DEMOCRATIC JUDGES IN ILLINOIS HAVE DECLARED WAR ON THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IN THEIR TREASON OFFENSES:

THE RACIST CORRUPT JUDGES IN ILLINOIS ARE WORSE THAN ANY SOUTHERN JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES THE DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY UPHOLD THEIR RACIST DOCTRINES UNDERMINING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION RECRUITING ANY AND ALL INFERIOR BLACK AND BROWN NEGROES & OTHER ETHNIC GROUPS TO SUBMIT AND ABIDE BY ALL OF THEIR RACIST OUT LAWED DOCTRINES.

1.)  THE ONLY NEGROES APPOINTED OR THE MACHINE WILL SUPPORT ARE BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS AND RACIST WHITES THAT WILL CONDONE OPPRESSING THE INNOCENT, KEEP THE BLACK AND BROWN ETHNIC GROUP DISENFRANCHISED BY WHATEVER UNLAWFUL MEANS NECESSARY;

2.)  THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE HAS BEEN ABLE TO RECRUIT MEDIOCRE OR SUB INTELLECTS WHO ARE PLIABLE TO DO WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD VIOLATING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION VIOLATING EVERY ONES CIVIL RIGHTS DISPENSING THEIR JIM CROW DOCTRINES OF UNLAWFUL JUSTICE PURSUANT TO THE FRATERNAL LAWS OF THE GOOD OL BOYS;

3.)  BECAUSE SO MANY NEGROES ESPECIALLY AND MANY OTHER ETHNIC GROUPS HAVE ASSIMILATED TO RACIAL HATRED SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE OPPRESSORS HAVE NOW BECOME CO CONSPIRATORS TO THE VERY TREASON ACTS AND OFFENSES NOTED IN THIS DOCUMENT.

4.)  EVERY JUDGE APPOINTED BY EDWARD BURKE TO THE BENCH AND LUCKILY MADE IT TO FEDERAL COURT DID NOT GET THEIR BECAUSE OF THEIR ACADEMICS, THE SAD REALITY IS THAT MANY GOT THEIR BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR.

NO SELF-RESPECTING JUDGE OF ANY COLOR WOULD BE NAMED OR CAUGHT UP IN A COMPLAINT LIKE THIS ONLY WHITE JUDGES WHO PERSONIFY THEMSELVES AS GODS UNTOUCHABLE MEN. THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A HATE TOWARDS PEOPLE OF COLOR IS LIKENED TO THE DAYS WHEN HITLER HATED JEWS OR SELF-HATRED BLACKS WITH POST SLAVERY ATTITUDE ABOUT THE VERY PEOPLE IN THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUP, IN THAT MANY OF THEM OF THEM ARE WILLING TO WHAT EVER SELLING THEIR SOULS DESTROYING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS.

NOT ONE PERSON OF COLOR OPENED THEIR MOUTHS TO DENOUNCE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS LODGED AT OTIS LEE LOVE, JR IN TRYING TO SPEND FATHER TIME WITH HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER, INSTEAD RACIST HATEFUL JUDGES HAVE ENGAGED IN TREASON ACTS TRYING TO PROVE TO HIM ANY ANYONE WHO STANDS UP AND FIGHTS BACK THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE AND IS WILLING TO DESTROY THEIR CAREERS IN COMMITTING TREASON MAKING SURE A MAN OF COLOR NEVER RECEIVE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS IN ILLINOIS.

SO MANY JUDGES HAVE COMMITTED TREASON AT DR LINDA SHELTON A CAUCASIAN WOMAN TREATING HER AS IF SHE WAS A BLACK OR BROWN PERSON IT ONLY DEMONSTRATE IN THIS CASE #ALLLIVESDONTMATTER AND #BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER

THANKS TO SO MANY JUDGES WHO WENT TO LAW SCHOOL TO ENDEAVOR IN THE FIELD OF LAW AS TERRORIST AND PAPER THUGS, OR HOODLUMS, THIS DOCUMENT IS A REQUEST SEEKING ANOTHER CIRCUIT OUTSIDE OF ILLINOIS, WISCONSIN AND INDIANA WHICH IS THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT NOT TO HAVE ANY DEALINGS WITH THIS CASE DUE TO THE AFOREMENTIONED MENTIONED ABOVE;

IT WOULD BE NICE AND IRONIC IF A SOUTHERN CIRCUIT WAS ASSIGNED TO RECEIVE AND PRESIDE OVER THIS CASE, THE SOUTHERNERS NEED TO SEE JUST HOW RACIST AND DIABOLICAL THE NORTH REALLY IS IN COMPARISON TO THE SOUTH.

IT IS A DAM SHAME A MAN CAN MARRY ANOTHER MAN BUT A MAN OF COLOR CAN NOT RECEIVE EQUAL JUSTICE IN THE COURTS!

THERE HAS BEEN MORE TWITTER FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS HAVE COMPLAINED OF THE UNEQUAL APPLICATIONS OF THE LAWS IN ILLINOIS BUT NOT ONE PERSON OF COLOR NOT EVEN MAYOR RAHM WHO HAS A BLACK NEPHEW.

IT IS EASY TO JUMP ON THE BANDWAGON AND TALK ABOUT PRESIDENT ELECT DONALD TRUMP BUT MANY CAN HEAR A RAT PISS ON COTTON AT THE NUMBER OF BLACK DEMOCRATS DENOUNCING THESE HORRENDOUS HOLOCAUST ACTS ON PEOPLE OF COLOR AND INDEPENDENT WHITES WHY IS THAT?

  
NOT ONE JUDGE HAD THE LEGAL APTITUDE OR ANY SCINTILLA OF WISDOM REALIZING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CAUGHT YOU CAN NOT OUTSMART JUSTICE.

                                                            IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                              219 South Dearborn

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence

Petitioner                                                                               U.S.C.A.- 7th Circuit 

                                                                                                  RECEIVED

   V.                                                                                           DEC 9, 2016 COD 

   

                                                                                                     Case # 07-16-90074

John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood et al.

Respondent

            PETITION TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL                               

                         

 I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se Counsel, Heterosexual Native/African American “Free Man” Born & Raised hereby petitions the Honorable Judicial Council of the aforementioned statutes of violations ignored by Judge John W. Darrah and all of his colleagues complicit in said foregoing acts to transfer said matter Pursuant to Rule 26.

Statute: Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination,  Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of  Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.

The request for a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b) (1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:

Rule 26 is new, it implements the Breyer Committee’s recommended use of transfers. Breyer Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.        

1.)  That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook County judges violating the RICO ACT, the 7^th Cir. Held that the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther Merritt Swygert;

2.)  That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to every complaint said Petitioner put before them on appeal in affidavits validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR” against the United States Constitution making every order rendered against the Petitioner. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason;

3.)  That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes to the fact Petitioner was locked up unlawfully 5 times for allegedly owing child support on a case Alderman Edward Burke and his Democratic Terrorist in the Political Machine orchestrated (88 D 079012) to unlawfully extort money, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, falsified document Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account from the Il Dept. of Healthcare and Family Services, against Petitioner in the name of child support where the case was dismissed September 17, 1987 85 D 068185;

4.)   That every judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware Judge Kenneth Ripple, African American Ann Claire Williams, and Diane Sykes Trespassed upon the laws and committed Treason lied on court documents saying, “In 1987 the State of Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence to pay child support. He did not comply, and consequently the state revoked his driver's license. He appealed the revocation to the Secretary of State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also unsuccessfully sued his former employers, International Brands Corporation and the Chicago Transit Authority, in state and federal court for embezzlement and theft”.

5.)  That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware Petitioner was homeless and the Nazi style acts perpetrated at him with a Section 8 voucher was denied access to live within the city using said voucher, due to ethnicity and complaining blowing the whistle on many of the powerfully connected judges engaging criminal terrorist acts;

6.)  That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware African American Associate Political Appointed judge Franklin Ulylesses Vallderrama acting as a Puppet for his white masters, “Fixed” the case Trespassed upon the Laws and committed Treason threatened the Petitioner in open court in front of many white attorneys who openly stated, “Hell naw, I don’t want no part of this shit! This judge is crazy”

A-   That Judge Valderrama ignored the fact the 6 or 7 law firms admitted to Petitioner’s claims of Housing and Racial Discrimination regarding Source Income violations DEFAULTED on $25 Million Dollars, said judge stated, “he does not accept certified mail or an affidavit printout from the clerk’s office (Dorothy Brown) showing the parties were served and never replied timely; 

B-   Judges Mary Lane Mikva and Neil Cohen have asked said attorneys to respond or rebut the Petitioners argument all have declined and never have any attorney ever objected or denied any of the facts Petitioner has put before any courts, so said judges have to step outside their jurisdiction and commit Treason to keep the Petitioner from having Equal Protection of the Laws from any courts where they have control. 

7.)   That it is apparent no judge in the Seventh Circuit were aware they had become Trespassers of the laws and committed Treason pursuant to the aforementioned acts and are the new “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and a dangerous Threat to National Security due to their abuse of Power;

    

   WHEREFORE Petitioner Prays this matter and all related cases be transferred to another Honorable Judicial Council Circuit, for a reversal and remand with instructions removing the necessary judges based on the foregoing stated above who have participated in these Diabolical Terrorist Acts:

   The Honorable Judicial Council has the Jurisdiction, to correct any error, and establish any precedent in the law where deemed necessary, without fear of reprisals from any political organization, terrorist fraternal orders, elected or otherwise, for the mandate of their decision;

   The Honorable Judicial Council has the Jurisdiction and Wisdom to recognize when an individual has not been afforded sapiency in accordance to the United States Constitution Laws;

Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council  because as a”Pro Se” “Informa Pauper’s“ the admissions recorded in this instrument demonstrates under the Illinois Legal system Black and Brown lives don’t matter and the Jim Crow methods still being exercised criminalizing persons of color for attempting to rise above racial injustice perpetrated on innocent persons. 

Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council because of the color of his skin all defendants have admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated according to racial political guidelines;

For all of the aforementioned reasons is why the Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council for Jurisdiction and Enforcement.  

I affirm the above as being true.

                                                             Respectfully Submitted,

                                                             Petitioner/Counsel Pro Se

                                                               Joe Louis Lawrence

 ,   

                                                            IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                              219 South Dearborn

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Joe Louis Lawrence

Petitioner

   V.

   

                                                                                                     Case # 07-16-90074

John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood et al.

Respondent

                                                           NOTICE OF

            PETITION TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL                               

I  Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Petition to Transfer et al. Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.

To: Dir. James Comey, FBI 601 4^th Street, NW Washington D.C. 20535

          FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612

          US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability

Attn: Office of General Counsel

Administrative Office of the United States Courts

One Columbus Circle, NE

Washington, D. C. 20544

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on Dec 9, 2016, A Petition to Transfer et al. has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals. 

                                                             Respectfully Submitted

                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se

                                                                           PO Box 490075

                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075

                                                                          312 -965-6455

                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                                         @joelouis7     

FEDERAL JUDGES TRESPASSING UPON THE LAWS AS A NORM COMMITTING TREASON

DEMOCRATS IN CHICAGO HAVE MANAGED TO CIRCUMVENT THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND VIOLATE EVERY LAW UNIMAGINABLE "FIXING" ANY CASE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS COMMITTING TREASON:

EVERY BLACK DEMOCRATIC JUDGE SEE THE RACIST ACTS OF OTHER JUDGES ENGAGING IN TREASON AND OTHER TERRORIST ACTS HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES TO THE PLETHORA OF MANY ENGAGING DIABOLICAL TREASON OFFENSES TRYING TO STEAL THE JOHNSON SISTER'S HOME.

NO PERSON OF COLOR OR INDEPENDENT WHITES ESPECIALLY REPUBLICANS CAN OR EVER RECEIVE ANY JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS DUE TO THE COURTS BEING "RIGGED" WITH WITH POLITICAL APPOINTEES OPERATING AS TERRORISTS DOING WHAT THEY ARE TOLD, THIS IS WHY OTIS LEE LOVE, JR, DR. LINDA SHELTON DR. BANSA AND WIFE BISHOP CONNIE BANSA AND A HOST OF OTHERS ARE EXPERIENCING THE LEVEL OF INJUSTICE IN THE COURTS BECAUSE JUDGES HAVE BEEN UNTOUCHABLE NOT FEARING ANY FEDERAL AUTHORITIES BASICALLY GIVING THE FBI THE MIDDLE FINGER.

MANY BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES ARE GOING ALONG WITH WRONG SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE WRONG DOERS WHICH IS A SICKNESS WITHIN ITSELF.

RULE 26 IS NEW  WAIT UNTIL YOU READ THE DEC 9, 2016 POST FROM JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE

                                                            IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

                                                                                                         USCA-7th Circuit 

                                                                                                  RECEIVED

                                                                                                    DEC 14, 2016 NR

Monzella Johnson,

     Petitioner                                                                        07-16-90079

v

Diane P. Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans

Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,

Lloyd A. Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.

     Respondents

 PETITION FOR REVIEW & PETITION TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL COUNCIL

                                                     

To the Honorable Justices of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:

    Complainant a United States Citizen, Monzella Y. Johnson, hereby respectfully represents as Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be reviewed and Transferred to another Judicial Council.

   Now comes Monzella Y. Johnson, Pro Se Appellant in this cause  files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that Judge Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, and a plethora of other judges has Trespassed upon the Laws in an arrogant “Contemptuous manner” this Seventh Circuit has ignored all sufficient motions with affidavits, stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the courts that the District Court ignored and holding Racism Corruption in the courts.

STATUTES: Trespassers of the Laws, Treason, hereto attached, Group Ex. A, Judicial Complaint, (filed Dec. 6, 2016) detailing just how said judges engaging in acts of Treason likened to “Weapons of Mass Destruction” destroying innocent lives like the Appellant;

Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of appeals et al.

   

                                                             

                                                                               Respectfully Submitted

                                                                               _____________________                                                                                 

                                                                               Monzella Y. Johnson

                                                                              5217 S. Ingleside Ave.

                                                                               Chicago, IL. 60615

                                                                                                   

                                                                                        

                                                             IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

1.)    That said Chief judge had evidence from Page 5, Par. 4, Motion to Disqualify Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan et al. filed (Nov. 14, 2016) further validating the verity within the “Preponderance of the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys were acting in concert in said “Organize Conspiracy” engaging in TREASON and WAR on the United States Constitution

A-    The court ignored the valid certified court order demonstrating Cook County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment June 2, 2010;

B-     In that said, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U. S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 (7^th Cir. 1985).  

“Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges”    

  

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505

2.)      That Page 4, Par. 5 (A) further validate the verity within the “Preponderance of the Evidence” that said judge and attorneys were acting in concert in said “Organize Conspiracy”;

C-    The court ignored the valid certified court order demonstrating Cook County Circuit Court judge vacated the Foreclosure judgment June 2, 2010;

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

  Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.

  Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.

CONSPIRACY

Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

     Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728 (Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic constitutional rights;

3.)      That the court ignored the Defendant’s Motions accompanied with affidavits and clear attachments described as exhibits demonstrating a plethora of Criminal Civil Rights violations with “Fraudulent Acts surpassing human imagination signed and entered an order stating, “This court granted Plaintiff’s motion to remand “

A-   It further stated, “Having remanded the instant action to state court with a certified copy of the order, this court lacks jurisdiction over the instant matter”

B-    That because of the judges intimate ability in colluding with said attorneys clearly and convincingly violated all Canon Ethics and his jurisdiction by expeditiously having a certified order to be mailed remanding said matter back to state court claiming he had no jurisdiction;

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).

 In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.

As the color line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options, high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar Myrdal (1898–1987) in his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access to the resources of problem solving, and daring them—under threat of violence—to complain, protest, or advance.

Finally, protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcement’s complicity in the structure. From emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders, red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with personal attacks, school burnings, and lynchings. African Americans rarely served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel, nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt. African Americans—including the innocent—suffered the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage. Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks across the South.

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

4.)        That The judge’s orders of Nov 22, 2016 citing 28 U.S.C. 352 (b)(1)(A)(ii) and   spews the racial hatred and disdain said judges have against the Appellant as they willfully engaged in Treason, Trespassing upon the Laws ; See Gr Ex B, Petition to Transfer to Another Judicial Council, (filed Dec 9, 2016)

5.)      “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) he/she is without jurisdiction , and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.”          

  

6.)   A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

7.)   Finally, “An Evaluation of the United States District Court Judges in Chicago, by the Chicago Council of Lawyers was had against Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, states Page 10, Par.2, While a minority of lawyers commented positively on Judge Der-Yeghiayan, the vast majority of lawyers interviewed gave him poor marks on virtually all areas relevant to the Council’s evaluation, and these poor marks are consistent with the ratings given to Judge Der-Yeghiayan by respondents to the Council’s written survey”

A-    That said report truly find him unqualified and stated, “he lacks an adequate understanding of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and suggested that the judge’s background had not prepared him to assume such an important post.” 6

                                                                        

  

Wherefore the Foregoing Reasons, Appellant Prays for the following relief:

1.)   Appellant requests that another Honorable Court of Appeals, Judicial Circuit accept Jurisdiction of this matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said Treason Offenses;

2.)    Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against the Defendant/Government  

3.)   Issue an Injunction on U S Bank and all judges presiding in the matter trying to steal Defendants home in the unlawful application of Foreclosure and relied on judges acting outside their jurisdiction committing treason offenses;  

4.)   Issue an Order Nullifying Voiding Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan’s orders and Chief Judge in the Court of Appeals absent a signature, due to “Fraud” and other Civil Rights Violations;

5.)   An order issuing a Moratorium on all Foreclosures in Cook County Circuit courts, Appellate Court or Supreme Court of Illinois where Wells Fargo and U. S. Bank are a party to foreclosures where “Fraud” and treason is apparent and not being properly registered in the State of Illinois; 

        

Finally, this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”           

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                    Respectfully Submitted

                                                                               _____________________                                                                                 

                                                                               Monzella Y. Johnson

                                                                              5217 S. Ingleside Ave.

                                                                               Chicago, IL. 60615

                                                                                                   

                                                           IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

Monzella Johnson,

     Petitioner                                                                        07-16-90079

v

Diane P. Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans

Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,

Lloyd A. Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.

     Respondents

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I  Monzella Y. Johnson, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.

To: Dir. James Comey, FBI 601 4^th Street  Washington D.C. 20535

          FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612

          US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial and Disability

Attn: Office of General Counsel

Administrative Office of the United States Courts

One Columbus Circle, NE

Washington, D.C. 20544

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on December 13, 2016, A Petition for Review et al has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals. 

                                                                          Respectfully Submitted,

                                                                                    

                                                                               _____________________                                                                                  

                                                                               Monzella Y. Johnson

                                                                              5217 S. Ingleside Ave.

                                                                               Chicago, IL. 60615

                                                             IN THE

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

               

 Monzella Johnson,

     Petitioner                                                                        07-16-90079

v

Diane P. Wood, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, Pamela Myerson Timothy C. Evans

Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Charles Freeman, Thomas L. Kilbride,

Lloyd A. Karmeier, Rita Garman, Mary Jane Theis et al.

     Respondents

                                                                                                                  

                                                  AFFIDAVIT

I Monzella Y. Johnson, files herewith her affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:

I Monzella Y. Johnson Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said Petition for Review et al, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

Respectfully Submitted                                                         Notary

                                                                       

____________________

Monzella Y. Johnson

5217 S. Ingleside. Ave

Chicago, Il 60615

773 835-5849