Associate Judge Franklin Valderrama caught trying to "FIX" a court case where they DEFAULTED in Circuit Court;
Rumor has it there are some judges on the take in the 4th Division trying to protect the Good ol Boys trying to "FIX" the case if it becomes before them.
JUSTICE IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS HAS BEEN HIJACKED BY THESE TERRORISTS HIDING WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
UPDATE!!!!
EFFECTIVE JULY 22, 2015 JUDGES NATHANIEL R. HOWSE, JR, DAVID ELLIS AND CYNTHIA Y. COBBS HAVE ADMITTED AND CORROBORATED THEIR INVOLVEMENT AS TERRORIST AND "FIXING" THIS CASE BY DENYING THE MOTION DEMONSTRATING THAT JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS HAVE BEEN HIJACKED BY THESE JUDGES THINKING THE FBI AND OTHER FEDERAL OFFICIALS WOULD NOT HAVE THE APTITUDE TO CATCH OR PROSECUTE ALL OF THEM.
After targeting Blagojevich, David Ellis publishes his first book after collaborating with James Patterson
APPEAL TO THE
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court No. 15 CH 1670
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 15-1274
) Division No. 4
V. )
)
420 East
Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East
Ohio, City of Chicago, Comm. )
On Human
Relations
)
Defendants- Appellees )
MOTION
TO FILE RECORD INSTANTER DUE TO “FRAUD” “FIXING CASE” CORROBORATION OF PUBLIC
CORRUPTION & JUDICIAL VIOLATIONS OF THE RICO ACT w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Appellant Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel
Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and
files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Motion to file record
instanter due to “Fraud” “Fixing case” Public Corruption & Judicial
violations of the RICO Act with Affidavit;
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
P.O. Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
312 927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Twitter @joelouis7
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on
oath states:
1.)
That
said record was due, July 2, 2015 but
due to a plethora of criminal acts where court documents were removed from the
court file receipt showing City of Chicago, Comm. On Human Relations, CHA;
A- The record had pages of other cases
integrated with case 15 CH 1670 causing numerous extra pages totaling 5 volumes
when said issues were noted to clerk it was reduced to 3 volumes with pages
duplicated consistently;
B-
That Judge Valderrama tried “Fixing” the case denying Appellant’s Default & Summary
Judgment Ref as Vol 11 C0256 and Motion for Reconsideration
Vacate March 30, 2015 et al. Ref as C0510
and court order with his signature Denying said Motion Ref as C0580;
C-
That no Appellee denied or objected to the
veracity of any of Appellant’s pleadings and relied on Judge Valderrama to “FIX” said case saving them due
to their ethnicity being white and politically connected;
D- Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the
adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v.
Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291;
Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
2.) That pursuant to said letter directed to the
Illinois Supreme Court Judges (Jan. 22, 2008) Request for Investigations of
Justice Anne Burke and Alderman Ed Burke
hereto attached, Group Ex A ;
A- That Page 3 Par. 5 “A report by Abdon M. Pallasch from Chicago
Lawyer dated January 1998 stated that WBBM-TV reported “U.S.
Attorney’s Office investigated rumors in 1988 that [Ed] Burke bribed judges to
fix two murder cases.”
B- That Page 3 Par. 1, Ed Burke approached Judge Cieslik and told
him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to withdraw from the
case, he told the judge, “What’s the big
deal. It’s only a fucking nigger.”
3.) That Appellant having complete cognizance
Alderman Edward Burke controlled and appointed every judge in every aspect have
denied all Motions accompanied by affidavits needed the necessary corroboration
validating the veracity of the aforementioned;
4.) That
Supreme Court judge Anne Burke is on record “Ed Burke’s wife, Anne, had filed an appearance in the case as
co-counsel with Pat Tuite. Anne Burke also requested that the judge
withdraw from the case saying, “My
husband was the one who put you on the bench.” [Judge Cieslek
lived in the 14th ward.] When the judge finally
withdrew from the case due to media pressure initiated by the attorneys, the
case was assigned to Judge Tom Maloney. Judge Maloney dismissed the
case in a bench trial. Cooley revealed that he was wearing a wire
when the aforementioned events took place such that the FBI was fully
informed. Cooley revealed that he was in communication with Judge
Cieslik and he tried to encourage the judge to not let the case
go. He also reported to the feds that the case would be assigned to
Judge Maloney who would fix the case.”
5.) That because
Appellant was Born & Raised a Heterosexual Free Man with integrity and
stood up to the Racial Hate Terrorist Acts deployed by Burke’s “Weapons of Mass
of Destruction” (judges), he had his
racist white Irish and Negroes judges he see as “Niggers” to “FIX” and deny every Motion and
dismiss all cases that was presented
before any tribunal seeking justice;
6.) That because Ed
Burke is deemed as the alleged “King of the Democratic Machine” and is
an expert playing chess with people’s lives it was only befitting to trap him
using the “storm the castled King “approach in the Appellate court “Fixing”
this case giving the middle finger to the Feds telling them he is untouchable;
Now on the other hand, any judge granting
the motion demonstrates Appellant has met his burden corroborating the veracity
of all facts properly plead and that said judges who attempted the coup in “Fixing” this case with the
attorneys are faced with career ending consequences with Federal Officials;
Ed Burke appears to have a strong bias for men
living in the closet with wives or pedophiles and very little regard for women
of color how he took Tina Olison’s baby is indicative of this fact;
Ed Burke was the author of Appellant not
being reinstated back to the CTA from a work-related injury using Associate Judge Ronald Bartkowicz to issue a
Bogus warrant for Contempt of Court while in handcuffs CTA had a M. Burton to
come to court and remove his badge from his body saying he was not an employee
all of this was done to protect the Irish judge who allowed child support
payments to be garnisheed sent to the law firm of Joseph V. Roddy c/o Francoise
Hightower which was extortion because
Appellant never owed child support and because CTA owed the Appellant back
wages being off injured on duty at the time it was approximately $30,000.00 because
CTA did not have it in their budget any person reinstating the Appellant would
have been terminated.
Ed Burke had Judge Bartkowicz to threaten
Appellant if he tried to return back to the CTA, he was going to have him
locked up and was ordered to drive a School bus where William Stewart Boyd was
Appellant’s attorney;
That Edward Burke do not have to hide in
the “Dark “or closet anymore he can now come into the “Light” where the Appellant is standing in a” square
circle” of truth –Psalm 109;
for the mouth
of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful are opened against me:
|
||||
They
compassed me about also with words of hatred;
|
||||
For my love
they are my adversaries:
|
A- For
example, the Appellate Court’s responsibility is to ascertain errors in the
laws that the lower court made, the legal standard used in this proceeding is
based upon the Preponderance of the Evidence which simply means the
greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for
the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side
or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and
its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence. Thus, one
clearly knowledgeable witness may provide a preponderance of evidence over a
dozen witnesses with hazy testimony, or a signed agreement with definite terms
may outweigh opinions or speculation about what the parties intended.
B- Judges under Ed Burkes control and influence do
whatever they are told which is what was expected, in this case to substantiate
and corroborate that said judges are deemed “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and are named
and noted in all affidavits not challenged by any opposing attorneys and said
affidavits and motions would stand up in any Grand Jury for purposes of
indictments;
C- Further, ref Gr
Ex A Page 8, He told me
that within the past year, Judge Cieslak gave an interview to two members of
the media in which Judge Cieslak verified that all the allegations made in
Cooley’s book were true. After the judge gave the interview, the two separate
reporters specifically told Mr. Cooley that they were “not allowed to do the
story because it involves Ed Burke.”
D- That Ed Burke as an Irishman and his political
appointment of judges would never support or back any person of color who have
lied or falsified documents on his behalf or the “Good ol boys”; after all,
they are only fucking Niggers!
7.) Hereto attached, Gr Ex B, Jan 20, 2015 Affidavit filed before the City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Page 3 Par
3, “Alderman Edward Burke assigned
all judges to enter corrupt unlawful orders on a Paternity case that was
DISMISSED September 17, 1987”, but because these were RACIST WHITE MEN IN
THE DEMOCRATIC MACHINE, this was a norm violating the Civil Rights of men of
color; Gr Ex C, Emergency Petition for Rule to
Show Cause et al. Page 4 Par. D the names of all judges in the
Appellate Court under Burkes control and authority, in that there are more
judges under his control than Magic Don Juan had whores in his stable on the
west side.
A-
That because the Appellees Defaulted on $25 Million
Dollars and they were cognizant that there “KING” and SAVIOR Ed Burke
controlled the judges and Negroes in authority in Cook County were aware they
committed Terrorists Acts of Fraud and their orders lacked jurisdiction didn’t
care because of their ability to “Hijack Justice” in the courts : ILL. App. (1st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT
OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the
parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the
particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re
Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm
7, 16, 375.
B- Hereto attached, Gr Ex D, United States Attorney Zachary
T. Fardon, (Nov. 10, 2014) CORROBBORATION
OF CONSPIRACY TERRORISM FRAUD RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN CHA HOUSING W/
DEMOCRATIC MACHINE OPERATIVES REQUEST REMAND INSTANTER W/BODY ATTACHMENTS
&
OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
C-
That Page 2 Par. C, D, Page 5 Par 5 unequivocally corroborates
and demonstrates how Ed Burke orchestrated the “Fixing “of many cases against
the Appellant.
D-
That Judge George F. Scully, Jr. See Oct. 4, 2012 Post
unlawful1.blogspot.com allegedly tried to “FIX” said case he vacated the Order
of Possession September 11, 2012, Craig Fulton never filed a Motion or legal
document in the court against the Appellant when the Sheriff learned it was the
Appellant involved in this fiasco informed him Judge Leonard Murray “FIXED” the
case signed a court order for Craig
Fulton for the Sheriff to evict Appellant unlawfully, Sheriff said “there is some shit going on up there
with them judges”
E-
Squatter Masterminds Arrested In Beverly, Morgan Park
Raids: Authorities | Beverly-Mtgreenwood, IL Patch https://patch.com/illinois/beverly-mtgreenwood/squatter-masterminds-
But because of Craig Fulton’s connections
Appellant was living in a foreclosed home where he received Section 8 monies
from more than one property he was never indicted or arrested but was allowed
to take 30 years of personal possessions from Appellants 4 bedroom home.
8.) That Burke used the same modis operandi to take an
African American baby from Tina Olison: See unlawful1.blogspot.com Post June 4,
2013
A- After initial test reports indicated that Tina Olison, the mother
involved in a child custody dispute with a prominent Cook County political
couple, had tested positive for opiates, more extensive drug testing was
negative. "This is just what we expected," said Anita
Rivkin-Carothers, Olison's attorney, after receiving the results of more
sophisticated tests from a Pennsylvania lab that found no narcotics. After the
initial "quick strip" test results were said to be positive, Olison and
her attorneys contended that the test, conducted at the Family Guidance Center
in Chicago, was faulty.
April
8, 1999
The
3-year-old boy known as Baby T moved one step closer to being permanently
reunited with his birth family Wednesday when state officials decided not to
appeal a Circuit Court decision to return custody to his natural mother.
Neither the state's attorney's office nor the Illinois Department of Children
and Family Services will
further pursue the case, which pitted Tina Olison, a 37-year-old former drug
user, against Chicago Ald. Edward Burke (14th) and Appellate Judge Anne Burke.
C- When judges do what
Burke tells them they are rewarded with appointments | January 24, 2011
The two
Appellate Court judges responsible for tossing Rahm Emanuel from the ballot in
February's mayoral race both won their jobs after
being anointed by a Chicago political power broker who openly supports an
Emanuel opponent. Whether or not their opinions are colored by politics, the
case has recharged the debate among critics who decry a process of selecting
judges that relies more heavily on political clout than merit. Longtime
Appellate Court Judges Thomas E. Hoffman and Shelvin Louise Marie Hall — who on
Monday ruled that Emanuel's stay in Washington precludes him from running for
mayor this year — were both judicial candidates slated for election by the Cook
County Democratic Party judicial slating committee chaired by Ald. Edward
Burke, 14th.
D- One can infer from the Olison case if Ed Burke
had raped her and impregnated her or had consensual sex where a child was
conceived from that union her being labeled a drug addict leaves her little
credibility; furthermore, negates any charges of any sort and most importantly
total exoneration of paying any child support;
9.)
18 U.S. Code § 1962(c); elaborating that
"A Defendant May Be Liable for a RICO Conspiracy Offense Even if the
Defendant Did Not Participate In the Operation or Management of the Enterprise"
10.) That
because of the Appellees arrogant contempt for laws; especially receiving
Notice of Federal Officials following this case basically inferred that Ed
Burke was untouchable and that no Federal Official were smart enough to capture
him because of his influence and connections owning certain judges giving the Feds
the middle finger thinking Edward Burke will be able to save them “Fixing” this
case the way other cases have been “Fixed” in the past;.
11.) That pursuant to Carter V.
Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme court has held
that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation
(sometimes referred to as “(fraud and deceit)”are: (1) False statement of
material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance., the attorneys for the Defendants satisfied this
requirement by committing PERJURY and engaging in a plethora of other
Terrorists Acts;
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions.
People
V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of
conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that
offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of
agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in
pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in
violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may
impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an
appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or
parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filling of
the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney fee. Not
only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active false
statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also justify
an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison,
No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992).
Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an
honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an
individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can
also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
12.)
That
Governor Rauner has criticized the Supreme Court saying it is a part of a
“corrupt system” and he is correct in his analysis.
Fraud admissibility great
latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57.
where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case, great
latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts
allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL
334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for fraud,
plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature which was
relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance, and that
victim’s reliance led to his injury.
Parsons
V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E. 2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d
354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335
ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme Court has held that: “The elements of a
cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as
“fraud and deceit” or deceit) are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2)
known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the
other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of
the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance.
Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an
agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537
U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement
to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a
distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime
ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy
poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the
relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more
likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from
their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe
inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest
of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time
of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending
culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242
N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines
help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for
corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the
most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are
the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FEDERAL JUDGE
GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of
police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00,
“No
one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker,
it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto
himself. It invites Anarchy.”
Rauner: ‘I don’t trust the Supreme Court’
Bruce
Rauner
Related Story
In
the March issue of Chicago
Lawyer magazine, Editor Pat Milhizer looked at Gov. Bruce
Rauner's proposed changes to the judicial system, including one to create
merit-based judicial selection as opposed to our current system of electing
judges. Read the story»
By Andrew
Maloney
Law Bulletin staff writer
Law Bulletin staff writer
A day after Gov. Bruce Rauner said the Illinois Supreme Court
is part of a “corrupt system,” a judges’ association fired back, calling his
comments “disturbing” and saying it “endangers the rule of law.”
The group’s response follows the Republican governor telling a
suburban newspaper: “I don’t trust the Supreme Court to be rational in their
decisions.”
Rauner said they’re “activist judges who want to be
legislators” and part of a “corrupt system” because they accept donations from
trial lawyers.
“You tell me if you look at who gives them the money, and you
decide whether there’s a conflict of interest going on in the courts,” Rauner
told the Daily Herald editorial board on Tuesday. “You tell me. Do you think
there’s not?”
If at this point any
judge reading this and still feels that he or she is above the law and continue
to desecrate his or her oath of their judicial position denying the Appellant’s
motion simply because of his skin color by all means deny this legal instrument
your signature will determine your fate.
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265
5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Appellant/Counsel Pro Se
APPEAL TO THE
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 15 CH 1670
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 15-1274
) Division No.
4
V. )
)
420 East
Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East
Ohio, City of Chicago, Comm. )
On Human
Relations
)
Defendants- Appellees )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama Loretta
Lynch
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West
Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Mary Lane Mikva Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West
Washington, Suite 50 West
Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan Asst. Atty. Gen
Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph,
Suite 1200 100 West
Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Sec of State Asst
Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville
60 East Van Buren, 8th
floor
100 West
Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
CHA Mobility
CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive
Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson
Blvd. 4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd
Floor
Chicago, Ill
60604
Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash
118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill.
60615
Chicago, Ill. 60602
States Attorney
Anita Alvarez
50 West Washington,
Suite 500
Chicago, Il
60601
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Seyfarth & Shaw
Meredith Oliva,
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Suite 2400
131 South
Dearborn
Chicago, IL.
60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the
General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van
Buren
Chicago, IL.
60605
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst
Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle
Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill
60602
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van
Buren 420 East
Ohio
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales Consultant Sarah
Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East
Ohio 420
East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Chicago, Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI
Robert J. Holley
Zachary T.
Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt
Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill
60604
Hon Judge Neil Cohen
50 West
Washington, Suite 2308
Chicago, Ill
60601
Mayor Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office
Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly E.
Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Governor Hon Mark Kirk
525 South 8th St. 607 East
Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703 Springfield, Ill. 62701
Bruce Rauner
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County President Cook County
Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark,
Room 517 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill.
60602 Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel
Asst. Gen
Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph
60 East Van
Buren
Chicago, Ill.
60605
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman &
Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
55 West Monroe,
Street, Suite 3800
Chicago, Ill.
60603
Hon Dick Durbin Hearing Officer CHA
525 South 8th St.
Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703 60 East Van Buren,
Suite 900
Chicago, Ill. 60605
Father Pfleger Alderman David Moore 17th ward
St. Sabina
Chicago, IL. 60620
1210 West 78th Pl.
Chicago, IL. 60620
Alderman Ed Burke
2650
West 51st Street 302
Chicago,
Il 60632
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and
all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via
facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses
provided before 5:00 pm on July 8, 2015.
________________________
Joe Louis
Lawrence
Plaintiff/Counsel
Pro Se
APPEAL TO THE
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe
Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 15 CH 1670
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 15-1274
) Division No.
4
V. )
)
420 East
Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
345 East
Ohio, City of Chicago, Comm. )
On Human
Relations
)
Defendants- Appellees )
ORDER
This
matter having come on to be heard on Motion to File Record Instanter due to
“Fraud” “Fixing case” Public Corruption & Judicial violations of the RICO
Act with Affidavit , due notice having been
given, the court having jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter,
and being fully advised in the premises;
It is HEREBY
ORDERED that Motion to File Record Instanter et al, Order is GRANTED
INSTANTER.
ENTERED:
_________________________________
Judge
Cynthia Y. Cobb
_________________________________
Judge David Ellis
________________________________
Judge Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr.
Joe
Louis Lawrence
________________________________
________________________________
Counsel
Pro Se Judge James Fitzgerald Smith
P.O. Box
490075
Chicago,
Illinois 60649-0075