She added that these areas can have higher retention rates. “So that once a family does move and becomes integrated in their new community, that they’re not moving is success.”

In segregated Chicago, North Side neighborhoods may seem inaccessible for some families in the voucher program. There can be feelings of isolation. CHA has mobility counselors who try to alleviate those concerns.

But that was never an issue for Tiara. She said in her case it was pushback from the rental community. It’s illegal for Chicago landlords to say at the outset that they won’t take Section 8 vouchers.

Danielle McCain is an attorney with the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and she represents Tiara.

“We want her voice heard as a voucher holder. We want these landlords to have to address these issues. Whatever damages we’re able to recover, those are ways in which we can influence landlords going forward not to have conduct such as this in the future,” McCain said.

McClain said housing voucher discrimination is common, and not just in affluent areas. She pointed to her group’s recent report as evidence, but also says a lot of discrimination goes unreported.
As for Tiara, she eventually found a happy ending in a Streeterville apartment building that accepted her voucher.

“I love it,” Tiara said. “You have parks everywhere. You have bus stops everywhere. You have stores, easy to get to. Healthy food. Healthy food almost everywhere. So it’s more like convenience.”
And most importantly, Tiara said, her six-year-old son attends a high-performing public school. And he’s thriving.
Natalie Moore is WBEZ’s South Side Bureau reporter. nmoore@wbez.org

New report reveals pervasive discrimination in housing voucher program

April 1, 2014

By: Natalie Moore

(WBEZ/Natalie Moore)

Sign for an apartment that takes a housing choice voucher.

 

The Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law spent two years investigating discrimination in the subsidized housing market and found rampant racial discrimination.
Subsidized housing vouchers, commonly referred to as Section 8, allow families to rent in the private market. A new report outlines the discrimination.

To assess fair housing practices, trained investigators posing as potential tenants inquire about availability, terms and conditions to assess compliance. White and black testers, with comparable backgrounds, tried to rent from landlords.

Landlords already participating in the voucher program discriminated against tenants based on race 33 percent of the time, most commonly by steering them to other buildings or neighborhoods. This also happened based on disabilities 44 percent of the time and against families with children 25 percent of the time.

Landlords in opportunity areas - places with low poverty - who were not participating in the Chicago Housing Authority’s voucher program discriminated against white testers with vouchers 55 percent of the time. In 39 percent of the tests, landlords directly refused to rent to them. And a little more than half of the landlords who told white testers that they accepted vouchers discriminated against African American testers who said they had vouchers. Opportunity areas are an important tool to break up segregation in the housing market; voucher holders tend to be clustered in low-income, segregated black communities.

“Race is still a pressing concern within the city of Chicago and within our region. Even though this happened specifically within Chicago, it’s probably not a surprise to any of us that it’s probably the reality going even beyond that scope,” said Morgan Davis, executive director of the Chicago Area Fair Housing Alliance.

The study was conducted for the CHA. In a statement, the agency said it takes allegations of fair housing violations very seriously and “educates owners, property managers and participants to ensure that federal, state and local fair housing laws are adhered upon. CHA also assists the Chicago Commission on Human Relations in its investigations of potential housing discrimination cases and/or fair housing violations.”

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION CORRUPTION CONSPIRACY

TAKE A LOOK AT SYSTEMIC GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND OVERT DISCRIMINATION POLICIES USED TO KEEP PERSONS OF COLOR FROM ADVANCING OR MOVING IN AN IDEAL COMMUNITY SIMPLY BY ACCESSING CREDIT REPORTS HACKING INTO THE FILES DESTROYING FILES IN GOOD STANDING OR IN MY CASE PLACING INFORMATION ON THE CREDIT FILES ILLEGALLY.

IT APPEARS EXPERIAN AND EQUIFAX ARE THE ONLY CREDIT AGENCIES WHERE CORRUPTION IS ABLE TO ACCESS WHY IS THAT?

Dear Mr. Lawrence,

 

Based on the information you provided to us on your fraud alert, we’d like to run an additional credit check from another credit bureau.

 

We wanted to get your permission to do so as the second credit check may negatively impact your credit score. Please respond via email if you would like me to move forward with this screening.

 

Thank you,

 

Lauren

I am confused what are you looking for?

Why would I agree to have you to go into another credit file when the alert is on all credit reporting agencies and negatively affect my credit scores?

I have had a number of corrupt assistant states attorneys working with corrupt judges accessing my credit report hacking into my file deleting all of my excellent remarks resulting to a paternity matter from which don't belong to me.

Credit specialist in special services advised me to set up my account this way, please find examples of fraud an Affidavit sent to Experian Equifax and Transunion scanned to your attention.

September 2, 2013 Affidavit, sent to FBI Experian et al., most important Transunion is the only credit bureau that expeditiously deleted the paternity matter from my files.

April 28, 2014, Letter from CFPB requesting court order dismissing the case.

June 18, 2014, Letter/Fax sent to CFPB.

Madam so that we are clear, I have unequivocally to Mary Grace their is a plethora of law enforcement officials keeping abreast of this matter, the FBI have been assigned to this matter, they don't want 1 or 2 judges they want the entire Klan, the Feds got their wish because the 85 D 068184 court order sent to you court file was suppose to be destroyed which it was but nobody thought, I had a copy.

The 88 D 079012 is a Bogus case used to extort money from me ruin my life and create the necessary mayhem experienced now, I am a victim of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Racial Hate Crimes by judges, Housing Fraud & Discrimination, Extortion, Racial Conspiracy Cover-up.

Now Madam with my scores being in order and I meet all of the necessary criterion's to live and maintain the unit will you respectfully fill out my moving papers so that the business of expediting this matter can get started?

Respectfully submitted 

P.S. Word to the wise take a dollar bill out and read the back of it notice it says "In God We Trust" take heed to those words because nothing is what it seems and nobody is all what they appear to be.

Your Credit information as of 28 days ago:

716	Credit Rating: Good Your Credit Score as of Jun 21st, 2014 Log in - Free Credit Scores & Credit Report Monitoring | Credit Karma

COURT ORDER THAT CORROBORATES CHICAGO LEGAL SYSTEM UNDER SIEGE BY TERRORIST DEMOCRATIC MACHINE OPERATIVES

UNDER THE ALLEGED AUTHORITY OF ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE WHO CONTROLS THE APPOINTMENT OF ALL JUDGES AND PERSONALLY ASSIGNED IRISH AND POLISH ETHNIC JUDGES TO CASE 88 D 079012 TO CIRCUMVENT THIS COURT ORDER AND CREATE THEIR OWN ORDERS SO AS TO EXTORT MONEY FROM ME IN THE GUISE OF CHILD SUPPORT.

WHAT IS SAD SO MANY AFRICAN AMERICANS AND HISPANIC BROTHERS HAVE BEEN FRAMED INCARCERATED FROM CRIMES THEY NEVER COMMITTED AND SUBJECTED TO THE SAME HEINOUS CONSPIRACIES USED TO PROMOTE POWERFUL CORRUPT WHITE MEN INTO THE VARIOUS POSITIONS OF JUDGES, STATES ATTORNEYS, ALDERMAN'S ETC. THAT THEY DON'T DESERVE TO BE IN.

ANY NEWS REPORTER WHO MAYBE COMPETENT TO RETRIEVE INFORMATION FROM THE COMPUTER THAT ESTABLISHES FRAUD AND CORRUPTION ON THE PART OF COOK COUNTY JUDGES WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ASCERTAIN DOCUMENTATION BECAUSE A COOK COUNTY CLERK HAVE DELETED THE MICROFICHE NUMBERS OFF THE DATABASE;

FOR EXAMPLE, #8700113626 ON THE COURT ORDER IS WHAT ENABLES THE CLERK TO PRINT THE DESIRED INFORMATION FROM THE COMPUTER.

NOBODY IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO OR STATE OF ILLINOIS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO LOCATE THE COURT FILE WITH THE HARD COPIES!

 

WHEN YOU STAND UP TO RACIAL INJUSTICE AND IS ACADEMICALLY PROFICIENT THIS IS HOW CORRUPT WHITE MEN IN POWER DISCRIMINATE AND KEEP QUALIFIED LITIGATORS OUT OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM.

“About 86 percent of the people in our jail are black and brown. Unless you believe that black people and Latinos are much more likely criminal than white people, there’s something weird happening here,” Preckwinkle said. Cook County Board President

Judge dismisses DePaul law school grad’s second suit seeking law license

March 28, 2014 1:09 PM
By Jonathan Bilyk

Holderman

A law school graduate who passed the Illinois bar exam more than a decade ago, but has not been admitted to the state bar will not be allowed to proceed with his federal lawsuit claiming that his “fundamental right to practice law” was violated.
U.S. District Court Judge James F. Holderman last week granted requests from defendants Lawrence Hill, president of the Illinois Board of Admissions to the Bar, and Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan to dismiss the suit that John Joseph Otrompke brought against them late last year.
The case came to Chicago’s federal court in November 2013, in what was largely a reprise of a previously dismissed legal battle between Otrompke and the Board of Admissions dating back about a decade.
Otrompke graduated from DePaul University College of Law in 2000, and subsequently passed the bar exam and other necessary tests, including the Multi-state Professional Responsibility Exam.
But, his application for admission to the state bar remained pending until 2003, delayed for proceedings in the Committee on Character and Fitness for the First Judicial District.

In October 2003, Otrompke sued, arguing “the defendants’ failure to approve his admission to the bar and their delay in granting him a hearing” violated several of his constitutional rights.

In two years of arguments that followed, a federal court eventually dismissed all of his complaints, indicating it believed the case should have been brought in state courts, as the Illinois Supreme Court stands as “the final arbiter of attorney admissions in Illinois” and therefore, the defendants were also entitled to “absolute immunity from suits for damages.”

At the time, Otrompke did not appeal because he said he was assisting his fiancée who was battling a terminal illness. Likewise, he said he did not reapply for admission to the bar because “it could cost thousands of dollars even to complete the bar application.”

However, almost 10 years after filing his first lawsuit and eight years after a federal judge dismissed his final counts, Otrompke filed suit against Hill and Madigan, again asking the federal courts to force the board to admit him and let him to practice law.

Otrompke again argued that his constitutional rights were violated, but this time, also alleged that the rules governing attorney admissions in Illinois, both as they exist now and as they existed a decade ago, were unconstitutional.
Specifically, he asserted, among other points, that the rules “imply that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination [does] not apply to bar admissions proceedings,” and also interfere “with his fundamental right to practice law,” which he said violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
In response, Hill and Madigan moved to dismiss the suit, arguing that Otrompke’s failure to raise the issues in state court a decade ago preclude the case from being heard in federal court now. They also claimed Otrompke failed to raise a legitimate claim for relief.
Holderman agreed in a 17-page, March 20 opinion that dismissed the case.
Holderman’s opinion does not explain the reasoning behind the committee’s delay or the board’s decision not to admit him to the bar, but Otrompke’s 2003 suit blames it on his July 4, 2000 arrest.
In his original suit, Otrompke claimed he observed Chicago police searching a vehicle as he was “leaving a meeting space operated and used for the propagation of political dissent” and was arrested after he asked an officer for his badge number and told him he planned to file a complaint with the Office of Professional Standards.
Otrompke stated in his 2003 suit, which was dismissed in 2005, that the charges that led to his arrest were thrown out.
In dismissing the 2013 suit, Holderman explained that the federal court “does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over Otrompke’s claims” over the state bar admission rules.
Holderman found that the board is not constitutionally prohibited by the Fifth Amendment from enacting moral standards for lawyers and would-be lawyers to abide by.
And he further held that Otrompke had simply manufactured his “fundamental right to practice law,” cobbling together an argument using U.S. Supreme Court precedents, including the District of Columbia vs. Heller and McDonald vs. Chicago decisions, the Constitution’s Bill of Attainder provisions, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and even the Magna Carta.
“Otrompke’s assertion that he has a fundamental right to practice law absent a felony conviction or adjudication of insanity has no basis in law,” Holderman wrote.

The third section of Otrompke’s Amended Complaint, titled “New Paragraphs First

Amended Complaint,”

includes a number of facts apparently intended to prove Otrompke’s good

moral character. These

facts include Otrompke’s c

ooperation with

federal

authorities

investigating a mail bomber named the “Bishop,” (Am. Compl. ¶ 59), Otrompke’s cooperation

with a state prosecutor in an unrelated case (Am. Compl. ¶ 66), and a lengthy explanation of

Otrompke’s involvement with a group c

alled Anti

-

Racist Action (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 60

-

65, 73).

This section of Otrompke’s Amended Complaint contains no

discernible claim

s.

Otrompke

appears instead to be seeking a finding from this court that he has good moral character in light

of acts

undertaken

since

the conclusion of

his first federal lawsuit.

CHICAGO IS VIOLENT AND CORRUPT BECAUSE NEGROE BLACKS IN CHARGE DO NOT EXERCISE THEIR POSITIONS TO HELP BUT OPPRESS SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE OPPRESSORS

THERE IS A SAYING "IF BLACKS KNEW HOW TO READ THEY WOULD BE DANGEROUS"

THIS IS WHY CHICAGO IS SEGREGATED AND RACIST BECAUSE OF THE VERY PEOPLE AFFECTED BY VIOLENCE AND MAYHEM IN AUTHORITY HAVE EMULATED THE SAME PEOPLE WHO DON'T ACCEPT THEM AND NEVER WILL BUT WILL APPOINT THEM TO VARIOUS CITY AND JUDICIAL POSITIONS BECAUSE THEIR OWN SELF-HATE OF THEMSELVES.

BLACK PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CAN SAVE THEMSELVES MANY ARE CONTENT WHERE THEY ARE!!

HAD TO RE POST THIS ARTICLE, I HOPE MY FB PALS WILL READ IT AND
LEARN FROM THERE MISTAKE
Once you finished reading this....you will see why i post the things I do... ‪#‎ILOVEMYPPL‬
This article was read on a New York radio station having been written by a Caucasian male. I know it might not apply to you but it makes you think a little bit and is very hard to swallow, but, to some extent this man is right. Please read his write up to the end.
"We can continue to reap profits from the Blacks without the effort of physical slavery. Look at the current methods of containment that they use on themselves: IGNORANCE, GREED, and SELFISHNESS.

Their IGNORANCE is the primary weapon of containment. A great man once said, "The best way to hide something from Black people is to put it in a book." We live now in the Information Age. They have gained the opportunity to read any book on any subject through the efforts of their fight for freedom, yet they refuse to read. There are numerous books readily available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and Amazon.com, not to mention their own Black Bookstores that provide solid blueprints to reach economic equality (which should have been their fight all along), but few read consistently, if at all.

GREED is another powerful weapon of containment.
Blacks, since the abolition of slavery, have had large amounts of money at their disposal. Last year they spent 10 billion dollars during Christmas, out of their 450 billion dollars in total yearly income (2.22%). Any of us can use them as our target market, for any business venture we care to dream up, no matter how outlandish, they will buy into it. Being primarily a consumer people, they function totally by greed. They continually want more, with little thought for saving or investing. They would rather buy some new sneaker than invest in starting a business. Sometimes even neglect their children to have the latest Tom Ford or Polo. And they still think that having a Mercedes, and a big house gives the "Status" or that they have achieved the American Dream. They are fools! The vast majority of their people are still in poverty because their greed holds them back from collectively making better communities. With the help of BET, and the rest of their Black media that often broadcasts destructive images into their own homes, we will continue to see huge profits like those of Tom Ford and Nike. (Tommy Hilfiger and Eddie Bauer along with Ralph Lauren has even jeered them, saying they don't want their money, and look at how the fools spend more with them than ever before!). They'll continue to show off to each other while we build solid communities with the profits from our businesses that we market to them.

SELFISHNESS, ingrained in their minds through slavery, is one of the major ways we can continue to contain them. One of their own, W. E. B. Dubois said that there was an innate division in their culture. A "Talented Tenth" he called it. He was correct in his deduction that there are segments of their culture that has achieved some "form" of success. However, that segment missed the fullness of his work. They didn't read that the "Talented Tenth" was then responsible to aid the Non-Talented Ninety Percent in achieving a better life. Instead, that segment has created another class, a Buppie(wanting to fit in rather than see the truth for what it is) class that looks down on their people or aids them in a condescending manner. They will never achieve what we have. Their selfishness does not allow them to be able to work together on any project or endeavor of substance. When they do get together, their selfishness lets their egos get in the way of the goal. Their so-called help organizations seem to only want to promote their name without making any real change in their community. They are content to sit in conferences and conventions in our hotels, and talk about what they will do, while they award plaques to the best speakers, not the best doers. Is there no end to their selfishness?

They steadfastly refuse to see that "TOGETHER EACH ACHIEVES MORE (TEAM)! They do not understand that they are no better than each other because of what they own. In fact, most of those Buppies are but one or two paychecks away from poverty. All of which is under the control of our pens in our offices and our boardrooms.
Yes, we will continue to contain them as long as they refuse to read, continue to buy anything they want, and keep thinking they are "helping" their communities by paying dues to organizations which do little other than hold lavish conventions in our hotels. By the way, don't worry about any of them reading this letter, remember, 'THEY DON'T READ!!!!"
.