Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Monday, May 24, 2021

 

SEE HOW BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS ACT AS THE THE COLORED KU KLUX KLAN IN DESTROYING THEIR OWN RACE SUPPORTING RACISM AND RACIAL APARTHEID

BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE USED TO HELP STEAL THE HOMES OF THE SENIOR CITIZENS AND ENGAGE IN A PLETHORA OF HATEFUL ACTS DUE TO SELF-HATE IN DESTROYING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS.

THEIR ARE MORE COLORED PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BE INFERIOR AND ENSLAVED BY ANGLO SAXONS, THAT IS WHY CHICAGO POLITICIANS ARE SO QUIET.

EVERY BLACK OR BROWN PERSON COMPLICIT OR GUILTY OF THE ABOVE DON'T WANT NOBODY TO READ THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IT TRULY IDENTIFIES EVERY IF NOT MOST RACISTS AND IMPOTENT, INFERIOR ENSLAVED BLACK OR BROWN PERSON.

IT'S TIME NOW FOR EVERYONE TO COME OUT INTO THE LIGHT OUT OF THE CLOSET, SO EVERYONE CAN SEE WHO YOU ARE AND WHY CHICAGO IS SO FUCKED UP!   

  • Joe Louis <joelouis565@yahoo.com>
    To:kenneth ditkowsky,Kin Mapper
    Cc:Dean Sallas,'kenneth ditkowsky' via govcuff,Janet Phelan,Chicago FBI,J. Ditkowsky clara
    Mon, May 24 at 10:28 PM
    First of All Greetings Professor Ken and all of those advocates fighting against tyranny and injustice on the elderly, the indigent or the disenfranchised individuals of color.

    A Federal Complaint has been filed in Federal Court detailing the horrendous JIM CROW Laws still being ENFORCED in Illinois Courts, Now that the Registered Agent for US Bank has been properly served, this information can be publicly displayed; after all, US Bank and all other parties complicit in these "Organized Terrorist Insurrectional Acts" have already admitted to these criminal acts.

    The entire Civil Complaint is attached, you will see how inferior Black or Brown persons are appointed or sponsored for judicial or political positions because of that very nature, this is why men like my Brother Lanre Amu are not accepted into the bar men like him are unjustly suspended so as to make examples against anyone who opposes the Tyrannical Political Machine of Domestic Terrorists.

    Nobody BLACK OR BROWN have the authority or permission in the Democratic party to speak up on the Injustices noted in the Complaint or for the Senior Citizens victimized by Mr. Sallas as you have so eloquently pointed out; due to their enslaved mental disposition or self-hatred mannerism to individual that looks like them, so instead of the Good ol boys as Ku Klux Klan or Nazis terrorizing so many men of color by physically LYNCHING them from trees, they have armed so many Black and Brown men with enough guns to kill off their own ethnic groups while they control every aspect of the legal system keeping the Senior Citizens, Black or Brown persons OPPRESSED, INCARCERATED, SUBJECTED TO REMARKABLE APARTHEID LIVING CONDITIONS surpassing human imagination.

    In the Industrial Commission Black and Brown injured employees do not receive EQUAL PROTECTION of the LAWS at all, for example racist corporations realizing that Illinois don't embrace the laws of the United States Constitution for persons of color.

    ILLINOIS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

               

                                                           

    Teresa Collins                                                                           Case # 19 WC 13788

    Employee/Petitioner

     

     

    V.

     

    Rockdale School District 84

    Employer/Respondent

     

     

                                                     Courtesy Copy

                                                        Exhibit List

     

    1.)  That because of Petitioner’s skin color being non-Anglo Saxon they have refused to pay temporary payments, medical expenses, in that, the following injury was incurred Pursuant to Vigus v.O’Bannon Page 7, Par 18, the necessary fraternal Organized Conspiracies had to keep people of color from receiving Equal Protection of the Laws in Illinois State Agencies and Illinois Courts.

    A-    That pursuant to Gr Ex O, Page 6 Par B states, “Judge Murphy violated his Judicial Authority to prevent Plaintiff from cross-examining Thomas Webber, attorney representing IBC Wonder bread, they stole $55,000.00 of his disability monies while off injured on duty with a torn rotator cuff surgery had to be had, and he was on Welfare with wife and 5 children when all of the aforementioned took place”;  

     

    B-    That said March 13, email 2021, 9:30 PM Corroborates and Demonstrates the necessary evils said Racial Hatred is levying at this Petitioner making it clear to her and everyone reading this that, “BLACK LIVES DON’T MATTER” in any VENUE in ILLINOIS as longs as the Democratic Insurrectionist are in Control of the Courts and State Agencies.   

     

    2.)  Please find the Official Complaint against RACISM, CORRUPTION et al. In the Industrial Commission (Feb 11, 2021) ignored by the Commission but is the reason why Jessica Haggerty recused herself from the case and why the case was handed to Arbitrator Cellini to finish “FIXING” this case, in an attempt to help his Alumni David Martay graduates from John Marshall Law School.

     

    3.)  That an Feb 8, 2021 email response, Please find an email response to attorney Rachael’s misinformation provided to you Jan 22, 2021.

     

     

    4.)  That on Nov 9, 2020 (filed), PETITIONERS MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF ARBITRATOR DUE TO “FRAUD” OBJECTION TO COUNSEL RECEIVING ANY LEGAL FEES DUE TO “CORROBORATION OF A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY REQUESTING STATE/FEDERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALL PARTIES INSTANTER  w/AFFIDAVIT

    A-    That Page 1, That pursuant to an email Ref as Ex A sent to Arbitrator Hagerty Friday September 25, 2020 2:24 pm, “I am emailing you to ask if you have received a copy of my 19 (b-1)”? It was filed by my attorney, David Martay. My case number is : 19 WC 13788. “Attorney David Martay has not provided me with a copy of the document et al…”   

     

    B-      Arbitrator Hagerty’s reply, “I don’t think I have a copy Mr. Martay please advise”

     

     

    5.)    That on Nov 18, 2020, PETITIONERS MOTION OBJECTING & STRIKING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL DUE TO ADMISSIONS BY THE RESPONDENT NOT IMPEACHING OR DENYING OR SUBMITTING A COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT & SUMMARY JUDGMENT w/AFFIDAVIT       

    A-       That Gr Ex D Corroborates and validates the verity of further admissions to Petitioners pleadings Notice of Motion and Order with a file stamp of Aug 19, 2020 2:46 pm.

     

    B-    That Gr Ex F from Respondent’s attorney Rachael E. Smith “Hey David Thank you for sending this over. Based on the tentative regular duty release in June, please confirm that there will not be a hardware removal procedure” (April 3, 2020);

     

    C-    That said racist attorneys corroborating their roles colluding concocted That Respondent’s attorney (Rachael E. Smith) forwarded an email August 26 2020, 4:31 pm Ref as Gr H to David Martay stating, “I am in receipt of your 19(b) Petition and wanted to quickly reiterate what we discussed over the phone last week and just clarify the basis upon which TTD benefits have been suspended at this time, for your reference”

     

    D-    “The petitioner’s current condition of ill being arose out of a neutral risk and there is no evidence to suggest that she was exposed to that risk et al.”

     

    6.)   That on Dec 30, 2020,  PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR AN ADDENDUM TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT REINFORCING SAID MOTION OBJECTING & STRIKING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL DUE TO ADMISSIONS BY THE RESPONDENT NOT IMPEACHING OR DENYING OR SUBMITTING A COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT ET AL                                                       

    A-   That because Rockdale School district 84 have no respect or regard for the color of Petitioners skin color have recruited lawyers and State Arbitrators to aid and assist in the Diabolical racial Hatred in making sure she not receives any Equal Protection of the Laws afforded to her by the United states Constitution.

     

    B-    Hereto attached, Ex A, said milage check was forwarded to the Petitioner directing her to see an IME of $65.78 dated Dec 2, 2020.

     

    C-    That because Petitioner’s former attorney David Martay and Respondent’s present counsel has admitted colluding with one another, in that Respondents have been aggressively filing and mailing more documents to her than she ever received under Martay.

     

    D-    That said Respondent’s including the State of Illinois Industrial Commission Arbitrator acted in concert corroborated the fact that Black Lives don’t matter in Illinois and the necessary hateful racist acts they have demonstrated in this matter proving this fact.

                                               

    Respectfully Submitted,

     

    Teresa Collins

     

      

    Tina McDaniel                                                                           Case # 18 WC 25010

    Employee/Petitioner

     

     

    V.

     

    Adams& Assoc./Joliet Job Corps

    Employer/Respondent

       

     

                                                     Courtesy Copy

                                                        Exhibit List

     

    1.)  Pursuant to a March 17, 2017 Letter from Wiedner & McAuliffe, their letter indicates claim number is unknown!

    A-   HELL YEAH!!! Petitioner REFUSED A SETTLEMENT OF $30,000.00 when Caucasians receive on average of $200,000.00+ for the aforementioned injuries.

     

    2.)  Please find the Official Complaint against Arbitrator and Commissioner (Feb 12, 2021) ignored by the Commission but is the reason why Carolyn Doherty recused herself from the case and why the case was handed to Arbitrator Cellini to finish “FIXING” this case.

     

    3.)   That on Oct. 14, 2020,   PETITIONERS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE TO “FRAUD” “CORROBORATION OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OF ALL PARTIES WITH ADMISSIONS”  w/AFFIDAVIT

    a.      That Page 5 of the aforementioned Summary Judgment, That Page 2 of Gr Ex F Page 5 Examination of the knee: Response by Tina Mc.: “My right knee is not stable! When Dr Gleason examined my right knee with the metal apparatus doctors use to check reflexes, Dr. Gleason kept hitting all sides of my Right Knee, and I started to cry because, he kept hitting my right knee and seeing no reflex, had become so painful, I couldn’t hold it in any longer! And , he stated, “don’t you cry! Don’t you cry! Or, I’m going to stop this examination, and you will have to come back another time!” I believe Dr Gleason has created more damage because since the IME, my knee has weakened and pain kicks in, having me lose my balance, more often. My Right Knee did not show any reflex; my Right Knee nor right leg did not move for him; however, the left leg did respond with a reflux.”

     

    b.      That said IME Report is filled with a plethora of “Fraudulent Misrepresentations” in an attempt to keep said employer from paying the Petitioner her Temporary Disability Payments Corroborating said parties complicit in an “Organized Conspiracy.”

     

    2.)   That Page 6 is CLEAR & UNEQUIVICOL That Petitioner had to file for Disability with the Social Security Administration ref as Gr Ex G, Page 1 Par 3 said government medical physicians stated, the claimant is alleging disability since July 10, 2018;

    a.       Page 2 Par 3 states, “The Claimant has the following severe impairments: lumbar degenerative disc disease with stenosis; left ankle fracture; left foot fracture; left ankle degenerative disease; left shoulder fracture; right shoulder rotator cuff tear; right knee degenerative joint disease, meniscal tear; and morbid obesity (20 CFR 404.1520 (c) and 416.920 (c).  

     

    b.      That Par 8 of the aforementioned Ex G further states, “Throughout the record, the claimant’s persistent complaints are corroborated by a multitude of medical evidence and treatment notes from severable acceptable medical sources. Regarding the claimant’s impairments, the undersigned highlights that there are affirmative diagnoses throughout the record. The record contains office treatment notes reflecting regular trips to the doctor to seek relief from the alleged symptoms”.

     

    c.       That Page 3 Par 3, “Medical expert, Steven Golub, M.D., opined that the claimant can perform light duty work except can sit six hours out of an eight-hour day and stand/walk two hours out of an eight-hour day (Hearing Testimony)”.  

     

    d.                            DECISION Page 5 of 5 Based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on January 30, 2019, the claimant has been disabled under sections 216(i) and 223 (d) of the Social Security Act since July 10, 2018.

     

     

    4.)  That on Nov 19, 2020,  PETITIONERS MOTION OBJECTING & STRIKING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS PETITION FOR REVIEW AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE TO ADMISSIONS BY THE RESPONDENT NOT IMPEACHING OR DENYING ANY OF THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 56.1  w/AFFIDAVIT 

     

    5.)  That Pursuant to Page 3, Pars 9-11 CORRABORATE and DEMONSTRATE beyond the PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE a PLETHORA OF DEMOCRATIC INSURRECTIONIST ARE ON THE STATE LEVEL in ILLINOIS AGENCIES working FRATERNALLY TO DENY, OPPRESS, DISCRIMINATE and STEAL FROM PERSONS OF COLOR making sure any and all United States Constitutional Laws are not afforded to them, See the attached Post taken from the Blog taken from unlawful1.blogspot.com and is my closing argument demonstrating Arbitrator Cellini can not “FIX” this case if you are a FRATERNAL MEMBER of this Domestic Terrorist Cell.

     

    Tina McDaniel        

    The Arbitrators in the Industrial Commission have closed their eyes to the plethora of Terrorists Acts perpetrated by every Anglo Saxon involved in the aforementioned, what is worse the Arbitrator stated, they don't accept Summary Judgments and don't have jurisdiction on the above, in the matter of Ms. McDaniel's case the Federal Government has DECLARED her to TOTAL DISABLED, the IME for the company fabricated a plethora of events surrounding this woman's injury and never paid her shit, (TTD) the law firm had the audacity to tell her that if she was planning on using the Federal document from Social Security, he was going to OBJECT from it being presented to the trial.

    Nobody from the Industrial Commission ever investigated the allegations from both women surrounding the allegations of "FRAUD", from all STATE EMPLOYEES (ARBITRATORS) in colluding with said attorneys in FIXING CASES in their favor against the clients.

    The Complaint identifies CORRUPTION in every court where said Insurrectionist's control all verdicts and uphold the criminal acts of their other Brethren, as Black and Brown individuals act as foot soldiers or ENFORCERS for the Political Machine destroying their ethnic group doing whatever, they are told in stealing seniors homes, closing their eyes to all corrupt activities against persons of color proving BLACK LIVES DON'T MATTER and senior citizens lives is of meaningful significance as well.  

    THE 14TH AMENDMENT IS NOT AFFORDED TO EVERYONE and this COMPLAINT PROVES THE VERACITY OF EVERYTHING BEING ASSERTED.  

    IN THE 

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE

    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

    EASTERN DIVISION

     

                                           CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ET AL

                                                   Jurisdictional Statement

    Order entered:  May 5, 2021

    Notice of Civil Rights Complaint: May  18, 2021

    Statute: Treason, Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Discrimination, Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Anarchy, Jim Crowism, No Jurisdiction on Defendant, Canon Ethics violations, Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of  Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Perjury, Chicanery, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.

       

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

 See How White Nationalist has controlled all Courts in Illinois under the nose of the Federal Government Enforcing JIM CROW LAWS by Recruiting and Appointing only certain Black or Brown persons who will keep their mouths shut and do what they are told.

Illinois Judges have found a way to undermine the laws of the United States Supreme Court and Laws of the United States  Constitution by making sure people of color or the elderly remain oppressed and disenfranchised by any laws of equality by maintaining a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE in all State Agencies and legal venues.

Many Black and Brown Leaders or Judges of today have accepted their roles as FIGUREHEADS, powerless over any Anglo-Saxons but those same Colored individuals are by far the worse any person of color could ever appeal to for help or stand before in any court

My Prayer is that everyone will be able to pull up and read all six parts, my baby son who is studying 

animation and cartoons was the person who made this visual possible and a great success    

Provided if everyone is able to pull it up and read it.

I want to thank all of my #Twitterfriends and Holy Men and women from across the world praying for my success in the courts from the Racial Injustices perpetrated by men and women as judges who embodies hate in their rulings because they detest a persons skin color or sexuality.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL2
Yahoo/Sent
Posted by at No comments:

Friday, May 7, 2021

 

CORRUPTION AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM IN ILLINOIS COURTS IS WORSE THAN THE INSURRECTION ACTIVITIES SEIZED ON THE WHITE HOUSE ON JAN 6, 2021

SEE HOW A BLACK FEMALE JUDGE WITH THE SUPPORT OF WHITE NATIONALISTS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS VIOLATING EVERY ASPECT OF HER JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, HELPING US BANK ATTORNEYS STEAL THEIR HOME.

BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE BY FAR THE WORSE PEOPLE ANY PERSON OF COLOR COULD GO BEFORE, SO MANY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ACT LIKE THEY WANT TO BE AN ANGLO SAXON, I MEAN THE MOST VILE RACISTS, THEY WILL DO ANYTHING TO DESTROY THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUP.

IN THIS CASE JUDGE LYLE SEEMS TO BE OF THE IMPRESSION BECAUSE RACISM IS SO WELL TOLERATED AGAINST PERSONS OF COLOR, BLACKS IN AUTHORITY ACT LIKE THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THE FUCK THEY WANT VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THEIR ETHNICITY.

THE VIOLENCE AND HATE IN OUR STREETS IS BECAUSE OF THE TYPE OF BLACKS IN POWER STANDING BY CLOSING THEIR EYES TO INJUSTICES PERPETRATED ON INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR AND THE ELDERLY.

THE SAME FEDERAL OFFICIALS THAT IS APPREHENDING EVERY PERSON WHO SEIZED THE WHITE HOUSE ON JAN 6, NEEDS TO COME TO CHICAGO AND APPREHEND EVERY DEMOCRAT ACTING AS THE SAME TYPE OF INSURRECTIONIST DESTROYING PEOPLES LIVES.

THIS CASE IS SUPER CLEAR NO JUDGE IS FOLLOWING ANY LAWS AS EVERY PERSON IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES AS US BANK ATTORNEYS ARE TRYING THEIR HOME AND THE JUDGE IS VIOLATING EVERY LAW HELPING THEM.

THIS IS THE SAME LAW THAT WAS IN EFFECT IN 1988 SHOWING, I NEVER OWED ANY CHILD SUPPORT BUT, THE RACIST DEMOCRATIC KLAN JUDGES IGNORED THE LAWS AND HAD ME LOCKED UP 5 TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT, THAT WAS NEVER OWED OR MY CHILD.

EVERY BLACK PERSON IN AUTHORITY KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT, WHICH BEGS THE QUESTION WHY VOTE FOR A BLACK PERSON IF THEY ARE GOING TO ACT LIKE THE SAME RACIST VOTED OUT OF OFFICE?

 

Professor Ken and Colleagues:

First of all, my brother Lanre Amu never should have had his law license suspended which we all know from reading the plethora of emails from Professor Ken as well as the article from Crain's Chicago; furthermore, the egregious scandals of the guardians and judges of the Dean Sallas case is indicative to what everyone is about to read in the foregoing hearing May 5, at 11:00 am, I am quite certain many tuned into the zoom matter on that day and was probably shocked at her true ignorance and interpretation of the laws.

With the present leadership and ignorant judges on the benches in Illinois nobody especially senior citizens if you don't take a stand now everything you have earned and has accumulated will be stolen from you by judges and attorneys who personify themselves as DOMESTIC TERRORISTS or WANNABE GANGSTERS.

Here is the recap of that egregious day of her "Trespassing upon the Laws" as a "Private Citizen"

First of all, here is the following argument that was prepared for that matter, the last time an argument was prepared like this, these sisters smoked the attorneys, Lyle asked the Johnson sister's if she could have a copy of what, they were saying "laughing out loud."

The sisters knew when to execute and object, I am not undefeated in any courts and have not been out argued by any attorney in the State of Illinois because of the color of my skin and being Born & Raised a Freeman Heterosexual in these United States of America, Illinois do not recognize men like me or senior citizens, too many cowards and terrorists have infiltrated the legal system making it impossible for anyone to receive justice.

Counsel for Potestivo law firm never OBJECTED or DENIED to anything properly asserted, Judge Lyle acted like the bully or for a better word, the demeanor of an ex gangbanger from the streets, i explained to the sister's not to be discouraged or intimidated if the judge interjects and try to stop her from reading her argument, 

   When Monzella Objected as noted in the aforementioned argument, she only made it to paragraph 3 before Lyle interjected in a nasty manner, telling her she did not have to read the legal citations, she can see the laws and in the first place you don't argue no case reading from any material, the judges delivery was quite venomous (she was basically full of shit), so Monzella asked the judge in plain English, WHY ARE WE HERE? You Judge Lyle vacated the judgment of December 6, 2017 on October 29, 2018, and how is it what you are doing is legal? You have not vacated your judgment, Judge Lyle said that, she did not have to VACATE her judgment and asked her clerks to find the court order showing, she vacated the case Poulami said to the judge, she found the order again Lyle said the laws don't apply in this case because they filed a Summary Judgement, Monzella Objected and  went to Par 4 asked the judge if the attorney can overcome being REMANDED into custody et al?  Lyle interjected and said that, she didn't understand what the Johnson sister's were trying to say in their pleadings because it didn't make sense, also the plaintiff's did file a Summary Judgment and reminded everyone listening to the zoom proceeding that, she didn't have any documents in front of her, she have to rely on the clerks to pull up the information, The Johnson sister's reminded the judge, that they never filed a Summary Judgment, it was a Certificate of Service and the Summary Judgment was a Exhibit.

Monzella repeated,  For the record your Honor Plaintiff has not presented nothing before you timely or defensive refuting our Summary Judgment. 
For Example, Nov. 19, 2019 Plaintiff filed purportedly what they thought was a Motion but it was a CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS if your Honor like have your Clerk to pull it up on the computer and see  for yourself, the judge got personal and said the document you titled "RESPONDENT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES COMPLICIT IN SAID TERRORIST ACTS TRYING TO STEAL RESPONDENT'S HOME W/AFFIDAVIT  is not a Summary judgment and citing rule 56.1 doesn't make any sense and they didn't have to respond to anything you said because you did not state any facts, this case from what, I can see is about Joe Louis and other judges you mentioning invoking the FBI and US Attorney they are not going to get involved with this.

As a caveat to her disgruntled disposition of my name being mentioned in the documents pursuant to Page 15 of the Summary Judgment that Lyle admitted not understanding, That because of the above and Summary Judgment Defendant has produced a number of other cases similar to the injustices they have experienced, where judges have engaged in Terrorist Acts egregiously protecting one another; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

Oh she was a real a piece of work, she acted like she was wearing BRASS BALLS! Nobody could say shit to her!

Before, I demonstrate just how ignorant she really is the Johnson sister's were tending to their ailing mom taking her to the Doctor and she passed last year, I was the person who ascertained all of the information ask any judge in Cook County about me and my research, they may be Racist Gay or Both one they can tell anybody, I have never presented a false document to them in any court, if I say a DUCK CAN PULL A TRUCK, HITCH HIM UP, THAT DUCK WILL PULL THAT TRUCK, Find Timothy P. Murphy, DAVID E. HARACZ, RONALD BARTKOWICZ, MARY LANE MIKVA, ELIZABETH RIVERA ETC. don't ask a Black judge shit about me.

Illinois Political System has found a way to keep JIM CROW alive by appointing the worse of the worse in judicial positions without a scintilla  of legal expertise or integrity too many people have purchased their law degrees and judicial positions which is why everything is so FUCKED UP.    

NOW FOR EVERYONE READING THIS EMAIL KEEP IN MIND THE FOLLOWING JUDGES WITH LAW LICENSES AND JUDGES:
Oct. 29, 2018, Judge Daryl Simko, Judge Moche Jacobius, Timothy Calvin Evans, Federal Judge Samuel Der yeghian----EVERY COURT ORDER THAT CAME AFTER THAT DATE IS DEEMED A NULLITY, VOID. BECAUSE IT IS A JUDGMENT.

Keep in mind so many judges don't know the laws or the rules have been violating citizens CIVIL RIGHTS for so long, what has been done wrong for so long is correct to them.

Judge Lyle said or implied the FBI won't touch this case because she is a judge, I would beg to differ in the GreyLord Indictments many of the judges of today are worse than the judges indicted back then, what DUMB ASS didn't know since she wants to mention my name in her argument trying to justify stealing the Defendants home.

Oct 29, 2020 is the 2 year anniversary, that Plaintiff had to come before the court and petition the court to VACATE THE OCT. 29, 2018 JUDGMENT.

These are laws created by Anglo Saxons of Illinois 
   

                                                         Motions to Vacate Pursuant to Section 2-1301 Section 2-1301(e)

provides litigants with the option to bring a motion to vacate a non-final or final order during the course of litigation. 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(e). Under section 2-1301(e), a litigant can move to vacate a non-final order or judgment at any time before that order or judgment becomes final. Id.; Federal Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n v. Tomei, 2014 IL App (2d) 130652, ¶ 9. Once the order or judgment is rendered final, the litigant must bring its motion within 30 days. 735 ILCS 5/2-1301. In the event that the litigant fails to bring a motion to vacate during the 30 day period, the court loses jurisdiction and the party’s only option is to bring a petition to vacate the judgment under the more exacting standards provided for in section 2-1401. Blazyk v. Daman Express, Inc., 406 Ill. App. 3d 203, 206-07 (2d Dist. 2010). In Illinois, the moving party bears the burden of establishing that the judgment should be vacated. Larson v. Pedersen, 349 Ill. App. 3d 203, 207 (2d Dist. 2004). Generally, the court will vacate an order or judgment within 30 days “upon any terms and conditions that shall be reasonable.” Larson, 349 Ill. App. 3d at 207 (citing 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(e)). In reviewing a section 2-1301(e) motion the court’s primary consideration is “whether substantial justice is being done between the parties and whether it is reasonable under the circumstances to proceed to trial on the merits.” Id. at 207-08 (citing Mann v. Upjohn Co., 324 Ill. App. 3d 367, 377 (1st Dist. 2001)). The Illinois courts have expressed a preference that, if possible, litigation be determined on its merits. Jones v. Fox, 313 Ill. App. 3d 249, 257 (3d Dist. 2000). As a result, where a party provides a reasonable justification, the court will generally exercise its discretion and grant a motion to vacate, pursuant to section 2-1301(e).

                                                                Petition to Vacate Pursuant to 2-1401 

The entry of a final order or judgment may not end the litigation in the trial court. Section 2-1401 entitles a party to bring a petition to vacate a final judgment or order after the 30 day period provided for under section 2-1301(e) has expired and for two years from the date of the entry of the judgment or order. 735 ILCS 5/2-1401. In order to ensure that a section 2-1401 petition is timely filed a party should file the petition no later than the day before the anniversary date of the entry of the final order or judgment. See generally Parker v. Murdock, 2011 IL App (1st) 101645, ¶ 21 (superseding its opinion withdrawn on Sept. 20, 2011). The two year period excludes time during which the party seeking relief is under legal disability or duress and when the ground for relief is fraudulently concealed. 735 ILCS 5/2-1401(c). As a procedural note, a trial court only retains jurisdiction over a matter for 30 days after it has entered a final judgment. Blazyk, 406 Ill. App. 3d at 206. As a result, a party seeking relief from a final judgment under section 2-1401 must do so through a petition to the court, not a motion. Id. The filing of a section 2-1401 petition is a new proceeding, not a continuation of the old proceeding. 735 ILCS 5/2-1401(b); Sarkissian v. Chicago Bd. of Educ., 201 Ill. 2d 95, 102 (2002). A section 2-1401 petition, just like any other initial pleading, is subject to the rules of civil procedure in Illinois. People v. Vincent, 226 Ill. 2d 1, 8 (2007). Specifically, a party who files a section 2-1401 petition must give notice to opposing parties as required under Supreme Court Rule 106, which dictates that the proper service must comply with the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 105. Ill. S. Ct. R. 106; Blazyk, 406 Ill. App. 3d at 207. In addition, a section 2-1401 petition invites a responsive pleading and may be challenged by a motion to dismiss for a failure to state a cause of action or for a failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Vincent, 226 Ill. 2d at 8

 So Lyle is basically saying in her orders FUCK THE FBI AND US ATTORNEY, THE POLITICAL MACHINE GOT HER BACK; after all, other judges have gotten away so she is going to get away as well.

Our violent streets are indicative to our legal system people are killing each other rather resolve issues civilly because we have no civility in Illinois Courts.

Illinois is no better with all Blacks in prominent positions than when all Irish or Polacas had the positions, the Political Machine needs to be recognized under the definition as a violation of the Jim Crow Laws and when individuals close their eyes to corruption being perpetuated on people of color and now the elderly, this needs to be recognized as DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Our legal system is under siege by Domestic Terrorist and Insurrectionist Black and Brown judges are worse than Anglo Saxons but the elderly and everyone else are being affected by the hate and Terrorist Acts being ignored by Black leadership.

 See Professor Ken and every responsible senior, I am trying to help those victimized by  the Terrorist Empire:

Joe Louis
   

Good Morning Your Honor:

 

I am here on my Motion---- For the record we filed the read the motions into the record

 

 RESPONDENT’S REPLY MOTION STRIKING & OBJECTING PETITIONER’S MOTION  DUE TO “PERJURY” “FRAUD” & RESPONDENTS BEING VICTIMS OF AN “ORGANIZED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY” TRYING TO STEAL THE SAID HOME WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS AND UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INVOKE JURISDICTION INSTANTER PURSUANT TO SAID PARTIES ENGAGING IN TERRORIST ACTS NULLIFYING ALL COURT ORDERS w/AFFIDAVIT

 

 

RESPONDENT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ALL PARTIES COMPLICIT IN SAID TERRORIST ACTS TRYING TO STEAL RESPONDENT’S HOME  w/AFFIDAVIT

 

First of all, I OBJECT to anything COUNSEL attempts to assert in this court due to a JUDGMENT of Oct. 29, 2018 being entered by this court and never VACATED!

In each response, Defendants fails to raise any facts that would allow Plaintiff to respond. For example, Defendants cite several statutes and cases which are randomly included in each response that have no bearings on the issue at hand, et al.

1.)  For the record your Honor can you explain to me how  is it the Seventh Circuit, COURT OF APPEALS has established a legal precedent on what a JUDGMENT IS

KARL KIEFER MACH. CO. v. U.S. BOTTLERS MACHINERY CO. No. 6985. 108 F.2d 469| Dec. 18, 1939.

In determining whether decree or judgment is interlocutory or final, character thereof is important factor to be considered and it should be borne in mind that “decree” or “judgment” is law’s last word in judicial controversy and court’s final consideration and determination on matters submitted to it in action or proceeding.

2.)    Also, the Illinois Supreme Court  PEOPLE ex rel. Carl M. SCHWARTZ, Commissioner of Highways, Appellee, v.

Albert R. FAGERHOLM, Town Clerk, Appellant, (Woodrow Wood et al, Intervenors-Separate Appellants.) No. 35176. 17 Ill.2d 131 May 22, 1959.

|Rehearing Denied Sept. 22, 1959.

A “judgment” is the official and authentic decision of a court of justice upon the respective rights and claims of the parties to an action or suit therein litigated and submitted to its determination, and it is the expression of the court’s decision that constitutes the rendition of the judgment.

A judgment is the sentence of the law pronounced by the court upon the matter contained in the record. 3 Blackstone’s Com. 395. It is the law’s last word in a judicial controversy and may *86 be defined as the final consideration and determination of a court upon matters submitted to it in an action or proceeding. 15 R.C.L.,

3.)    Finally, the Appellate Court  of Illinois, First District, Second Division.

PEOPLE EX REL. KLEE ET AL. v. KELLY, MAYOR, ET AL.

Gen. No. 41417. 309 Ill. App. 72 March 11, 1941.

Judgments, 569. A judgment is the judicial act of the court. Dorman v. Usbe Building & Loan Assn, 115 N.J.L. 337, 180 A. 413.

A “judgment” is the sentence of the law

pronounced by the court upon a matter contained

in the record, and is the law’s last word in a

judicial controversy; it may be defined as the

final consideration and determination of the court

upon matters submitted to it in an action or

proceeding, and is the judicial act of the court,

and interest thereon is not an integral part

thereof. S.H.A. ch. 74, § 3.

4.)   Now can this attorney overcome the Rule to Show Cause of being REMANDED into CUSTODY BY PRODUCING A VALID CREDIBLE LEGAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED TIMELY AFTER THE OCT 29, 2018 JUDGMENT?

                             FINALLY ON THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

5.)   The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

 

            This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs,    including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

 

In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7th Cir. 2013) )  The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.

 

6.)  It is clear counsel didn’t read the laws or fail to comprehend the established legal precedents already ruled upon defining what constitutes a JUDGMENT and the necessary requirements on how to respond to a SUMMARY JUDGMENT which counsel has repeatedly failed to do on many occasions in the SEVENTH CIRCUIT AND NOW CIRCUIT COURT.

 

7.)  REPEATEDLY ADMITTING TO EVERY ASSERTION, that has been properly plead in this court; thereby validating the verity of  us receiving a JUDGEMENT OF $13 MILLION DOLLARS PLUS DAMAGES FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS AND OTHER CRIMINAL ACTS ASSOCIATED IN THIS CASE.

 

8.)  Which is why we have repeatedly Re Noticed said Motion

 

       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE “PRIVATE CITIZEN” FOR “CAUSE” USING HER ROBE ENGAGING IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY  & VACATE (February9th 2021) ORDER DUE TO 14th AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “FRAUD” TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS MAKING THE ORDER A NULLITY w/AFFIDAVIT

Because it is clear Judge Lyle has favored the Plaintiff’s since the inception of this case and has VIOLATED our CIVIL RIGHTS because of the color of our skin Black Judges or Racist Judges do not rule in favor of Pro se litigants especially if they are African American.

 

 I REST MY CASE !




Download all attachments as a zip file
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)