CORRUPTION AND RACIAL HATE IS REAL IN CHICAGO AND MANY COLORED PEOPLE WHO HATE BLACK THEMSELVES AND ARE TRYING TO BE ACCEPTED BY ANGLO SAXONS HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES TO THE SYSTEMIC HATE AND DISPARATE APPLICATIONS IN THE LAWS BY RACIST JUDGES.
SEE HOW FEDERAL JUDGES WITH NO REGARD FOR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, HAVE SUCCESSFULLY WARRED AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, HELPING US BANK STEAL THE HOMES OF HARD WORKING RETIRED SENIOR CITIZENS OF COLOR.
READ HOW 3 HIGH RANKING REPUBLICAN JUDGES ARE CAUGHT "FIXING" A FEDERAL CASE TRYING TO SAVE US BANK FROM A LEGAL JUDGMENT, WHERE A DEMOCRATIC JUDGE ENTERED FALSE COURT ORDERS DENYING ALL MOTIONS DEMONSTRATING, US BANK HAD BEEN PROPERLY SERVED AND FAILED TO RESPOND OR ANSWER ANY SUMMARY JUDGMENTS.
SO THE AFOREMENTIONED JUDGES ASSUMED THAT SAID WOMAN WAS A COLORED MAN REFERENCED HER WITH THE PRONOUN HE AS THEY SANCTIONED HER $1000 FOR LEGALLY PRESENTING VALID CLAIMS OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND A PLETHORA OF EGREGIOUS CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OF SINISTER HATE.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor: 'There is going to be a lot of disappointment in the law, a huge amount'
MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF UNLAWFUL SANCTIONS DUE TO JUDICIAL “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” JUDGES NOT HAVING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS DUE TO JUDGES ENGAGING IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES ENTERING ORDERS BEING “VOID” A “NULLITY” CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” ALTERNATIVELY DISQUALIFY JUDGES DUE TO BIAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST PURSUANT TO {28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)} Canon 3E (1990) TRANSFER CASE PURSUANT TO RULE 26 BREYERS COMMITTEE REPORT239 F.R.D. at 214-15 TO ANOTHER CIRCUIT OUTSIDE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
RETIRED 7TH CIRCUIT JUDGE RICHARD A POSNER STATED “MOST JUDGES REGARD PRO SE LITIGANTS AS KIND OF TRASH NOT WORTH THE TIME”
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."