JUSSIE SMOLLETT IS PROVING SOMETHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE'S LEGAL SYSTEM THAT MANY IS HOPING REMAIN A SECRET

1.) JUSSIE SMOLLETT HAS PROUDLY ADMITTED HIMSELF TO BE GAY.

2.) JUSSIE SMOLLETT HAS FABRICATED EVENTS SURROUNDING PRESIDENT TRUMP'S CONSTITUENTS WHERE CHICAGO POLICE LATER DETERMINED HE ORCHESTRATED THE ATTACKS ON HIMSELF.

3.) COOK COUNTY GRAND JURY INDICTED HIM ON 16 FELONY COUNTS---KEEP IN  IN MIND HE ALLEGED HATE CRIMES WERE PERPETRATED ON HIM.

4.) STATES ATTORNEY KIM FOXX USED HER POSITION AND AUTHORITY DROPPED ALL CHARGES AGAINST HIM

5.) THE CITY OF CHICAGO IS SUING JUSSIE SMOLLETT FOR THE NUMBER OF MAN HOURS POLICE HAVE EXHAUSTED TRYING TO ASCERTAIN SUSPECTS THAT PERPETRATED ANY CRIMES ON HIM.

6.) UNBEKNOWN TO JUSSIE CHICAGO IS A RACIST CITY FILLED WITH HATE BUT JUDGES APPOINTED BY ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE IS SEEMINGLY PARTIAL TO GAY BLACK MEN NOT HETEROSEXUAL MEN OF COLOR.

7.) FOR JUSSIE SMOLLETT TO NOW WANT TO SUE THE CITY OF CHICAGO FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN SPITE OF KIM FOXX PUTTING POSSIBLY HER CAREER ON THE LINE TO SAVE AN UNGRATEFUL INDIVIDUAL IS ALL THE REASONS WHY THIS PARTICULAR POST IS BEING BLOGGED ALL OVER THE WORLD.

A HOMOSEXUAL OR BISEXUAL MAN CAN STAB HIS WIFE 40 TIMES IN THE MOUTH AND CALL ON ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE LIKE HE IS SOME TYPE OF JESUS CHRIST AND SOLICIT THE RIGHT TYPE OF JUDGE TO GET THE MAN OFF FOR MURDER AND COLLECT $250,000.00 AND SHARE IT WITH HIS HOMOSEXUAL LOVER, A BLACK MAN KILLING HIS WIFE SO AS LONG AS BLACKS KILLING ONE ANOTHER IT IS OK PROVIDED YOU PAY OFF THE RIGHT ALDERMAN.

I AM A HETEROSEXUAL MAN WHO HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT THE ALLEGED RACIST HOMOSEXUAL JUDGES WITH FAMILIES SLEEPING WITH BLACK JUDGES OR POLITICIANS WHO HAVE PERPETRATED HATE CRIMES ON ME SIMPLY BECAUSE I AM NOT GAY AND NOT ONE PERSON IN THE MEDIA OR KIM FOXX OR TIMOTHY CALVIN EVANS INITIATED ANY TYPE OF INVESTIGATION INTO MY ALLEGATIONS.

WHAT IS EVEN WORSE HERE IS TWO SENIOR CITIZENS A RETIRED POLICE OFFICER AND RETIRED SCHOOL TEACHER WHO ARE VICTIMS OF TERRORIST JUDGES IN THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE TERRORIST ENTERPRISE HAVE BEEN FIGHTING RACISM AND NIGGERCISM WHERE DEMOCRATS IN THE MACHINE LAUGHING AT THE FBI BECAUSE THEY HAVE INSURGENTS IN ALL COURTS DESTROYING THE LIVES OF HETEROSEXUALS, ELDERLY, PERSONS OF COLOR ETC.

KIM FOXX DID NOT OPEN HER MOUTH OR ATTEMPT TO HELP THESE SENIOR CITIZENS AS WOMEN OF COLOR IS IT BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT LESBIANS?

JUSSIE I HAVE SUED THE CITY OF CHICAGO BUT BECAUSE SO MANY BLACK JUDGES APPOINTED TO THE BENCH BY ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE THEIR IS NOT A BLACK JUDGE IN COOK COUNTY WILL HONOR YOUR SUIT BECAUSE YOU HAVE MADE AN ASS OUT OF EVERYONE.

KIM FOXX IN MY OPINION KEPT YOU FROM GOING IN FRONT OF POSSIBLY A HETEROSEXUAL JUDGE BY DROPPING THE CHARGES BUT DUE TO YOUR GRANDIOSE NATURE YOU ARE STILL GOING BEFORE SOME OF THE MOST RACIST JUDGES, THAT YOUR DELUDED ACTIONS COULD NOT FATHOM.

YOUR LAWYERS ARE GOING TO GET PAID IN THE END YOU WILL BE THE LOSER BECAUSE I DON'T CARE WHO IS REPRESENTING YOU IF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OR THE FBI FINDS THAT KIM FOXX ACTED AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN DROPPING THE CHARGES YOUR ASS IS UP SHITS CREEK!

IT IS A DAM SHAME SO MANY HETEROSEXUAL PEOPLE ARE FACING REAL ISSUES OF RACISM, HATE CRIMES AND SEXISM BECAUSE OF THEIR SEXUALITY AND SKIN COLOR NOBODY IS ADDRESSING THIS BUT YOU ARE ALL IN THE NEWS.

JUSSIE SMOLLETT WHAT YOU CONCOCTED IN YOUR HEAD IS A TRUE REALITY ONLY THESE ARE DEMOCRATS PERPETRATING THESE TERRORIST ACTS NOT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. 

ANYTIME A GROUP OR A MAJORITY OF AN ETHNIC GROUP USES THEIR SKIN COLOR AND OR SEXUALITY IN COMBINATION TO OPPRESS OR DENY A PERSON THEIR CIVIL LIBERTIES ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION BECAUSE THEY MAY NOT BE OF THE MAJORITY ETHNIC OR SEXUAL MAKE UP IS A TERRORIST ACT.

SO IT IS NOT JUST THE KU KLUX KLAN OR NAZIS WHITE NATIONALIST THAT WERE ONCE THE AUTHORS OF THESE TERRORIST ACTS IT IS COLORED PEOPLE AND PEOPLE IN SEXUAL FRATERNITIES THE NEW BREED OF TERRORIST THAT IS NOT BEING DISCUSSED.

NOBODY IS DISCUSSING THE DEMONIC HATE SINISTER HATE THAT IS BEING PERPETRATED ON NOT ONLY PERSONS OF COLOR BUT HETEROSEXUAL BEINGS NOW WE SEE WHY.   

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              ) Judge Darryl B. Simko

                                                                                 )                                                                                        ) Room 2806    

                                                                                 )

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )                                                 Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO AMEND PUNITIVE DAMAGES DUE TO “PERJURY” “FRAUD” & RESPONDENTS BEING VICTIMS OF AN “ORGANIZED TERRORIST CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY” TRYING TO STEAL THE SAID HOME WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS AND UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INVOKE JURISDICTION INSTANTER PURSUANT TO SAID PARTIES ENGAGING IN TERRORIST ACTS NULLIFYING ALL COURT ORDERS w/AFFIDAVIT

   Now comes Respondent, Monzella Y. Johnson et al. being represented Pro Se in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith her Affidavit in support of Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment et al;

1.      That pursuant to Federal Laws of the United States and Laws of the United States Constitution Various Cook County, State and Federal Judges do not honor, respect or adhere to the aforementioned laws:

A-    Respondent filed a Jurisdictional Memorandum (June 10, 2019) in the Seventh Circuit, Court of Appeals detailing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction: Hereto attached as Gr Ex A.

“Cook County Judges have been Indicted and Convicted for Corruption and “Fixing” cases in Greylord but Federal Democratic Judges are ignoring the crimes due to Defendant being female African Americans complaining not Anglo-Saxon person, hereto attached, Gr Ex A Jurisdictional Brief Memorandum (filed June 5, 2019) detailing how Democrats under Alderman Burke “Fixed” cases where Supreme court Judge Anne burke coercing a judge as an attorney, Anne Burke also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying, “My husband was the one who put you on the bench.”  

B-    That on June 11, 2019, it is alleged a Clerk in the Seventh Circuit or anonymous judge issued an unsigned directive, ORDER On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by the appellant on June 10, 2019, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee shall file, on or before June 18, 2019, a response to appellant’s filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court’s order of June 3, 2019, hereto attached both Court Orders not signed or certified from any Judge or Clerk from the Seventh Circuit.

C-    That Pursuant to the instruments purportedly sent from the Seventh Circuit as Orders the Appellees failed to respond, comply or DENY any of the Pleadings in the Jurisdictional Memorandum; thereby causing said Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed (June 24, 2019) hereto attached.

D-    That Appellees hired several multi- million-dollar law firms trying to save them and the end result was the same even with so many individuals engaging in Terrorist Acts, they have admitted to every PLEADING in Gr Ex A.

   

2.     The Local Rules provide detailed instructions as to how litigants should approach their summary judgment motions and responses. Local Rule 56.1(a) provides that a motion for summary must include a "statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law."

            This statement of material facts "shall consist of short numbered paragraphs,    including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph." Part (b) of Local Rule 56.1 requires a party opposing summary for judgment to file a concise response to the movant's statement of material facts. That statement is required to include a response to each numbered paragraph in the moving party's statement, including in the case of any disagreement, "specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon." The rule is very clear that "all material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party will be deemed admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party." Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B).

In the matter of Raymond, 442 F. 3d at 606. (7^th Cir. 2013) )  The Court, nevertheless, is concerned and considers the prejudice to Plaintiff for Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure, particularly because cases should be decided on their merits. Certainly, the failure to file a response to a summary judgment motion can be fatal. See, e.g., id at 611.

3. That Pursuant to Par B Page 14, 15 “That the Associate Judge abused her discretion violated all Canon ethics and Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure and Defendants Civil Rights by denying the aforementioned Motions proving beyond the Preponderance of the Evidence that Associate Judges cannot and will not apply the laws in a just and fair manner, due to how they are appointed. In that Black and Brown judges are mere puppets and has demonstrated their willingness to go to jail risk losing everything to protect Alderman Burke or any Anglo-Saxon person in the Democratic Political Machine”;

4.      That because of the Terrorist control that is upon the aforementioned judges have on innocent citizens like the Respondent and others is all the reasons why this matter is unlawfully before Simko and not Lyle.

5.      Pursuant to the Rules of Illinois Civil Procedures and Respondent’s Affidavits Petitioner never filed a counter-affidavit to any of the pleadings presented to the Illinois courts.

Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512. Respondent provided cases attached to the exhibits 18 D 3208 and Emergency Motion filed before Federal Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. regarding William Stewart Boyd, case 2015 CH 01670 Re Franklin Ulysses Valderrama, case 12-M-711552 Leonard Murray, case 2008 CH 33616 US Bank et al. v Monzella Y. Johnson et al. Exhibits 1-11 validate the verity in how these unrelated cases are related to the aforementioned case.

6.      FACT: To further validate and corroborate that Terrorists are operating the courts and not duly appointed or elected judges “Private Citizen” Simko was asked by Respondent Marcia Johnson was he sending the case back to Judge Jacobius so he could reassign it back to “Private Citizen” he gave her a stern look and s replied, he did not have to do that;

A-    Said court order states, “The Clerk of the Circuit Court is directed to reassign this case back to Calendar 56 Lyle Judge” The attorney for Postestivo never allowed Respondents to review the court order before presenting it to the judge, the judge immediately left the bench and attorney presented the court order and expeditiously left the court room;

B-    Respondent notified the clerk she said that the judge said he was not changing anything he signed it and that the next judge was going to require them to present different pleadings anyway;

C-    That Pursuant to Rule 23.6 Substitution of judge of the Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure (C) Orders granting a substitution of judge shall be accompanied by an order transferring the case to the presiding judge of the division or district in which the case is then pending for reassignment.

7.  FACT: Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence filed a MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137 (Dec 17, 2018)

A-    Said case named and demonstrated a plethora of judges corroborating their roles as Terrorist was assigned to Judge Jean M. Cocozza who immediately recused herself from the case and was reassigned to Judge Elizabeth Rivera and because said judge had her clerk to look into the computer to see who the last attorney of record was which was the States Attorney which was consistent with what the Respondent had asserted.

B-    Judge Rivera directed the Respondent to serve Notice on the States Attorney in Child Support and return back to court Jan. 22, 2019.

                           

8. FACT: Respondent Joe Louis Lawrence filed a  MOTION TO VACATE Jan 22, 2019 ORDER & FOR RECONSIDERATION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS DUE TO ORDERS BEING VOID A NULLITY CASE BEING “FRAUDULENT” JUDGES “TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES ACTING AS “PRIVATE CITIZENS” MAKING MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE COURT & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137 (Jan 25, 2019)

A-   That because “Private Citizen” corroborated his role a Terrorist Operative obstructed the jurisprudence of Judge Rivera acting upon the laws trying to save all of the Terrorist in this “Organized Criminal Conspiracy” DENIED Respondent’s motion Jan. 22, 2019;

B-   That on Feb. 26, 2019, Respondent went to court seeking to vacate the Jan 22, 2019 and was met with another judge pursuant to Par 1 of Page 1 and learned “Judge A. Trevino stated, “no judge can rule on this matter because Judge Mackoff entered an order”…

C-   That said motion corroborates and demonstrates a Primae Facie showing that the Cook County Courts and participants colluding with one another as Terrorist Operatives.

9.      Said Judge Simko and other Terrorist are trying to further wear down the Respondents by subjecting them to further humiliating obstructions in the Cook County Criminal Enterprise when it is clear said judge must sign a court order in order that the case be properly before Lyle.

10.   That Petitioner In re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations Housing Matters (2015 CH 01670) Joe Louis Lawrence v. 420 East Ohio et al. filed a Motion Moving for Prove-Up Entering Default Judgment & Summary Judgment w/Affidavit (Feb. 11, 2016) $25 Million Dollars.

A-    Not one attorney for the City of Chicago, Chicago Housing Authority et al DENY or OBJECTED to any of the Terrorist Acts but “Private Citizen” Valderrama DENIED Petitioner’s Motion.

11.   That Petitioner In re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations Housing Matters (2015 CH 01670) Joe Louis Lawrence v. 420 East Ohio et al. filed a MOTION TO REINSTATE DEFAULT & SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE TO JUDGE VALDERRAMA TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON MAKING THE ORDER “VOID” A “NULLITY” w/AFFIDAVIT (Oct 30, 2017)

12.  That every attorney for the City of Chicago, Chicago Housing Authority et al DENY or OBJECTED to any of the Terrorist Acts but admitted to the aforementioned Pleadings on Page 17 “Private Citizen” Valderrama DENIED Petitioner’s Motion.

A-  Hereto attached Gr Ex A, In the matter of Lee Oties Love, Jr. v. Sup. Ct. of Ill. et al. Page 6, Par.4 Judge Thomas Panici had charged Plaintiff with a DUI case et al…….Plaintiff never appeared before this judge and he does not drink.  

B-    Page 7 Par. D “That because many are aware Chief judge being a Negroe realized he had no real authority caused many ethnic groups to come along and “Trespass upon the Laws” destroy black and brown families, use the laws as Ropes and Water hoses as they “Lynched” innocent men or women who stood up to their Terrorist Acts of injustices in the courts;”

C-    That Pages 11, 12 demonstrates how Judge Lyle taking part in helping a bank steal the home of a retired Chicago Board of Education teacher and Retired Police Officer and other judges in the Domestic Relations Division unlawfully taking children from mothers helping child rep attorneys accrue fees in this extortion operation.

13.   Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure w/Affidavit (April 24, 2018), hereto attached, In the United States District Court (16 CV 7434) “Private Citizen” Robert M. Dow, Jr.

A-    420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority, 345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, Supreme Court of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke, Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva as Defendants did not DENY or OBJECT to any of the pleadings.

B-    That Robert M. Dow, Jr. corroborated his role as a co conspirator and colluded with the Defendants by DENYING said Motion and engaged in a plethora of other Terrorist Acts by engaging in perjury, hereto attached, said court transcript of May 2, 2018, where he committed PERJURY saying he dismissed said case April 3^rd.

14.    Plaintiff filed a Motion For Disqualification of Judge Personal Bias or Prejudice {28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1) Vacate Order of May 3, 2018nDue too Federal Clerk Committing Fraud Entering Court Order In Computer Unlawfully, In the United States Court of Appeals (May 11, 2018).

15. That pursuant to Par 3-6 Page 4 That “Private Citizen” Robert M. Dow, Jr. violated his oath operated outside of his jurisdiction became a “Trespasser of the Laws” engaging in “Treason” signed an order of April 3, 2018 but never properly Docketed as indicated on the computer printout hereto attached.

That the Judge used his position and authority in an attempt to undermine the integrity of Plaintiff’s motion by Inducing Reliance on all persons and judges reviewing this matter; in that Page 2 of the manufactured order that corroborates the Judge as a “Private Citizen” states Milchtein v Chisholm, 880 F 3d 895, 897 (7^th Cir 2018)  

That said order demonstrates said judge colluding in a diabolical conspiracy with the Defendants, “Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which was filed April 24^th, 2018, validating the verity that a Federal Clerk has used their position and authority to commit a criminal act engaging in now a conspiracy pursuant to Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983,

        That Page 2 of the unlawful order purportedly entered in the data system after Plaintiff’s, states, “Plaintiff’s motion must be denied, because this Court has no authority to review the decisions of state court judges like Valderrama. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, only the Supreme Court of the United States has statutory authority to review the decisions of state courts in civil cases” the laws and citations are from the Seventh Circuit; That the United States Supreme Court has already laid out the precedent of the laws that are being ignored in Illinois Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason 

16.     That an alleged Judge in the Court of Appeals or Clerk in the Court of Appeals Dismissed said Motion.

17.     That on June 16, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellant filed a Jurisdictional Memorandum pursuant to an alleged court order from an alleged judge, in that not one person recorded as an Defendant-Appellee was required to respond to the Appellant.

A-    That pursuant to Page 5 Par F, The aforementioned demonstrates how valid cases are dismissed unlawfully, thereby forcing Pro se litigants to frivolously exhaust laws filing briefs so as to wear them down financially and psychologically likened to “war crimes”

The District Court and Chief Judge closed their eyes to the Mayhem of Democratic judges as “Private Citizens” perpetrating acts of “Treason” entering “VOID ORDERS” entered against the Plaintiff-Appellant for standing up to racial terrorism validating the verity of the aforementioned order as an order described as a nullity on all accounts.

18.  Finally, in Re Marriage of Cazembe Oboi Kabir vs. Bernadette Kabir (2018 D 003208) Motion Objecting Respondent’s Motion to  Enter Qualifying Retirement Benefits et al. & Rule to Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding all Judges and Parties with Body Attachments et al. due to Terrorist Acts of “Fraud” Racism and Hate Crimes (Civil Rights Violations) and Prejudice pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2, 3) “Extortion” Petitioner being a Victim of an “Organized Conspiracy” Judges Trespassing upon the Laws” Court never had Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” a “Nullity”  

WARRANTING THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND U.S  ATTTORNEY’S JURISDICTION INSTANTER (Filed Oct 10, 2019)

19.  Not one person in competent authority that received Notice and Knowledge questioned or investigated the merits of said pleadings, due to said judges and clerks being active participants in an “Organized Criminal Terrorist Conspiracy” in that Par 2 of Page 1  Said Democratic racist and colored judges ignored all laws and treated Petitioner as if he was an Illegal Immigrant or non U.S. citizen ignored all documents demonstrating the Respondent was in Default and Ignored Petitioners Motion due to his skin color and alleged Heterosexuality pursuant to the noted Exhibits attached how colored men embrace racism in alleged sexual relations with powerful racist Democrats in the Political Machine, (MOTION OBJECTING & STRIKING RESPONDENT’S COUNTER-PETITION DUE TO “FRAUDULENT” MISREPRESENTATIONS & ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND OR REMAND PURSUANT TO SUPREME COURT RULE 137)  properly filed and recorded in the computer and served upon the court as a Courtesy Copy but enforced jurisdiction on said matter where he had no jurisdiction by “Trespassing upon the Laws” and engaged in overt “Fraud Bias and Prejudice” acting as a private individual on the bench not as a Honorable judge with any integrity;

A-     That Page 3 Pars 1-2 corroborates the judges roles as Terrorists relying on each other to cover-up their crimes as long as said criminal acts are perpetrated on persons of color.

20. That because of the Terrorist control said machine has over all legal venues as described within, pursuant to Page 7 Par 10 A-E

10.)That pursuant to Par 6 of Respondent’s motion, the attempted Extortion was disguised as Maintenance filed July 26, 2018;

A-   That Joan S. Colen committed mail fraud by falsifying an Income Withholding Order and caused monies to be unlawfully EXTORTED in the disguise as a garnishee, hereto attached Gr Ex F.

B-   That because Boyd and Joan were complicit in this criminal episode of Terrorist Acts Joan further perpetrated her criminal acts by using Cook County Stationery to Induce the Post Office to unlawfully release said wages not certified with the Clerk’s Office, in that Page 2 of 6 of the document requests the signature of the judge and no judges signature is recorded, hereto attached, Gr Ex G.

C-   That as a result to these “Terrorist Extortion Offenses by members of said Democratic Organized Criminal Enterprise” Plaintiff’s home is in FORECLOSURE, HE IN ARREARS ON ALL DEBTS WHERE HIS OLDEST SON HAVE TO PURCHASE FOOD FOR HIM AND SUPPLEMENT HIM WITH INCOME because he has no money for gas to travel to work.

D-   That because of the aforementioned the Chicago Post Office has unlawfully released money to these said Terrorists perpetrating as Judges and attorneys when in actuality they are “Private Citizens”, hereto attached Gr Ex H Pay Stubs for June $6104.75 unlawfully Extorted, Oct. 2019 $13333.79 is the totaled amount for Oct., hereto attached, Gr Ex I. IRS Delinquency and Ex J Foreclosure Notice.

E-   That Plaintiff was unlawfully Remanded into Custody where he had to borrow almost $7000.00 a first time ever being behind bars for the Terrorist Acts of Boyd acting as an alleged Enforcer destroying men of his ethnicity so as to prove his allegiance to the Democratic Political Machine.

A purported street-gang leader from Lombard is accused of trying to send money to Islamic State militants in Syria, federal authorities said Friday.

A federal complaint says 37-year-old Jason Brown gave $500 on three separate occasions to someone he believed would forward it to an ISIS fighter. But the middleman was cooperating with authorities and the supposed militant was an undercover law enforcement officer. The charging documents say Brown, whose nickname is "Abdul Ja'Me," is the leader of a street gang based in Bellwood. He is charged with attempting to provide material support and resources to a foreign terrorist organization.

In Illinois and Cook County, Federal, State Judges and Clerks and a plethora of attorneys have made a career upholding the Terrorists doctrines of the Criminal Enterprise surpassing the actions of ISIS and has demonstrated no regard or fear of federal personnel and has shown in their disregard for any laws a willingness to go to jail or risk being executed for their infamous crimes by ignoring every document purportedly names as the FBI or United States Attorney as recipients of all legal documents.

Pursuant to Illinois Civil Procedure Rules, failure to file an answer, where an answer is required, results in the admission of the allegations of the complaint, Ill. S. Ct. R. 286 (a) Pinnacle Corp. v. Village of Lake in the Hills, 258 Ill. App 3d 205, 196 Ill. Dec 567, 630 N.E. 2d 502 (2d Dist. 1994)

                That because Petitioner properly plead to all facts correctly in said complaint negates any extension of time for the Defendant to respond, due to there not being “Good Cause Shown” Bright v. Dicke, 166 Ill. 2d 204, 209 Ill. Dec. 735 652 N.E. 2d 275 (1995)

                   Justice Harrison delivered the opinion of the court:

The issue in this case is whether a circuit court may permit a party to respond to a request for the admission of facts or the genuineness of documents once the 28-day time limit specified by Rule 216 (c) (134 Ill. 2d R. 216 (c) has expired. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the court may allow an untimely response where the delinquent party has shown good cause for the delay in accordance with Rule 183 (134 Ill. 2d R. 183) Because No Good Cause was shown here, permission to make a late response was properly denied. The circuit court’s order denying such permission and the judgment of the appellate court affirming the circuit court’s order are therefore affirmed

21. That pursuant to Illinois Rules of Civil Procedure In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:

(A)  State in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and

(B)  Admit or Deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.

(2) Denials—Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.

(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading—including the jurisdictional grounds—may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.

(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.

(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement, has the effect of a denial.

(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation –other than one relating to the amount of damages –is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required an allegation is considered denied or avoided.

22. “No one is above the Law”,  citing a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928),

“We must subject government officials to the same rules of conduct that we expect of the citizen. The very existence of the government is imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. As Brandeis puts it, "if the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means—to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal—would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."         

23. That Federal Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. already signed a court order August 20, 2019 GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION WITH COURT TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 26, 2019 THAT CORROBORATES JUDGE NORGLE AS AN ALLEGED WHITE NATIONALIST ENGAGING IN HATE CRIMES OF AN ACTIVE “ORGANIZED CONSPIRACY” w/AFFIDAVIT WHEREBY WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS/UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INSTANTER (filed Aug. 19, 2019).

A-     That no Racist Corrupt Politically appointed judges in Cook County or Puppet judges appointed by Alderman Edward Burke have the JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY to sign any court orders seeking to STEAL the Respondent’s home due to the aforementioned recorded within.

B-    To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9^th Cir. 1989);

C-    A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.

  Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al

24.          That Pursuant to “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court   of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518,     1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.

The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                   Respectfully submitted,

                                                                                  Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se

                                                                                         5217 S. Ingleside Ave

                                                                                        Chicago, Il 60615

                                                                                           773 835-5849

     

                                                                                                                                          

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief

  

25. For an Order Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983} of $13 Million Dollars for the number of years they have had to endure the Terrorist Mayhem inflicted via stress and anxiety upon them by this Organized Terrorist Criminal Enterprise;

26. Plaintiffs have not raised any affirmative defenses.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the movant or non-movant fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby    

1.      Entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to determine whether one exists.

When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which, if not contradicted, would entitle her to judgment, the opposing party cannot rely upon his non-compliance to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures or a court order or a complaint or answer if submitted alone to raise issues of material fact. A counter Affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit Supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted.

Here, Appellant has supplied affidavits, Certified Court transcripts and other evidentiary material that establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery, including the amount of damages. Appellees have failed to submit any evidence in opposition to the Motions or Order by this Honorable Seventh Circuit to raise any genuine issues of material fact.

 Thus, Summary Judgment is proper.

1.    For an Order Imposing Sanctions on all attorneys and law Firms for their “Fraudulent Acts” in this matter. 

2.    For an Order Invoking the Jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigations/United States Attorney Instanter for judges “Trespassing upon the Laws” in this “Organized Criminal Enterprise”;

3.    For an Order Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983} of $13  

4.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

        IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               ) Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              ) Judge Darryl B. Simko

                                                                                 )                                                                                   )     

                                                                                 ) Room 2806   

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )                                                 Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                  

NOTICE OF 

       RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO AMEND PUNITIVE DAMAGES DUE TO “PERJURY” “FRAUD” & RESPONDENTS BEING VICTIMS OF AN “ORGANIZED TERRORIST CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY” TRYING TO STEAL THE SAID HOME WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS AND UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INVOKE JURISDICTION INSTANTER PURSUANT TO SAID PARTIES ENGAGING IN TERRORIST ACTS NULLIFYING ALL COURT ORDERS w/AFFIDAVIT

Please be advised that on  Nov. 12, 2019, Respondent has filed before this Circuit Court, Motion for Reconsideration et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Simko or any Judge in his stead Nov. 14, 2019 at 9:30 am in room 2806.       

                                 FBI Dir. Emmerson Buie, Jr.

                                  2111 West Roosevelt Road  

                                        Chicago, Ill. 60612

                                             U.S. Attorney

                                                    John R. Lausch

                                          219 South Dearborn Suite 500

                                                   Chicago, Ill 60605

        Cook County State’s Attorney            Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans

         Kim Foxx                                              50 West Washington, Suite 2600

         50 West Washington, Suite 500                Chicago, Ill. 60601

         Chicago, Ill. 60601                           

                                                         

Potestivo & Ass., PC                         

223 West Jackson, Blvd, Suite 610  
Chicago, IL. 60606                           

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, to the above parties at the addresses provided before 5:00 pm on November 12, 2019.

                                                                ________________________

                                                                  Respectfully Submitted, Monzella Y. Johnson

            IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT--CHANCERY DIVISION

U.S. Bank National Association, As Trustee Under)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of        )

December 1, 2006 Mastr Asset–Backed Securities )

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage Pass-Through               )  Case # 2008 CH 33616

Certificates, Series 2006-NC3                                 )                                                           Petitioner        )

                                                                                 )          

V.                                                                              )  Judge Darryl B. Simko

                                                                                 )                                                                                   )     

                                                                                 )   Room 2806    

Monzella Y. Johnson, A/K/A Monzella                  )                                   

Johnson; Marcia E. Johnson A/K/A Marcia            )                                                 Johnson: Mortgage Electronic Registration            )

Systems, Inc. As Nominee for New Century          )

Mortgage Corporation; Monzella Y. Johnson         )                                         

( C ) Cestui Que Trust; Discover Bank;                  )

Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants,      )

                                                                                 )

                                                           Respondents  )

                                                                                                                   

                                                 AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

                                        )

COUNTY OF COOK   )

I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary

                                                                        

____________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

5217 S. Ingleside. Ave

Chicago, Il 60615