THE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN CHICAGO WANT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO KNOW THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE YOU INDICT ONE YOU HAVE TO INDICT ALL OF THEM.
"PRIVATE CITIZEN" EILEEN BURKE COULD BE AN ALLEGED RELATIVE OF ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE THIS COULD BE HER MOTIVE PISSING IN THE FEDS FACE AS RETALIATION FOR INDICTING HIM BY ACTING AS A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION TRYING TO SAVE EVERYONE COMPLICIT IN THESE NOTED CRIMES AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT.
AFTER READING THE HATRED RACIST DEMOCRATS HAVE ON PERSONS OF COLOR WHY WOULD ANY PERSON OF COLOR EVER VOTE DEMOCRATIC AFTER READING THE HORRIFIC CRIMES PERPETRATED ON PEOPLE OF COLOR?
GREYLORD WAS A FUCKING JOKE TO MANY OF THESE JUDGES IF THE LAWS INCLUDED EXECUTIONS OR LIFE SENTENCES THIS WOULD ELIMINATE THESE TERRORIST JUDGES!
ALLEGEDLY $50,000.00 WAS PAID TO DESTROY THE CONTENTS IN THIS BOGUS PATERNITY CASE THIS IS WHAT NOBODY IS SUPPOSED TO BE READING OR HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF READ WHY:
ROD SERLING OR NO EPISODE FROM THE TWILIGHT ZONE CAN COMPARE TO THE PARALLELS OF REALITIES THAT EXIST IN THIS POST.
REV MOSS DID A SERMON LAST SATURDAY ON THE VERY EVENTS ARTICULATED IN THIS VERY POST DEC 17, 2019 GET THE CD.
READ HOW CHRISTIANS GO TO CHURCH EVERY SUNDAY SCREAMING AND SHOUTING PRETENDING TO PRAISE GOD AND PRETENDING TO BE GOD FEARING AS THEY HAVE SOLD OUT BY INTER COURSING WITH DEMONIC BEINGS.
GROWING UP WE ALWAYS HEARD STORIES OF THE DEVIL AND SAW HORROR MOVIES OF EVIL DEMONS COMING AFTER THE GOOD PEOPLE DESTROYING THEM TERRORIZING THEM BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT EVIL DOES.
The Demons and the Pigs
…30In the distance a large herd of pigs was feeding. 31So the demons begged Jesus, “If You drive us out, send us into the herd of pigs.” 32“Go!” He told them. So they came out and went into the pigs, and the whole herd rushed down the steep bank into the sea and died in the waters.…Berean Study Bible ·
The demons begged Jesus, "If you drive us out, send us into the herd of pigs."
New Living Translation
So the demons begged, “If you cast us out, send us into that herd of pigs.”
English Standard Version
And the demons begged him, saying, “If you cast us out, send us away into the herd of pigs.”
YOUR RELIGIOUS FAITH WHAT YOU BELIEVE OR HOW YOU BELIEVE IS IRRELEVANT AS LONG AS YOU BELIEVE IN GOD BECAUSE GOD IS IN ALL RELIGIONS.
BUT THE DEMONIC MAN WHO PERSONIFY HIMSELF WITH POWER LIKE ALDERMAN EDWARD BURKE WHO APPOINTED EVERY COWARD RACIST INFERIOR DEMON POSSESSED PERSON TO DO HIS BIDDING, DEEMED HIMSELF AS THE KING AS HE PARLAYED MONIES INTO DIFFERENT CAMPAIGNS OF WHATEVER DEMOCRAT WILLING TO SELL THEIR SOUL OR GIVE THEIR SOUL TO THE KING FOR ANY POSITION AS JUDGE, STATES ATTORNEY OR WHATEVER WAS FOR SELL.
GOD IS A JEALOUS GOD
…13Rather, you must tear down their altars, smash their sacred stones, and chop down their Asherah poles. 14For you must not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. 15Do not make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, for when they prostitute themselves to their gods and sacrifice to them, they will invite you, and you will eat their sacrifices;…
New International Version
Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
New Living Translation
You must worship no other gods, for the LORD, whose very name is Jealous, is a God who is jealous about his relationship with you.
English Standard Version
(for you shall worship no other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God),
Berean Study Bible
For you must not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
IN SPITE OF ALL OF EDWARD BURKES MONIES HIS TONS OF ATTORNEYS VERSUS ME A HUMBLE SERVANT OF THE TRUE KING "GOD" NOT EVEN HE WAS ABLE TO STOP THIS TRUTH FROM COMING FORWARD, BURKE HAS RECRUITED AND APPOINTED EVERY ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL, BISEXUAL, TRISEXUAL RACIST HETEROSEXUAL ANYBODY WILLING TO STAND WITH HIM TO FIGHT A HUMBLE SERVANT OF GOD WHO HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING TO ANY OF THESE INDIVIDUALS.
EDWARD BURKE KNEW DAM FUCKING WELL, I NEVER IMPREGNATED FRANCOISE BUT HIS DEMONIC HATE FOR MY BROWN SKIN TONE AND INTELLECTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAWS BETTER THAN HE COULD EVER COMPREHEND GETTING HIS LAW DEGREE FROM DE PAUL ENRAGED HIM SO, HE HAD TO SET UP UP HIS OWN RACE OF RACIST INDIVIDUALS AND DEPLOY THEM INTO COMMITTING HEINOUS RACIST DEMONIC ACTS BY LOCKING ME UP NOT ONE BUT 5 FUCKING TIMES FOR ALLEGEDLY OWING CHILD SUPPORT.
WAHT IS EVEN FUCKED UP, THE JUDGES WANTED TO KNOW WHAT COUNTRY, I WAS FROM THEY ALLEGEDLY SAID I WAS NOT FROM HERE, SO BECAUSE, I DID NOT EMBRACE THE SODOM AND GOMORRAH STYLE OF POLITICS AND, BECAUSE I AM THAT, THAT I AM A HETEROSEXUAL MAN BORN AND RAISED A FREE MAN, THE DEMONIC FORCES CONTROLLING THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE AND EVERY CHRISTIAN BLACK AND BROWN PERSON HIDING IN THE CHURCHES EVERY SUNDAY WAS HELLBENT ON SHOWING ME THAT THE GOD, I SERVE AND PRAISE WAS A MYTH OR A JOKE.
109TH pSALM
Hold not thy peace, O God of my praise; 2For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful are opened against me: they have spoken against me with a lying tongue. 3They compassed me about also with words of hatred; and fought against me without a cause. 4For my love they are my adversaries: but I give myself unto prayer. 5And they have rewarded me evil for good, and hatred for my love.
Appoint someone evil to oppose my enemy;
let an accuser stand at his right hand.
7 When he is tried, let him be found guilty,
and may his prayers condemn him.
8 May his days be few;
may another take his place of leadership.
9 May his children be fatherless
and his wife a widow.
10 May his children be wandering beggars;
may they be driven[a] from their ruined homes.
11 May a creditor seize all he has;
may strangers plunder the fruits of his labor.
12 May no one extend kindness to him
or take pity on his fatherless children.
13 May his descendants be cut off,
their names blotted out from the next generation.
14 May the iniquity of his fathers be remembered before the Lord;
may the sin of his mother never be blotted out.
15 May their sins always remain before the Lord,
that he may blot out their name from the earth.
BECAUSE OF MY SKIN COLOR AND HETEROSEXUALITY AND LOVE FOR WHO I AM NOT LICKING UP BEHIND NO MAN OR WORSHIPING THE MACHINE OR ITS DEMOCRATIC MEMBERS EVERY BLACK AND BROWN PERSON WORSHIPING THE DEVIL CLOSED THEIR EYES AND EARS TO THE TERRORS PERPETRATED BY THE DEMONS RUNNING CHICAGO.
THIS DOCUMENT IS LIKENED TO BEING A BURNING BUILDING RATHER THAN A PERSON FREE HIS OR HERSELF AND WALK THROUGH THE DOORS, THEY MUCH RATHER RUN AN HIDE IN THE CLOSET WAITING FOR THEIR FALSE GOD TO COME AND SAVE THEM FROM THE FLAMES.
THE GOD FEARING PEOPLE HATE THE FUCK OUT OF ALDERMAN BURKE ONLY HE IS TOO GRANDIOSE TO REALIZE THIS BUT SO MANY BLACK AND BROWN PEOPLE SEE HIM AS THEIR JESUS WHO IS GOING TO SAVE THEM FOR ALL OF THE DIRTY DEEDS, THEY HAVE ALLEGEDLY PERPETRATED UNDER HIS AUTHORITY, BURKE IS NOT GOING TO OPEN HIS MOUTH TO SAVE NO PERSON OF COLOR, HELL HE CAN'T SAVE HIMSELF.
YOU CAN'T SERVE 2 MASTERS GOD AND THE DEVIL.
I LEFT THIS WOMAN FRANCOISE ALONE SHE INSISTED HER FATHER WAS IN LOVE WITH HER BUT SHE DIDN'T LOVE HIM SHE LOVED ME, SEE THE DEMONIC SHIT MY LIFE WAS SUBJECTED TO DEALING WITH SATIN'S LAIR, AS A MAN, I TRIED TO HELP THIS WOMAN AND WARNED HER IF SHE EVER DECEIVED ME, I WAS GOING TO BE HER WORSE NIGHTMARE EVERYBODY WAS GOING TO KNOW.
APPEAL
TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF
COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court No. 88 D
079012
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 19-0845
) Division No. 4
V. )
)
Francoise Hightower )
)
Defendant- Appellee )
)
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER FOR
WANT OF PROSECUTION AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS AND LEVY PUNITIVE DAMAGES & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS FRANCOISE L. B. HIGHTOWER DUE TO
“PERJURY” “FRAUD ON THE COURT” ORDERING JUDGMENT BE ENTERED $6 MILLION DOLLARS FOR
UNLAWFUL REMANDS INSTANTER WARRANTING THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATIONS AND UNITED STATES ATTORNEY INVOKE JURISDICTION INSTANTER PURSUANT
TO SAID PARTIES ENGAGING IN TERRORIST ACTS OF AN “ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE”
NULLIFYING COURT ORDER OF DEC. 10, 2019 & RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE REMANDING MYRON F. MACKOFF, TIMOTHY P. MURPHY, DAVID E. HARACZ
& RONALD F. BARTKOWICZ & other JUDGES COMPLICIT AS PRIVATE CITIZENS TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS ENGAGING
IN TREASON OFFENSES w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes the Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, Heterosexual MAN BORN & RAISED a FREEMAN Promise
and Swear to this Honorable Court as follows:
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates
disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating
court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to
accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s
indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with
our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
A-
Fraud upon the court is a basis for equitable relief. Luttrell v.
United States, 644 F. 2d 1274, 1276 (9th Cir. 1980); see Abatti v.
C.I.R. , 859 F 2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988) “it is beyond question
that a court may investigate a question as to whether there was fraud in the procurement
of a judgment” Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co., 328 U.S. 575,
66 S. Ct. 1176, 90 L. Ed. 1447. The power of the court to unearth such a fraud
is the power to unearth it effectively. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.
Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S. Ct. 997, 88 L. Ed. 1250; Sprague v.
Ticonic National Bank, 1184 and United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. (8 Otto)
61, 25 L. Ed. 93.
B-
“A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A
judge is a judicial officer, paid by the Government to act impartially and
lawfully”. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626. “A void judgment is regarded as a
nullity, and the situation is the same as it would be if there were no
judgment. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at
any place….It is not entitled to enforcement. 30A Am Judgments 43, 44,
45. Henderson v Henderson 59 S.E. 2d
227-232
C-
“A Void Judgment from
its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy,
ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect
whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any
manner or to any degree. “A void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at
any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally” Oak Park Nat Bank v.
Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill. App. 2d 385, 197 N.E. 3d 73, 77, (1st
Dist. 1964)
D-
To show fraud upon the court, the complaining party must establish
that the alleged misconduct affected the integrity of the judicial process,
either because the court itself was defrauded or because the misconduct was
perpetrated by officers of the court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d
421,424 (9th Cir. 1989);
E-
A void judgment does not create any binding
obligation. Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and 42
U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or not
to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135 Ill. 2d
384 (1990).
1.
That Respondent has been unlawfully Remanded 5
times for allegedly owing child support on a case that was Dismissed and is
seeking $1.5 million dollars per Remand;
2.
That Respondent is seeking punitive damages on
the interests accrued on the $7.5 million dollars for
the number of years Respondent has endured under the Democratic Party closing their eyes to the plethora
of Terrorist Acts perpetrated at the Respondent;
or
3.
That Respondent is seeking the average salaries of all attorneys not excluding
Assistant States Attorneys for their roles in colluding against the Respondent in
a Terrorist manner violated all of his Civil Rights for understanding and
applying the laws better than everyone involved.
4.
Respondent has presented and articulated the
laws better than every attorney or judge presiding over the case and was Denied
ignored and Dismissed because Democrats in Chicago presiding over this case do
not uphold or grant Equal Protection of the laws to men like the Respondent and
has done everything unfathomable treating him has a criminal felon blackballing
him from all competent areas of employment.
5.
Said case was originally DISMISSED
under case 85 D 068184
September 17, 1987 before judge D. Adolphus Rivers where Richard J. Daley was
the States Attorney.
6.
That because Richard J. Daley allegedly wanted
no part to unlawfully “FIXING” said
Paternity case against the Respondent where there were allegations of William
Jenkins Hightower a Chicago Police Officer impregnating his second biological
daughter Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, the first daughter being Danielle
Hightower as a minor.
7.
That under case 85 D 068184 Respondent DEMANDED
a JURY TRIAL and was properly served
had two independent paternity tests that excluded him from paternity but was
altered to state he was the father from Cook County Hospital and American Red
Cross Hospital, hereto attached, Ex A Appearance and Jury Demand (filed
Feb 21, 1986).
8.
That under case 88 D 079012 Respondent was never served!!! There were never any
paternity tests nor were there a Motion filed to consolidate the 85 D 068184 pursuant to the Feb 1988
court order if the Respondent was never served.
A-
That under the alleged authority of Alderman Burke who
appointed all judges but as Democrats or shall we say Hatefulcrats they had
knowledge the May 18, 1988 court order was never signed by a judge or an
attorney, hereto attached Gr Ex B.
B-
That Judge D. Adolphus Rivers on Feb. 8, 1988,
stated Page 4, Lines 8-14 “Based on the circumstances, if you have
difficulty serving the defendant in this case, you may want to file the appropriate
motion to vacate the nonsuit order, based upon the fact that there were
misrepresentations to the court with references to the plaintiff appearing and
cooperating with the State’s Attorney’s Office.” Hereto attached as Gr
Ex C, Court Transcript.
C-
That Rock Detective Agency created a “Fraudulent
Affidavit” purportedly serving Defendant’s grandmother which was not true. In
that Par. 2 states “That on Feb 21, 1988, This investigator was told by a
second floor tenant that Mr. Lawrence resides in the Allen apartment on the
third floor rear of the building”
D-
In that here are pictures as Gr Ex D of the
building 7911 South Clyde front rear and side entrance there are no third-
floor rear apartments this was a six-flat unit.
E-
That on Feb 23, 1988 investigator Miguel Valdes
fraudulently stated, “Service was executed on Mrs. Allen who stated that she
was the grandmother of Mr. Lawrence and that he was not home and was the
grandmother of Mr. Lawrence et al.”… about 70-75 years of age” hereto
attached Gr Ex E Affidavit.
9.
That on May 2, 1988, Court Transcript by Richard M.
Daley, States Attorney, George Berbas Asst. States Atty and Richard Senar
appeared on behalf Francoise Hightower, Page 2 Lines 2-10 Good Morning your Honor,
Richard Senar from Joseph V. Roddy’s law firm. This case has been continued to
March 21st. Here is a copy of
the order. In that order it said we were supposed to serve Defendant a copy of
the order and notice. We have had a special process server attempting to do
this. He has not been successful et al.”
Judge Rivers Lines
11-14, “It is not necessary to have him served by a process server or
deputy sheriff. Serve him at the address which he was personally served with
summons.”
States Attorney Berbas Lines
15, “I think substituted service was had.”
Judge Rivers Lines
16-17, “I know. You didn’t mail him a copy of the order?”
States Attorney Berbas Lines
18-19, “I didn’t show nothing in our file to indicate that”.
Judge Rivers Lines
20-24, “Because if you had just done that it would have shown some
compliance with the order that was entered on March 21st, and if he had not responded I would permit you
today to make a motion for default order permitting you to have a prove up”
hereto attached Gr Ex F Court Transcript Corroborating an Associate Cook
County Judge colluding with the Assistant States Attorney.
10.
That Gr Ex G May 18, 1988 Court Transcript
hereto attached articulates collusion conspiracies surpassing any human beings
mental understanding, Page 2 Lines 2-6 states Good Morning, your Honor, Joseph
Riley (should be Roddy) on behalf of Ms. Hightower. Judge this matter was
continued last time until today, with requirement that we serve him. He was
personally served on May 15th, at eight this morning at his house,
personal service. May 15 was a SUNDAY
Judge Rivers Line 7,
“In reference to a copy of this order”?
Roddy Line 8, “Yes”.
Judge Rivers Line 9,
“Do you have an appropriate motion”?
Roddy Lines 10-11, “I
would ask for motion for default. And ask that we prove it up. Et al”.
Judge Rivers Lines
16-21, “The Court has reviewed the court file, and I do not find an
appearance or answer in the court file. It appears from an Affidavit of special
process server that defendant was served by substitute service on February 23,
1988. Plaintiff’s motion for default is entered, for failure to defendant to
file answer”.
11.
That Roddy asked Francoise Page 4 Line 24, Line
1 Page 5 “Did you have sexual intercourse with anyone other than Joseph
Lawrence”?
Francoise Line 2, “No”.
That Page 6 Line 10,
Roddy “You are employed, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 11, “Yes,
I am”.
Roddy Line 12, “You
are a Chicago Police person, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 13, “Yes,
I am”.
Roddy Lines 19-22, “Am
I correct in the processing of prior petition, which resulted in the state’s
SOL of the charge, state’s attorney office of Cook County represented you, is
that correct”?
Francoise Line 23, “Yes,
they were”.
Roddy Line 24, Page 7
Line 1, “Now, you have hired private counsel, and endured various legal
fees, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 2, “Yes,
I have”.
Judge Rivers Lines
10-12 “Ms. Hightower, did you have intercourse with the defendant,
Joseph L. Lawrence, Jr., within the seven , eight, nine and tenth months prior
to November 21, 1988”?
Francoise Line 13, “Yes,
I did”.
Judge Rivers Lines 14-15,
“Did you have sexual intercourse with any other person during that period”?
Francoise Line 16, “No,
I didn’t”.
12.
That on Page 8 Line1-2, Judge Rivers seemed to
have been in receipt of documents only he and Francoise were cognizant of he
asked her, “Did you also file answer interrogatories, which were sworn to
under oath by you, on April 4, 1986”?
Francoise Line 3, “Yes,
I did”.
Judge Rivers Lines 4-6,
“And that indicated, exactly, the time you lived with Mr. Hightower and had
intercourse with him, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 7, “Yes,
it did”.
Judge Rivers Lines 8-11,
“And particular interrogatory nine, did you engage in sexual intercourse
with defendant, within ten-month period immediately proceeding birth of, and
you said yes, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 12, “Yes”.
Judge Rivers Lines 13-14,
“And you had sexual intercourse with nobody else, is that correct”?
Francoise Line 15, “Yes”.
13.
That Page 9 Lines 5-14, Unequivocally
corroborate no judge in Cook County or the State of Illinois ever had
jurisdiction on the Defendant in any capacity, in that Judge Rivers stated, “Well,
counsel, in reference to the instant case, 88 D079012, there has not been no
blood test ordered in this case. Now, your client, the plaintiff here, has
testified that the blood test results were tendered to the court. That is not in
this particular case. A previous case having been nonsuited, as you have
indicated in your complaint on September 17, 1987. So, this is a new cause of
action against the defendant, although it involves the same parties and subject
matter.”
14.
That because Black and Brown judges don’t have jurisdiction
on Caucasian attorneys they are mere figure heads is all the reasons why said
paternity matter escalated through the ranks as each racist heinous Demonic
person acting as humans engaged in some of the most prolific HATE CRIMES ever
recorded, in that Ex H, Court Order prepared by Robert Anthony
Egan, Defendant’s former attorney who prepared the order vacating “The
service of summons of Feb 24, 1988 is hereby quashed and judgment entered on
5-18-88 vacated. Dated August 3, 1988”.
A-
That Benjamin Mackoff who was the Presiding Judge in the Domestic
Relations Division and Aurelia Pucinski who was the Clerk of the Circuit Court
knew the case was “FIXED” and as Caucasians explained the men controlling these
acts were considered “White Trash” the worst of the white people it
was said, Presiding Judge provided Defendant a Certified Affidavit of the
Computer Printout of Roddy appearing before Judge Rivers not recorded.
B-
Defendant learned that the term “good ol boys” are the men
of the Democratic party that are considered as “White Trash” the original
authors of Jim Crow and is responsible for the lynching’s of people of color
who happens to be Irish in ethnicity.
C-
FACT: Never will any person of Irish ethnicity rule in favor of any
person of color, they will lie cheat destroy any documents as demonstrated in
this case, no colored person will rule against Caucasians, no homosexual,
bisexual, trisexual will rule in favor of the Defendant due to his Heterosexual
position and moral character.
D-
That Jeanne Sprietsma who was the Supervisor of all Court Reporters
rallied all of her court reporters to prepare transcripts of Francoise and her
attorney appearing before Judge Rivers without Defendant’s knowledge.
E-
Because Jeanne mysteriously died on a boat drowning it was not
sure if it was the result of “FOUL PLAY” due to this paternity case (she
was very sweet and a outspoken critic of the injustices in this case her court
reporters complained to her about what was going on in court), so the Cook
County Sheriff and certain members of the Police department advised the
Defendant not to name any person helping him not even them because everybody
knew Francoise’s father William Jenkins Hightower was sleeping with his
daughters, but couldn’t understand the kind of muscle he had staying on the
Police force as a Pedophile.
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered conspiracy at same time or have
taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec.
162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element
is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981,
50 ILL, Dec. 63
Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728
(Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for
improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make
restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants’ basic
constitutional rights;
15.
That Respondent has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of
Evidence that said acts demonstrates how Section
1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the
Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v.
Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with
Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be
treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis
v. Brautigan (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W.
Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).
A- “The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal
enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy,
768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Respondent Respectfully
prays:
1.)
That
monetary damages be imposed Instanter based upon the reasons cited in this
document and noted in the Affidavits.
2.
For an Order Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632
(1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages
for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here,
where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is
also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that
actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the
deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for
those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for
liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is
no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983} of
$1.5 Million Dollars per Remand along with average costs relating to the
interests’ for the number of years Respondent has endured
under the Democratic Party, or the average salaries of all attorneys not
excluding Assistant States Attorneys for their roles in colluding against the
Respondent.
3.
For an Order Remanding all Parties and reimbursing
all fees and costs to the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;
4. That Pursuant to Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In
the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of
the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than
that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any
“two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in
violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which
he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout
the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations
of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but
white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were
not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy.
Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and
agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury
of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id,
at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep.
Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe,
supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking
abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been
visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been
found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And
the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford
protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
4.) That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall
become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a
rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Defendant for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under
penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned
certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and
correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief
and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted,
____________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
IL 60649-0075
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
EXHIBIT LIST
1. Ex A Appearance & Jury Demand (filed Feb. 21, 1986).
2. Gr Ex B May 18, 1988 Court Order not signed by anyone.
3. Gr Ex C Feb, 8, 1988 Court Transcript
4. Gr Ex D Pictures of 7911 S. Clyde no third-floor rear.
5. Gr Ex E Affidavit Rock Detective Agency (falsified).
6. Gr Ex F May 2, 1988 Court Transcript.
7. Gr Ex G May 18, 1988 Court Transcript.
8. Ex H Court Order of Aug 3, 1988.
9. Gr Ex I Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment et al.
10. Gr Ex J Respondent’s Motion for Sanctions et al.
_________________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
DRAFT ORDER
This matter having
come on to be heard on Motion to Vacate Order for want of prosecution and Impose
Sanctions et al. and Warranting Jurisdiction of FBI, U.S. Attorney due notice
having been given, the court having jurisdiction over the parties and the
subject matter, and being fully advised in the premises;
It is HEREBY ORDERED that Sanctions are
Imposed Instanter granting $7 Million Dollars no Court or State Judges ever had
Jurisdiction on the appellant thereby warranting the FBI and U.S. Attorney
invoke jurisdiction on all parties involved in said conspiracies Instanter.
ENTERED:
_________________________________
Justice Eileen O’Neili Burke
_________________________________
Justice Robert E. Gordon
_________________________________
Justice Margaret McBride
Counsel Pro Se
_________________________________
P.O. Box 490075
Justice Jesse G. Reyes
(312) 965-6455
APPEAL TO THE
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF
COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being
duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said
motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that the
statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated
to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned
certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted Notary
____________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF
COOK COUNTY
DOMESTIC
RELATIONS DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis
Lawrence
)
) Trial Court
No. 88 D 079012
Plaintiff-Appellant
) General No. 19-0845
) Division No.
4
V. )
)
Francoise Hightower )
)
Defendant- Appellee
)
)
AMENDED NOTICE OF
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF WANT OF PROSECUTION AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS
AND LEVY PUNITIVE DAMAGES & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEYS FRANCOISE L. B. HIGHTOWER DUE TO “PERJURY” “FRAUD ON THE COURT” ORDERING
JUDGMENT BE ENTERED $6 MILLION DOLLARS FOR UNLAWFUL REMANDS INSTANTER WARRANTING
THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS AND UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY INVOKE JURISDICTION INSTANTER PURSUANT TO SAID PARTIES ENGAGING IN
TERRORIST ACTS OF AN “ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” NULLIFYING COURT ORDER OF
DEC. 10, 2019 & RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING MYRON F. MACKOFF, TIMOTHY P.
MURPHY, DAVID E. HARACZ & RONALD F. BARTKOWICZ & other JUDGES COMPLICIT
AS PRIVATE CITIZENS TRESPASSING UPON THE
LAWS ENGAGING IN TREASON OFFENSES w/AFFIDAVIT
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Plaintiff-Appellant
Moves to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District for an Order on Motion Vacating
Order and Impose Sanctions et al. and Amends said Notice to an alleged Racist
Appellate Clerk Thomas D. Palella Obstructed Justice Ordered clerk to reject
said Motion from being filed because no zip codes were listed. July and August
Motions all parties didn’t have zip codes were accepted and never rejected
TO: Hon. Mayor Lori Lightfoot, City Hall 121 N. La
Salle Chg. Il. 60602 Served via Police
Officer 12-19-2019, Great staff of Officers always receive Defendant
well.
Dir. Emmerson Buie, Jr. FBI 2111 West Roosevelt Road,
Chicago, Ill. 60612 FBI Served via Chicago Mail Priority mail expected delivery
12-20-2019 am.
U.S. Attorney John R. Laush, Jr., 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500,
Chg. Il. 60604 Served via Receptionist
12-19-2019.
Cook County Sheriff, Tom Dart, Daley Center Floor 701, Chg.
Il. 60601 Served via Secretary 12-19-2019, Great staff of Deputies and
secretary always greet Defendant kindly.
TO: Chief Judge
Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg, Ill. 60601 Served via Courtesy Copy Prior to
the Basket Timothy Evans Assistant Lou would receive all judges copies knew
everyone by name a great person, he would always say something encouraging and
say we are praying for you after his retirement a basket was placed on the 26
floor per instructions for all judges, but id a clerk saw me they would take
the documents before they were placed in the basket noted except for judges in
Chancery they are served on the 28th Floor via Receptionist everyone
is familiar with the Defendant.
Presiding
Judge Grace Dickler, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601 via Basket 26th
Floor
Hon. Myron F. Mackoff, Daley Center Chg. Il. 60601
Served via Basket 26th Floor
Hon. Elizabeth
Rivera Daley Center, Chg. Il. 60601 Served via Basket 26th Floor
Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite
1001, Chg. Ill. 60601 not served yet but
her staff is great .
Asst. Gen.
Counsel, Sec of State Terrence McConville, 100 West Randolph Chg. Ill. 60601
Served via Receptionist Terry’s entire staff is great many have been promoted.
States
Attorney, Kim Foxx, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601, 5th floor, Served
via receptionist a little bumpy earlier but her Receptionist has demonstrated a
lot of love now that she understands the hell being endured and are great women.
AG Kwame Raoul General
Law Bureau 100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300 Chicago, Ill. 60601, Served via
Receptionist 12-19-2019.
Amalgamated Transit
Union, President Keith Hill/ Vice President
Chg. Ill. 60616, they have refused prior service and said document will
be emailed to the Union Body.
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Dec. 19, 2019
said Notice of Motion was hereby filed with the Motion to Vacate Order and
Impose Sanctions et al. with the attachments and mailed/hand delivered to all
parties recorded in said notice via regular mail.
Please Be Advised that on Dec. 20, 2019 Defendant had to
Amend his Notice of Filing to appease Thomas D. Palella in order that this
entire document everyone has received make it to the judges, it appears he is
using his position to Obstruct this document from going forward by whatever
means necessary. Said Notice has been hand delivered, mailed and will be
emailed and mailed via regular mail to Special Agent Emmerson Buie, Jr. before
5:00 pm today.
It is sick and ironic Defendant received return mail from
the Post Office saying Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower is DECEASED provided
a copy to the 4th Division of judges Thomas D. Palella saw it but
nobody questioned her death or attempted to investigate it’s veracity but he
rejects my fucking document unlawfully, how come they didn’t investigate her
alleged death? He don’t need to be making $106,100.00 a year, for his role
trying to aid and abet in a “Terrorist Criminal Enterprise” trying to protect
said parties.
Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
Name Joe
Louis Lawrence
Attorney for Pro Se
Address P.O. Box 490075
City, State Chicago , Illinois
60649-0075
Phone (312) 965-6455
Twitter:
@joelouis7
