CORRUPTION EXPOSED UNDER MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL:

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama

2601 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, Illinois 60602                                                  Mar. 23, 2015

                                                                                      Case# 15 CH 01670

                                                                                             Room 2305

                                                  

                                          COURTESY COPY

                                   A MUST READ

Honorable Judge Valderrama:

  

Please Find Plaintiff’s

                                                                  

   MOTION MOVING FOR DEFAULT & SUMMARY JUDGMENT W/ AFFIDAVIT AND ORDER      

     

Special Note:  Please be advised the number of attorneys engaging in criminal acts upholding Perjury and “fraud”.

Because of the “Hue” of your skin these attorneys have lied to you turned your court into a circus as if they have you intimidated they don’t respect you as a Judge or a person because they are RACIST!!.

Because certain attorneys with political clout with certain unnamed City Hall officials have demonstrated “Above the Law” antics and is quite “Brazen”

Because many of the parties involved are not able to “Lynch” the Plaintiff with a physical rope “Lynching” is executed in an updated manner on an innocent man simply for standing up to Racism, Racial Segregation and Racial Injustice in Chicago and how many closed their eyes to the crimes because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in Chicago.

Because your Honor is up for re appointment for the position of Associate Judge June of this year maybe the reason why you are hesitant admonishing said attorneys.

If the Illinois Supreme Court had a position of Judge Pro Se Plaintiff would be able to fulfill the roles of jurisprudence with integrity before any ethnic group corruption and racist personnel would settle before coming before me in any case.

Court Call Mar.   , 2015 @ 9:30 am

  

Let this communication receive you and your family in good health

Respectfully Submitted,

________________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Movant

Counsel Pro Se

(312) 927-4210

  

CC. Chief Judge Timothy Evans Courtesy Copy U.S. Atty. Zachary T. Fardon, Judge Mary Mikva, Gordon & Rees, Cary & Schiff & Assc., Seyfarth & Shaw, CHA, Maria Sewell Joseph, Gov. Bruce Rauner, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel ---See Certificate of Service of other names.

       Presiding Judge Moshe Jacobius, Asst. Gen Counsel, Sec. of State Terrence McConville, City of Chg Commission on Human Relations,   States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown  

    Robert J. Holley, FBI Agent Chicago Courtesy Copy

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF

COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS

CHANCERY DIVISION

In Re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations

Housing Matters:                                                               

Joe Louis Lawrence                                                               Case # 2015 CH 01670

            Appellant                                                                  HON. F. U. Valderrama       

                                                                                                   Room 2305       

            V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority

345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, K2 Apartments                                                                                             

           Respondents 

                                                                                               

                    MOTION MOVING FOR DEFAULT & SUMMARY JUDGMENT W/AFFIDAVIT

    Now comes Plaintiff, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this Hon Court the reasons for a Default & Summary Judgment and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Motion Moving for Default et al; Pursuant to Supreme Court Rules & Civil Procedures.    

                                                                                     Respectfully Submitted,    

                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                            Plaintiff Counsel Pro Se                                                                            

                                                              P.O. Box 490075

                                                                Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

                                                            312 927-4210

                                                                     joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                                                 Twitter @joelouis7

                                         AFFIDAVIT

  

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

                     1.) CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED January 30^th 2015

2.)  SUMMONS ISSUED AND RETURNED SERVED ON ALL PARTIES

3.)  NO DEFENDANT ANSWERED OR FILED AN APPEARANCE or ANSWER ON OR BEFORE March 9^th 2015

        4.) That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. 420 East Ohio, ZRS Management, Tracking #7014-0150-0001-5043-5130 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 10:57 am, Attorney Anne D. Harris admitted in open court Feb. 27, 2015 on Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al.

5.) That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. 345 East Ohio, Village Green Management same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5154 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 1:18 pm; Frank Fiorentino.

6.) That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations  same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5147 was served via certified mail Feb. 5, 2015, 2:12 pm; Jeffery Wilson.

        7.) That pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. Chicago Housing Authority   same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5123 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 12:35 pm; Armstrong C.

        8.) Attorney T.B. King of CHA, Christian Novay of 345 East Ohio perjured themselves before Hon Valderrama that they were never served!

        9.) Judge Valderrama accepted the perjured testimony of the above and dismissed the Petition for Rule to Show Cause because he had no jurisdiction, Feb. 27, 2015 all attorneys admitted not filing an appearance;

       10.) That on March 20, 2015 on an Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al. The City attorney, 345 East Ohio and CHA again reiterated they were never served any documents;

       11.)  Plaintiff handed the Judge (March 20, 2015) copies of services had on all parties as they continuously denied being served:

That because the defendants/attorneys Induced Reliance on Judge Valderrama committing Fraud causing him to sign court orders dismissing said Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al makes both orders VOID,  ILL. App. (1^st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.  

A.) Sheriff #01712556 Served CHA via corporation 3-11-2015, 10:17am they served them copies of the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause along with an Amended Request for Review et al. Counsel never Objected or responded to the $25 Million Dollar Demand;

   B.)  Sheriff #01712558 Served Christian T. Novay 3-9-2015, 11:21am copies of the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al along with an Amended Request for Review et al. Counsel never Objected or responded to the $25 Million Dollar Demand.

   C.)  Sheriff #01712557 Served Rahm Emanuel via corporation 3-12-2015, 10:00am copies of the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al along with an Amended Request for Review et al. Counsel never Objected or responded to the $25 Million Dollar Demand.    

   D.)  Sheriff #01712560 Served Christopher R. Johnson personal service 3-12-2015, 10:20am, copies of the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al along with an Amended Request for Review et al. Counsel never objected or responded to the $25 Million Dollar Demand K2 has Defaulted twice on a $3 Million Dollar Default before the Human Relations Commission.

   E.)  Sheriff #01722070 Served Seyfarth & Shaw via corporation 3-16-2015, 12:30pm copies of the Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al. along with the Amended Request for Review et al. Counsel never Objected or responded to the $25 Million Dollar Demand. 

       12.)  That Defendants with vexatious Contempt for the laws did not request leave of the court in which to file a late response and has Defaulted whereby summary judgment is being sought on the claims presented before the court, defendants have not raised any affirmative defenses or responded to any documents filed before the courts due to its veracity.    

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmovant, fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. 735 ILCS 5/2-1005; Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 215 Ill.2d 121, 127-28 (2005). The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to determine whether one exists, Jackson v. TLC Assoc., Inc., 185 Ill. 2d 418, 423 (1998). A trial court is required to construe the record against the moving party and may only grant summary judgment if the record shows that the movant’s right to relief is clear and free from doubt. Id. If disputes as to material facts exist or if reasonable minds may differ with respect to the inferences drawn from the evidence, summary judgment may not be granted.

Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.

When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which, if not contradicted, would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot rely upon his complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. Smith v. St. Therese Hospital, 106 Ill.  App. 3d 268, 270 (2d Dist. 1982). A counter affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted. Barber-Colman Co. A And K Midwest Insulation Co. 236 Ill.  App. 3d 1065, 1078 (5^th Dist. 1992).   

                                       FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                          Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                      Plaintiff/Counsel Pro Se

   

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief

1.)  For an Order Defaulting the Defendants Granting Summary Judgment Instanter;

That because of the heinous acts Plaintiff have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before any tribunal, and the number of City personnel and plethora of other conspirators making sure he did move where he desired and numerous Civil Rights Violations, Plaintiff is seeking Summary Judgment $25 Million Dollars as punitive damages; Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)  Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”

  

2.)  For the entry of an Order awarding to the Plaintiff for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                  Respectfully Submitted

      Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                            Plaintiff                                                       

Counsel Pro se

                                       CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States

President Barack Obama                                 Eric Holder

The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Office of the General Counsel                  Christian T. Novay

Asst Gen Counsel                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800 

Maria Sewell Joseph                                 Chicago, Il 60603

60 East Van Buren                                   

Chicago, Ill 60605                                     Seyfarth & Shaw

                                                                 Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris       

                                                                   131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400

                                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60603

TO AAG Tyler Roland          Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601

         General Law Bureau       Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

        100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300

        Chicago, Ill. 60601    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.                                           

                                                         

       States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

       Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601

           

Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin

Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8^th floor

100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601     

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors

Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris

28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2^nd Floor 

Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     

                                                                   

CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds

Jessie McDaniel                                                   Karen Yarbrough    

4859 S. Wabash                                                    118 N. Clark, Room 120

Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments

Christopher Lynch                                            120 West Madison Street

121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cary G. Schiff & Associates

Yuleidy Joa                                               Gordon & Rees LLP

Christopher R. Johnson                             Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay

134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606

Courtesy Copies:

 US Attorney                                            FBI   Robert J. Holley

 Zachary T. Fardon                                   2111 West Roosevelt Road

219 S. Dearborn, 5^th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612

Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor

Bruce Rauner

100 West Randolph

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.

Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop

City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff

Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart

118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hearing Officer CHA

Frederick Bates

60 East Van Buren, Suite 900

Chicago, Il 60605

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on March 23, 2015, A Motion Defaulting the Defendants with Summary Judgment has been filed with the Circuit Court of Cook County and said copy have been delivered or emailed to the applicable parties;

                                                             Respectfully Submitted

                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se

                                                                           PO Box 490075

                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075

                                                                          312 927-4210

                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                                         @joelouis7          

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF

COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS

CHANCERY DIVISION

In Re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations

Housing Matters:                                                               

Joe Louis Lawrence                                                               Case # 2015 CH 01670

            Appellant                                                                  HON. F. U. Valderrama       

                                                                                                   Room 2305       

            V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority

345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, K2 Apartments                                                                                             

           Respondents 

                                                                                              

                                                                   ORDER 

This case is before the Court on the Plaintiff Joe Louis Lawrence’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendants 420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority, 345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1005.

Plaintiff is a United States Citizen born and Raised a Freeman and Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants have defaulted on their obligation to respond to the summons or any motions accompanied by affidavits.

That said Request for Review et al and Petition for Rule to Show Cause was filed to recover damages and bring to the courts attention the “fraudulent” acts perpetrated by attorneys “sandbagging” the courts violating individuals “Civil Rights” just to obtain an advantage before any judge, Defendants have not raised any affirmative defenses or counterclaims.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings, depositions, admissions and affidavits, viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmovant, fail to establish a genuine issue of material fact, thereby entitling the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. 735 ILCS 5/2-1005; Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 215 Ill.2d 121, 127-28 (2005). The purpose of summary judgment is not to try a question of fact, but simply to determine whether one exists, Jackson v. TLC Assoc., Inc., 185 Ill. 2d 418, 423 (1998).

A trial court is required to construe the record against the moving party and may only grant summary judgment if the record shows that the movant’s right to relief is clear and free from doubt. Id. If disputes as to material facts exist or if reasonable minds may differ with respect to the inferences drawn from the evidence, summary judgment may not be granted. Assoc. Underwriters of Am. Agency, Inc. v. McCarthy, 356 Ill. App. 3d 1010, 1016-17 (1^st Dist. 2005).   

When the party moving for summary judgment supplies evidentiary facts which, if not contradicted, would entitle him to judgment, the opposing party cannot rely upon his complaint or answer alone to raise issues of material fact. Smith v. St. Therese Hospital, 106 Ill.  App. 3d 268, 270 (2d Dist. 1982). A counter affidavit is necessary to refute evidentiary facts properly asserted by affidavit supporting the motion or else the facts are deemed admitted. Barber-Colman Co. A And K Midwest Insulation Co. 236 Ill.  App. 3d 1065, 1078 (5^th Dist. 1992). 

Here, Plaintiff has supplied Affidavits and other evidentiary material that establishes all of the elements necessary to entitle it to recovery under the parties’ agreements, including the amount of damages. Defendants have failed to submit any evidence in opposition to the Motion in order to raise any genuine issues of material fact. Thus, summary judgment is proper.

Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED:

1.)    Plaintiff’ Joe Louis Lawrence’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants 420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority, 345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations severally and jointly of $25 Million Dollars Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted depraved acts of all parties pay punitive damages, of $25 Million Dollars Plaintiff has endured in these matters;

2.)    For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s jurisdiction due to the political influence involved and them ignoring the criminal acts perpetrated by “Powerful” White Men in authority;

  

3.)    For an Order REVERSING the Commission’s order for failing to follow Supreme Court rules and procedures;

4.)    For an Order Imposing Sanctions Fining CHA and all attorneys and law firms $20,000.00 - $30, 000.00 a day to the City of Chicago until Appellant is expeditiously housed;

5.)    Prohibit any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Appellant and family suffering behind said acts;

6.)    For an Order Remanding every Party and attorneys disbarring them complicit in said Criminal acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties;

7.)    For an Order Compelling  all Parties to appear before a Court or Grand Jury to determine who should be INDICTED for their part in said Conspiracy;

8.)    For an Order Appointing an Independent Examiner to ascertain all persons removed from the CHA section 8 program in the last 4 years where the City of Chicago, Human Relations Commission and Hearing Officers under CHA’s authority dismissed their complaints unlawfully;

                                                           _____________________________

                                                            ENTERED

                                                              

                                                             ____________________________

                                                                       JUDGE    

CHICAGO IS RACIST AND SEGREGATED BECAUSE MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL NEEDS THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE AND #BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER.

RAHM WILL SAY ANYTHING NECESSARY JUST TO GET RE ELECTED SHUTTING DOWN THE CAMERAS IN PREDOMINANTLY BLACK AND BROWN AREAS IS SUPPOSE TO APPEASE THOSE PERSONS.

THE REALITY IS THAT HIS ADMINISTRATION CONDONES RACIAL TERRORISM AND JIM CROW APPLICATION OF THE LAWS.

SEE HOW THE MARCH 11, 2015 POST PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE RELATES TO THIS DOCUMENT.

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama

2601 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, Illinois 60602                                                  Mar. 13, 2015

                                                                                      Case# 15 CH 01670

                                                                                             Room 2305

                                                  

                                          COURTESY COPY

                                   A MUST READ

Honorable Judge Valderrama:

  

Please Find Plaintiff’s

                                                                  

   PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO CORROBBORATION of FRAUD PERJURY CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RETALIATION ON COMPLAINANT REMAND/BODY ATTACHMENT INSTANTER   

 w/Affidavit with the attachments demonstrating heinous criminal acts likened to war crimes.   

 

Special Note:  Please be advised  the number of attorneys engaging in criminal acts upholding Perjury and “fraud”.

In the event court file is missing or destroyed: Sheriff #01712556 CHA; #01712557 City of Chicago, #01712558 345 East Ohio, #01712560 K2

Because of the “Hue” of your skin these attorneys seems to feel they don’t have to respect you or the laws and has demonstrated this in their testimonies not being served and going along with various acts of Criminal Acts of Terrorism Discrimination in housing and a plethora of other Civil Rights Violations.

Because certain attorneys with political clout with certain unnamed City Hall officials have demonstrated “Above the Law” antics and is quite “Brazen”

Cook County Sheriff Sergeant Bradford, tried retrieving the above case number up case not found,  but was able to ascertain information from the Sheriff # 01712528 for example, Plaintiff was not able to retrieve case either computer says case not found!

Somebody destroyed Exhibits J, K, and L and other related documents showing service on the Defendant’s.

Because many of the parties involved are not able to “Lynch” the Plaintiff with a physical rope “Lynching” is executed in an updated manner on an innocent man simply for standing up to Racism, Racial Segregation and Racial Injustice in Chicago and how many closed their eyes to the crimes because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in Chicago.

Court Call Mar. 20, 2015 @ 9:30 am

  

Let this communication receive you and your family in good health

Respectfully Submitted,

________________________

Joe Louis Lawrence

Petitioner

Counsel Pro Se

(312) 927-4210

  

CC. Chief Judge Timothy Evans Courtesy Copy U.S. Atty. Zachary T. Fardon, Judge Mary Mikva, Gordon & Rees, Cary & Schiff & Assc., Seyfarth & Shaw, CHA, Maria Sewell Joseph, Gov. Bruce Rauner, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel ---See Certificate of Service of other names.

       Presiding Judge Moshe Jacobius, Asst. Gen Counsel, Sec. of State Terrence McConville, City of Chg Commission on Human Relations,   States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown  

    Robert J. Holley, FBI Agent Chicago Courtesy Copy

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF

COOK COUNTY, ILLNOIS

CHANCERY DIVISION

In Re Racial Discrimination/Source Income Violations

Housing Matters:                                                                

Joe Louis Lawrence                                                               Case # 2015 CH 01670

            Appellant                                                                  HON. F. U. Valderrama       

                                                                                                   Room 2305       

            V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority

345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations, K2 Apartments                                                                                             

           Respondents                                                                                                 

.                                                  AMENDED

REQUEST FOR REVIEW/APPEAL/RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR “FRAUD” “CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS “CONTEMPT OF COURT” PERJURY & “CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY/COVER-UP CONSPIRACY” “CORRUPTION” OTHER IRREGULARITIES & IMPOSE SANCTIONS WITH AFFIDAVIT

    Now comes Appellant Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Request for Review/Appeal/Rule to Show Cause for “Fraud” “Contempt of Court” “Perjury”  “Criminal Conspiracy”/ “Cover-up Conspiracy” “Corruption” other Irregularities & Impose Sanctions with Affidavit, pursuant to the provisions of the Admin. Rev. Law, 735 ILCS 5/3-101 pursuant to the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;

Be advised the Commission has committed “Fraud” of many sorts engaged in a Heinous Civil Rights Conspiracy enacting “Jim Crow Laws” outlawed by the United Supreme Court by covering up and ignoring the various criminal acts by members of the Democratic Political Machine.

That Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 272 “if at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge et al” the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed—there was never any signatures or seals recorded from the mailed documents!  Causing the documents to be VOID in authority!

                                                                                     Respectfully Submitted,    

                                                            Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                            Counsel Pro Se/Appellant                                                                            

                                                              P.O. Box 490075

                                                                Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075

                                                            312 927-4210

                                                                     joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                                                 Twitter @joelouis7

                                         AFFIDAVIT

  

I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on oath states:

1.)     That said identified person operating in disguise as an alleged Commissioner for the Chicago Commission on Human Relations used his position and unlawful authority to uphold “Jim Crow Laws” of said Confederate applications to unlawfully dismiss said Complaint filed by the City of Chicago;

2.)     Said records unequivocally demonstrate CHA colluding with Respondents in opportunity areas making sure he did not move into certain areas due to his skin color and the Commission having knowledge of this falsified documents upholding racism racial discrimination and a plethora of Civil Rights Violations in Housing and other acts of “FRAUD”, hereto attached, Gr Ex A, B, C, D and E Orders from the Commission violating Supreme Court Rule 272 where a signature is required and mail fraud Inducing Reliance on all parties;

A-   That Gr. Ex A Order Denying Request for Review, in favor of Respondent 420 East Ohio with no signature or seal; (Jan. 6, 2015)

B-   That Gr. Ex B Order Denying Request for Review, in favor of Respondent CHA and The Streeter 355 East Ohio with no signature or seal;(Jan. 6, 2015)

C-   That the Respondent City of Chicago ignored Gr Ex F Motion for Reconsideration et al w/Affidavit;(Dec. 8, 2014)

D-   That Gr. Ex C Order Finding No Substantial Evidence, in favor of Respondent 420 East Ohio with no signature or seal; (Dec. 2015)

E-   That Gr. Ex D Investigative Order against Appellant seeking documents with no signature or seal;(Dec 29, 2014)

F-    That Gr. Ex E Order to Respond and Notice of Potential Default with no signature or seal; (Jan. 5, 2015)

3.)     That Appellant filed Gr. Ex’s G, H, I and M

A-   That Gr. Ex G Motion Objecting Extension of Time w/Affidavit before the Respondent City of Chicago went ignored by all parties due to the veracity stated within;

B-   That Gr. Ex H Motion Moving for a Default w/Affidavit (Jan. 22, 2015) this said document went ignored by all parties, due to the veracity stated within;

C-   That Appellant complying with the clerks directive, Gr Ex I  recorded the names and certified numbers for all defendant’s for proper service via United States Postal delivery;

D-   That Gr. Ex M Appellant filed a Motion to Cure Defects in Investigative Order Due to Error or Fraud w/Affidavit, nobody denied or objected to the Motion;

E-   That defendant’s attorneys from the CHA and 345 East Ohio with contemptuous vexation for the laws committed PERJURY told the judge “they were never served”! Allegedly a city attorney stood in the background observing took a picture of the court order with their cell phone;

F-     That Gr. Ex J, Frank Fiorentino signed for 345 East Ohio;

G-   That Gr. Ex K, Jeffrey Wilson, signed for Chicago Commission on Human Relations;

H-   That Gr. Ex L, C. Armstrong signed for the CHA;

4.)     That the Honorable Franklin Ulysses Valderrama had jurisdiction over the parties when they were properly before the court demonstrated the level of Racial Disrespect towards the judge as perpetrated at the Appellant;

A-   That Appellant honestly in error failed to attach the court orders from the Commission on Human Relations, but deliberately failed to seek the service on all parties involved so as to demonstrate to this court, the racist animosity of the mindset of the parties involved, in that whether they are in court before this Honorable Court or Appellant is presenting perfected legal documents the hue of our skin tone still to this day (year 2015) yields the diabolical heinous acts of what white men are willing to do to undermine the integrity of an innocent man prohibiting him and family equal access to housing or the laws and in the judge’s case no respect because you are in a robe!

 

5.)     That Anne D. Harris referenced the Appellant’s documents as “Jibberish” but admitted she was in fact served certified mail by the clerk of the Circuit Court;

6.)     That Respondents CHA maliciously with vexatious contempt for the laws incited racist policies made perjured admissions to the Commission on Human Relations and court.    

A-    In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.

B-   Appellant filed a Motion for Reconsideration Vacate Order Due To “Fraud” Terrorist Conspiracy Acts Civil Rights Violations Impose Sanctions w/Affidavit (Dec. 8, 2014);

C-   That a City employee in the Commission on Human Relations falsified a document purported as an Order from the authority of the Commissioner absent a signature or seal titled “Request for Review” denying said Motion Jan. 6, 2015;

D-   Appellant filed a “Request for Review” Impose Sanctions w/Affidavit March 28, 2014, that a City employee in the Commission on Human Relations falsified a document purported as an Order from the authority of the Commissioner absent a signature or seal titled “Request for Review” denying said document Jan. 6, 2015;

     2.)   That Appellant legally with astute integrity filed an “Emergency Amended Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al., w/Affidavit (March 14, 2014), totaling 157 pages served on all parties as well as Hon. Rahm Emmanuel (Mayor) via personal service, said Complaint was expeditiously dismissed unlawfully (March 18, 2014) ignoring all of the corroborating facts of all parties involved, hereto attached, Gr Ex F, Motion for Reconsideration et al; Because of Appellant’s ethnicity Rahm Emmanuel closed his eyes to the Racist Heinous Acts perpetrated by the Political Machine.

           

               A-   "The mayor of Chicago is the mayor of Chicago land," Myron Orfield says. Orfield, who used to live here, has been a leading force for desegregation in the Twin Cities—he's the executive director of the Institute on Race & Poverty at the University of Minnesota. He says a Chicago mayor carries much clout with suburban mayors, and could use it to help ease segregation in the city and the near suburbs.

 B-         Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-610 where allegations of complaint are not denied, there is admission of all facts well-pleaded by adversary, and such admission, drawn from failure to plead, may be considered as evidence. Hecht v. Hecht, App. 1 Dist. 1977, 7 Ill. Dec. 169, 49 Ill. App. 3d 334, 364 N.E. 2d 330.

    C-   Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.

That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue involved in a case,  great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.

3.)   That because the Democratic Political Machine is likened to the  Ku Klux Klan Page 3, 4 of Gr Ex F demonstrate the racial hatred “Powerful Whites” in authority have against persons of color and the degree of “Hate Crimes they are willing to exhaust making sure a person of color remain oppressed;

A-           A- That there has not been a single person to stand up against the Racist Atrocities lodged at the Complainant in every layer of this conspiracy ILL. App. (1^st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16, 375.  

B-     U.S 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.-U.S. v. Jimenez Recio; 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154, L. Ed.2d 744, on remand 371 F.3d 1093;

   Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.

   Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;

                 C      Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).    

   4.)     That because Brown, Black and some foreigners lives don’t matter this   is the consensus of Democrats in the Political Machine to maintain job security keeping their ethnicity employed as demonstrated in this matter how top attorneys are earning income at the demise and Racial Torture of an innocent man standing up to them in a “Homeless State” is how The Chicago Commission on Human Relations erred in ignoring all of Appellant’s affidavits never challenged or objected to, (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5^th Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5^th Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5^th Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess “final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452 (1986) (plurality opinion),Smith v. Wade U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct.1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)

C -  Vigus v. O’Bannon, 1886 N.E. 788, 118 Ill. 334; Hazelton v. Carolus, 1907 132 Ill. App. 512; Carter v. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “(fraud and deceit)”are: (1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party resulting from such reliance……………

 D-   Beatie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 189 WL 2373 (1st Dist.1989). As is making false representations to the court. People v. Katelhut, 332 Ill. App. 693, 54 N.E. 2d 590, (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer of the court is punishable as contempt. People ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N. E. 2d 895 (1st Dist. 1939). 

E- Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the ed. 1992).

  5.)  How can any person whether they are Irish or of Polish ethnicity be the majority in control, see wrong, ignore wrong, close their ears and eyes to wrong when a person of their ethnic group commits fraudulent acts?

   6.)   How can any Judge whether they be Asian, Mexican or African American etc.,   who are a minority on the bench or in a Commission go up against a majority in control especially if that lawyer or law firm is of the majority’s ethnic make-up or part of the Terrorist Order and rule against that lawyer and not expect some type of repercussion from those in control?

7.)   That said document that was mailed by the unnamed Commissioner had as much value to it as yesterday’s toilet paper where said paper is heavily needed from those suffering from Crohn’s Disease involved in these matters;

     8.)   Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.

        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,

           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)  

The President had additional power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong. Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion, Section 4 provided;

9.)   FACT: CHA had agreed to pay rent for the Appellant via the Mobility program at 420 East Ohio but the Respondent did not want him and family in the building and used falsified credit scores of Appellant and children credit scores only after his identity was compromised and stolen where CHA officials were involved to deny him access to renting the unit;

     A- That said documents tendered with the filing of the March 14, Amended Emergency Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al clearly and unequivocally demonstrate Complainant’s credit score at 670, despite credit report hacked and falsified;

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981                 

 Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

That because of the number of years Appellant have been harmed by said Civil Rights Violations and no one objected to said assertions put before this tribunal, Complainant is seeking  $25 Million from the inception of this matter, until this matter is finally adjudicated and for the heinous Racial Hate acts associated in these matters causing some of his children to be hospitalized for various psychological traumas where therapy was necessary but said medical information was used unlawfully in an attempt to destroy Appellant;

    Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983)  Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the context of {1983}”          

Finally, this document is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Most recently stated in Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”    

   The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

                                       FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                          Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                     Appellant/Counsel Pro Se

   

WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Complainant respectfully Prays for the Relief

1.)  For an Order Remanding all CHA & related Respondents Section 8 employees who had knowledge and closed their eyes to said injustices or persons in authority absorb any and all related expenses costs relating to Appellant vacating home which was an abandoned building CHA paid an illegal person money who never owned the property and Judge Scully was involved as an attorney and Judge Leonard Murray had Sheriff to break into home locking Appellant out 10058 South Vernon Instanter and being homeless, and has no income and is on welfare receiving FOOD STAMPS only due to said parties RETALIATING and OPPRESSING him and family EXHAUSTING TERRORISTS TACTICS PLACING HIM IN THAT STATE;

Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted depraved acts of all parties pay punitive damages, of $30 Million Dollars Appellant and family has endured in these matters;

  

2.)  For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s jurisdiction due to the political influence involved and them ignoring the criminal acts perpetrated by “Powerful” White Men in authority;

  

3.)  For an Order REVERSING the Commission’s order for failing to follow Supreme Court rules and procedures;

4.)  For an Order Imposing Sanctions Fining CHA and all attorneys and law firms $20,000.00 - $30, 000.00 day until Appellant receives his law license and is admitted to the bar.

5.)  Prohibit any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Appellant and family suffering behind said acts;

6.)  For an Order Remanding every Party and attorneys disbarring them complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties;

7.)  For an Order Compelling  all Parties to appear before a Court or Grand Jury to determine who should be INDICTED for their part in said Conspiracy;

8.)  For an Order Appointing an Independent Examiner to ascertain all persons removed from the CHA section 8 program in the last 4 years where the City of Chicago, Human Relations Commission and Hearing Officers under CHA’s authority dismissed their complaints unlawfully;

9.)  For the entry of an Order awarding to your Appellant for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;

Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.

                                                                                                                                   Respectfully Submitted

                                                                              Joe Louis Lawrence

                                                                                      Complainant                                                         

                                                                                        Counsel Pro se

                            

                                               

                                                                             

                                                               

                                       CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States

President Barack Obama                                 Eric Holder

The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chicago Housing Authority             Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Office of the General Counsel                  Christian T. Novay

Asst Gen Counsel                                  55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800 

Maria Sewell Joseph                                 Chicago, Il 60603

60 East Van Buren

Chicago, Ill 60605                                  Seyfarth & Shaw

                                                                 Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris       

                                                                   131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400

                                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60603

TO AAG Tyler Roland          Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601

         General Law Bureau       Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

        100 West Randolph Street Suite 1300

        Chicago, Ill. 60601    Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.                                            

        Judge Mikva Daley Center, Chg. Il 60601

       States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

       Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601

           

Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin

Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8^th floor

100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601

Chicago, Ill. 60601     

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors

Chris Klepper, Executive Dir                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris

28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2^nd Floor 

Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615    

                                                                   

CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist              

Jessie McDaniel                                                        

4859 S. Wabash                                                    

Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings      

Christopher Lynch                                              

121 North LaSalle, Room 900                               

Chicago, Ill. 60601

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP

Christopher R. Johnson                             Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay

134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606

Courtesy Copies:

 US Attorney                                            FBI  Robert J. Holley

 Zachary T. Fardon                                    2111 West Roosevelt Road

219 S. Dearborn, 5^th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612

Chicago, Ill. 60604

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.

Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop

City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff

Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart

118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701

Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on  March 3, 2015, An Amended Request for Review, Impose Sanctions et al., has been filed with the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division and said copy have been delivered or emailed to the applicable parties by the Cook County Sheriff;

                                                             Respectfully Submitted

                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se

                                                                           PO Box 490075

                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075

                                                                          312 927-4210

                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                           @joelouis7