WHEN WE HEAR THUNDER IT MAKES US REALIZE HOW POWERFUL IS WHEN YOU ARE IN A HURRICANE YOU SEEK COVER, WHEN YOU ARE IN TORNADO YOU SEEK IMMEDIATE COVER, WHEN THERE IS A FLOOD YOU SEEK HIGHER GROUND;
WHEN YOU READ THIS DOCUMENT MANY OF YOU WILL THINK YOU ARE APART OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ELEMENTS THIS DOCUMENT IS QUITE EARTHSHAKING!
THIS VERY DOCUMENT DEMONSTRATES HOW MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE WHO HAPPENS TO BE INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED IN THE LAWS WHO HAPPENED TO INFILTRATE THE LEGAL SYSTEM BY "RIGGING" IT RACIST HATEFUL, SEXIST JUDGES WHO MANY WOULD NEVER HAVE EVER WORN A ROBE DUE TO THEIR INCOMPETENCE;
IT SEEMS AS IF ALL OF THE RACIST JUDGES HAVE MIGRATED HERE FROM THE SOUTH SET UP SHOP HERE IN ILLINOIS AND HAS TAKEN REFUGE OVERTHROWING THE ILLINOIS COURTS, THE SURPRISING PART IS THAT THEY MANAGED TO RECRUIT AND APPOINT SOME INTELLECTUAL NEGROES AND HISPANICS TO TAKE ON INFERIOR ROLES AND FORSAKE THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAWS AND BECOME COMPLICIT IN TERRORIST ACTS OPPRESSING THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS AS A MEANS OF SECURING BEING APPOINTED OR REAPPOINTED;
THERE IS NOT ONE JUDGE WHO HAPPENS TO BE AFRICAN AMERICAN NEGROE OR HISPANIC WITH ANY REAL JUDICIAL AUTHORITY OVER THE IRISH ETHNIC GROUP OR THE "GOOD OL BOYS" AS THEY ARE AFFECTIONATELY DESCRIBED.
THE AFOREMENTIONED JUDGES ARE PUPPETS POST ERA SLAVES, INFERIOR BEINGS MANY OF THE BLACK MEN IN THE POSITIONS ARE SPINELESS BEING GAY OR TRANSGENDER DOES NOT ERASE THE SYSTEMIC GENOCIDAL TREATMENT PERPETRATED ON INNOCENT FAMILIES OF COLOR;
RACISM AND HATE AFFECTS NOT JUST #BLACKLIVESMATTER IT AFFECTS #ALLLIVESMATTER THEIR ARE SO MANY JUDGES IN THE CLOSET FROM THE LGBT COMMUNITY WHO WON'T SAY A THING UNLESS IT IS AN ISSUE INVOLVING THEM--THE SAD REALITY THEY ARE AFFECTED GROSSLY LIKE EVERYONE ELSE.
OTIS LOVE, JR. +RedBilla ONLY WANTED TO SPEND TIME WITH HIS DAUGHTER AND HAS EXPERIENCED THE NIGHTMARE OF HIS LIFE HIS EX GIRLFRIEND HAS EXHAUSTED EVERY DECEPTIVE TECHNIQUE POSSIBLE LYING ON HIM WHITE MEN LOVE THIS FROM BLACK WOMEN.
THE NOTED JUDGES WILL STAND BEHIND ANY BLACK OR BROWN WOMAN SO AS TO KEEP THE BLACK MAN OPPRESSED MAKING THEM FEEL SUPERIOR;
MANY OF YOU HAVE READ MY BLOG AND UNDERSTAND THE TYPE OF MAN, I AM BECAUSE THE WOMAN WHO LIED ON ME MOTHER WAS WHITE INSTEAD OF PUNISHING HER FATHER FOR WHAT HE DID TO HIS DAUGHTERS IMPREGNATING THEM EDWARD BURKE DEPLOYED HIS ENTIRE ARMY OF RACIST INFERIOR JUDGES AT ME, BUT WHAT HE DID NOT REALIZE BIG BROTHER (THE GOVERNMENT) WAS MY BACK UP SO PERSONALLY, THEY WANT EVERY JUDGE INVOLVED IT TOOK A WHILE.
LINDA SHELTON @DRLINDASHELTON WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING RACISM CORRUPTION, I THINK SHE HAS A HANDICAP AND CAUCASIAN THEY ARE TRYING TO INCARCERATE HER FOR SPEAKING UP AGAINST RACIAL INJUSTICE;
TWO RETIRED CIVIL SERVANTS WHO ARE SENIOR CITIZENS TAKING CARE OF THEIR ELDERLY MOM WHICH IS A BLESSING FEDERAL JUDGES ARE WORKING WITH ATTORNEYS TRYING TO STEAL THEIR HOME WITH FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS;
A MINISTER AND HER HUSBAND DR BANSA ARE VICTIMS OF THE SAME CRIMES WHERE DOCUMENTS WERE FALSIFIED STEALING THEIR HOME DON'T NOBODY SEE THE CRIMES BECAUSE ILLINOIS COURTS ARE A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE BLACK AND BROWN LIVES DON'T MATTER AND ALL LIVES DON'T MATTER.
THIS BLOG IS DEDICATED TO TIMOTHY DAVID LAWRENCE AND ALL OF THE POLICE AND MEMBERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO SOLVED HIS MURDER, THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF FOR THEIR CONTINUOUS INTEGRITY SHARED FOR MANY YEARS AND EVERYONE WHO TOOK A STAND EXTENDED THE OLIVE BRANCH AND CABLES HELPING ME GET TO THIS POSITION BUT THE ULTIMATE CREDIT GOES TO THOSE SPECIAL FORCES BEHIND THE SCENES WHO NEVER LOOKED AT MY SKIN COLOR.
HATE CREATED THIS MESS AND IT IS GOING TO TAKE LOVE TO TURN IT AROUND #1LOVEALL THANK YOU MY TWITTER FRIENDS YOUR RETWEETS MADE THIS POSSIBLE I THANK GOD FOR ALL OF YOU.
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
V.
Case # 07-16-90074
William J. Bauer,
Daniel A. Manion, Richard A Posner,
Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond Rovner,
David Hamilton, Mathew Connelly, Edmong Chang, Franklin
Uylesses
Valderrama, Thomas Hoffman, Mary K. Rochford,
Leonard Murray, George F. Scully,Jr., Ronald Bartkowicz,
Timothy P. Murphy, David Haracz, Kathleen Kennedy, Themeis
N. Karnezis,
Mathias W. Delort, Joy V. Cunningham, Timothy Calvin Evans,
Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Lloyd A. Karmeier, Charles Freeman, Thomas L.
Kilbride, Cynthia Y. Cobb, David Ellis, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., James
Fitzgerald Smith, Rodolpho Garcia, Patrick J. Quinn, Warren D. Wolfson, Lorreta
Higgins- Wolfson, Sebastin Patti, Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, Michael Murphy,
Maxwell Griffin, Jr. Leida J. Gonzalez Santiago et al.
Respondents
PETITION FOR REVIEW
W/AFFIDAVIT PART II
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se
Counsel hereby Petitions the Honorable Judicial Council regarding the
aforementioned statutes of violations ignored by Judge John W. Darrah and all
of his colleagues complicit in said foregoing acts.
Statutes: Trespassers of the Laws,
Treason, Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal
Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination, Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their
immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of the provisions of the
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy,
Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any
Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the
Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.
1.) That judges (Daniel A. Manion, Diane
Sykes, Richard A. Posner, Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond
Rovner) in the Court of Appeals demonstrated their racial hatred at the
Petitioner for standing up to corruption and racial hatred collectively denied
every motion accompanied with an affidavit;
A-
Petitioner
informed the court how CHA colluded with Craig Fulton case 13 cv 02852 Edmond E. Chang was the judge, City officials and CHA
embezzled money from the section 8 program where abandoned buildings were used
placing innocent families like the Petitioner in buildings that was “Nigger Rigged” which is the
term city officials described when buildings are put together bypassing all
city certifications and inspections to place qualified applicants in
substandard housing as they collect tax free money from the Federal Government
section 8 program;
B-
That
many administrators within the Section 8 program where aware of this allegedly
received kickbacks keeping their mouths and was relying on every corrupt judge
where this matter presided before to Dismiss the claims as John Darrah and his
fraternal brethren did in the 7th Cir;
C-
That
said net had to be widened so as to include and trap every person involved
stealing from the Federal Housing program not excluding anyone;
2.) That said Motion to Disqualify judge
Darrah went ignored pursuant to the Civil
Rights Act of 1866 referencing, Par.
8, Page 12;
3.) That judges within the Democratic
Political Machine has systematically denied every document, motion,
affidavit court transcript put before the courts demonstrating members within
the Political Machine have used their robes influence and authority to
continuously enforce Jim Crow Laws
outlawed by the United States Supreme Court;
A-
On
the Bogus Paternity case 88 D 079012
where Secret Service Agents contacted Petitioner on another unrelated
matter and mentioned the paternity case as Bogus Plaintiff identified them as
FBI agents they laughed and said they are not any of those “Wussies”
B-
That
the FBI did not have to create a Bogus case snaring corrupt judges, they snared
themselves, in that it took at least 21 Cook County judges to continuously “FIX” falsify court orders under Edward
Burkes authority in spite of certain alleged Irishmen and others pleading with
him to leave the Plaintiff alone;
C-
In
that the worst part is that said judges David E. Haracz, Timothy P.
Murphy & Ronald Bartkowicz a former CTA attorney working in
workman’s compensation department was appointed as judge to issue an order of
protection order against Petitioner on behalf of Chicago Police Officer
Francoise Louise Barbara Hightower, he was not aware she was a Police officer
but was using Public Aid and attorney Joseph V. Roddy trying to extort money
from him using the child support scheme unlawfully, Roddy was successful in
that Petitioners wages were garnisheed to the Law office of Joseph c/o
Francoise Hightower the secretary at Reliable School Bus company displayed the
cancelled checks to the Petitioner, she said she has processed 100’s of child
support payments and never seen anything like this the President of the company
questioned the unsigned court order, Petitioner had to receive welfare and food
stamps they garnisheed so much money from the Petitioner, he was not able to
provide for his family;
D-
Petitioner
was Remanded in custody while in his CTA uniform as the judge used his
unlawfully authority helping the CTA take his badge off his body, but the Cook
County Sheriff made the attorney sign on their stationery what they were removing
from his body while handcuffed, Sheriff Beradi told them you know this is not
right!
E-
Judge
Bartkowicz used his robe unlawfully to help the CTA from paying him his lost
wages that the CTA stole while he was off work injured on duty and ordered him
to go drive a school bus and threatened him if he was to try and return back to
CTA he was going to have him remanded into custody because CTA said “You are not an employee”;
F-
Cook
County Sheriff informed the Petitioner that the judge was a former CTA employee
and should not be on your case, “Fuck
what he said, we run the courts” you are not going to jail, they escorted
him home and picked him up for court;
G-
Petitioner
filed a Motion Disqualifying Ronald Bartkowicz from the case for Bias and
conflict of interest, said judge asked the Petitioner, it is true, and how
did you know? He recused himself and the case went to Morgan Hamilton who hated
men of color, she and (Franklin Valderrama acted like they came from the same
womb);
H-
Morgan
Hamilton was the supervising Associate judge never elected helped judge
Bartkowicz by falsifying a court order saying “Petitioner left a cloud of
mistrust saying he was a CTA employee” the Cook County Sheriff were very
vociferous in speaking up in Petitioners behalf about the corruption in the
paternity case, so she reassigned the case to David Delgado he read the
warrant, he became adamant and said if he ever found out Petitioner was a CTA
employee, he was going to lock up everybody at the CTA;
I-
Judge
Delgado noticed the warrant was missing a lot of pertinent information, he told
Francoise’s attorney, I cannot send him to jail on this it has no return date,
no court information, it was basically blank, he said if he was to send
Petitioner to jail, he would never come out and be lost in the system an
attempt was to made on his life Judge Bartkowicz was heard saying he wanted no
part of this and the day Petitioner was supposed to be in jail another person
was locked up and hung in the jail cell;
J-
The
case was reassigned to Judge Lester Bonoguru, see unlawful1.blogspot.com Post Thursday August 30, 2012,
Certified Affidavit demonstrating the Chronology of unlawful Contempt Charges
issued by Racist Hateful white men operating on behalf of their Boss Edward
Burke;
K- Judge Lester Bonoguru stated, Page 3, Par 10, Post August 30, 2012, unlawful1.blogspot.com, “He was aware who, I was and what was going
on he said the problem here is that a lot of men paid a lot of money getting
their law school education and you are embarrassing them” et al.
L-
That
of the 21 judges one of them was a FBI agent appointed to the Circuit Court who
somehow mysteriously had Plaintiff in Contempt of Court and Plaintiff never
appeared before him and so many of the judges involved with falsifying court
documents;
M- That not less than 15 State Appellate
judges signed their names denying every Motion and Affidavit demonstrating,
corroborating racist white men within the Democratic Party “Organized” with “Terror
and Mayhem” in mind perpetrated heinous “Hate Crimes” at the Petitioner ignored everything he filed
demonstrating his innocence;
N-
That
allegedly Supreme Court judge Anne Burke had 2-4 attorneys to go along with her
in denying every Motion accompanied with affidavits denying his Writ of
Mandamus and Supervisory;
4.) Petitioner has filed the appropriate Complaints
Motions, Exhibits corroborated with affidavits detailing how cases are “Fixed” in all courts, hereto
attached, Ex A, Court Order signed
and certified by George F. Sculley, Jr. Vacating Order of Possession September
11, 2012;
A- That Craig Fulton allegedly had
intimate relations with said judge when he was an attorney and thought he could
commit any crime and get out of jail free, in that, Judge Sculley admitted to
Petitioner he prepared the papers for Craig Fulton when he was the attorney,
see Gr Ex C, Page 8, Par18 A-E;
B-
That
Craig would brag how he knew people didn’t have to pay city water bills, he had
no credit and that CHA was depositing money in his girlfriend’s account in Las
Vegas and was connected and stated, “he
had no idea who the Petitioner knew his people told him to leave the Petitioner
along because he was generating too much heat”
C-
Petitioner
submitted to the Deputy clerks everything that was deleted from the Database in
the Daley Center regarding said case sources within the Sheriff stated, Judge
Leonard Murray signed an Order illegally allowing the Cook County Sheriff to
break into Petitioners home stealing all of his original court documents and 25
years of personal effects making the Petitioner HOMELESS TO THIS VERY DAY and on Welfare;
D- That said Ex A was never vacated and Craig Fulton never challenged or
objected to anything Petitioner filed in the courts;
5.) That because of Ex A every Federal and State judge that had Notice and knowledge of
the foregoing stated above became complicit and established their roles
intimately in an “Organized Conspiracy”,
hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Page
8, Par 9, FACT: “The Democratic Political Machine judges in
the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals is by far why Chicago is the most
racist segregated City and State to live in et al….”
6.) In furtherance to the above, when
cases are “Fixed” Corrupt judges
have found a way to circumvent a good judges integrity by undermining his
authority by engaging in diabolical acts overturning his authority unlawfully
as demonstrated in this document;
A-
That
Gr Ex D, Motion for
Disqualification of judge et al. (Former Chief Judge Frank H. Easterbrook) Page 4 Par. B, “That judge
Easterbrook is aware of the “Systemic” Racial application of Unjust Laws
Dispensated against Appellant et al……….said judge ignored every unlawful
criminal act”;
B- That Group Ex D, E, F, G, H
categorically demonstrate the unwarranted racial hatred Easterbrook and other
judges had towards the Petitioner simply for standing up to Racial Injustice, said
judge had the audacity to cite a law for reasons denying him legal
representation Farmer v Haas, 990 F 2d 319, 321 (7th Cir 1993) Page 6,
Par 7 B-C a prisoner who was a homosexual raped by another inmate viciously
where correctional officers placed the man in the cell against the homosexual
request, he had fear for his life which was warranted because what he feared
actually took place, he was brutally raped.
C- In that said judge have never met a
man like the Plaintiff and judging how he has habitually tried denigrating
Petitioner in denying him an appointment of attorney and justice his Ivy League
education didn’t seem to help him from not getting trapped in this conspiracy
like the rest of his colleagues;
7.) That Judge Edmond E. Chang closed his
eyes to the injustices on case 13 CV 02852 because this is the Democratic
way in Illinois persons of color are not equal in accordance to the laws where
Democrats rule but they are required to vote every year or whenever there is an
election keeping the oppressors in power so they can continue to deny any
document that demonstrates Disparate treatment in the laws or Discrimination
and more importantly Unequal Protection of the Laws, in that, said order is in
violation of Rule 60 (b) (3) (4), Ex A hereto attached, validates the
verity of judges engaging in diabolical criminal acts;
8.) That Judge Darrah was expecting the
very judges in the Court of Appeals to help him once again in upholding the assassination
of Petitioner’s character as demonstrated in the aforementioned cases, in that
said judges are a law unto themselves, anarchy runs the courts demonstrating
within the Preponderance of the Evidence legal standards that, Illinois courts
and Federal Courts are presently under siege by Terrorists who have infiltrated
the Democratic party and is inciting laws against the United States
Constitution;
A-
That many have complained on what the
President elect Donald Trump’s administration will bring to America is already
here in Chicago courts it’s just been kept a secret for so many years, now the
world can see justice is not afforded to everyone.
9.) That Gr
Ex H, Motion for Reconsideration for
Appointment of Counsel et al. Judge Daniel Manion filed 1-23-2012, that Page 5, Pars 2, 3 unequivocally validate the verity said judge exercising
anarchy from the bench operating outside of his judicial discretion but from a
racist fraternal disposition;
A- That Gr Ex I, Motion for
Reconsideration Vacate Orders due to Bias or Fraud et al. Judge William J.
Bauer, Filed Feb. 27, 2013, said motion clearly identifies the heinous acts of
Holocaust Oppression that is indicative to the laws afforded within the United
States Constitution but because said judge don’t embrace and follow the
doctrines of the United States Constitution, Page 9, Par 7, “Because they are true Terrorists in this
matter, what Adolph Hitler could not accomplish in the War with the United
States have been replaced with some of the offspring inciting “WARLIKE
Crimes on people of color, using the laws unlawfully to achieve their racist
goals”;
B- That Gr Ex J, Joe Louis Lawrence v IBC/Wonder bread, Chicago Transit
Authority, Chicago Police, Complaint of Civil Rights Violations, Equal
Protection of the Laws Violations, Employment Discrimination/Retaliatory
Harassment, Disparate Treatment, $350 Million, Judge Kennelly case 07-1191 stated, “the gist of Mr. Lawrence complaint is somewhat difficult to make out” see
unlawful1.blogspot.com Post April
14, 2012, Brief prepared by the
Petitioner his very first Dec. 7, 2007, Page
11 Statement of the Issues
demonstrates a comprehensible picture of the racist events taking place in the
courts as corrupt white men “Organized
in said Conspiracy” not fearing the laws of any judge because said
judges worked for the Democratic Political Machine”
C-
That
Gr Ex F of Part 1, Petition for
Review clearly and unequivocally validate the verity of judges engaging in
a diabolical conspiracy committing “Fraud”
and “Perjury”, thereby, violating Rule 60 (b) (3) Fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic),
misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; Fed Rules of Civil Procedure.
D-
That
Gr Ex F of Part 1, Petition for Review impeaches Judge Darrah’s
credibility and demonstrates a violation of Rule 60 (b) (3) (4) and Gr Ex A hereto attached, further amplifies the
verity within the Preponderance of the Evidence of said judge and his racist
brethren along with many inferior persons of color as Trespassers of the Laws;
E-
That
Gr Ex K Motion for Appointment of
Counsel, Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judge Darrah et al. filed Nov. 7,
2011, said judges denied Petitioner legal representation thinking they would be
able to bully him and apply any order against him and it would go unnoticed, in
that said judges further amplified this fact by prohibiting him from filing any
documents knowing all of his funds had been stolen and extorted and that he was
on welfare, Diane Sykes and David Hamilton issued an order to the clerks
letting them know they were not to accept any documents from the Petitioner
unless he paid $505.00;
F-
That
the crimes perpetrated by judge Darrah and all of his brethren surpasses the
crimes of former Governor Rod Blagoivich who tried selling President Obama’s
Senate seat and has been sentenced to 14 years in Federal prison, in that every
judge and attorney in said matter should receive nothing less than LIFE for
their actions in the aforementioned documents;
G-
That Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a State………unlawful
combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous and powerful et
al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the
conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public safety shall
become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall be deemed a
rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
H-
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held
that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy,
768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The
Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such
jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his
process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109
(1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928).
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
10.)
That
said judges have violated the oath of their offices in that no Circuit Court
judge ever had jurisdiction but the
Federal judges ignored the Treason Like offenses and continuously violated
their oath on the bench;
The U.S. Supreme Court has
stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war
against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support
it.". Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below). If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below). If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
TREASON
Whenever
a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is
engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101
S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat)
264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
Any
judge or attorney who does not report the above judges for treason as required
by law may themselves be guilty of misprision of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section
2382.
Petitioner is appealing to the Honorable Judicial Council, for a
reversal and remand with instructions removing the necessary judges based on the
foregoing stated above who have participated in these Diabolical Terrorist Acts:
The Honorable
Judicial Council has the Jurisdiction, to correct any error, and
establish any precedent in the law where deemed necessary, without fear of
reprisals from any political organization, terrorist fraternal orders, elected
or otherwise, for the mandate of their decision;
The Honorable
Judicial Council has the Jurisdiction and Wisdom to recognize when an
individual has not been afforded sapiency in accordance to the United States
Constitution Laws;
Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council because as a”Pro Se” “Informa Pauper’s“
the admissions recorded in this instrument demonstrates under the Illinois
Legal system Black and Brown lives don’t matter and the Jim Crow methods still
being exercised criminalizing persons of color for attempting to rise above
racial injustice perpetrated on innocent persons.
Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council
because of the color of his skin all defendants have admitted to all criminal
acts and civil rights violations but the judges have ignored all admissions
affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs
Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because
of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated according to racial
political guidelines;
Petitioner Prays’ that this Honorable
Judicial Council Invoke Jurisdiction and Order the Removal of John W. Darrah and any and all
judges complicit in the Coup enforcing Jim Crow Laws, and are Trespassers of
the Laws in the State of Illinois recorded within;
Petitioner Prays that this Honorable
Judicial Council recruit Judges from other Circuits with integrity and knowledge of the
laws and render every order entered against the Petitioner as Null and
Void/Invoke a Moratorium prohibiting any of the aforementioned judges from
prosecuting anymore authority from the bench Instanter;
For all of
the aforementioned reasons is why the Petitioner is before the Honorable Judicial Council for
Jurisdiction and Enforcement.
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted,
______________________________
Petitioner/Counsel Pro Se
Joe
Louis Lawrence
,
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
V.
Case # 07-16-90074
William J. Bauer,
Daniel A. Manion, Richard A Posner,
Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond Rovner,
David Hamilton, Mathew Connelly, Edmong Chang, Franklin
Uylesses
Valderrama, Thomas Hoffman, Mary K. Rochford,
Leonard Murray, George F. Scully,Jr., Ronald Bartkowicz,
Timothy P. Murphy, David Haracz, Kathleen Kennedy, Themeis
N. Karnezis,
Mathias W. Delort, Joy V. Cunningham, Timothy Calvin Evans,
Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Lloyd A. Karmeier, Charles Freeman, Thomas L.
Kilbride, Cynthia Y. Cobb, David Ellis, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., James
Fitzgerald Smith, Rodolpho Garcia, Patrick J. Quinn, Warren D. Wolfson, Lorreta
Higgins- Wolfson, Sebastin Patti, Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, Michael Murphy,
Maxwell Griffin, Jr. Leida J. Gonzalez Santiago
et al.
Respondents
NOTICE OF
PETITION FOR REVIEW
W/AFFIDAVIT PART II
I Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on
this day filed said Notice of Petition for Review Part II et al. Before the
Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.
To:
Dir. James Comey, FBI Washington D.C.
FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West
Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500
Commander
& Chief
Attorney
General of United States
President
Barack Obama
Loretta
Lynch
The White House
U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
President Elect Donald Trump
Chief Judge Timothy Evans
Judge
Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50
West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Judge Mary Lane Mikva
Clerk
of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite
50
West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan
Asst.
Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
100
West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
States
Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center,
Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State
Patricia
Rios, CHA Chief Adm. Officer
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville 60
East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Housing Choice Partners
CHA
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.
Kathryn
Ludwig, Chief HCV Officer
401 S. La Salle, Suite 1105
60
East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605
Chicago, Ill. 60605
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist
Eugene
Jones, Jr. CEO
Jessie McDaniel
CHA
401 S. La Salle, Suite 1105
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill. 60605
Chicago,
Ill. 60605
City of Chicago, Department of Buildings
Christopher Lynch
121 North LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber
Fowler Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B.
King, James Bebley,
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605
Cary
G. Schiff & Associates Gordon
& Rees LLP
Christopher
R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Rahimi Goli
134 N.
LaSalle Street, Suite 1720
1 North
Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Christian
Novay
Chicago, Ill. 60603
550
West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago,
IL. 60661
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales
Consultant
Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio
420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Chicago,
Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto,
Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Father
Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill. 60611
St.
Sabina
1210
West 78th Pl.
Chg.
Il
60620
Courtesy Copies:
US
Attorney
FBI
Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary
T. Fardon
2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S.
Dearborn, 5th floor
Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
Leo
High School President/Sun Times
Columnist Dan McGrath
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
7901
S. Sangamon
50 West Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago,
Il 60620
Chicago, Ill 60601
Mayor
Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel ANTONIO R. RILEY
City Hall
77
West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago,
Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon
Mark Kirk
525 South
8th St.
607
East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce
Rauner
Alderman
David Moore
100 West
Randolph
Alderman Ed Burke
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
Alderwoman Carrie Austin
Alderwoman Emma Mitts
Cook County President
Cook
County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas
J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517
Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Hon
Dick Durbin
Hon
Judge
525 South
8th St.
Frederick Bates
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
50
West Washington
Chicago,
Ill. 60601
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on November 23, 2016 A Petition for Review
Part II et al has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312 -965-6455
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
219 South Dearborn
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
V.
Case # 07-16-90074
William J. Bauer,
Daniel A. Manion, Richard A Posner,
Richard D. Cudahy, Daniel Tinder, Ilana Diamond Rovner,
David Hamilton, Mathew Connelly, Edmong Chang, Franklin
Uylesses
Valderrama, Thomas Hoffman, Mary K. Rochford,
Leonard Murray, George F. Scully,Jr., Ronald Bartkowicz,
Timothy P. Murphy, David Haracz, Kathleen Kennedy, Themeis
N. Karnezis,
Mathias W. Delort, Joy V. Cunningham, Timothy Calvin Evans,
Anne M. Burke, Robert R. Thomas, Lloyd A. Karmeier, Charles Freeman, Thomas L.
Kilbride, Cynthia Y. Cobb, David Ellis, Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr., James
Fitzgerald Smith, Rodolpho Garcia, Patrick J. Quinn, Warren D. Wolfson, Lorreta
Higgins- Wolfson, Sebastin Patti, Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, Michael Murphy,
Maxwell Griffin, Jr. Leida J. Gonzalez Santiago
et al.
Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, files herewith her
affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:
I Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner/Counsel Pro
Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated
within said Petition for Review, the undersigned certifies that the statements
set forth in this instrument are true
and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and
belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he
verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Notary
Joe Louis Lawrence
P. O. Box 490075
Chicago, IL 60649-0075
@joelouis7
312 965-4655
