TERRORISM IN CHICAGO WORSE THAN EVER PART III OF III
THAT BECAUSE THIS IS A MACHINE DEMOCRAT CITY MANY SEEMS TO THINK AND ACCEPT RACIAL OPPRESSION TYRANNY IS THE NORM BECAUSE THE IRISH AND POLISH CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF THE GOVERNMENT PUTTING BLACKS IN CHARGE IS FUTILE BECAUSE MANY OF THEM ARE WORSE THAN WHITES ADDRESSING RACIST ISSUES THEY ARE WHAT ALEX HALEY CALLED THEM IN ROOTS "HOUSE NIGGERS"
NOT ONE PERSON OF COLOR STOOD UP AND DENOUNCED THE RACIST ACTS PERPETRATED AT ME AND MY FAMILY THEY KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT!
#JUDICIALCORRUPTION #JIMCROW #DEMOCRATICTERRORISM #CHIRAQ
A-
That
because this matter is now before a judge with “Contempt Power” it is necessary
to establish a precedent in the laws imposing applicable laws that would
discourage and prohibit this area of Racial Genocide, Racial Apartheid ethnic
cleansing of persons of color from Equal access to the laws and Public Housing,
unlawful incarcerations by a racial majority seizing a City and legal system is
why Remands are necessary with Body attachments;
B- Petitioner served Rahm Emmanuel via
Police Personnel, he ignored the issues simply because Black and Brown people
lives simply don’t matter where racial Discrimination or Segregation is concerned, Chicago Reader, Feb. 5, 2015, Steve Bogira
and Mike Dumke, The Chicago agency charged with investigating
complaints of housing discrimination is the Commission on Human Relations. In
recent years, it has seldom punished landlords for discriminating racially. The
commission's modest $1.9 million budget has grown yet more modest since Rahm
Emanuel became mayor: he's cut it to $1.1 million. It's one of the things we
would have liked to have discussed with him, but he
declined to talk with us about
segregation.
C- That the Mayor’s true color on how he
feels about people of color is indicative to how policies are enforced under his
jurisdiction Racism and Racial Hatred is how Chicago is presently governed;
D- That many blacks and certain Hispanics
have excepted their roles as inferior people and have personified themselves as
slaves allowing certain whites to live in a grandiose manner as “slave
masters” or “tyrants” likened to Hitler making Chicago, Illinois a
city that works if you are a racist or person of color with no backbone, the
movie Django starring Jamie Foxx depicting
him as a free man is parallel today to the very Negroes applicable to this very
case;
The
Mis education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933
“History shows that it does not matter who is in power or what
revolutionary forces take over the government, those who have not learned to do
for themselves and have to depend solely on others never obtain any more rights
or privileges in the end than they had in the beginning.”
“When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary.”
10.) That many Defendants white and
Hispanic not racist and not a part of the political machine tried to help Plaintiff,
stated “he needed a court order from a
judge not connected because there are too many judges Burke owns and is
involved and nobody wants to lose their job doing what is right to help you”
A-) That because Ed Burke is the
Finance Chairman and is responsible for who receives payment from the City,
allegedly stated “As long as he is Chairman
the Nigger referencing Petitioner
will never be reinstated to CTA and receive his back wages” To this date no
one has ever objected to the veracity of said assertions recorded in said
affidavits.
B-) That
Petitioner under the FBI’s directorship ascertained the necessary corroboration
from every legal tribunal and State Agencies demonstrating and recording it in
all affidavits how cases are fixed and judges are used as weapons of “Mass
Destruction” against citizens of color as demonstrated in this matter attorneys
are free to ask the Feds;
C-) That all parties were properly
noticed that the FBI was in fact receiving courtesy copies basically presented
a middle finger to the Feds and every respected legal representative of the
laws challenging them to exercise their authority and necessary force removing
them from office, the FBI will not get involved directly until the case is
disposed of because it is still a private civil matter;
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional Debate of the second
section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of
Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or
more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of
the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled
under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.
“Where these gangs of Assassins show
themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with
forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence.
Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not;
witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they
might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and
machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if
government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most
dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the
uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is
credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app.
At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While
murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and
banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local
administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper
corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the
guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and
innocent.”)
Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud
104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue
involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the introduction
of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the method of
examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E
788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96 ILL Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
Properly
alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter
affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel,
Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d
1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy
is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819,
537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public
over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime,
both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of
offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part
in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108.
Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
Supreme Court Rule [137] provides in
pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other
paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its
own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party,
or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other
party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the
filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable
attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for
active false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can
also justify an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN
v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec.
30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the
result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the
extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanctionable conduct, that
lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
11.)
That
because of the Directed Evidence and admissions in the aforementioned recorded
within Complainant is seeking all parties be REMANDED into CUSTODY Instanter regardless to their
Racial Political Fraternal Affiliations for their respective roles in said
Criminal Housing Conspiracies;
A- That
all parties have demonstrated in their respective roles that they are not
capable of DISCHARGING their duties in accordance to the Laws of Professional
Ethics, Rules of Illinois Supreme Court or United States Constitution with any
integrity; therefore, a COURT’S ORDER is needed to MANDATE THE PARTIES TO act
within their obligations;
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265
5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant
Counsel
Pro se
____________________________________________________________________
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination ) 2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations )
Housing Matters:
) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Room 2305
Petitioner )
)
V
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission on Human
Relations,
K2 Apartments
Respondents
________________________________________________________________________
In
Accordance to all of The Cook County Circuit Court Rules
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE
RELIEF REQUESTED
The
canons of ethic in the Rules of Professional Conduct constitute a safe guide
for professional conduct, and attorneys may be disciplined for not observing
them. In re Himmel, 125 Ill.2d 531,
533 N.E.2d 790, 127 Ill. Dec 708 (1988). Although they represent the best
thoughts of the organized bar, it has been held that these canons are
non-enforceable other than through the disciplinary proceedings. Ettinger v.
Rolewick, 140 Ill.App.3d 295, 488 N.E.2d 598, 94 Ill.Dec.599 (1st
Dist. 1986). Disciplinary proceedings and sanctions are strictly within the
province of the Supreme Court. Reed Yates
Farms, Inc. v. Yates, 172 Ill.App.3d 519, 526 N.E2d 1115, 122 Ill. Dec 576
(4th Dist.), appeal denied,
the Illinois Supreme Court, through its disciplinary arm, the Attorney
Registration and Disciplinary Commission, is the only forum for exacting
such punishment. Beale v. Edgemark
Financial Corp., 297 Ill. App. 3d 999, 697 N.E.2d 820, 232 Ill. Dec. 78 (1st
Dist. 1998). The ultimate authority to regulate and define the practice of law
rests with the Supreme Court. Perto v.
Board of Review, Illinois Department of Employment Security, 274 Ill.
App.3d 485, 654 N.E.2d 232, 210 Ill. Dec. 933 (2d Dist.), appeal denied, 164 Ill. 2d 581 (1995).
Ethics
All Illinois lawyers must be familiar with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, and trail lawyers must be
particularly familiar with the rules that apply specially to them.
RPC
3.3, entitled “Conduct Before a Tribunal,” sets forth the
standards to be followed by the trial lawyer during “battle.” Section (a) of
that rule states:
(a) In appearing in a professional capacity before a tribunal, a
lawyer shall not:
(1) make a statement of
material fact or law to a tribunal which the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know is false;
(2) fail to disclose to a
tribunal a material fact known to the lawyer when disclosure is necessary to
avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to
be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing
counsel;
(4) Offer evidence that the
lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes
to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures;
(5) participate in the
creation or preservation of evidence when the lawyer knows or reasonably should
know the evidence is false ;
(6) counsel or assist the
client in conduct the lawyer knows to be illegal of fraudulent;
(7) engage in other illegal
conduct or conduct in violation of these Rules;
(8) fail to disclose the
identities of the clients represented and of the persons who employed the
lawyer unless such information is privileged or irrelevant;
(9) intentionally degrade a
witness or other person by stating or alluding to personal facts concerning
that person which are not relevant to the case;
(10) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably
believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence,
assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a
witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of and accused, but a lawyer may argue, on analysis of evidence, for
any position or conclusion with respect to the matter stated herein;
Acts constituting direct, criminal
contempt
A wide variety of acts may constitute a direct, criminal contempt.
And act may be criminal contempt even though it is also an indictable crime. Beattie v. People, 33 Ill. App 651, 1889
WL 2373 (1st Dist. 1889). As is making false representations to the
court. People v. Katelhut, 322 Ill.
App. 693, 54 N.E.2d 590 (1st Dist. 1944). Misconduct of an officer
of the court is punishable as contempt. People
ex rel. Rusch v. Levin, 305 Ill. App. 142, 26 N.E. 2d 895 (1st
Dist. 1939).
Official
misconduct is a criminal offense; and a public officer or employee commits misconduct,
punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, when, in his official capacity, he
intentionally or recklessly fails to perform any mandatory duty as required by
law; or knowingly performs an act which he knows he is forbidden by law to
perform; or with intent to obtain a personal advantage for himself or another,
he performs an act in excess of his lawful authority ….S.H.A. Ch 38 33-3.
False statements
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which she knew or reasonably should have known
to be false, and failed to disclose to tribunal a material fact known to her
when disclosure was necessary to avoid assisting criminal or fraudulent at by
client, given that attorney’s misconduct was not result of dishonest or corrupt
motive, but of misguided attempt to accommodate clients. 99 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH11
Three-year suspension was
recommended sanction for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty
and fraud, made statement of material fact to tribunal which he knew or
reasonably should have known was false, and offered evidence that he knew to be
false and failed to take reasonable remedial measures. 96 Ill.Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. SH 358.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, made false statements
of material fact or law to tribunal which she knew were false and engaged in
conduct which tended to defeat administration of justice. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 877.
Censure was recommended sanction for
attorney who made statements of material fact or law known was false, and
engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice. 95
Ill Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. CH 504
One-year suspension was recommended sanction for attorney who made
statement of material fact which he knew was false in appearing in professional
capacity before tribunal, made a statement of material fact which he knew to be
false in course of representing client, and engaged in conduct involving
dishonesty. 95 Ill Atty.Reg. &
Disc.Comm. CH 191.
Disbarment was recommended sanction
for attorney who engaged in serious misconduct by making misrepresentation
during his divorce proceedings and who was a recidivist. 94 Ill.Atty.Reg. & Disc.Comm. SH469
Fraud on court
Two-year suspension, retroactive to beginning of interim
suspension, was recommended sanction for attorney who made statement of
material fact or law to tribunal which lawyer knew or reasonably should have
known to be false, instituted criminal charges as prosecutor when he knew or
reasonably should have known that charges were not supported by probable cause,
committed criminal act that reflected adversely upon lawyer ‘s honesty,
trustworthiness, or fitness as lawyer, engaged in conduct involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaged in conduct prejudicial to
administration of justice, and engaged in conduct which tended to bring courts
or legal profession into disrepute. 96
Ill. Atty. Reg. & Disc. Comm. CH 118.
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Respondent respectfully Prays for the Relief
1.) For an Order Remanding all attorneys related Respondents found in Contempt who
did not report any improprieties to proper authorities demonstrating their non-
involvement in Civil Rights Violations, Terrorist Acts et al.
2.) Pursuant to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S.
30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that because of the noted
depraved acts of all parties For an Order to pay PUNITIVE damages of $25
Million Dollars to the Petitioner and bond be set for all parties from the
above demand;
3.) For an Order Recommending a Special Prosecutor outside of States
Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan jurisdiction (more
importantly attorney Kent Stephan Ray who committed numerous Civil Rights
violations as General attorney of the CTA is now a States Attorney; Attorney
General Lisa Madigan, when confronted with numerous documents alleging “FRAUD
on numerous Judges and States Attorneys her reply, “The Civil Rights Bureau of the Attorney General is in receipt of the
correspondence you delivered to our offices on 10/26/06. Unfortunately, your
file was closed because we do not have jurisdiction over child support related
matters”); outside of
States Attorney Anita Alvarez, Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s jurisdiction due
to the political influence involved and them ignoring the criminal acts
perpetrated by “Powerful” White Men in authority;
due to Murder of brother (Timothy D. Lawrence) a City employee of 17 years;
4.) For an Order Compelling Defendants to provide documentation of all persons
living in the named units that excluded the Petitioner a 3 bedroom voucher;
5.) For
an Order issuing an Injunction against
the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations to ascertain the number of
cases “Fixed” that were disposed of without signatures or dismissed;
6.) For
an Order seeking Federal
Jurisdiction in the applicable statutes prohibiting the Respondent CHA from
removing any families from the Voucher program and reinstate all families who
were removed during the last years Petitioner complained of Racial Housing
Discrimination that went ignored;
7.) For
an Order Imposing Sanctions against
all attorneys and law firms to absorb any and all attorney fees and costs for the
prosecution and enforcement of these matters;
8.) For an Order auditing all tenants for ZRS Management, Riverstone
Management and K2 Management and the Streeter to determine the ethnicity of all
tenants with vouchers and income criteria with said vouchers;
9.) For an Order Remanding every Party complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory
acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties and
participants at the City of Chicago, Commission on Human Relations responsible
for mailing fraudulent documents to Petitioner ;
10.)
For
an Order Compelling all Parties to appear before a Court with
jurisdiction to determine who should be REMANDED
into Custody for their part in said Terrorist Conspiracies perpetrated at
Plaintiff;
11.)
For
the entry of an Order awarding to
your Respondent for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity
may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
12.)
For
an Order Remanding all CHA & related
Respondents Section 8 employees who had knowledge and closed their eyes to said
injustices or persons in authority absorb any and all related expenses
costs relating to Plaintiff vacating home which was an abandoned building CHA
paid an illegal person money who never owned the property and Judge Scully was
involved as an attorney and Judge Leonard Murray had Sheriff to break into home
locking Plaintiff out 10058 South Vernon Instanter and being homeless, and has
no income and is on welfare receiving FOOD STAMPS only due to said parties
RETALIATING and OPPRESSING him and family EXHAUSTING TERRORISTS TACTICS PLACING
HIM IN THAT STATE;
Pursuant
to Smith V. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35. 103 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) that
because of the noted depraved acts of all parties pay punitive damages, of $30
Million Dollars Appellant and family has endured in these matters;
13.)
For
an Order REVERSING the Commission’s
order for failing to follow Supreme Court rules and procedures;
14.)
For an Order Imposing Sanctions Fining CHA and
all attorneys and law firms $20,000.00 - $30, 000.00 day until Appellant
receives his law license and is admitted to the bar.
15.)
Prohibit
any Attorney from delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous
continuances due to Plaintiff and family suffering behind said acts;
16.)
For
an Order Remanding every Party and
attorneys disbarring them complicit in said Criminal Conspiratory acts ignoring
and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties;
17.)
For
an Order Compelling all Parties to appear before a Court or Grand
Jury to determine who should be INDICTED
for their part in said Conspiracy;
18.)
For an Order
Appointing an Independent Examiner
to ascertain all persons removed from the CHA section 8 program in the last 4
years where the City of Chicago, Human Relations Commission and Hearing
Officers under CHA’s authority dismissed their complaints unlawfully;
19.)
For
the entry of an Order awarding to
your Appellant for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity
may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
20.)
For an Order removing Judge Franklin Ulysses Valderrama from
presiding over said matter for his role in threatening the Plaintiff and
applicable charges filed before the Judicial Inquiry Board and ascertain the
identity of the person responsible for calling A. R. Leak Oct. 3, saying the
family cancelled the Memorial Service which was a lie! Fining 420 East Ohio,
City of Chicago ,K2 apartments, 345 East Ohio, CHA et al $20,000.00 - $30,000.00 a day to the City of
Chicago until Plaintiff is expeditiously housed;
21.)
Prohibit any Attorney from
delaying prosecution of this matter with frivolous continuances due to
Plaintiff and family suffering behind said acts;
22.)
For an Order Remanding every Party complicit in said Criminal Terrorist
Conspiratory acts ignoring and covering-up said unlawful acts of all parties
because of the ethnicity of Plaintiff skin color; (Black and Brown lives don’t
matter)
23.)
For an Order Compelling all Parties
to appear before a Court with jurisdiction to determine who should be REMANDED into Custody for their part in
said Murder Conspiracies of brother (city employee Timothy David Lawrence);
24.)
For the entry of an Order awarding to your Plaintiff for
such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which
this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
Under penalties as
provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5\1-109, the undersigned certifies that
the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to
matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters,
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be
true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Complainant
Counsel
Pro se
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK
COUNTY, ILLNOIS
CHANCERY
DIVISION
)
In Re Racial Discrimination
) 2015 CH 01670
/Source Income Violations )
Housing Matters:
) Hon. F. U. Valderrama
Joe Louis Lawrence ) Room 2305
Plaintiff )
)
V
)
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority )
345 East Ohio, City of Chicago, Commission)
On Human Relations,
K2 Apt. )
Defendants
)
________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE
OF FILING
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that on Nov. 30,
2015, Plaintiff has filed a 2nd Amended Complaint Request for Review
due to “Fraud” & Terrorist Acts et al. …. w/Affidavit.
Commander & Chief Attorney General of United States
President Barack
Obama
Loretta Lynch
The White House U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Chief Judge Timothy Evans Judge Moshe
Jacobius
50 West
Washington, Suite 2600 50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Judge
Mary Lane Mikva Clerk of
Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West
Washington, Suite 50 West Washington,
Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West
Randolph, Suite 1200 100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
States Attorney,
Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State Asst Deputy Dir.
Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville
60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West
Randolph, Suite 500
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
CHA Mobility CHA Mobility, HCP
Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive
Dir. Tracey Robinson/Joann
Harris
28 East Jackson
Blvd.
4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill
60604 Chicago, Ill.
60615
CHA Mobility, Real Estate
Specialist Recorder of
Deeds
Jessie McDaniel Karen Yarbrough
4859 S.
Wabash
118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill.
60615
Chicago, Ill. 60602
City of Chicago, Department of
Buildings Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch
120 West Madison Street
121 North
LaSalle, Room 900
Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris,
Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Suite 2400
131 South
Dearborn
Chicago, IL.
60603
Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the
General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van
Buren
Chicago, IL.
60605
Cary G. Schiff &
Associates Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720 1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Illinois 60606
Stephan R.
Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst
Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle
Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill
60602
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman &
Dicker LLP
Christian Novay
55 West Monroe,
Street, Suite 3800
Chicago, Ill.
60603
Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA Roy Martinez Manager 420
East Ohio
60 East Van
Buren
420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60611
Eve Aywaz,
Sales Consultant Sarah
Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio
420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill.
60611
Chicago, Ill. 60611
John-Paul
Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio
Leo High School Terra London
Chicago, Ill.
60611
7901 S. Sangamon
Chicago, Ill. 60620
Courtesy Copies:
US Attorney FBI
Robert J. Holley
Zachary T. Fardon 2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago,
Ill 60604
Superintendent of Police
Garry F. McCarthy
Hon Judge Neil Cohen 3510 S. Michigan
50 West
Washington, Suite 2308 Chicago, Ill 60653
Chicago, Ill
60601
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly E.
Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Governor
Hon Mark Kirk
525 South 8th St. 607 East
Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703 Springfield,
Ill. 62701
Bruce Rauner Media
Personnel
100 West Randolph
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Cook County President Cook County
Sheriff
Toni
Preckwinkle Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark,
Room 517 Richard
J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill.
60602
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Hon Dick Durbin Hearing
Officer CHA
525 South 8th St.
Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703 60 East Van Buren,
Suite 900
Chicago, Ill. 60605
Father Pfleger Alderman David Moore 17th ward
St. Sabina
Chicago, IL. 60620
1210 West 78th Pl.
Chicago, IL. 60620
Alderman Ed Burke
2650
West 51st Street 302
Chicago,
Il 60632
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above notice and
all attachments were caused to be personally delivered, emailed or via
facsimile or deposited in the U.S. mail to the above parties at the addresses
provided before 5:00 pm on Nov. 30, 2015.
PLEASE
BE ADVISED that on Nov. 30, 2015 said 2nd Amended Complaint with
the attachments was mailed, emailed hand delivered to all parties recorded in
said notice via regular mail.
_________________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
Name Joe
Louis Lawrence
Attorney for Pro Se
Address P.O.
Box 490075
City, State
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
Phone
(312) 927-4210
Twitter
@joelouis7
