PRESIDENT OBAMA IS ENDORSING RAHM EMMANUEL FOR RE ELECTION AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
RAHM EMMANUEL HAS AN ADMINISTRATION IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RELATIONS INVOLVED IN RACIAL HATE CRIMES COVERING UP RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING.
THIS CASE DEMONSTRATES HOW CHICAGO IS LIKENED TO A SLAVE PLANTATION IN THAT MANY BLACKS DON'T REALIZE THEY ARE FREE BUT ARE WILLING TO DESTROY THE LIVES OF INNOCENT PEOPLE OF COLOR SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE WHITE MEN "ORGANIZED" IN NUMBERS DESTROYING AND OPPRESSING INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR.
THIS CASE IS LIKENED TO A RACIAL HOLOCAUST ONLY IN GERMANY JEWS WERE BURNED IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS RACIAL HATRED AND GENOCIDE WAS THAT INTENSE, IN CHICAGO GENOCIDE AND THE RACIAL HOLOCAUST IS PERPETRATED DIFFERENTLY JAILS AND INJUSTICE ARE THE MAINSTAY IN HOW CORRUPT WHITE MEN ARE MAKING THEIR MONIES.
IT IS MUCH MORE PROFITABLE TO LYNCH A BLACK AND BROWN MAN THIS WAY ILLUSTRATED IN THIS DOCUMENT THAN TO USE A "ROPE"
Honorable Franklin U.
Valderrama
2601 Richard J. Daley
Center
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Feb. 13, 2015
Case#
15 CH 01670
Room 2305
COURTESY COPY
A MUST READ
Honorable Judge Valderrama:
Please Find Plaintiff’s
PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO CORROBBORATION of FRAUD PERJURY
CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RETALIATION ON COMPLAINANT REMAND/BODY
ATTACHMENT INSTANTER
w/Affidavit with the attachments
demonstrating heinous criminal acts likened to war crimes.
Special Note: Please be advised the number of attorneys engaging in criminal acts upholding “fraud”.
Terrorism
is here in America in this State of Illinois, City of Chicago and the
techniques used to Oppress and commit Genocide on innocent men of color and the
methodologies employed in how certain ethnic groups are recruited to advance
their agenda to remain employed to destroy an innocent man in the likes of the
plaintiff for standing up to Racist
Terrorism in this State in the courts for seeking equality conditions
where housing was concerned trying to live with a CHA voucher;
Count
the number of lawyers and judges used to attempt “Lynching” on an innocent man simply for standing up to
Racism, Racial Segregation and Racial Injustice in Chicago and how many closed
their eyes to the crimes because Black and Brown lives don’t matter living in
Chicago.
.
Court Call Feb. 27, 2015
@ 9:30 am
Let
this communication receive you and your family in good health
Respectfully
Submitted,
________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
Counsel
Pro Se
(312)
927-4210
CC.
Chief Judge Timothy Evans Courtesy
Copy U.S. Atty. Zachary T. Fardon, Judge Mary Mikva, Gordon & Rees,
Cary & Schiff & Assc., Seyfarth & Shaw, CHA, Maria Sewell Joseph, Gov.
Bruce Rauner, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel
Presiding
Judge Moshe Jacobius, Asst. Gen
Counsel, Sec. of State Terrence McConville, City of Chg Commission on Human Relations, States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown
Robert
J. Holley, FBI Agent Chicago
Courtesy Copy
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination ) 2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations )
Housing Matters: ) Hon. Rodolfo Garcia
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Room 2601
Petitioner ) DEMAND
) $25 MILLION DOLLARS
V )
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority)
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
On Human
Relations )
Respondents )
________________________________________________________________________
EMERGENCY
PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO CORROBBORATION of FRAUD PERJURY
CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RETALIATION ON COMPLAINANT REMAND/BODY
ATTACHMENT INSTANTER
IMPOSE SANCTIONS
w/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes Petitioner, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel
Pro Se, in this cause respectfully represents to this court the reasons and
files herewith his Affidavit in support for said Petition for Rule to Show
Cause for Willful Misrepresentations to Court et al… Remand/Body Attachment
Instanter Impose Sanctions, pursuant to
the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Section
1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 3D
(2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;
Respectfully
Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
312 927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Twitter @joelouis7
AFFIDAVIT
I Joe Louis Lawrence, being duly sworn on
oath states:
1.)
That
pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. 420 East Ohio, ZRS Management,
Tracking #7014-0150-0001-5043-5130 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015,
10:57 am,
2.)
That
pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. 345 East Ohio, Village Green
Management same sequence of numbers except for the last four numbers, #5154 was
served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 1:18 pm;
3.)
That
pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. City of Chicago, Commission on
Human Relations same sequence of numbers
except for the last four numbers, #5147 was served via certified mail Feb. 5,
2015, 2:12 pm;
4.)
That
pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/3-101, et seq. Chicago Housing Authority same sequence of numbers except for the last
four numbers, #5123 was served via certified mail Feb. 6, 2015, 12:35 pm;
5.)
That
said attorneys and all participants have
satisfied the legal standard of the preponderance of the evidence taking part
in an “Organized Conspiracy” engaging
in Terrorist activities likened to the Ku Klux Klan fraternal order;
6.)
That
the CHA Terrorist Operatives with vexation for the laws deliberately made
perjured testimony to Hearing Officer Frederick Bates for reasons in trying to
remove petitioner from voucher program, but was reinstated, Jan 21, 2015;
A-
That
because of the “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated at Petitioner by
Respondents at the CHA and Commission on Human Relations, as they colluded
mailing out “Fraudulent” court orders absent certification with a seal or
signature;
B-
That because of Petitioners ethnicity
non-white many in the City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, CHA have
corroborated their roles in this active chain conspiracy by disseminating false
documents to whomever is necessary to Induce Reliance on the agency or judge
hearing the matter, as demonstrated in this case;
That Group Ex A, of the Request for Review
et al filed (Jan 30, 2015) unequivocally demonstrate the mayhem and Terrorist
Acts many racist individuals were willing to exhaust covering up-crimes that
should have been reported and addressed but was ignored because Petitioner’s
life did not matter; Canon
3D
(1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct
A-
Mass.
Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op. 2002-04 (2002)……………………………………
B-
That
in addition to the Organized Conspiracy, Respondents continued to violate Petitioners
Civil Rights as they colluded with alleged members of the City of Chicago by accessing
personal credit information where there was on a “freeze” on said report while said matter was under
investigation. See Par. 15 of Dec.
10, response;
C-
Pursuant to Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 N.E 788,
188 Ill 334 Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 Ill. App. 512, hereto attached,
D-
Petitioner Appealed to the Appellate Court
where Honorable Rodolfo Garcia, Thomas Hoffman, John Owen Steele, Patrick J.
Quinn former Governor Pat Quinn’s brother, Themesis Karnezis, Mary K. Rochford,
Warren D. Wolfson who is related to Loretta Higgins- Wolfson, Mathias W.
Delort, Bertina Lampkin, Sebastian Patti, Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, Joy
Cunningham, Mary Jane Theis, who had a father convicted in the Greylord sting
as a judge, Michael Murphy all were complicit in covering-up criminal Civil
Rights violations of a “Bogus” paternity case 88 D 079012, said judges ignored
every unchallenged affidavit issued orders outside of their provisions of
judicial immunity;
Cannon v. Commission on Judicial
Qualifications,
14 Cal. 3d 678, 537 P. 2d 898,
122 Cal. Rptr. 778 (1975)……………………
E-
That Respondents are anticipating any judge
recorded within the aforementioned, who is corrupt and willing to step outside
of their immunity provisions and commit the following “Terrorist Crimes” by
dismissing said “Request for Review et al” simply because ethnic groups Black
and Brown don’t matter; Judges erred in abusing the adversarial process, a
fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are to be
conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of cases
without an adversarial proceeding, In re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination
(Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A. 2d 220 (1977……………………….
Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220
(1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985)
(Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt
power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court
Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be
characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted
willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of
justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where
there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.
Vaughn 462 S.E. 2d 728 (Ga. 1995), The Supreme
Court of Georgia removed a judge from office for disregarding defendant’s
constitutional rights
Section 1983 of
USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional
application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla)
372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured
by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for
the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227
F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505.
7.)
That
many blacks along with obvious whites working for Edward Burke see him as a
Messiah an untouchable God in that, they have forsaken the integrity of their
careers by participating in said Terrorists Acts, so as to maintain their
positions of authority and titles oppressing individuals like the Petitioner
and said Blacks, Latinos are only figureheads and will not enforce the laws on
the perpetrators who’s ethnicity is white and is a part of the “Organized
Conspiracy”;
A-
That
Judge Moche Jacobius before being appointed judge of the circuit court had
assisted Petitioner on another case as Assistant Attorney General was aware of
the corruption and mayhem he had experienced in the courts is the only attorney
to appoint him legal representation when locked up 5 times for allegedly owing
child support on a “Bogus” paternity case that had no judges signatures which
is the modis operandi of the
perpetrators involved engaging in this “Terrorist Organized Conspiracy”;
B-
That
Judge Timothy P. Murphy said “today is your lucky day” and was upset he could
not remand Petitioner back into custody because his attorney Gerald Nordgren informed
him he was on Public Aid;
That
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan
Act of 1871: the law is clear, “Whenever in any State or part of a
State………unlawful combinations…….shall be organized and armed, and so numerous
and powerful et al…………and whenever, by reason of either or all of the causes
aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders and the preservation of the public
safety shall become…..Impracticable, in every such case such combinations shall
be deemed a rebellion against the Government of the United States…..”
8.)
Said Respondent Terrorists impersonating
attorneys and private citizens thought they were in fact denying the Petitioner
in their plethora of unlawful acts were really demonstrating their might
against the Federal Government;
A-
That
because the conspirators have demonstrated their rebellion against the federal
government, it is necessary to ascertain how many are willing to spend the rest
of their lives in a Maximum Federal Penitentiary or face execution working for
the King of Terrorism;
B-
That
because this matter is now before a judge with “Contempt Power” it is necessary
to establish a precedent in the laws imposing applicable laws that would
discourage and prohibit this area of Racial Genocide, Racial Apartheid ethnic
cleansing of persons of color from Equal access to the laws and Public Housing,
unlawful incarcerations by a racial majority seizing a City and legal system is
why Remands are necessary with Body attachments;
C-
Petitioner
served Rahm Emmanuel via Police Personnel, he ignored the issues simply because
Black and Brown people lives simply don’t matter where racial Discrimination or
Segregation is concerned, Chicago
Reader, Feb. 5, 2015, Steve Bogira and Mike Dumke, The Chicago agency charged with investigating complaints of housing
discrimination is the Commission on Human Relations. In recent years, it has
seldom punished landlords for discriminating racially. The commission's modest
$1.9 million budget has grown yet more modest since Rahm Emanuel became mayor:
he's cut it to $1.1 million. It's one of the things we would have liked to have
discussed with him, but he declined to talk with us about segregation.
D-
That
the Mayor’s true color on how he feels about people of color is indicative to
how policies are enforced under his jurisdiction but President Obama is
endorsing him for re-election unaware Rahm Emmanuel do not share the same
sentiment, Racism and Racial Hatred is how Chicago is presently governed;
The
Mis education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933
“History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what
revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do
for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights
or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.”
“When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary.”
9.)
That many Respondents white and
Hispanic not racist and not a part of the political machine tried to help Petitioner,
stated “he needed a court order from a
judge not connected because there are too many judges Burke owns and is
involved and nobody wants to lose their job doing what is right to help you”
A-) That because Ed Burke is the
Finance Chairman and responsible who receives payment from the City, allegedly
stated “As long as he is Chairman the Nigger referencing Petitioner
will never be reinstated to CTA and receive his back wages” To this date no
one has ever objected to the veracity of said assertions recorded in said
affidavits.
B-) That Petitioner
under the FBI’s directorship ascertained the necessary corroboration from every
legal tribunal and State Agencies demonstrating and recording in all affidavits
how cases are fixed and judges are used as weapons of “Mass Destruction”
against citizens of color as demonstrated in this matter;
C-)
That all parties were properly noticed that the FBI was in fact
receiving courtesy copies basically presented a middle finger to the Feds and
every respected legal representative of the laws challenging them to exercise
their authority and necessary force removing them from office;
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of the second section of
the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As
originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to
conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and
privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the
Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where these gangs of Assassins show
themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with
forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence.
Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not;
witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they
might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and
machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if
government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most
dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the
uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is
credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise,
while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon
unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found
inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the
State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford
protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)
Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud
104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue
involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction
of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of
examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E
788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96 ILL
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel,
Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d
1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
U. S
Sup Court
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public
over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime,
both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of
offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part
in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108.
Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement
of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL
Supreme Court Rule [137]
provides in pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other
paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its
own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party,
or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the
other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of
the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable
attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for
active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can
also justify an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN
v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec.
30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the
result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the
extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that
lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
10.)
That
because of the Directed Evidence and admissions in the aforementioned recorded
within Complainant is seeking all parties be REMANDED into CUSTODY Instanter regardless to their
Racial Political Fraternal Affiliations for their respective roles in said
Criminal Housing Conspiracies;
A- That all parties have demonstrated in their respective
roles that they are not capable of DISCHARGING their duties in accordance to
the Laws of Professional Ethics, Rules of Illinois Supreme Court or United
States Constitution with any integrity; therefore, a COURT’S ORDER is needed to
MANDATE THE PARTIES TO act within their obligations;
The Chicago Daily
Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page
1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press
writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois
is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.
That Chicago is the
most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet
Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are
the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a
former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265
5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant/Counsel
Pro Se
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination ) 2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations )
Housing Matters:
) Hon. Rodolfo Garcia
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Room 2601
Petitioner ) DEMAND
) $25 MILLION DOLLARS
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human
Relations
Respondents
________________________________________________________________________
In
Accordance to all of The Cook County Circuit Court Rules
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE
RELIEF REQUESTED
The
canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide
for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing
them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531,
533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Ill.
App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933
(2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill.
Ethics
All Illinois
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the standards
to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of that rule
states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the
creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know the evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not
reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible
evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as
a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal
contempt. And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable
crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. Ill. Ill.
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits
misconduct, punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official
capacity, he intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as
required by law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by
law to perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or
another, he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38
33-3.
False statements
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known
to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her
when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by
client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt
motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients. 99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11
Three-year suspension was
recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty
and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or
reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be
false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. SH 358.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements
of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in
conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and
engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95
Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504
One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made
statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional
capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be
false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving
dishonesty. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. CH 191.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation
during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist. 94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469
Fraud on court
Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim
suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have known
to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or
reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause,
committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty,
trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to
administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts
or legal profession into disrepute. 96 Ill.
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.) For an Order Remanding all attorneys related Respondents found in Contempt who
did not report any improprieties to proper authorities demonstrating their non-
involvement in Civil Rights Violations, Terrorist Acts et al.
2.) Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S.
30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted
depraved acts of all parties For an Order to pay PUNITIVE damages of $25
Million Dollars to the Petitioner and bond be set for all parties from the
above demand;
3.) For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States
Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan jurisdiction (more
importantly attorney Kent Stephan Ray who committed numerous Civil Rights
violations as General attorney of the CTA is now a States Attorney; Attorney
General Lisa Madigan, when confronted with numerous documents alleging “FRAUD
on numerous Judges and States Attorneys her reply, “The Civil Rights Bureau of the Attorney General is in receipt of the
correspondence you delivered to our offices on 10/26/06. Unfortunately, your
file was closed because we do not have jurisdiction over child support related
matters”);
4.) For an Order Compelling Respondents to provide documentation of all
persons living in the named units that excluded the Petitioner a 3 bedroom
voucher;
5.) For
an Order issuing an Injunction against
the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations to ascertain the number of
cases “Fixed” that were disposed of without signatures or dismissed;
6.) For
an Order seeking Federal
Jurisdiction in the applicable statutes prohibiting the Respondent CHA from
removing any families from the Voucher program and reinstate all families who
were removed during the last years Petitioner complained of Racial
Discrimination that went ignored;
7.) For
an Order Imposing Sanctions against
all attorneys and law firms to absorb any and all attorney fees and costs for
the prosecution and enforcement of these matters;
8.) Prohibit any Attorney from delaying
prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to Petitioner and
family suffering behind said acts;
9.) For an Order auditing all tenants for ZRS Management, Riverstone
Management and K2 Management and the Streeter to determine the ethnicity of all
tenants with vouchers and income criteria with said vouchers;
10.)
For
an Order Remanding every Party
complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said
unlawful acts of all parties and participants at the City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations responsible for mailing fraudulent documents to
Petitioner ;
11.)
For
an Order Compelling all Parties to appear before a Court with
jurisdiction to determine who should be REMANDED
into Custody for their part in said Terrorist Conspiracies;
12.)
For
the entry of an Order awarding to
your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity
may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under penalties as
provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that
the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to
matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters,
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be
true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant
Counsel Pro se
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama
Eric Holder
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500 Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chicago Housing
Authority Wilson Elser
Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Office of the General Counsel Christian T. Novay
Asst Gen Counsel 55 West
Monroe, Street, Suite 3800
Maria Sewell Joseph Chicago, Il
60603
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill 60605 Seyfarth &
Shaw
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen & Anne Harris
131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
TO AAG Tyler
Roland Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
General Law
Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
100 West
Randolph Street Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.
Judge Mikva Daley
Center, Chg. Il 60601
States Attorney, Anita Alvarez,
Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West
Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State
Asst Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel
Terrence McConville 60 East Van
Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility
CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann
Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd. 4859 S.
Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604
Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real
Estate Specialist
Jessie McDaniel
4859 S. Wabash
Chicago, Ill. 60615
City of Chicago,
Department of Buildings
Christopher
Lynch
121 North LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleda Joy Lindsay Watson,
Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI Robert J. Holley
Zachary T. Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt
Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Cook County
President Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517 Richard J. Daley
Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago, Ill. 60602
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on February 9,
2015, An Emergency Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al., has been filed
with the Chancery Circuit Court of Cook County and said copy have been
delivered or emailed to the applicable parties;
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO
Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312 927-4210
joelouislaw@yahoo.com
@joelouis7
