READ HOW INNOCENT SENIOR CITIZENS RETIRED FIRST RESPONDERS WERE UNLAFULLY EVICTED FROM THEIR HOME OF 61 YEARS 2 DAYS BEFORE THANKSGIVING ON A CASE THE APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMED VACATING THE FORECLOSURE OF JUDGE GILLESPIE'S ORDER:
A CERTIFIED COURT ORDER (OCT. 29, 2024) OF JUDGE PAMELA GILLESPIE VACATING FORECLOSURE JUNE 10, 2010 AND AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE COURT 5TH DIVISION DEC. 30, 2011.
There are a number of Democratic Judges who Hate Blacks, Colored and Senior Citizens of any Color and don't be a Heterosexual trying to seek justice in Illinois, Domestic Terrorists have a new face in Illinois Courts.
Judge Derico allegedly showed his hate for the Senior Citizens acting Pro Se in their behalf because their original attorney Joseph P. Harris had his Law License suspended for pointing out attorney's engaging in acts of Fraud in the Mortgage Fraud Illegal Foreclosure cases and judges closed their eyes to these criminal acts.
Judge Derico allegedly provided a COURT ORDER, Ordering the COOK COUNTY SHERIFFS to EVICT the Johnson sister's UNLAWFULLY, the problem there is no court order filed with the Clerk of Cook County validating the verity of this, so Derico tried covering his tracks by backdating a Court Order of Nov 21, 2024, that the attorneys told him how to prepare in a Ex parte email and he did exactly what was instructed, but what was not aware of the FBI was provided those emails of the blank court order, that the attorneys drafted and had their law firm number recorded in the upper left hand corner.
The problem with this is that no attorney ever filed an APPEARANCE because if they did all of them would have been REMANDED into custody for committing fraud on the courts, so they allowed to commit all of the criminal acts allegedly US Bank paid him well to put his career and judicial position in Jeopardy, the court order was signed and emailed to the Clerk of the Circuit Court after Dec. 23, 2024, that indicated on the court order Law Division not Chancery Division.
The DEMOCRATIC PARTY seems to only APPOINT BLACKS OR HISPANICS who hate their ethnic groups or RACIST JUDGES making sure no Black or Colored persons as well as Senior Citizens not receive any justice or Equal Protection of the Laws.
YOU WON'T FIND A BLACK OR COLORED DEMOCRAT OPENING THEIR MOUTHS DENOUNCING THE HATEFUL RACIST INJUSTICE, THAT THESE WOMEN HAS EXPERIENCED BECAUSE MANY OF THEM ARE ONLY FIGUREHEADS IN THE PARTY AND HAVE TO DO WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD.
FEDERAL JUDGE PERRY REALIZING JUST HOW RACIST THE ILLINOIS JUDICIARY IS AND THAT NOBODY WOULD EVER SAY ANYTHING TO HER BECAUSE OF HER RACIST POSITION BECAME ONE OF THE BOYS AND SHOWED HER VICIOUS HATE FOR COLORED SENIOR CITIZENS BY LYING COMMITTING PERJURY SAYING SHE DISMISSED THEIR EMERGENCY DOCUMENTS DEC 13, 2024, WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE HER DEPUTY CLERK DID NOT RECEIVE THE DOCUMENTS UNTIL 4:30 PM, ON DEC 13, 2024.
MANY OF THE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES ARE WORSE THAN INTERNATIONAL TERRORISTS, THEY ARE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, THEY ARE CAPABLE OF GENOCIDAL RULINGS BY SENDING INNOCENT MEN OR WOMEN TO PRISON FOR CRIMES, THEY NEVER COMMITTTED OR STEAL HOMES FROM VOLUMES OF CITIZENS AND SELL THEM TO OTHER TERRORISTS INVESTORS.
THE LAWS ARE MISAPPLIED TOO LITIGIOUSLY WEAR DOWN ANY PERSON WHO ATTEMPTS TO RISE ABOVE THE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS WHO CONTROLS THE JUDICIARY AND STATE AGENCIES IN ILLINOIS.
WHERE IS THE MEDIA TO COVER THIS STORY?
- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
SUPPORTING THE VERACITY OF THE COMPLAINT
Defendant has Due-Diligently been fighting to keep their home from unlawfully being stolen from them in the disguise as foreclosure before the Supreme Court of Illinois, District Court and now before the Court of Appeals for over 16 years racist political judges have “Trespassed upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Defendants as senior citizens in that every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men or women in the Democratic Party and they are only figureheads.
Defendant is appealing to the Judicial Council, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored, the fact Defendants are victims of an “Organized Criminal Mortgage Fraud Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the courts, & State Agencies controlled by Democrats, in that Judge April Perry entered a “FRAUDULENT” admission in the court order to obstruct and corroborate her role as an alleged “White Supremacist stating that Defendant was served in 2008, nowhere in the record is there any mentioning of this nor did the Plaintiffs object to the veracity of all pleadings accompanied with affidavits.
Judge Perry closed her eyes to all of the criminal acts of Democratic Judges violating Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of the Defendant’s as she became the “Defacto” attorney for US Bank condoning all Terrorist Treason offenses accompanied by an affidavit unimpeached by every attorney supporting the Plaintiffs’ by violating the Civil Rights of the Defendants showing her hate and contemptuousness demeanor at the Senior Citizens of African American descent
“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Id. (citing Brumark Case 1:07-cv-00644-WDM-KLM Document 158 Filed 08/25/2009 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6 1 Although the Tenth Circuit does not allow citation to unpublished opinions for precedential value, unpublished opinions may be cited for persuasive value. 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 3 Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp., 57 F.3d 941, 948 (10th Cir. 1995)).
1.) That pursuant to Judge Perry’s Standing Order, her Deputy Clerk James Capparelli was contacted to ascertain how to file a Hearing before Judge Perry, the case number and names of the parties were submitted and he called back Wednesday Dec. 11, 2024 at 11:54 am and explained what was expected and Dec 19, 2024 was the scheduled Motion Hearing.
2.) In compliance to Judge Perry’s Directive hereto attached, an email was generated and sent to all parties Thursday Dec 12, 2024 at 10:05 am.
3.) Friday Dec. 13, 2024 at 4:30 pm, Deputy Clerk James Capparelli received an email of the Motions properly Re Noticed for Dec 19, 2024 at 10:00 am, the Motions were UNOPPOSED.
4.) Pursuant to the Federal Judicial Center re Judge Perry’s Professional Career as a Asst U.S. Atty she has closed her eyes to levels of Mortgage Fraud and Judicial Corruption, She worked as a Civil Rights and Hate Crimes coordinator, 2014-2016 but she was blind to all of the Civil Rights Terrorists Acts particularized in the Notice of Emergency Removal et al.
A- What is even more egregious is that she was the Chief Deputy State’s Attorney and Chief Ethics Officer, in Cook County, Illinois 2017-2019; which is a conflict of interest because Page 10, Par B, Judge Perry used her robe and unlawful authority as a Democrat closed her eyes--- That Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. An INNOCENT MAN was DISMISSED from a Paternity Case fraught with “Fraudulent” allegations by the only Person of Irish Ethnicity, Former States Attorney and Mayor Richard J. Daley Dismissed Sept 17, 1987, (85 D 068184) and has never been served or had any paternity tests as Democrats undermined the same legal system using Inferior Negros and Colored or Racist Democrats to undermine the same laws by REMANDING HIM into Custody 5 times for allegedly owing child support on (88 D 079012) a case that was DISMISSED and worse they had to back date the age of the adult woman, as Racist Asst States Attys “Fraudulently” manufactured documents to make Tycee Hightower a minor to justify bringing him into the courts illegally for not making any child support payments to a Police Officer knowing, that he is not the biological father. (She kept her mouth shut to this Democratic “Lynching”)
5.) That Judge Perry wanted her Democratic Brethren to see just how much she hates Colored, African American and Senior Citizens as a Hearing Officer, Chicago Police Board, 2021-2024, she wanted the alleged terrorist Cell to see she was able to “FIX” any case that comes before her because as a Anglo-Saxon woman nobody would ever investigate her and would believe anything she says simply because of the color of her skin.
6.) The Fact Judge Perry had prior relations in employment to the states Attorney, Civil Rights Hate Group Coordinator, she has failed to act Pursuant to Canon Ethics in adjudicating the merits of the Emergency Documents filed repeatedly as she has corroborated her role in this active Chain Criminal Conspiracy in the Criminal Enterprise of Cook County and now Federal Court.
7.) That Judge Perry has committed so many deliberate acts of “Fraud” seriously questions her ability to continuously remain as a Federal judge, For example if her Deputy Clerk did not receive Defendant’s Re Notice of Emergency Motions filed until the end of business day on Friday the 13th at 4:30, HOW WAS JUDGE PERRY ABLE TO DENY DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS WHEN SHE NEVER RECEIVED THEM FROM HER CLERK?
A- The FBI can ask this question and receive the correct answer because lying to a Federal Agent is PERJURY, a criminal offense.
B- Judge Perry stated, “the case is pending” Judge Derico and the other Democrats engaging in criminal acts as “Private Citizens” allegedly provided a court order signed for the Plaintiff’s to be UNLAWFULLY EVICTED, but no court order has ever been filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
C- Judge Derico is allegedly trying to cover his criminal tracks signed a court order for Nov. 21, 2024 and had it sent to the Clerk of the Circuit Court after Dec 23, 2024, hereto attached, Complaint to the OIG delivered personally Dec 30, 2024 at 9:12 am to Suite 1422.
D- That unbeknownst to all Democratic Judges Page 15, Par 21, and Page 16, Summary Judgment w/Affidavit was admitted to by all parties.
8.) Now if a Cook County Clerk can lie and record an unlawful court order being placed on the database 32 + days late, it is not unfathomable to see how a Federal Clerk would enter and have docketed a Court Order for Dec. 13, 2024, Most Federal Clerks are much sharper than Cook County Clerks, you can’t file a Summary Judgment if the case is terminated only proves that case was never DISMISSED DEC 13, 2024, in that Judge Dow did the same thing, 16 CV 7434, after a Summary Judgment was filed, hereto attached.
9.) Judge Perry is obviously hoping nobody of intelligence ever read this material because it will corroborate unequivocally the necessary Domestic Terrorist techniques Democrats are willing to exhaust making sure people of Color, Senior Citizens not receive Equal Protection of the Laws or Due Process in any court where racist Caucasians are the subject.
A- That Judge Perry had knowledge affidavits of Plaintiff US Bank being served via Registered Agent through electronic delivery, Nov. 26, 2024 on the Notice of Removal from State Court, Judge ignored the fact, Plaintiffs never responded in 14 days entered an ORDER, Deemed a Nullity The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline. Cannon v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898, 122 Cal. Rptr. 778 (1975). Vaughn 462 S.E. 2d 728 (Ga. 1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a judge from office for disregarding defendant’s constitutional rights.
B- That Plaintiff filed an Emergency Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures w/ Affidavit Dec 16, 2024. Judge Perry became a “Private Citizen” (after Plaintiffs admitted to all of the Pleadings of Judges colluding with them in said “Criminal Organized Conspiracy”) categorically DENIED the Motion, Dec 13, 2024 Court Order et al.
C- That Defendant filed an Emergency Motion for Reconsideration due to Fraud & Misrepresentations to the court Vacate all Judgments due to Democratic Judges entering orders being “VOID” A “NULLITY” case being “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TRESON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS”, Judge April Perry demonstrated and corroborated her Racist Bias animus hatred at the Senior Citizens homeless to the heinous criminal acts of them being unlawfully evicted, DENIED said Motion, (Denied Dec 23, 2024)
D- That April Perry corroborated her involvement in this Criminal Enterprise by using her robe to facilitate her authority in denying any and all claims Defendant put before her court showing the FBI and this Honorable Court her depraved indifference to the United States Constitution and people of Color now that she is an untouchable federal judge.
E- That Judge April Perry is demonstrating unequivocally using her robe and jurisdiction to racially OPPRESS, LYNCH INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR, AS IF THEY WERE ROPES, DOGS OR WATERHOSES BY APPLYING UNLAWFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS IN AN TYRANNICAL TERRORIST MANNER, not fearing any retributions because of her fraternal brethren in the Seventh Circuit, allegedly will DENY ANY DOCUMENT Pro Se’s or individuals of color who presents valid legal claims before that circuit they will be SYSTEMATICALLY DISMISSED.
F- That Defendant and other innocent Litigants of color cases have appeared before JUDGES ALLEGEDLY DESCRIBED AS MEMBERS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, NAZI FRATERNAL ORDER OR WHITE NATIONALIST MEMBERS who have systematically denied all of their claims as outlined in the aforementioned history of cases.
G- That former States Attorney Kim Foxx, Illinois Attorney General, Kwame Raoul, and Chief Judge Timothy Calvin Murphy, former Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, have admitted via Summary Judgment and Default judgment (filed Feb. 2024) as Democratic judges incite hateful rulings not in accordance to any Civil Rights laws “the fact Negroes in the Democratic Party have no authority over Racist Anglo- Saxons” Pages 7-8 of the Affidavit, Summary Judgment have been admitted to via Local Rule 56.1
H- “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
I- That Fed Rule Civ P. 8 and 9 require plaintiffs to particularize their allegations of "fraud on the court" in as short, plain, and direct a way as is reasonable. Plaintiff complied with said rule but the court was a law unto himself.
J- Posner: ABA Journal (September 11, 2017) Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Posner, 78, told the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin last week that he decided to retire because of conflicts with his colleagues over the treatment of pro se litigants, who represent themselves. In a new interview with the New York Times
|
A- “The basic thing is that most judges regard these people as kind of trash not worth the time of a federal judge,” Posner said.
In the 7th Circuit, staff lawyers review appeals from pro se litigants, and their recommendations are generally rubber-stamped by judges, he noted.
Posner wanted to give the pro se litigants a better shake by reviewing all of the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges. Posner had approval from the director of the staff attorney program. “But the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I was very frustrated by that,” Posner said.
Posner has written about the pro se issue in an upcoming book, and its publication “would be particularly awkward” if he remained on the court because it “implicitly or explicitly” criticizes the other judges, he said.
A- US Bank has admitted to a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights violations along with the names of every judge in Illinois who have colluded with them helping them steal colored persons homes via every SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIDAVITS, COURT TRANSCRIPTS, ORAL TESTIMONY ETC.
