CHICAGO DEMOCRATIC CORRUPTION IS WORSE SEEMINGLY UNDER BLACK LEADERSHIP WHEN THE IRISH WAS IN CONTROL AND BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS WERE DISENFRANCHISED FROM RECEIVING JUSTICE IN THE COURTS, EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS, POLICE BRUTALITY UNDER JOHN BURGE WAS A NORMAL PRACTICE BY RACIST POLICE OFFICERS, COOK COUNTY JAILS WERE FILLED WITH COLORED MEN.
IN THE YEAR 2020 WE HAVE A BLACK LESBIAN DEMOCRATIC MAYOR, A NEGROE CHIEF JUDGE, A NEGROE ATTORNEY GENERAL, A NEGROE STATES ATTORNEY, A NEGROE PRESIDENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND COOK COUNTY PRESIDENT.
WE STILL HAVE THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM CONTROLLED BY DEMOCRATS LIKENED TO THE KU KLUX KLAN JUDGES ARE STILL DOING WHATEVER THEY PLEASE ON THE BENCH ONLY THIS TIME THEY HAVE RECRUITED NEGROE DEMOCRATS AS THE ENFORCERS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO INCITE HATE CRIMES ON THEIR OWN ETHNICITIES.
BLACK DEMOCRATS WILL GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO DESTROY ANY BLACK OR BROWN PERSON BUT WILL NOT OPEN THEIR MOUTHS AT THE PLETHORA OF DIABOLICAL CRIMINAL TERRORISTS ACTS PERPETRATED AT MEN AND WOMEN OF COLOR SIMPLY BECAUSE "BLACK LIVES DON'T MATTER" BUT THESE SAME NEGROES WILL GET ON TELEVISION AND PROCLAIM THE EQUAL RIGHTS FOR PERSONS OF COLOR, BUT IN REALITY NEED PERMISSION FROM ANGLO SAXON DEMOCRATS ON WHAT POSITIONS THEY SHOULD TAKE AGAINST THEIR OWN RACE OF PEOPLE.
PERSONALLY FROM A HETEROSEXUAL MAN'S PERSPECTIVE REGARDING PAST SUPERINTENDENT EDDIE JOHNSON, I LIKED THE MAN FELT HE WAS A GOOD PERSON, I HAVE A GREAT FRIEND WHO WORKED WITH ME AT THE CTA WHO WAS EITHER HIS PARTNER OR WORKED WITH HIM SPOKE VERY HIGHLY OF HIM.
ASSOCIATION BRINGS ABOUT ASSIMULATION, I NEVER FRATINIZED WITH BUMS ETC. A MAN IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT, IT IS A DAM SHAME THE WAY THIS MAN IS BEING VILIFIED IN THE MEDIA MY GUESS IT IS BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN THEIR IS NOT A BLACK WOMAN IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL LEVY THE MONSTROUS ALLEGATIONS ON AN ANGLO SAXON IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
HELL JEFFREY SMOLLETT MADE UP SOME ALLEGED ALLEGATIONS ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP SUPPORTERS PUTTING ROPES AROUND HIS NECK WHEN THE POLICE INVESTIGATIONS SEEMED TO CONTRADICT HIS VERSION AND THE GRAND JURY INDICTED HIM ON MULTIPLE COUNTS, IT SEEMS BECAUSE OF HIS BISEXUAL NATURE KIM FOXX DROPPED THE CHARGES AND THE MEDIA MADE A CIRCUS FRENZY OUT OF THAT MESS
IT APPEARS SOMEBODY HAS A VENDETTA AT PAST SUPERINTENDENT EDDIE JOHNSON SO A NEGROE WOMAN HAS LEVIED SEXUAL HARASSMENT CHARGES AT HIM.
IN THE MEANTIME BETWEEN TIME DEMOCRATIC JUDGES HAVE COME UP WITH A DIVERGENT TACTIC OF CREATING FAKE NEWS ABOUT THE ABOVE WHEN THE REAL NEWS SHOULD BE COVERING "WHITE NATIONALIST JUDGES AND PUPPET NEGROE JUDGES ACTING AS TERRORIST" STEALING HOMES IN THE GUISE AS FORECLOSURE, STEALING STIMULUS CHECKS DISGUISED AS CHILD SUPPORT, EXTORTING MONEY IN DIVORCE MATTERS FROM THE MEN DIVORCING THEIR WHOREISH WIVES, TAKING WOMENS CHILDREN AND AWARDING THEM TO ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER OH MY GOD THE LIST IS ENDLESS.
THIS HAS NOT BEEN POSTED YET BUT IN THE STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION (WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION) ANGLO SAXON ATTORNEYS ARE MAKING A KILLING OFF OF BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE, ARBITRATORS ARE FALSIFYING COURT ORDERS FOR ATTORNEYS WHILE THE ATTORNEY IS ACCEPTING ALLEGED KICK BACKS FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANIES DELUDING HIS CLIENT INTO BELIEVING THAT THEY ARE REPRESENTING THE INTERESTS OF THE INJURED BLACK OR BROWN EMPLOYEE; WHERE THEY ARE NOT RECEIVING ANY WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION OR SUPPORT MANY HAVE TO GET ON PUBLIC AID (THIS HAPPENED TO ME FROM THE CTA AND IBC WONDER BREAD)
IF IT WAS LEFT UP TO THE DEMOCRATS MANY WOULD LEAD YOU TO BELIEVE THAT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WAS THE CAUSE OF THESE RACIST TERRORIST ACTS AND NEED S TO BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE RIGHT AWAY BECAUSE HE IS DESTROYING CHICAGO, ILLINOIS BUT GUESS WHAT? THESE ARE DEMOCRATS WHO ARE TRYING TO DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWERS TO MAKE SURE NO INDEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL MINDED PERSONS READ THIS INFORMATION.
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
1. Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-105 quote “service of summons, summons issued in any action to review the final administrative decision of any administrative agency shall be served by registered or certified mail on the administrative agency and on each of the other defendants except in the case of a review of a final administrative decision of the regional board of school trustees, regional superintendent of schools, or state superintendent of education et al”.
Chronology of Facts: Plaintiff with due-diligence filed Motions to Disqualify Judge Valderrama for “Cause” due to “Fraud” et al. Judge Neil Cohen and Judge Mary Lane Mikva Denied Plaintiffs’ Motion; Deeming said Orders a Nullity Void.
Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Court where Judges James F. Smith, Cynthia Y. Cobb, David Ellis and Nathaniel J. Howse, Jr. Denied Plaintiffs Motion corroborating “Fraud” and Domestic Terrorism in the courts. Deeming said Order a Nullity Void.
Plaintiff appealed the Sup. Ct. of Ill. For A Writ of Madamus/Supervisory Order someone corrupt as hell mailed to Plaintiff a blank court Order Denying said Motion. Deeming said Order a Nullity Void.
Now Heather Widely. lawyers Ruth Ramirez 2nd Keith L. Spence Retainer I had to pay $7,500. Total $25,000 paid for all court fees. Plus just paid $4,500 for trumped up charges filed by the child mother Natasha
2.) Judge Pamela Elizabeth Loza known as the gate keeper rules with a iron first. Violated my civil, human and father rights since first court date 10/21/13 not letting me exercise my freedom of speech to speak or defend myself or speak up for myself and tell my side of the story? Just ordered me pay child support and had me to only have 4 hours only on Mondays after school visitations with my daughter from 3pm -7pm every week!
3.) Judge Loza demonstrated an obvious sexist racist attitude towards me and was remarkably unprofessional and ignorant of the laws and cruel. She used her robe to incite her racial hatred at me and rulings having no respect ,concern or compassion for my daughter's safety ,or development or life. Why because my daughter was an black baby .Judge Loza believes because my daughter was African American child she wasn't worthy or deserve a proper custody with a responsible father in myself because of my skin color!
4.) I filed a motion to vacate order of protection against 5 yr old daughter since 11/29/14. My lawyer Keith L. Spence and I been in front of Judge Pamela Loza 11 times to vacate order of protection so I can see and touch, my daughter to take her to chuckey cheese ,the park, etc.
5.) The sad and worse part of this is that the mother Natasha an AKA member of a college sorority has perjured her self in court filed bogus charges against saying their was domestic abuse when she knows dam well, I have never touched her in any way!
6.) Because I have filed charges against Judge Loza racist corrupt prosecutors under Anita Alvarez went along with trumped up charges that my daughters mother filed against me criminally so as to keep me from my daughter, judge (Luciano Pacini) Markam courthouse heard all of the inconsistencies and perjured statements of Natasha ignored them causing me to have to file an unnecessary appeal spend more money.
7.) If I was a white man they probably would have locked up Natasha long time ago but because of my skin color and standing up to these racist acts these corrupt judges have taken a personal racial hatred in trying to protect one another so as to prove WHITE POWER IS SUPREME IN CHICAGO JIM CROW LAWS ARE IN EFFECT!
ATTENTION CHIEF JUDGE TIMOTHY C. EVANS. (Case 13 D 080423)
I am emailing you my complaints of my child custody case with judge loza presiding. I understand the law and it takes time for custody battles. I was raised with my father and took an oath to love, support and raise my kids. I am the petitioner and only want what's right for my 5 year old daughter Kaylee. I have did every possible thing as far as filing and petitioning the court with lawyer and without. Judge Loza knows better and is not thinking or caring about the growth and development of my child .My daughter is 5yr old innocent and vulnerable somebody has to care.
Furthermore, because Boyd is aware of all the judges responsible for “Fixing” Petitioner Joe Louis Lawrence’s Bogus Paternity case 88 D 079012 when it was Dismissed September 17, 1987, and CTA case makes him furthermore untouchable by any Cook County Official because of the dirt and credible knowledge he has on all parties as his former attorney not even Timothy C. Evans, Chief Judge, Kim Foxx, States Attorney et al.
1.) Pursuant to the original court order by Judge Lyle (Dec. 9, 2019) Plaintiff’s requested 28 days to respond but demonstrated disrespect and racist animus behavior by circumventing the judges’ directive by failing to respond to Defendant’s Motions accompanied with Affidavits.
2.) Pursuant to Jan. 8, 2020 Court Order by Judge Lyle Plaintiff’s requested 28 days again to respond to all 4 Motions Defendant’s filed in Circuit Court totaling 56 days.
Please find: Postestivo Law firm bypassed responding to said court order pitched the documents to Lord & Locke Law firm P. Russel Perdew, Trustee’s Opposition to Johnson’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Trustee’s Opposition to Johnson’s Motion for Sanctions.
3.) Most importantly, Plaintiff stated Page 2 from their Opposition Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, “Johnson mentions events that purportedly took place in Federal Court. She also makes unsubstantiated claims that banks, attorneys, law firms, and judges are engaged in a conspiracy against her. Johnson’s allegations are so vague that the Trustee cannot present any evidence in response”.
4.) FACT: Plaintiff’s in their ranting rage to insult and disparage pleadings presented by Pro Se litigants not with law licenses seems to have affected the Democratic attorneys involved because said actions perpetrated by Anglo Saxon men are a norm in Chicago and is not a crime in their eyes, in that, Plaintiff never DENIED or OBJECTED to any of Defendant’s Pleadings in their response.
5.) FACT: Plaintiff’s received Defendant’s Reply Motion filed Jan. 22, 2020 did not dare impeach any of the Pleadings due to its veracity attached with an Affidavit, Plaintiff’s did not dare impeach Defendant’s Motion Striking & Objecting Petitioners’ Motion et al. due to its veracity attached with an Affidavit, Plaintiff’s did not dare impeach Defendant’s Motion Striking and Objecting Petitioners’ Motion for Extension of Time et al. due to its veracity attached with an Affidavit.
6.) A Racist or Terrorist person within the Democratic Party will never denounce their disposition to any person of color, but expects Black and Brown Judges or Politicians to do what they are told as Democrats in that said attorney with no respect for Judge Lyle or any other person of color in authority figured, he can say and do whatever, he felt because of the color of his skin knowing that Black and Brown Democrats have no authority over men like himself!
7.) Corrupt Judges or attorneys don’t follow the rules in any court or simply don’t know them because many are not fit to be judges in the first place. The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).
“No one is above the Law”, citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),
“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."
8.) Plaintiff’s attorneys would never have filed such insulting pleadings before Caucasian Judges, the sad reality is that so many Black and Brown judges going along with said criminal acts so as to be accepted by alleged members of the Democratic Party for favors or appointments.
 |
| Add caption |
