Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Sunday, July 31, 2016


Mississippi Jails Are Losing Inmates, And Local Officials Are ‘Devastated’ By The Loss Of Revenue

“If they do not send us our inmates back, we can’t make it,” said one county supervisor.

 04/14/2016 08:01 pm ET | Updated Apr 18, 2016
County officials across Mississippi are warning of job losses and deep deficits as local jails are being deprived of the state inmates needed to keep them afloat. The culprit, say local officials, is state government and private prisons, which are looking to boost their own revenue as sentencing and drug-policy reforms are sending fewer bodies into the correctional system.
In the late 1990s, as the overcrowded Mississippi prison system buckled under the weight of mass incarceration, the state asked local governments to build local correctional institutions to house state prisoners. It was billed as a win-win: The Mississippi Department of Correction would foot the bill for each prisoner, and the counties would get good jobs guarding them. The state guaranteed that the local jails would never be less than 80 percent occupied, and the locals would get a 3 percent boost in compensation each year.
After a few years, say local officials, the state offered a new deal: Instead of the 3 percent bump, they would give the locals more and more prisoners, thus boosting total revenue. Today, the state pays $29.74 per day per prisoner to the regional facilities, a deal that worked for everybody as long as the buildings were stuffed full with bodies.
Scott Strickland, president of the Stone County Board of Supervisors, said reforms at the state and local levels have shrunk the prison population. “Federal laws took some part in that — allowing prisoners to serve only a certain percentage of their term,” he said. “Also, they’ve reduced prison sentences for certain drug-related offenses.”
As the wave of mass incarceration begins to recede, the Mississippi controversy has local and state officials talking openly about how harmful locking up fewer people up will be for the economy, confirming the suspicions of those who have argued that mass incarceration is not merely a strategy directed at crime prevention. “Under the administrations of Reagan and Clinton, incarceration, a social tool used for punishment, also became a major job creator,” Antonio Moore, a producer of the documentary “Crack in the System,” wrote recently.
“I don’t think it necessarily started out this way, but the inmate population has become the backbone of some of these counties that are involved,” said Mississippi Corrections Commissioner Marshall Fisher as the controversy heated up.
The prisoners have value beyond the per diem, county officials add, when they can be put to work. State prisoners do garbage pickup, lawn maintenance and other manual labor that taxpayers would otherwise have to pay for. Convict labor has made it easier for local governments to absorb never-ending cuts in state funding, as tea party legislators and governors slash budgets in the name of conservative government.
The state knows it, and now demands that local jails house state convicts who perform labor for free, George County Supervisor Henry Cochran told The Huffington Post. The counties take the deal. “You’re either gonna go up on everybody’s garbage bill, or you’ve gotta house those inmates,” Cochran said. “You’re using that inmate labor, so [taxpayers are] getting a little good out of that inmate for their tax dollars. You either gotta hire a bunch of employees or keep that inmate. It’s like making a deal with the devil.”
BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES
Fencing surrounds the Walnut Grove Correctional Facility in Walnut Grove, Mississippi, U.S., on Wednesday, April 17, 2013. In Mississippis four privately run prisons last year, the assault rate averaged three times as high as in state-run lockups. None was more violent than the Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images
State lawmakers can claim to be acting conservatively, Cochran said, but they’re not responsible for the consequences of their decisions. “The state’s dumping responsibility on local government,” he said.
“The department has had to reduce spending by $5 million to comply with Gov. Phil Bryant’s recent order,” Fisher said in a February statement, citing the budget constraints as the reason for the prisoner transfers. 
Fisher added that he was re-evaluating the agency’s spending, given “low pay, high turnover, critical staff shortages, and aging facilities.”
The state was paying prison guards so little that it couldn’t even find staff for its community work centers, which run the convict labor program, Fisher said. Mississippi, in other words, couldn’t even afford free labor. “I don’t like having to close community work centers, but we simply don’t have the staff to keep some of them operating. Until we improve the pay of corrections officers, staffing will continue to be a critical issue,” Fisher said.
Like Mississippi, neighboring Louisiana, as well as Kansas, have recently become laboratories for conservative policy, with hard-line Republicans slashing taxes and dramatically cutting spending. The argument was that the tax cuts would fuel growth. Instead, the states have become economic basket-cases — Kansas actually performed worse economically than its neighbors. Deficits in Kansas and Louisiana both soared and basic services have been cut beyond the bone.
The next to fall in Mississippi will be workers at regional jails that have lost 20 percent of their inmates. Officials in Stone County and George County said that around 40 employees in each would be laid off if the jails were forced to close, a necessity if the inmate population or the state reimbursement doesn’t increase. The counties are losing $72,000 per month each, officials said. Both counties still owe significant sums on bonds that financed the jails, so even if they shut them down to stop the bleeding, taxpayers will still be on the hook.
“It’s a game,” said Scott Strickland. “The commissioner of corrections wants raises for all his state employees, so he’s trying to cry wolf.”
Strickland noted that it costs the state roughly $43 per day to lock people in Mississippi facilities, and that none of the inmates in Stone County were looking forward to being moved. “They treat them rough up there,” he said of the state prisons.
Jeffrey Schwartz, a consultant who has advised jails and prisons, said Mississippi’s battle is a strange turn of events. “It is a state that has had lots of problems within corrections. This is quite a new twist,” he said. “In the great overcrowding days, there were battles between the counties and the state over whether the state had to take inmates from the counties, and the states said we’re not taking any more, and the sheriffs said, well you have to.” A sheriff, Schwartz recalled, once dropped inmates off at a state prison, handcuffed them to the fence, and drove off.
But local officials are investigating whether the state inmates are instead winding up in private prisons. “According to their reports, they have some private prisons that they are actually paying up to $80 a day. I think it’s political favors going around, the reason they’re doing that, but that’s neither here nor there,” Strickland said.
Mississippi contracts with a Utah company called Management and Training Corp. to house some of its prisoners. Stone County Supervisor Dale Bond questioned why the state would send inmates to the private prison at more than double the cost of transferring them to a county facility. “Some of these private prisons have got 1,000 inmates and they’re getting that large per diem,” he lamented. 
“None of the offenders from the regional jails are being moved to the facilities we operate. We house approximately 4,100 inmates at the four facilities,” said Issa Arnita, spokesman for MTC.
“By the end of May, we’ll be well over a quarter-million in the red on that facility,” said Bond of Stone County’s facility. “If they do not send us our inmates back, we can’t make it.”
Bond said the county supervisors have asked for permission to bring prisoners from out of state to cover the shortfall, but he worried red tape will slow the flow of human traffic. “I don’t know how reliable that is. By the time we get that approved, we’re gonna be broke,” he said. 
At a recent meeting with state officials, Bond said, the state Corrections Department offered to pay off one sheriff’s bond and close the county facility, but he turned down the offer. “No, we don’t want that, we want the jobs,” the sheriff said.
For Strickland, something has to give. “In a way, we were sort of devastated. That revenue needs to be made up,” he said.
Sign up here to get an email when Ryan Grim writes a new story.

Also on HuffPost



The slave master would savagely sodomize the slave. Buck breaking was a tool to keep all young black slaves from being defiant and taking revenge. It also frightened the mother’s and wives from ever giving consent to an uprising. Buck Breaking was so successful that it was made into a “Sex Farm” where white men could travel from plantation to plantation feeding their sadistic, homosexual needs.

Observations of an Invisible Woman

Buck Breaking

The process of “breaking the buck” involves perhaps the most heinous and atrocious acts known to man.
{There is a reason why this scene is immortalized in cinematic history}
A strapping Negro slave, who was defiant, surly and may stir up trouble, was beaten with a whip till bloody in front of his entire slave congregation. The slave owner, deathly afraid of an uprising, would cut down a tree and, with the help of the overseer, would then pummel the deviant “buck” into submission. Once the slave was worn down, the white master had the other Negro slaves force him over the tree stump where his britches would be removed and he laid fully exposed and ripe for the taking.
What came next caused fear and terror to ripple through every slave plantation across the South.
The master, drunk on blood lust, would explain to all strong, young black men that if they do not follow strict orders and comply with the whims of the Overseer and the Master, this too would be their fate. He removed his own clothing and proceeded to savagely sodomize the buck in front his wife, family, friends and children. He then invited his associates from other plantations to join in the Nigger Festivities.
In order for his plan to take effect, he would require the buck’s male child to watch, front row center, so he too can witness his father’s sexual demise and humiliation. Buck Breaking was the slave master’s very effective tool to keep all young black slaves from ever being defiant and taking revenge. It also frightened the mother’s and wives from ever giving consent to an uprising.
Buck Breaking was so successful that it was made into a “Sex Farm” where white men could travel from plantation to plantation feeding their sadistic, homosexual needs. If there was ever any doubt that the white race is our mortal enemy, please remove all doubt and see the truth for what it is. An Example of modern day buck breaking is:
Those of us that do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

STILL TO THIS DAY THE RACIST WHITE MAN IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY MUST STILL TO THIS DAY IS RAPING THE BLACK MAN ONLY THIS TIME THEY HAVE APPOINTED MANY BLACK AND BROWN MEN IN THE PARTY WHO WILL OPPRESS THEIR PEOPLE AND SUCCUMB TO THEIR WHIMS AT ALL TIMES.

VIOLENCE AND MAYHEM IS STILL PERPETRATED ON BLACK AND BROWN FAMILIES AND MANY INDEPENDENT WHITES.

LOOK AT @redbilla OTIS LEE LOVE, JR. WHO PETITIONED THE COURT TO SEE HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER HIS CHILDS MOTHER NATASHA BROOMFIELD  THE AFOREMENTIONED POST DEMONSTRATES THE RACIAL HATRED LODGED AT THIS MAN FOR WANTING TO SEE AND BE A PART OF HIS DAUGHTERS LIFE.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016


HE HAS SPENT OVER $30,000 IN LEGAL FEES LOST GOOD JOBS LOST HIS CONDOMINIUM HIS VEHICLES SELLING THEM JUST TO BE IN HIS DAUGHTERS LIFE BUT HIS CHILD'S MOTHER  CONVICTED OF TAX FRAUD CONCOCTED A LIE ABOUT HIS CHARACTER TO KEEP HIM FROM SEEING HIS OWN CHILD.

A BOGUS ORDER OF PROTECTION WAS FILED AGAINST HIM CRIMINAL CHARGES WERE FILED AGAINST HIM AS RACIST JUDGES TRIED TO BUCK HIM TRYING TO BREAK HIM FOR STANDING UP FIGHTING BACK RACIAL INJUSTICE IN THE COURT SYSTEM.

THE TERRORIST IN THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE WILL NOT ADDRESS ANY OF THE WRONGS OR CRIMINAL ACTS PERPETRATED BY THE WHITES BECAUSE #BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER 

TAKE A LOOK AT HOW JUDGES LIED TRIED TO BREAK ME FEDERAL JUDGES PROTECTING RACIST DEMOCRATS READ THE JAN 12, 2012 POST HOW THEY DEPICTED ME AS FRIVOLOUS AND PRESENTED AN INCOMPREHENSIBLE COMPLAINT.

NOW LOOK AT THE JULY 22, 2016 POST HOW IT CORROBORATES AND DEMONSTRATES JUDGES ENGAGING IN TERRORIST ACTS AND THE AUGUST 30, 2012 HOW THEY WRONGFULLY TRIED TO BUCK ME FOR FIGHTING BACK!

NO BISEXUAL OR HOMOSEXUAL MAN OF COLOR OR THOSE LIVING IN THE CLOSET AS RACIST TERRORIST DID NOT FEAR REPRISALS BECAUSE EVERYONE SHARED A HATRED AT ME BEING EITHER A HETEROSEXUAL OR MAN OF COLOR.

MEMBERS OF THE #LGBT COMMUNITY WHO ARE JUDGES OR POLITICIANS IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DEMONSTRATES A  HATE ON THEIR OWN RACE SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION.

FOLLOW THIS CASE AND MANY ARE IDENTIFIED    

Friday, July 22, 2016

JUDGE JOHN DARRAH HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THIS SAME CASE WHERE HE IGNORED ALLEGATIONS OF KU KLUX KLAN MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ENGAGING IN #JIMCROW RACIST TERRORIST ACTS SEE THE MARCH 29, 2012 POST. and APRIL 26, 2012 POST.

BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES MARSHALL HAVE NOT EFFECTED SERVICE ON THE PARTIES THE ENTIRE 20 PAGE COMPLAINT WILL NOT BE SHARED AT THIS TIME.

MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE HARBORS A RACIAL HATRED TOWARDS PEOPLE OF COLOR AND INDEPENDENT WHITES SO STRONGLY THEY WILL GO TO ANY LENGTHS SEEKING THE BLACK VOTE AND ANYONE THEY CAN MANIPULATE SO AS TO SEEK ANY OFFICE TO KEEP PEOPLE OF COLOR OPPRESSED AND ANYONE THAT OPPOSES THEIR DOCTRINE

BLACK DEMOCRATS SEEMS TO BE WORSE THAN WHITES THEY CLOSE THEIR EYES TO RACIAL OPPRESSION SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE RACIST WHITE DEMOCRATS WHO DON'T REALLY LIKE THEM OR RESPECT THEM BUT ONLY TOLERATE THEM FOR THEIR VOTES

HELP IS NEEDED BECAUSE MANY DEMOCRATS IN CHICAGO WHO HAVE FRATERNAL CONNECTIONS TO HATE GROUPS DON'T LIKE PEOPLE OF COLOR OR INDEPENDENT WHITES AND THEY WILL DO ANYTHING NECESSARY TO KEEP THE PUBLIC FROM LEARNING OF THEIR RACIST OPPRESSIVE TACTICS THEY ARE USING AND EXHAUSTING IN THE COURTS AND ENTIRE LEGAL SYSTEM.



JUSTIA.COM

Lawrence v. 420 East Ohio et al

Plaintiff: Joe Louis Lawrence
Defendant: 420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority, 345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court of Illinois, Edward Burke, Franklin U. Valderrama and Mary Lane Mikva
Case Number: 1:2016cv07434
Filed: July 21, 2016
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: John W. Darrah
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription toPACER is required.

                           Complaint of Civil Rights Violations
                            Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations
                                Jim Crow Violations
                                 Judicial Corruption/Public Corruption Conspiracy
                                    Public Officials/Fraud/Conspiracy     
                                                     
To the Honorable Judges of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

 Complainant a United States Citizen, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be within this court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to (A) Color (Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
         (B) Race (Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
   Racial Discrimination, Racial Retaliation, Racial Hatred, Racial Oppression, Civil Rights Violations, Unequal Applications of the Laws, and Disparate Treatment on the basis of race, color or national origin (42 U.S.C. 1981).

 This court has Jurisdiction over the statutory violation alleged as conferred as follows: over Title V11 claims by U.S.C. {1331, 28 U.S.C. {1343 (a) (3), and 42 U.S.C. {2000e-5 (F) (3); over 42 U.S.C. {1981 and {1983 by 42 U.S.C. {1988; over the A.D.E.A. by 42 U.S.C. {12117}.

In addition, alleged violations of the noted Sections of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 all noted Public Officials with authority closed their eyes to the enumerated crimes within.

 To: Dir. James Comey, FBI Washington D.C.
          FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
          US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

  

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on July 21, 2016, A Civil Rights Complaint has been filed before the United States District Court.  

                                                             Respectfully Submitted


                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 927-4210
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                         @joelouis7                    


                                                                              
                                                



















IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION


 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I  Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Civil Complaint and Jurisdictional Statement before the Northern District Court of Illinois.























Dated July 21, 2016



                                                                                  _____________________          
                                                                                   Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                           Counsel Pro Se   



    CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ET AL

                                       Jurisdictional Statement

Order entered:  June 6, 2016 and July 5, 2016
Notice of Civil Rights Complaint: July 21, 2016

Statute: Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations, Housing Discrimination,  Judicial Bias, Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations, Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse of  Discretion, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by any Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.

    Plaintiff is appealing to the United States District Court, for a reversal and remand with instructions based on the foregoing stated above:

   The United States District Court   has the Jurisdiction, to correct any error, and establish any precedent in the law where deemed necessary, without fear of reprisals from any political organization, terrorist fraternal orders, elected or otherwise, for the mandate of their decision;

   The United States District Court has the Jurisdiction and Wisdom to recognize when an individual has not been afforded sapiency in accordance to the United States Constitution;

Plaintiff is before the United States District Court  because as a”Pro Se” “Informa Pauper’s“ the admissions recorded in this instrument demonstrates under the Illinois Legal system Black and Brown lives don’t matter and the Jim Crow methods still being exercised criminalizing persons of color for attempting to rise above racial injustice perpetrated on innocent persons. 

Plaintiff is before the United States District Court because of the color of his skin all defendants have admitted to all criminal acts and civil rights violations but the judges have ignored all admissions affidavits, the Laws and laws the United States Constitution and Plaintiffs Civil Liberties, validating the veracity Plaintiff is a nobody merely because of his skin color, every ruling has been dispensated according to racial political guidelines;


For all of the aforementioned reasons is why Plaintiff is before the United States District Court for Jurisdiction and Enforcement.  

I affirm the above as being true.
                                                             Respectfully Submitted, Counsel Pro Se



















                                                                                                                                                                          
IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

                                                     AFFIDAVIT

                              In support of Civil Rights Complaint et al.                                  

{Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1446 (a)}

I  Joe Louis Lawrence, Heterosexual Man Born and Raised a Free MAN Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED IN ALL COURTS NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath states: That all Defendant’s acted knowingly, intentionally, willfully and maliciously within the aforementioned, due to his skin color and non-affiliation to terrorist cells within the Democratic Political Machine:


1.)     That on June 21, 2016, and pursuant to the clerk’s directive an Amended Certificate of Service filed June 22, 2016 including Judge Valderrama’s name, Plaintiff filed a Motion before Illinois Supreme Court, (Motion for Reconsideration & Vacate June 1, 2016 Order absent Certification due to “Fraud” Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 272, hereto attached, Vol. 1, Gr Ex A;  
A-    State Law is Clear and unambiguous, Par. 1 and 2 of Ex A were ignored by  the Supreme Court justices, denied the Motion with no signature;

B-    That all Defendants have admitted via State Laws court transcripts, affidavits and no objections complete admissions but the Illinois Supreme Court had an insurgent within the membership to mail from Springfield a Blank Court Order absent a Certified Signature or name Denying the unchallenged Vol 1 Gr Ex A, Vol. III Gr Ex C, that the Ku Klux Klan hid their faces to conceal their identities have demonstrated a similar tactic enforcing Blank Court Orders;

C-    That the Illinois Attorney General, States Attorney, Judicial Inquiry Board or any person of color within the Democratic Political Machine denounce any of the aforementioned acts or crimes perpetrated at the Plaintiff or his family because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in Chicago, Illinois;

D-    That Par. 5 A, B and C and Par 8 validates the verity the legal system is governed and controlled by Domestic Terrorist within the Democratic Political Machine enforcing Jim Crow laws;

E-     That Group Ex A of Vol. 1 (2nd Amended Complaint Request for Review Due to “Fraud” Terrorist Acts Violations” “Contempt of Court” Perjury & “Criminal Judicial Conspiracy/Cover-up Conspiracy” “Corruption” Other Irregularities & Impose Sanctions with Affidavit, presented “Light” being the Truth on the Blueprint how cases are “Fixed” in Illinois Courts and how judges act as Weapons of Mass Destruction by colluding with said Defendants;

F-     That due to the aforementioned recorded within no Defendant objected or denied any of the facts in the Complaint but the Supreme Court Judges and other judges ignored all State Laws dismissed said matter from the courts;

G-    Plaintiff litigiously won a Default of $25 Million Dollars against the Defendants who were in fact properly served by Cook County Sheriffs and via Certified Mail they failed to respond, failed to answer and failed to file appearances but Judge Valderrama and certain judges within the Illinois Supreme Court exacerbated more harm upon the Plaintiff by keeping him homeless and oppressed closing their eyes to all Terrorist Civil Rights Violations denied the Motion with no signature;  

H-    That the Defendants have been able to successfully Induce Reliance on the Federal Court assassinating his character, criminalizing his character simply because of the color of his skin, hereto attached, Ex F of Vol. 1, September 17, 1987 Court Order signed by the late Judge D. Adolphus Rivers proving that case 85 D 068184 paternity matter was in fact dismissed against him. 

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505

2.)    That on May 12, 2016, hereto attached as Vol. II Gr Ex B, Motion to Supplement Motion for Issuance of a Supervisory Order Vacating Orders and Recusing Judge Valderrama for “Cause” due to Bias and or Prejudice Conduct Pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 1001 (a) (2,3) (West 2006) to Impose Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Ct. Rule 137 w/Affidavit, Sup Ct judge Hon Freeman Granted said Motion;
A-    That Par 3 is clear Judge Valderrama exhibited Bias and Prejudice went outside his judicial discretion and authority, Par 5, 6 demonstrates the updated version of “Lynching” being exercised in the courts;

B-    That Par 7 said attorneys admitted under oath never filing appearances but the judge allowed said attorneys to commit so many errors where they have culminated into a criminal conspiracy;

C-    That Plaintiff filed a Motion Moving for Prove-Up Entering Default Judgment & Summary judgment w/Affidavit, no attorney objected or denied said motion, hereto attached, as Vol. II Gr Ex B, Denied the Motion;

D-    That Judge Valderrama and the Supreme Court Judges ignored the misrepresentations of a former District Attorney from New York recorded in Pars 2, 3, et al. of Vol II of Gr Ex C;    

E-     That Pages 15, 16 of Vol. II, Gr Ex C clearly demonstrate District Court Judge Edmond Chang admonishing a City attorney for hiding evidence et al. but judges on the State level incite and encourage Fraud and misrepresentations;


3.)    That Plaintiff filed a Motion to proceed informa pauperis April 27, 2016, it was granted by former Clerk of The Circuit Court, now Appellate Court Judge Aurelia Pucinski sister Judge Mary Jane Theis hereto attached as Ex I of Vol. 1 Motion Granted.  
A-    That when Aurelia Pucinski was Clerk of the Circuit Court she was a real woman of integrity had her clerks to provide the Plaintiff any copies he needed because she knew who he was up against and was informed Alderman Edward Burke had his entire paternity case in his office.
                 
A-    Pursuant to the precedent already established, Carter v Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme Court of Illinois has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance;

B-    Pursuant to Brubakker v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill. App. Lexis 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result to an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. Et al.

Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is                                                     

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

WHEN THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT HAS BEEN TAKEN SEIZE BY TERRORIST AND JUDGES ARE VIOLATING THE LAWS FIXING CASES FOR THE CORRUPT AND HIGHEST BIDDERS

HOW DO YOU PROTEST THIS?

THE MEDIA THE PRESIDENT EVERYONE HAS EXCELLENT EULOGIES ON THEIR LIVES OR GREAT ARTICLES ON HOW THE PERSON LIVED BUT HOW DO YOU HELP THE VICTIMS LIVING UNDER TERRORIST CONDITIONS AS IN THIS CASE?


________________________________________________________________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination                          )                            2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations                            )
Housing Matters:                                           )                            Hon. F. U. Valderrama      
Joe Louis Lawrence                                      )                            Room   2305   
            Petitioner                                            )                                       
                                                                       )                     
            V                                                        )         
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  )
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago,Commission)
On Human Relations                                     )                                                       
          Respondents                                         )                                                         
________________________________________________________________________



                                      NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT NOTICE REGARDING COURT DATE OF JULY 18 AND BOGUS COURT ORDER FROM SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS W/AFFIDAVIT


                                                             AFFIDAVIT


I Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se deposes and swears to the following:

1.)    That during the week of June 21, 2016, a Post Card from the Circuit Court of Cook County Chancery Division mailed to Plaintiff but it was never recorded in the database, hereto attached, as Ex A;
A-    That to keep in mind Plaintiff never received Notice or Knowledge that Judge Mikva had received his case on Motion to Disqualify Judge Valderrama for “Cause”.

2.)    That during the week of July 5, 2016, someone mailed to the Plaintiff a Bogus Court order from Springfield an Order with no signature or any names recorded, hereto attached, as Ex B demonstrating blatant mail fraud in the FBI’s face;

3.)    That during the week of June 23, 2016, the Judicial Inquiry Board ignored all of the Criminal Terrorist Acts of Judge Valderrama and all other Defendants associated in these Criminal Nefarious Civil Rights Violations, hereto attached, Ex C, properly endorsed by Kathy D. Twine, Executive Director and General Counsel.

4.)    Plaintiff had a duty to demonstrate to the FBI how they could invoke jurisdiction in this matter because they do not get involved in personal matters, they believed the Plaintiff but he had to show with corroboration how the Ku Klux Klan were in control of the legal system and to further demonstrate how is it the CTA and Paternity case was in fact connected to IBC wonder bread;

5.)    They expressed that they couldn’t pay him but would provide him all the protection he needed in this matter;

6.)    Because the FBI did not want the Plaintiff to wear a wire he had to ascertain corroboration another way so traps within the laws were set going after every corrupt racist judge who were allegedly affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan or any Terrorist Cell within the court system;

7.)    I would like to personally thank the Federal Agents and other members of law enforcement that believed in the Plaintiff and those judges in the 7th Circuit, For the Record, Plaintiff want out of this mess, so that he can help his son pick the right University with a great football and academic program;  Plaintiff has fulfilled any and all requests of the Federal Government and the Defendants have Defaulted on $25 Million Dollars;
A-    Edward Burke cannot and will not be able to “FIX” this case.

B-    He recruited every racist white man and inferior person of color with no love for themselves to perpetuate a hate against a person of color to make them appear superior or articulate.

8.)     The State has closed its eyes to the mayhem perpetrated by racist whites in power along with their inferior puppet negroes in charge give rise to the Federal Government to invoke jurisdiction because black and brown lives don’t matter;

9.)    Plaintiff is prepared to file said Complaint in the District Court and will assess
additional monetary damages from the CTA where Ed Burke had Ronald Bartkowski to issue a Bogus warrant against the Plaintiff to cover up one of his Irish brethren falsified a garnishee order stealing and extorting his wages at the CTA in the disguise of child support; the union didn’t help the Plaintiff because the Negroe male secretary was allegedly sleeping with the racist white attorney, receiving kickbacks keeping their own race oppressed, monetary damages where Ed Burke had his Irish and Polish handpicked brethren to lock up the Plaintiff wrongfully claiming he owed child support;         

How do you Identify Racism? The Angry Eye with Jane Elliott
Everyone involved in this matter needs to read and listen to this video it may help an individual change themselves.


                                      FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.





                                                                                      Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                              _____________________________

                                                                                      Counsel Pro Se  





























CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Loretta Lynch
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chief Judge Timothy Evans                              Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600                           50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601                                          Chicago, Ill. 60601

Judge Mary Lane Mikva                                   Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite                                    50 West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan                            Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200                 100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601

States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601       

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor  
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel                                                    Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash                                                     118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch                                               120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber Fowler Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy        Goli Rahimi
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606

Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP     Father Michael Pfleger
Christian Novay                                                               St. Sabina Church
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800                                   1210 West 78th Pl
Chicago, Ill. 60603                                                             . Chg. Ill. 60620
                                                                                             
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA                    Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren                                                  420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611

Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant                                   Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio                                                        420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611   

John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager             Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
345 East Ohio                                                       550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                  Chg. Il 60661
                                                                           Christian T. Novay, Julie A. Carillo                                                                                                                    
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney                                            FBI  Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary T. Fardon                                2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604

Hon Judge Neil Cohen                              Media Personnel & Journalist
50 West Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago, Ill 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604
Governor                                                 Hon Mark Kirk                                 
525 South 8th St.                                       607 East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               Springfield, Ill. 62701
                                                                   
Bruce Rauner                                           Leo High School
100 West Randolph                                  7901 S. Sangamon
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                    Chg. Ill. 60620

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hon Dick Durbin                                       Hon. Judge
525 South 8th St.                                       Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                            50 West Washington
                                                               Chicago, Ill. 60601

Alderman Edward Burke
Alderman David Moore




PLEASE BE ADVISED that on July 12, 2016, A Notice of Fraudulent Notice et al. has been filed with the Chancery Circuit Court of Cook County and said copies being served on said applicable parties via hand delivery or regular mail of a court date of July 18th at 9:45am.










                                                                        Respectfully Submitted
                                                                                                 
                                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                                      Counsel Pro Se
                                                                                                    Chicago, Ill 60649
                                                           312 927-4210 

                                                                                                      @joelouis7