IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE IN ILLINOIS COURTS BE IT STATE OR FEDERAL COURTS FOR JUDGES APPOINTED BY THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE TO TRESPASS UPON THE LAWS COMMITTING TREASON
THE WHITE MEN WHO CONTROLS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ARE NOT ONLY RACIST BUT THEY ONLY RECRUIT AND APPOINT THOSE INDIVIDUALS OF COLOR WHO ARE WILLING TO SELL OUT THEIR ETHNICITY AND GO ALONG WITH ANYTHING THEY ARE TOLD TO DO, "IT'S CALLED GOING ALONG TO GET ALONG"
NOT ONE PERSON IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WHO RECEIVE NOTICE OR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE HORRENDOUS RACIST TERRORIST ACTS LODGED AT ME OR LEE OTIS LOVE, JR. DR. LINDA SHELTON AND MANY OTHERS OPENED THEIR MOUTHS TO DENOUNCE THESE WAR CRIME ACTS OR ADMONISH THE PERPETRATORS RESPONSIBLE.
FEDERAL JUDGES IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT WANT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP TO KNOW THAT AS WHITE MEN THEY DON'T RESPECT HIS AUTHORITY AND NEVER GAVE A DAM ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA'S AUTHORITY DID WHAT THEY WANTED BY TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS AND WILL CONTINUE TO COMMIT TREASON UNTIL AN ADMINISTRATION ERADICATE THEM FROM POWER!
RECENTLY SOMEONE MAILED TO MY ATTENTION FROM THE FEDERAL BUILDING AN ORDER WITH JUDGES FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, CIRCUIT DANIEL A. MANION, CIRCUIT JUDGE AN ORDER WITH NO SIGNATURES:
IT SAYS "UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FILED ON JANUARY 19, 2017, BY THE PRO SE APPELLANT.
IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED. APPELLANT SHALL PAY THE REQUIRED DOCKETING FEE WITHIN 14 DAYS, OR ELSE THIS APPEAL WILL BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE PURSUANT TO CIRCUIT RULE 3(b). SEE NEWLIN V. HELMAN, 123 F. 3D 429, 434 (7TH CIR 1997).
IT IS CLEAR FROM THE ABOVE VOIDED ORDER WHITE MEN ARE SO USED TO DEALING WITH SO MANY INFERIOR AFRICAN AMERICANS OR SPINELESS MEN OF COLOR THEY EXPECT PRESIDENT TRUMP TO ACT AS IF HE IS INFERIOR OR ASSUME THE POSITION AS ONE OF THEM AND TO CONTINUOUSLY CLOSE HIS EYES LIKE OTHERS HAVE DONE WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO REIN HAVOC AND TERROR ON PEOPLE OF COLOR AND INDEPENDENT CAUCASIANS, NO REPUBLICAN OR ANY PERSON OF COLOR STANDS A CHANCE GOING UP IN FRONT OF THESE DEMOCRATIC JUDGES WHO HAVE SEIZED THE COURTS;
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK HAS BEEN SO RACIST AGAINST ME WHEN I SOUGHT LEGAL LEGAL REPRESENTATION HE DENIED ME AN ATTORNEY CITING FARMER V HAAS, A CASE THAT RELATES TO A HOMOSEXUAL TRANSSEXUAL INMATE;
I AM A FREEMAN BORN & RAISED HETEROSEXUAL SO THIS JUDGE HAS MADE IT A NORMAL PRACTICE TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS BECAUSE HE DEEMED HIMSELF AS A GOD DICTATOR MR UNTOUCHABLE!
927 F. 2d 607 - Farmer v. Haas
Deliberate indifference to an inmate's medical needs is a violation of the eighth amendment proscribing cruel and unusual punishment. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). However, the constitution does not protect prisoners against mere inadvertence or negligence in diagnosis or treatment. Id. at 105-06. This court has recognized that transsexualism is a severe psychiatric disorder and that the failure to provide incarcerated transsexuals with any type of treatment constitutes an eighth amendment violation. Meriwether, 821 F.2d at 413. An eighth amendment violation will not be found when the inmate merely disagrees with the type of treatment offered. A violation occurs "in a case where there had been a total failure to provide any kind of medical attention at all." Id. at 414.
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON
JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES
ONE COLUMBUS
CIRCLE, NE
WASHINGTON
D. C. 20544
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
V.
Case # 07-16-90074
John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood, Ann C. Williams,
Diane Sykes, Kenneth Ripple, Frank H. Easterbrook et al.
Respondents
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO “FRAUD”
“TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OF THE JANUARY 25, 2017 DOCUMENT MAILED
AS AN ORDER ABSENT A SIGNATURE w/Affidavit
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se
Counsel hereby files his Motion for Reconsideration due to “Fraud” et al. Petitions
the Honorable Judicial Conference regarding the aforementioned statutes of
violations ignored by Terrorist in the Washington Bureau (Judicial Conference
Committee, Administrative Office of the United States) who have become complicit
in said foregoing acts, by upholding said Treason Offenses and is trying to
protect the many Untouchable Democrats who have made it a career “Trespassing
upon the laws” engaging in “Treason offenses” because they have for many years
been the majority in power and has engaged in “War” against the United States
Constitution because of the number of insurgents they have had at their
disposal in all Administrative agencies and judges in the fraternal Democratic
party;
Statutes: Trespassers of the Laws,
Treason, Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal
Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination, Judicial Bias, Obstruction of Justice, Judges
Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of
the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy,
Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any
Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the
Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.
1.) That on January 25, 2017, an un named
person unlawfully mailed to the Petitioner a document in violation of laws and
became a Trespasser of the Laws
A-
Said
January 25, 2017 Order from the Office of the General Counsel Administrative
Office of the United States is VOID!
B-
Said
document has about as much weight as yesterday’s toilet paper being used from
someone with a severe case of dysentery being caught up in this case.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court
has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and
those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are
trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328,
340,
26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
2.) That the person who mailed said document on behalf
of the Office of the General Counsel had no idea that they were committing
Treason against the government one can infer from this act, this is systematic
behavior of racist corrupt white men in power in the Democratic Machine how
crimes are covered-up inciting racial hatred bigotry within the Democratic
party proving all lives do not matter;
3.) That the Terrorist within the
Democratic party from this action is making a statement to President Donald
Trump and the FBI if they want them they are going to have to come and get everyone
involved;
A-
When
racist white men are involved and do not want to compromise the identity of
their Caucasian Brethern they employ inferior black and brown individuals to
commit crimes on their own ethnic groups so as to please their white masters who
have power and control over them;
B-
Perfect
example, racist corrupt white men “FIXING”
cases in Illinois do not sign court orders in an attempt to make asses out of
the Federal government but black and brown judges trying to please their white
masters sign their names to bogus court orders;
C-
Take
the case of, Associate Judge Franklin Ulysses Valderrama the perfect
candidate for this analogy Motion to Disqualify Judge for Cause et al.
Associate Judges most of them especially the black and brown judges are active
Trespassers of the Laws trying to protect their white masters who appointed
them to their positions, they are effective sellouts and is the many reasons
why Chicago is so violent and out of control, Chicago lacks real men in power,
hereto attached, Gr Ex A, Motion
Disqualifying Judge Darrah, Page 1
of Gr Ex A validates the verity of
said judge “Trespassing upon the
Laws” engaging in “Treason”;
D- Judge Darrah has demonstrated his role
against National Security and is making it clear to President Trump and any
Federal Official if you take him down you are going to have to take down the
entire Democratic Political Machine of judges, in that Par. H of Page 7, Ex. A “That Plaintiff is on Welfare and Homeless formerly with a Section 8
voucher because members of the Political Democratic Machine have deployed every
method feasible to keep him and other persons like himself oppressed Jim Crow
laws”
E- Judge Darrah had knowledge of Page 8, Par J, “That Pars (F) (G) unequivocally
articulates corruption in the HUD Section 8 voucher et al. (H) That CHA is
still today violating a Federal Court Order et al. Order entered program, that
Rahm Emanuel blasted the CHA voucher program March 15, 2016”
F-
That the sad reality in Chicago is that many
black and brown men in authority are merely puppets or figureheads, there are
so many in the closet it is pathetic no one want to open their mouths out of
fear someone will reveal the dirt, they may have in their closets so nothing is
being done to address racism corruption or violence, no self-respecting man or
woman will be caught up in this mess and because Petitioner is a Heterosexual
man born Free & a United States Citizen everyone involved cannot make the
same claims as the Petitioner Chicago courts and many politicians are worse
than some of the events recorded in Sodom & Gomorrah---Not one person
publicly denounced these unfathomable sic acts!
G-
That
many African Americans who has despicable self-hatred for themselves are
killing innocent blacks who have not caused no harm to anyone but the very
African Americans who have been elected or appointed to power are destroying
their own ethnic group so as to be excepted by members of the Democratic
Political Machine who has no love or respect for persons of color.
H-
The
fact of the matter is this everybody is not what they appear to be and nobody
is what many thought they were or appointed to do or elected to do, but so many
want to be what they cannot be and because of their displaced rage or mental
sickness from within caused so many to lodge unwarranted hate at an innocent
petitioner or many similar to his plight so as to make them feel superior about
themselves---this case identifies every person from every walk of life on who
is involved.
4.) That because of the veracity of Petitioners
pleadings put before this Judicial Conference validating the verity of certain
judges (majority Democrats) engaging in “Treason
Offenses” “Trespassing upon the
Laws” with untouchable arrogance caused someone in the office of the
General Counsel et al. to effect mail fraud and engage in the same criminal
acts complained of validates the veracity that all pleadings were in fact true;
A-
That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall
become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a
rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
Petitioner is appealing
to the Commander & Chief President
Donald Trump of the United States
that because of the aforementioned Treason acts recorded within warrants the
President of the United States to issue an Executive –Order fettering out all
Terrorist hiding within the Democratic party engaging in Treason Trespassing
upon the laws and for the Attorney General to collaborate with Federal and
Military Officials making this act a reality apprehending all suspects any and
all judges complicit in the Coup enforcing Jim Crow Laws and Trespassing upon
the Laws engaging in Treason in the State of Illinois.
Petitioner
is appealing to the Honorable
Judicial Conference, for a reversal and remand with instructions removing
the necessary judges based on the foregoing stated above who have participated
in these Diabolical Terrorist Acts:
Petitioner
is before the Honorable Judicial Conference
because as a” Pro Se” “Informa Pauper’s“ the admissions recorded in this instrument
demonstrates under the Illinois Legal system Black and Brown lives don’t matter
and the Jim Crow methods still being exercised criminalizing persons of color
for attempting to rise above racial injustice perpetrated on innocent
persons.
Petitioner
is before the Honorable Judicial
Conference because of the color of his skin all defendants have
admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have
ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States
Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff
is a nobody merely because of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated
according to racial political guidelines;
For all of
the aforementioned reasons is why the Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Conference for
Jurisdiction and Enforcement.
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted,
______________________________
Petitioner/Counsel Pro Se
Joe Louis Lawrence
,
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON
JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES
ONE COLUMBUS
CIRCLE, NE
WASHINGTON
D. C. 20544
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
V.
Case # 07-16-90074
John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood, Ann C. Williams,
Diane Sykes, Kenneth Ripple, Frank H. Easterbrook et al.
Respondents
NOTICE OF
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO “FRAUD”
“TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS” “TREASON” OF THE JANUARY 25, 2017 DOCUMENT MAILED
AS AN ORDER ABSENT A SIGNATURE w/Affidavit
I Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on
this day filed said Notice of Petition for Review et al. Before the Judicial
Conference et al. and noted parties.
President Donald Trump
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC. 20500
To:
Dir. James Comey, FBI Washington D.C.
601 4th
Street Washington, DC 20535
Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and
Disability
Administrative Office of the United States
Courts
One Columbus Circle, N E
Washington D. C. 20544
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on February 17, 2017 A Motion for Reconsideration
et al. has been submitted before the Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial
and Disability.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312
-965-6455
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
v.
Case # 07-16-90074
John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood, Ann C. Williams,
Diane Sykes, Kenneth Ripple, Frank H. Easterbrook et al.
Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, files herewith her
affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner/Counsel Pro
Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated
within said Petition for Review, the undersigned certifies that the statements
set forth in this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
Joe Louis Lawrence
P. O. Box 490075
Chicago, IL 60649-0075
@joelouis7
312 965-4655
