#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases: June 2020

#BLACKLIVESDONTMATTER IN CHICAGO OR IN CHICAGO COURTS
I NEED ALL WHITES ESPECIALLY WHO OPPOSES RACIAL INJUSTICE SYSTEMIC RACISM JUDICIAL CORRUPTION TO HELP ME BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE IN POWER IN CHICAGO MANY OF THEM ARE MERE FIGUREHEADS

I CAN'T SAY OUR MAYOR LIGHTFOOT FITS INTO THE ABOVE CATEGORY, I DON'T THINK SHE REALLY REALIZE THE TYPE OF PEOPLE RUNNING CHICAGO MANY OF THE BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE ARE LIKENED TO HOUSE NIGGERS ON A PLANTATION WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO DESTROY THEIR OWN COLOR TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE VERY RACIST AUTHORING THE MAYHEM NOTED IN THE COURTS.

BEING NATIVE AMERICAN AND BLACK I UNDERSTAND RACISM BETTER THAN THE RACIST ANGLO SAXON MAN UNDERSTANDS HIMSELF THIS POST DESCRIBES THE LOWEST FORM OF HUMAN BEINGS EVER TO WALK THE EARTH.

#GEORGEFLOYD PEOPLE SAW HOW HE WAS MURDERED BY A POLICE OFFICER THIS CASE DEMONSTRATES HOW THE ANGLO SAXON COPS AND JUDGES WORK TOGETHER TO COMMIT GENOCIDE AN INNOCENT MAN AND HIS CHILDREN 30+ YEARS HOW BLACK AND BROWN MEN ARE DESTROYED.

THE VERY PEOPLE WHO ALLOWED OUTSIDE FORCES TO ALLEGEDLY INFLUENCE THEM TO DECIMATE THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS WITH THE RIOTING AND LOOTING OF STORES THAT THEIR MOTHERS FATHERS AND GRANDPARENTS HAD TO PATRONIZE ARE THE SAME TYPE OF PERSONS IN THE COURT SYSTEM--READ IT FOR YOURSELF.

NEVER EVER HAVE I EVER RECEIVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE FROM ANY BLACK PERSON TRYING TO SUPPORT ME OR PROVIDE RESOURCES TO HELP ME EXCEPT JERRY BUTLER, LUIS GUITERREZ AS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA TWITTER BEING IN 84 COUNTRIES RECEIVING PRAYERS AND SUPPORT FFROM SO MANY @LINDALEEKING, @LISAROMANO THE NAMES ARE SO MANY AND I THANK EVERYONE OF THEM TRYING TO TWEET TO THEIR FOLLOWERS IN THE HOPES SOMEONE REACH OUT AND HELP AND I THANK EVERY TWITTER NEWS FEED THAT FEATURED MY POSTS.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP ENDORSED STIMULUS CHECK FOR EVERYONE DUE TO THE CORONOVIRUS AND MY CHECK WAS STOLEN FROM MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE GUISE OF CHILD SUPPORT.

THE WORSE PART OF THIS IS THAT, I TESTED POSITIVE (APRIL 14 BUT RECEIVED THE CONFIRMATION THAT FRIDAY APRIL 17) WITH NO SYMPTOMS THE ONLY REASON WHY I EVEN TOOK THE TEST BECAUSE MY FAMILY MEMBER WAS SICK WITH A FEVER FOR CONSECUTIVE DAYS MONDAY THE PHYSICIAN DIRECTED ME TO TAKE THEM TO BE TESTED.

PRIOR FRIDAY AND SATURDAY, I HAD INHALED ONIONS, ORANGE PEELINGS AND LEMONS AND WAS ABLE TO HOLD MY BREATH TAKING IN THE STEAM FOR 120 SECONDS

MY DOCTOR INDICATED THAT THE ANTIBODIES IN MY BODY WAS ENOUGH TO FIGHT OFF THE VIRUS WHICH IS THE REASON, I HAD NO SYMPTONS.

I INQUIRED ABOUT THE CORONAVIRUS CHECK VIA THE IRS AND RECEIVED A LETTER FROM ALABAMA US DEPT OF TREASURY STATING THAT $1200.00 WAS SENT TO ILL DEPT OF HLTH AND FAM SVCS DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES (5-28-20)

I WAS FUCKING PISSED BECAUSE THIS SHIT IS NEVER ENDING FIGHTING CORRUPTION AND RACISM IN CHICAGO COURTS, I CALLED 1 800 447-4278 AND THERE WAS 30 PEOPLE AHEAD OF ME ON THE PHONE 49 MIN 29 SEC AND LEARNED SOME REMARKABLE INFORMATION ON JUST HOW RACIST THESE JUDGES ARE MAKING THE POLICE OFFICER THAT KILLED #GEORGEFLOYD LOOK LIKE THEY CAME FROM THE SAME WOMB.

1.) I EXPLAINED TO THE PERSON WHO WAS VERY PROFESSIONAL AND EXTREMELY COURTEOUS IT IS CLEAR THEY FELT MY PAIN, THAT THIS CASE WAS DISMISSED SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 AND THAT THEIR WAS NEVER ANY ORDER FOR ME TO PAY ANY CHILD SUPPORT-----HER REPLY WAS THAT THERE WAS NO CHILD SUPPORT ORDER ONLY AN ARREARAGE ORDER, THE PATERNITY CASE WAS IN FACT OPEN AND A COURT WAS ENTERED MARCH 19,2019 AND THIS IS WHAT THEY WERE GOING BY, I WAS LIVID!!!! MY REPLY HOW IN THE HELL CAN THEIR BE AN ARREARAGE ORDER WITHOUT AN ORDER?

2.) SHE WAS NOT ABLE TO ANSWER THAT BUT ASKED ME IF I HAD A COURT ORDER SHOWING THE CASE WAS DISMISSED? MY REPLY WAS YES, SHE WAS ABLE TO GO INTO THE COMPUTER AND SEE THAT A NUMBER OF COURRT APPEARANCES WAS HAD IN 2004 AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT JUDGE HARACZ HAD ENTERED A NUMBER OF ILLEGAL ORDERS KNOWING THAT WAS NOT MY CHILD AND I CAN'T GET IN FRONT OF KNOW JUDGE WHO IS WILLING TO LISTEN TO ME.

3.) SHE STATED MY CASE HAD TO GO TO THE REGIONAL OFFICE IN COOK COUNTY BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT HELP ME THEY ARE A CALL CENTER AND SOMEONE WILL BE IN TOUCH YOU WITHIN 30 DAYS.

4.) THE WOMAN STARTED GOING THROUGH THE DATABASE AND NOTICED IN 2004, THAT I HAD APPEARED IN COURT A NUMBER OF TIMES-----ON NOV 21, 2002 TYCEE LAQITA HIGHTOWER WAS EMANCIPATED SHE WAS 18 YEARS OLD!!

5.) BECAUSE JUDGE HARACZ WAS A RACIST PROBABLY A KU KLUX KLANSMAN HE DEMONSTRATED IN HIS RULINGS AND ABOVE THE LAW ACTS HE WAS UNTOUCHABLE PROVING #BLACKLIVESDON'TMATTER.

6.) THE SICKEST PART TO THIS SHIT IS THAT, I WAS ON WELFARE WITH A WIFE AN 5 CHILDREN TAKING MY CHILDREN AND WIFE AT THAT TIME TO PSYCHIATRIST 2-3 TIMES A WEEK FOR FAMILY AND INDIVIDUAL THERAPY AND PUBLIC AID DID A REFERRAL FOR ME TO SEE A PSYCHIATRIST BECAUSE I WAS ASSERTING TO THEM THAT, I HAD TO USE MY PUBLIC AID MONEY TO PAY FOR CHILD SUPPORT WHEN THEY LOOKED IN THE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR CHILD SUPPORT THEIR WAS NO COURT ORDER FOR ME TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT SO THEY THOUGHT, I WAS HAVING SOME MENTAL ISSUES WHEN I PRESENTED COURT ORDERS WITHOUT JUDGES SIGNATURES ON THEM REMANDING ME INTO CUSTODY FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT TRACI POWELL, MD (BLACK WOMAN) TOLD ME THAT MY PAPERWORK WAS FALSE AND SOMEHOW, I CREATED THIS CASE IN MY MIND AND SHE WANTED ME TO TAKE SOME PILLS DEPAKOTE, I ASKED HER WHAT ARE THESE PILLS FOR? SHE SAID TO HELP YOU TO SLEEP, MY REPLY, I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEMS SLEEPING.

7.) I WAS LATER REFERRED TO FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIST AT RUSH HOSPITAL WHO REVIEWED MY SITUATION IT WAS 2 PSYCHIATRIST COLLABORATING AND WAS SHOCKED AT WHAT, I WAS ASSERTING WITH VALID DOCUMENTATIONS THEY SAID MY CASE WAS VERY INTENSE AND EXTENSIVE AND EXPLAINS THE IMPACT OF THE MENTAL ISSUES AFFECTING MY FAMILY AND THAT THEY HAD NO IDEA THIS TYPE OF RACISM EXISTED IN THIS CITY THEY THOUGHT THESE ISSUE WERE OF THE 1940 AND 50'S AND THEY WERE CACAUSIAN.

IN MY OPINION BECAUSE DR CARL BELL'S (DECEASED) REKNOWN PSYCHIATRIST FOR UIC CLINICS WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE ME TO BE MENTALLY ILL QUINN WHO WAS THE GOVERNOR DEFUNDED THE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS CITING CUTBACKS.

8.) DEC. 17, 2018 THE CASE WAS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JEAN MARGARET COCOZZA, SHE SAID FLAT OUT, SHE WAS NOT TAKING THIS CASE BUT WAS VERY POLITE.

9.) THE CASE WAS REASSIGNED TO LATINA JUDGE ELIZABETH LOREDO-RIVERA, I ASKED HER IF SHE WAS GOING TO RECUSE HERSELF (THE FIRST FEMALE JUDGE WITH THE DEMEANOR SHE WAS NOT TAKING SHIT OFF NOBODY SHE DIDN'T GIVE A FUCK WHO YOU WERE) BECAUSE GOOD JUDGES DON'T STAY ON THIS CASE, SHE ASKED ME WHY THE OTHER JUDGE RECUSED HERSELF FROM THIS CASE? MY REPLY WAS TO BE HONEST YOUR HONOR, I REALLY DIDN'T ASK HER BUT THIS IS AN INCEST CASE WHERE A POLICE OFFICER IMPREGNATED HIS DAUGHTER AND I WAS FRAMED FOR HIS CHILD TO KEEP HIM FROM GOING TO JAID BECAUSE THEI IS THE SECOND DAUGHTER HE IMPREGNATED AND SHE IS A POLICE OFFICER NOW THIS CASE WAS DISMISSED SEPTEMBER 17, 1987, THEY WENT BACK TO COURT WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE AND I AM ON WELFARE, LEGALLY HOMELESS CTA WILL NOT REINSTATE BACK TO WORK TREATING ME LIKE A FELON, HER REPLY "I AM NOT GOING ANYWHERE"

10.) JUDGE RIVERA ASKED ME WHO WAS THE LAST ATTORNEY OF RECORD, I TOLD HER THE STATES ATTORNEY SHE LOOKED AT ME EMPHATICALLY AND HAD HER CLERK A WHITE WOMAN TO LOOK INTO THE COMPUTER TO VERIFY WHAT, I HAD JUST ASSERTED AND SHE CONCURRED IT WAS THE STATES ATTORNEY, SHE REQUESTED THAT, I PRESENT THE COURT ORDER AND DOCUMENTS TO THEM AT CHILD SUPPORT AND COME BACK WITH PROOF THEY RECEIVED THE DOCUMENTS ON THE NEXT COURT DATE WHICH WAS JAN 22, 2019 10:00 AM.

11.) THAT ON JAN 22, I COMPLIED WITH THE JUDGES DIRECTIVE AND HAD THE SIGNATURE OF AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVING THE COURT ORDER AND WAS MET WITH ANOTHER JUDGE (I KNEW SOME SHIT WAS UP, I TOLD THE CLERK, I WANTED TO PASS THE CASE UNTIL JUDGE RIVERA RETURNS RACIST JUDGE MYRON MACKOFF DECLINED AND SAID HE WANTED A STATES ATTORNEY PRESENT)
KEEP IN MIND FRANCOISE IS A CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER PROPERLY NOTICED NEVER SHOWED UP TO COURT.
A- THE STATES ATTORNEY TOLD THE JUDGE THAT THE STATES ATTORNEY WAS NOT INVOLVED AND THAT THIS CASE DID NOT BELONG HERE SHE SOUNDED CRAZY SO THE JUDGES CLERK RESPECTFULLY INTERJECTED INFORMED THE JUDGE WHAT JUDGE RIVERA HAD INSTRUCTED ME TO DO BECAUSE THE LAST ATTORNEY OF RECORD WAS THE STATES ATTORNEY THE STATES ATTORNEY THEN SAID, I AM JUST DOING WHAT MY SUPERVISOR INSTRUCTED ME TO SAY YOUR HONOR IS THAT NO STATES ATTORNEY IS OR WAS ON THIS CASE-----THAT MUST HAVE BEEN SOME TYPE OF RACIAL CODE OF SOME SORT BECAUSE JUDGE MACKOFF WHO HAD NO JURISDICTION ON THE MATTER DISMISSED JUDGE RIVERA'S CASE HIS ATTITUDE WAS FUCK YOU NIGGER!
B-

12.) THAT ON JAN 25, I FILED A MOTION TO VACATE JUDGE MACKOFF'S RULING FOR JUDGE RIVERA'S COURT CALL WHICH WAS FEB 26, AND WAS MET WITH ANOTHER JUDGE TREVINO (HE SEEMED KINDA PROFESSIONAL AND WAS AWARE SOME SHIT WAS GOING ON WITH THE CASE) A STATES ATTORNEY APPEARED, THE JUDGE DIDN'T PAY ATTENTION TO THE STATE AT ALL, I EXPLAINED TO HIM WHAT HAPPENED HE WAS APOLOGETIC TO MY PLIGHT BUT MADE IT CLEAR NO SITTING JUDGE CAN OVERRULE ANOTHER SITTING JUDGES RULING WE DO NOT HAVE THAT AUTHORITY ONLY THE APPELLATE COURT CAN OVERTURN OUR ORDERS, HE SAID THAT, HE WOULD HAVE TO STRIKE MY MOTION NOT DENY IT AND THIS MATTER HAVE TO GO BEFORE THE JUDGE WHO ENTERED THE ORDER.

13.) THAT ON MARCH 19, I APPEARED BEFORE JUDGE MACKOFF IN THE BASEMENT OF THE DALEY CENTER HE DENIED THE MOTION BUT MADE IT CLEAR THIS WAS AN APPELLATE COURT ISSUE ANY EXCUSE TO SAY FUCK YOU NIGGER!

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE )

)

Francoise Hightower ) Judge Jean M. Cocozza

Petitioner )

) Cal 95

VS )

) No. 88 D 079012

Joe Louis Lawrence )

Respondent ) Room 1506

MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137

Now comes the Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Heterosexual MAN BORN & RAISED a FREEMAN Promise and Swear to this Honorable Court as follows:

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

A- Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v. United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9^th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v. C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9^th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575, 66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 61, 25 L. Ed. 93.

B- “A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44, 45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d 227-232

C- “A Void Judgment from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1^st Dist. 1964)

D- To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9^th Cir. 1989);

E- A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d 384 (1990).

1. That case 88 D 079012 is a “FIXED CASE” under the alleged authority of Alderman Edward Burke.

2. Said case was originally DISMISSED under case 85 D 068184 September 17, 1987 before judge D. Adolphus Rivers where Richard J. Daley was the States Attorney.

3. That because Richard J. Daley allegedly wanted no part to unlawfully “FIXING” said Paternity case against the Respondent where there were allegations of William Jenkins Hightower a Chicago Police Officer impregnating his second biological daughter Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, the first daughter being Danielle Hightower as a minor.

4. That because of Francoise’s fathers’ political connection to Joseph V. Roddy who was allegedly a great colleague to Edward Burke orchestrated the “Fixing” of said case assigning certain judges of Irish descent to do what was necessary framing the Respondent for a child that was never his.

5. That under case 85 D 068184 Respondent DEMANDED a JURY TRIAL and was properly served had two independent paternity tests that excluded him from paternity but was altered to state he was the father from Cook County Hospital and American Red Cross Hospital.

6. That under case 88 D 079012 Respondent was never served!!! There were never any paternity tests nor were there a Motion filed to consolidate the 85 D 068184 pursuant to the Feb 1988 court order if the Respondent was never served.

7. That because of the confidence in Edward Burke’s assignment of judges being appointed to this case and because D. Adolphus Rivers being at the time an African American his court directive was ignored.

8. That on May 18, 1988, hereto attached, a blank court order absent a judges’ signature or attorney information finding the Respondent in Default on a plethora of “Fraudulent misrepresentations” made to the court about serving him which was never true.

9. That Respondent had retained an Attorney Robert Anthony Egan who for years at that time aggressively represented and defended him and was the attorney of record but was never notified of any attorney going back before the clerks’ office refiling the matter.

10. That Respondent was a CTA Bus Operator at 69^th Ashland where Francoise appeared at the garage in her Police Officers uniform and left a copy of the May 1988 court order, clerks and bus operators described her perfectly’

11. That Respondent immediately notified Robert Egan of the court order, he purportedly went to vacate the date of Feb. 23, 1988 service of alleged service but vacated Feb. 24, 1988.

12. That because of the “Fraudulent admissions” the May 18, 1988 court order demonstrating Respondent was never ORDERED to pay any child support still legally standing to this very day.

13. That alderman Edward Burke appointed an alcoholic Associate Irish judge who was always drunk James T. Meehan to preside over the case where he “Trespassed upon the Laws” ordered the Respondent to pay Francoise’s attorney Joseph V. Roddy legal fees despite of testimony from Francoise having had gonorrhea and received medicine from her physician prescribing medicine for her and her partner, Respondent never had any disease from her but she had testified Respondent was the only person she had sex with and the child was allegedly born with an infection.

A- Respondent had a diary of the women he slept with and the date he had sex with Francoise was the second week of March but was pregnant in the second week of February.

B- Judge Meehan heard testimony of John Patterson III Francoise’s physician alter medical records to reflect the child was born premature.

C- Judge Meehan ordered the Respondent never to see the child because he knew the child was not his but ordered him to pay child support.

14. That Alderman Burke appointed Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney to preside over the Hightower case where he “Trespassed upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason” signed a Bogus Warrant against the Respondent for an Order of Protection in favor of Francoise. Respondent had not seen or communicated with Francoise.

A- That Ronald Bartkowicz threatened the Respondent in open court, stated if “he ever tried to be reinstated back to the CTA he was going to have him locked up because CTA said you are not an employee they fired you.”

B- That the Cook County Sheriff Deputy informed the Respondent Fuck him and what he said he is working with the CTA he was an attorney and should not be on this case, Respondent was shocked and scared because he had no idea what was going on and why a warrant was ever issued.

C- That the Respondent filed a Motion to Disqualify Ronald Bartkowicz due to the conflict, said judge was shocked asked him how did he know?

15. That Alderman Burke appointed David E. Haracz a former Legal Aid attorney who “Trespassed upon the Laws” engaged in “Treason” was a Supervisor at the time Respondent was seeking their support they had turned him down for any representation stating because there were too many judges on the case.

A- That Judge Haracz stated, “He realize this may not be his child he is just the bill collector, he has to get money from him some kind of way”

B- That the Respondent presented documents establishing the fact he was a certified CTA employee, Haracz stated, “you know, you are an employee you were telling the truth all along, you know, you are really smart, I mean really really smart” In a startling dumbfounded manner.

C- That Haracz placed the Respondent in Contempt for Allegedly owing child support, Respondent had to pay monies from his welfare payments and was sent to jail.

16. That every judge Burke appointed became “Private Citizens” as diabolical Racist White men had placed him in Contempt of Court for Allegedly owing Child Support when the record demonstrated he owed nothing.

17. That Alderman Burke appointed the ultimate racist Timothy P. Murphy, he demonstrated a personal hate because the Respondent was well versed in the laws when it was the Respondent’s opportunity to cross-examine Russ Hinkle from Wonder Bread human resource department, to prove he was an employee off work with a torn rotator cuff resulting from being injured on the truck not receiving any money (workman’s compensation), he ordered the Deputies to Remand the Respondent into Custody for Contempt of Court, the Deputies were shocked they expressed this is some deep bullshit, they said this is not about child support, Respondent explained to them about the father being a Police Officer impregnated his daughter who was a Police officer, they said, that they heard about the Respondent and this case and was very supportive to him. Respondent never got the opportunity to prove he was an active employee at Wonder Bread;

A- That allegedly Moche Jacobius whom Respondent had met prior as an Assistant Attorney General who learned of the Respondent fighting a Bogus Paternity case long before he became a judge, told him that he heard about that matter wished him success provided an attorney Gerald Norgren to defend him in the Contempt matter before Murphy.

B- That during this time never did Haracz or Murphy ever have a court file on the Respondent it was the States Attorney always providing documents, Respondent repeatedly refuted the allegations with numerous motions but was ignored and Denied.

C- Respondent was in Court because the Illinois Department of Public Aid was representing Francoise an active Police Officer when her daughter was a grown woman and the Respondent was on Public Aid with his family.

D- That Murphy had the audacity to say in front of the Respondent and Norgren “Today is your lucky day, I can’t lock you up anymore”

E- Respondent was on welfare with is wife and children and the judges were forcing him to pay his welfare money to pay child support.

F- That while everyone was falsifying and “Trespassing upon the Laws” trying to help Francoise in this “Heinous Diabolical Nefarious Acts” she notified school officials at Bogan High School in Chicago 79^th Pulaski that “she did not know who the father was of her daughter “

18. That Alderman Burke had appointed Associate judge Morgan Hamilton as a permanent judge during this time who had a self-hate for her own skin color and would do anything to protect a corrupt white judge wrote on a court order “that Respondent left a cloud of mistrust by the Cook County Sheriff claiming he was a CTA employee” as she was trying to protect Ronald Bartkowicz.

19. That Alderman Edward Burke appointed Leida J. Santiago- Gonzalez she was on the bench cussing, I don’t know who the fuck he think he is referring to the Respondent he will be going to jail, Respondent felt like he was about to have a bile movement but nothing was coming out he fell to the floor, he couldn’t see but was able to hear somebody shouted he is having an anxiety attack call the paramedics, the judge said his ass better be having something, someone provided something to smell and gave him some water, the Deputies comforted him said he didn’t need to go to the hospital try to breathe and get yourself together.

A- Respondent never got the opportunity to stand before the judge.

20. That because Alderman Edward Burke is the Author of Racist hate in acquiring judges who will abide by his rules of “Trespassing upon the Laws” and engage in “Treason Offenses” is why no Democratic judge of merit or any person with integrity would assist the Respondent because the Democratic Party is the original party of racial hatred.

A- Democratic Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, Former Police Superintendent McCarthy, Former States Attorney, Attorney General Lisa Madigan received Notice and knowledge of Corruption on Police Officer et al. via email hereto attached.

B- Democratic States Attorney Kim Foxx received Notice and Knowledge via email and Memo of States Attorneys using their positions to assist a Police Officer (retired).

C- That Respondent was informed by certain Caucasians that no Person Democratic of Irish or Polish ethnicity will ever rule in his favor against the perpetrators involved and especially none of his Bros referencing Black men fraternal or otherwise, in that they said they are the worse persons he was to ever go before for help because they do what they are told but there are some good white judges who will help him.

D- To validate the verity of Par C Respondent was living in an abandoned building that was “Nigger Rigged” the terminology city officials used to describe a said building CHA approved the respondent to move in case 12-M-711552 where judge George Scully had vacated order of possession in Respondent’s favor, allegedly Edward Burke had Leonard Murray a Black judge to issue an order for the Cook County Sheriff to break into his home 10058 S Vernon using a Battering Ram because the owner was connected to certain City officials where he did not have to pay water bills and was collecting section 8 monies by “Fixing” up abandon buildings not cleared by the city inspectors by bypassing city permits.

E- That Respondent lost 25-30 years of his possessions in the 4-bedroom home and was informed if he attempted to enter the building because a green NO TRESPASSING Notice was Posted on the front door.

F- That Alderman Edward Burke allegedly orchestrated the entire conspiracy seeking to ascertain what documents respondent in his possession Respondent had transcripts of the entire 88 D 079012 case and the entire original court file of 85 D 068184 and credit reports showing student loans paid off excellent credit and scores of 800+ in that after Respondent’s home was broken into his identity was tampered with someone went into his credit and deleted every item that was paid off in good status and placed a number of false entries on credit report by bringing his credit score to 500 and 600 in an attempt to blemish his credit score so as to keep him from qualifying from moving into certain buildings with his section 8 voucher with poor credit.

G-

21. That every person who received Notice and Knowledge of the aforementioned acts and did nothing have become complicit as active “Trespassers of the Laws” engaging in “Treason Offenses”

22. That a certain person or persons of white ethnicity allegedly connected to Edward Burke tried reaching out to him to leave the Respondent alone let him go back to work with the CTA and give him his money, Burkes alleged reply, “Fuck that Nigger as long as he is the Alderman Respondent will never go back to the CTA and he ain’t getting shit!”

A-That because Alderman Edward Burke controls all the Niggers at the CTA and Local ATU 241 and those under his control Respondent has never been properly reinstated to the CTA because of the intimate nature Burke seems to have against men he seems to affectionately hates and disparages in conversations referencing them as Niggers!

B- That because Alderman Edward Burke allegedly controls 98% of the Black men on the Cook County Bench allegedly authorized Franklin Ulysses Valderrama to “FIX” case 2015 CH 01670 a Discrimination Suit Respondent filed against various units who refused to allow him to rent into there buildings (credit score 716) with his voucher because of his skin color they took his fucking money didn’t return it, they DEFAULTED and Valderrama had no jurisdiction on the case because Moche Jacobius signed a court order removing him from the case. Valderrama became a God and law unto himself ruled on the case keeping Cecilia Gamrath from presiding over the case, he stated he didn’t accept certified mail nor did he except the Cook County Sheriff serving the parties.

23. There is not a Black man in Chicago politics with any testicles to stand up to Burke to tell him he is wrong but will remain in the closet hoping nobody will ever discover who they are.

A- INDUCING RELIANCE

To prevail in a cause of action for fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.

In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.

24. That Respondent was referred to William S. Boyd by a remarkable attorney James Montgomery who had him to sit and explain his issue for at least 30 minutes and was impressed with Respondents presentation, a member of Trinity church Boyd is in no way anything like Mr. Montgomery blacks like Boyd in the Cook County courts as Democrats are sell outs destroying their own ethnic groups so as to be accepted by the likes of Edward Burke whom has no love for persons of color and has demonstrated in the aforementioned how he destroys men of color and the Demonic Hate exercised as he selects and appoints judges to uphold his doctrines circumventing the laws of the United States constitution enforcing Jim Crow Laws.

25. That in furtherance to the above, Respondent asserts with authority and based on such information and belief, demonstrate beyond the Preponderance of the evidence standard that all judges acted as a “Private Citizens” and has “Trespassed upon the laws” whom this cause has pended before, has demonstrated taking part in an “Organized Conspiracy” with said Alderman Burke by making sure Joe Louis Lawrence remain oppressed for being a Heterosexual “FREEMAN” standing up to the unlawful acts perpetrated at him by racist white men engaging in Terrorist Acts in the Democratic Party. .

A- That all judges acted as a “Private Citizens” they never had jurisdiction on the Respondent to compel him to submit to any laws from any court compelling him to pay child support or enter any orders finding him in Contempt of Court, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

B- Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728 (Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants’ basic constitutional rights;

26. That Respondent has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of Evidence that said acts demonstrates how Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4the ed. 1992).

A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

27. That Respondent’s (former attorney William S. Boyd) has demonstrated being unfit and should be disbarred from the practice of law for his criminal involvement violating every aspect of Illinois Ethics by misrepresenting the Respondent to allegedly receive an Associate Judges position.

Ethics

All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trial lawyers must be particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.

RPC 3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal," sets forth the standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle." Section (a) of that rule states:

(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not:

(1) Make a statement of material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is false;

(2) Fail to disclose to a tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3) Fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

(4) Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;

Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:

If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it , a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify an award of sanctions. BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1^st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.

Despite the United States Constitution and Civil Rights Act Plaintiff has not been treated as a citizen of the United States in that whites under this Political System has been able to circumvent the laws and commit treason like offenses because they are the majority in control in Chicago, Ill. Political system; Pursuant to Vigus v. O’Bannon is an example of the “Fraudulent” Racist Acts perpetrated against persons like the Plaintiff standing up to Racial Injustice and Terrorism!

Plaintiff’s license was never suspended because there was never a signed court order stating he owed any child support but was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support;

A. Plaintiff Lost his job with Sheriff Department in the Administrative capacity because of the Bogus Paternity case;

B. Despite scoring in the top 5-10% on the Police Exam a Commander with the Police Department could not bring him on the Police department because of some integrity issues that had to be resolved with the Bogus Paternity case;

C. Plaintiff lost his job driving a School bus (Reliable who later went out of business) because someone was forcing them to accept bogus court orders for wage garnishees where Plaintiff was forced to get on Welfare because of all of the money extorted from his salary;

D. Plaintiff was rear ended by drunk Police Officer standing still driving a CTA bus Officer totaled his van, Plaintiff sustained a back injury while off work injured on duty allegedly City hall officials and CTA personnel stole his wages and tried to destroy said personnel records saying Plaintiff was never a CTA employee.

E. Despite filing a grievance the Union never acted on the matter even up to this date, but the union Javier Perez called the Plaintiff last year telling them they never received a letter from his physician stating he was fit to return to return to work, if he had that letter we could do something about getting you reinstated, what he did not realize Plaintiff had the information faxed it to him never heard from him again;

F. Plaintiff got accepted to Northwestern Law School scored very high on LSAT could not attend school because of the plethora of Racist Diabolical Obstructions no white man have to endure living in Chicago, Illinois

G. They have retaliated on Plaintiff’s children along with a plethora of other “Fraudulent Acts;

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE )

)

Francoise Hightower ) Judge Jean M. Cocozza

Petitioner )

) Cal 95

VS )

) No. 88 D 079012

Joe Louis Lawrence )

Respondent ) Room 1506

In Accordance to all of The Cook County Circuit Court Rules

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE RELIEF REQUESTED

The canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531, 533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Dec 708 (1988). Although they represent the best thoughts of the organized bar, it has been held that these canons are non-enforceable other than through the disciplinary proceedings. Ettinger v. Rolewick, 140 Ill.App.3d 295, 488 N.E.2d 598, 94 Ill.Dec.599 (1^st Dist. 1986). Disciplinary proceedings and sanctions are strictly within the province of the Supreme Court. Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. Yates, 172 Ill.App.3d 519, 526 N. E2d 1115, 122 Ill. Dec 576 (4^th Dist.), appeal denied, the Illinois Supreme Court, through its disciplinary arm, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, is the only forum for exacting such punishment. Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp., 297 Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Dec. 78 (1^st Dist. 1998). The ultimate authority to regulate and define the practice of law rests with the Supreme Court. Perto v. Board of Review, Illinois Department of Employment Security, 274 Ill. App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933 (2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill. 2d 581 (1995).

Acts constituting direct, criminal contempt

A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889 WL 2373 (1^st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1^st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1^st Dist. 1939).

Official misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.

False statements

            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients.   99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11

            Three-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH 358.

            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.

            Censure was recommended sanction for attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504

          One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 191.

            Disbarment was recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist.   94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469

Fraud on court

            Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause, committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts or legal profession into disrepute. 96 Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 118.

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent Respectfully prays:

1.) That all court orders be VACATED due to them being a NULLITY based upon the reasons cited in this document and noted in the Affidavits and appropriate Sanctions be imposed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137:

2.) That the Chief Judge or Presiding Judge summons Federal authorities to ascertain the criminal allegations noted to determine what prosecutorial remedies are afforded in this matter;

3.) That Pursuant to Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.

“Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

“Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.

“Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)

4.) That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”

5.) That this court collaborate and transfer certain parts of these issues where they may not have jurisdiction on parties complicit in said conspiracies be charged with terrorist acts to the Federal tribunal;

6.) That Cook County Sheriffs along with Federal Officials be present until this matter is properly adjudicated.

7.) That Alderman Edward Burke be Ordered not to proceed any further selecting any more judges Instanter;

8.) That all Judges name and implicated be Ordered to Recuse themselves pending an investigation for their roles recorded in this document;

9.) That the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause for Remand for Perjury and “Fraud” for all parties complicit in these matters.

For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted,

____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

PO Box 490075

Chicago, IL 60649-0075

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE )

)

Francoise Hightower ) Judge Jean M. Cocozza

Petitioner )

) Cal 95

VS )

) No. 88 D 079012

Joe Louis Lawrence )

Respondent ) Room 15

AFFIDAVIT

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted Notary

____________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Counsel Pro Se

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

IN RE )

)

Francoise Hightower ) Judge Jean M. Cocozza

Petitioner )

) Cal 95

VS )

) No. 88 D 079012

Joe Louis Lawrence )

Respondent ) Room 1506

NOTICE OF

Please be advised that on December , 2018, Respondent has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion to Reinstate Case 88 D 079012 et al.; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Jean M. Cocozza or any Judge in her stead Jan. 3, 2019 , at 9:30 am in room 1506.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Chicago Housing Authority Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Office of the General Counsel Christian T. Novay

Asst Gen Counsel 55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800

Maria Sewell Joseph Chicago, Il 60603

60 East Van Buren

Chicago, Ill 60605 Seyfarth & Shaw

Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris

, Suite 2400

Chicago, Ill. 60603

TO AAG Tyler Roland Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601

General Law Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300

Chicago, Ill. 60601 Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.

#JudicialCorruption in Chicago, Illinois how to fix cases

Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Thursday, June 18, 2020

About Me