STANDING YOUR GROUND AGAINST RACISM BULLISHNESS FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE
Huffington Post declared Chicago as the most corrupt City in America.
This is how Chicago Corrupt Judges circumvent the laws in America recognized as a Super Power Country and destroy United States citizens with corrupt applications of the laws they are the weapons of mass destruction.
Because other countries like Syria do not have the personnel or members of a political machine to destroy it's people like Chicago Corrupt Democrats they resort to what is accessible poison gas to eliminate their own citizens.
Anytime a Government be it Syria or cities in America like Chicago ( their are others) exercise Terror or any type of political abuse to oppress innocent citizens, these acts should be classified as a threat against National Security where either the United Nations, Congress expedite the applicable military resources eradicating those responsible for the threats against National Security and the welfare of the citizens of the United States.
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Plaintiff CIVIL
ACTION NO: 13 CV 2852
Honorable
Judge
V
Edmond
E. Chang
Craig Fulton,
Section 8, HUD, Cook County Sheriff,
Clerk of
Circuit Court, Attorney General,
States
Attorney, City of Chicago
Defendants
NOTICE
OF
MOTION
TO SUPPLEMENT (JUNE 27, 2013) PETITION FOR RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE REMANDING JUDGES THOMAS
HOFFMAN, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE LEONARD MURRAY, GEORGE SCULLEY, JR. CRAIG
FULTON ET AL
To the Most Honorable Edmond Chang, Judge of the United
States District Court for the Northern District:
Moving Party, Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se hereby
respectfully represents to this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why
this matter should be entertained within this courts Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to
the provisions of the United States Constitution}
COMMANDER
& CHIEF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA (Courtesy Copy)
WHITE HOUSE
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
To: Dir.
Mueller FBI Washington D.C.
Corey Nelson,
FBI 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
U.S.
Attorney, Gary S. Shapiro, 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500
TO AAG Tyler Roland Chief
Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
General Law
Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
100 West
Randolph Street Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill.
60601
Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown,
Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.
States Attorney, Anita Alvarez,
Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty Gen Lisa Madigan, 100 West
Randolph, Suite 1300 Chg. Ill. 60601
Sec of State Asst
Deputy Dir Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel
Terrence McConville 60 East Van
Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility CHA
Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir Tracey Robinson/Joann
Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd. 4859 S.
Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604 Chicago,
Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real
Estate Specialist Recorder
of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash 118 N. Clark,
Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615 Chicago, Ill.
60602
City of Chicago,
Department of Buildings Sabre Investments
Christopher
Lynch
120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900 Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Courtesy Copies:
Mayor Deputy Regional Adm., Field
Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601 Chicago, Ill. 60604
Cook County
President
Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517 Richard J. Daley
Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Illinois State Police President David Lowery
Director Hiram
Grau Living
& Driving While Black Foundation
801 South 7th
Ave P O
Box 333, Oak Forest, IL 60452
Springfield,
Ill. 62703
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on September 4, 2013, A Motion to Supplement (June 27, 2013) Rule to Show Cause et
al has been filed before the United States District Court.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312 927-4210
@joelouis7
Certificate of Service
The
undersigned hereby certifies that the above Petition with attachments was
caused to be delivered by regular mail to the above named parties
______________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
Joe Louis Lawrence
Plaintiff CIVIL
ACTION NO: 13 CV 2852
Honorable
Judge:
V
Edmond E. Chang
Craig Fulton,
Section 8, HUD, Cook County Sheriff,
Clerk of
Circuit Court, Attorney General,
States
Attorney, City of Chicago
Defendants
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT JUNE 27, 2013
PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE REMANDING
JUDGES THOMAS HOFFMAN, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE LEONARD MURRAY, GEORGE
SCULLEY, JR. & CRAIG FULTON ET AL OTHERS
IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE:
Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
in this cause respectfully represents to this court said Motion to Supplement Petition
for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judges Thomas Hoffman, Leonard Murray, George
Sculley, Jr., & Craig Fulton others et al Corroboration in an Organized
Chain Conspiracy “Perjury” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other Irregularities,
Remand/Body Attachment with FBI’s Jurisdiction & Authority Instanter.
Said reasons are recorded in the attached
affidavit;
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
PO Box 490075
Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
312 927-4210
@joelouis7
IN THE
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT
In support of
Motion to
Supplement June 27, 2013 Petition for Rule to Show Cause Remanding Judges
Thomas Hoffman, Obstruction of Justice Leonard Murray, George Sculley, Jr.
& Craig Fulton others et al., Corroboration in an Organized Chain
Conspiracy “Perjury” “Fraud of all sorts” Contempt of Court other
Irregularities, Remand/Body Attachment with FBI’s Jurisdiction and Authority
Instanter.
{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal
Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch.
38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct,
3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct States Attorneys, Attorney Generals ignoring
all applicable noted unlawful acts;
Under Section 4 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:
The President had additional
power in case of rebellion within a state to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
and to declare and enforce marital law. Cong.
Globe, supra note 1, at 317. With respect to a definition of rebellion,
Section 4 provided;
“Whenever
in any State or part of a State……unlawful combinations……..shall be organized
and armed, and so numerous and powerful as to be able, by violence, to either
overthrow or set at defiance the constituted authorities of such State, or when
the constituted authorities are in complicity with or shall connive at the
unlawful purposes of such powerful and armed combinations; and whenever, by
reason of either or all of the causes aforesaid, the conviction of such offenders
and the preservation of the public safety shall become…. Impracticable, in
every such case such combinations shall be deemed a rebellion against the
Government of the United States….”
A-
That
on August 27, 2013, Appellate Court Judge Thomas E. Hoffman entered his
signature and two stamped signatures were used to unlawfully dismiss Motion to
Vacate Order of (August 14, 2013)
Although some trial judges may not review the orders of other
judges, because that would not be consistent with the orderly administration of
justice or with our judicial system People ex rel. Kelly, Ketting Furth, Lnc.
V. Epstein, 61 ILL 2d, 229, 335 N.E. 2d 430 (1974) (Appeal of order as proper remedy); Cruz v. Columbus-Cuneo-Cabrini Medical Center, 194 ILL
App. 3d 1037, 551 N.E. 2d 1345, 141. Dec. 817 (1st Dist. 1990)
ILL. App. (1st Dist. 2000). A “VOID JUDGEMENT OR
ORDER” is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties
or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular
order of judgment, or where the order was procured by FRAUD- in re Adoption of
E.L., 248 ILL. Dec. 171, 733 N.E. 2d 846, 315 ILL. App. 3d 137- Judgm 7, 16,
375.
Review of the orders of
one judge by another in the same case is not consistent with effective judicial
administration. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Baker Industries, Inc., 128 ILL. App.
3d 215, 470 N.E. 2d 577, 83 ILL. Dec. 451 (1st Dist. 1984).
Although the
chancery division of the County Department of the Circuit Court and the
Municipal Department of the Circuit Court have concurrent jurisdiction of
actions to demolish buildings, where the municipal department first acquired
jurisdiction of the subject matter and entered an order of demolition, the
county department could not properly assume jurisdiction and enter an order
preventing municipal departments from entering an order of demolition. Pepin v.
City of Chicago, 79 ILL. App. 2d 295, 224 N.E. 587 (1st Dist. 1967).
1.) That because of the nature of the
crimes and additional counts of criminal activities being exercised by judge
Hoffman;
2.) That it is now time for the FBI agents
to immediately invoke jurisdiction so as to determine whether Joy V. Cunningham
& Mathias W. Delort allowed their stamp signatures to be used in this
unlawful manner or did judge Hoffman obtain the stamp signatures and recorded
them on the court order himself;
3.) Judge Thomas Hoffman realized he had
no legal grounds to Deny any of the Motions accompanied with affidavits by the
Appellant had to act outside of the confines of his jurisdiction and judicial
immunity committed a plethora of additional criminal Civil Rights violations so
as to demonstrate to this Honorable Court and FBI he and the political machine
is above the law! Ex. A his
certified signature court order of august 27, 2013;
A-
The Law
is CLEAR: Properly alleged facts within an
affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true,
despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel,
Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d
1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
That Judge Hoffman is using his robe as a pass key to aid
and assist all criminals in this manner by Dismissing said case from the docket
in an attempt to cover-up the number of judges involved in housing scams
stealing from Section 8 hud programs and unlawfully stealing United States
citizens homes in the name of foreclosure; Scott, 377
Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order
No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent
pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the
findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the
judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law
and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office
into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or
indifference, which warrant discipline.
Section
1983 of U.S.C.S.
contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional
Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA
5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into
effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the depravation of such rights under 42
U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff
was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action maybe treated as
one for the depravation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigam
(CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the
ed. 1992).
See that is why, the
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
“Of all the
Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has
had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act
grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March
23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of
legislation”.
Section 2 (42 U.S.C.)
In the House of Representatives.
“Congressional
Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and
enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a
felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated
crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person,
to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
“Throughout the debates, supporters
of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan;
Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as
well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated
occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin
and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large
numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of
citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id.
At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to
these societies”) et al.,
“Where
these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not
with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is
not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges,
having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand
or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these
gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of
justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared
detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal
to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and
murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra
note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep.
Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and
lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens,
the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the
proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring
the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and
innocent.”)
4.) That
said judges and the likes of the Democratic Machine are demonstrating to this
court and FBI, they will violate any and all laws necessary so as to achieve
their racist agenda in the courts and is not about to change or comply with any
Federal laws or laws of this court;
5.) That said judge and members of their fraternal
order are challenging the integrity and fabric of the Federal jurisprudence, in
that this Honorable Court and FBI have the resources and to eradicate all of
their brethren from their positions;
Supreme
Court Rule [137] provides in pertinent part:
If a pleading, motion, or other
paper is signed in violation of this Rule, the court, upon motion or upon its
own initiative, may impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party,
or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the
other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of
the filling of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable
attorney fee. Not only will the courts consider an award of sanctions for active
false statements: failures to disclose material facts to the court can also
justify an award of sanctions.
BRUBAKKEN
v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec.
30, 1992). Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the
result of an honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the
extent that an individual lawyer has engaged in sanction able conduct, that
lawyer’s firm can also be jointly and severally liable with the lawyer.
A-
That the Terrorist issues in Chicago, Illinois is far
more draconian than the issues in Syria innocent United states citizens are
being tortured to death killed in their neighborhoods behind the
well-orchestrated criminal acts by judges protecting corruption and criminals.
B-
That said judges are a threat to National Security and
safety and welfare to the citizens of
the United States of America
That because of the above; Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S. Fraud
104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the issue
involved in a case, great latitude is
ordinarily permitted in the introduction of evidence, and courts allow the
greatest liberality in the method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus
V. O’Bannon, 1886 8 N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL.
App. 512.
INDUCING RELIANCE
To prevail in a cause of action for
fraud, plaintiff must prove that defendant made statement of material nature
which was relied on by victim and was made for purposes of inducing reliance,
and that victim’s reliance led to his injury. Parsons V. Winter, 1986, 1 Dist., 491 N.E.
2d 1236, 96 ILL
Dec. 776, 142 ILL App 3d 354, Appeal Denied.
In Carter V. Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 ILL. App. 1 Dist. 1983 The Supreme
Court has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are:
(1) False statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the
party making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the
other party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the
other party resulting from such reliance.
6.)
That all Judges
and Related Conspirator’s, have corroborated/admitted beyond all legal
standards of the law engaging in a criminal conspiracy and implicating numerous
“powerful corrupt white men” in office
covering up for the Political machine operatives; and how they use inferior
ethnic groups outside their ethnicity to enforce their doctrines on innocent
non-white men like the Petitioner as noted throughout all documents;
A-
That a Federal Court is suppose to view
a complaint’s allegations in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, draws all
reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, and takes as true all
well-pleaded facts and allegations in the complaint. Reger Dev., LLC v. Nat’l City
Bank, 592 F. 3d 759, 764 (7th Cir. 2010). Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 8(a) (2) requires “a short and plain statement of the claim
showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” in order to provide the
defendant with fair notice of the plaintiff’s claims and the grounds upon which
they rest. Bell Atl. V. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (Twombly). To
survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s claim must be plausible and the
factual allegations of the complaint must be “enough to raise a right to relief
above the speculative level.” Brooks v. Ross, 578 F. 3d 574, 581 (7th
Cir. 2009) (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555).
B-
That Petitioner has met and fulfilled
the requirements of the aforementioned for the relief being sought;
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues,-id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over
and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both
because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality-id;
7.) REPORTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
CANON 3D (1)
Under Section 3D (1), a judge who receives information that indicates “a
substantial likelihood that another judge “has violated the Code of Judicial “should
take appropriate action”. The Canon does not require the judge to hold a
hearing and make a definitive decision that a violation has occurred before the
reporting requirement is triggered and at least one state’s judicial ethics
committee has advised that the reporting requirement is triggered when the
judge has “sufficient information” to conclude that a “substantial issue” has
been raised that a violation has occurred, Mass. Comm. On Judicial Ethics, Op.
2002-04 (2002)
“Appropriate action” may include direct
communication with the judge who has committed the violation and reporting the
violation to the appropriate or other agency or body. See Commentary to Canon
3D (1). “Appropriate authority” is the authority with responsibility for
initiation of disciplinary proceedings with respect to the violation reported.
Some jurisdictions’ rules specify to whom a judge must report misconduct. For
instance, Massachusetts Rule 3D (1) provides that if a judge becomes aware of
another judge’s unprofessional conduct he must report his knowledge to the
Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court and the court of which the
judge in question is a member.
Note that the term “knowledge”, as defined
in the Terminology Section, denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question
and as such, a person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. In
drafting Section 3D (1), the Committee rejected the suggestion that the
criteria of raising substantial question as to honesty or trustworthiness be
applied in the context of reporting judicial misconduct as well, on the grounds
that those criteria are implicit in the present criterion of raising a
substantial question as to a judge’s fitness for office.
U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General
Conspiracy
U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful
act.—U.S.
v. Jimenez Recio, 123 SCt. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand
371F.3d 1093
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be
punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public
over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime,
both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other
crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of
offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part
in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108.
Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of
agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL,
Dec. 63
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court
demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2 A for
violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in
attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted,
“[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent
with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its
citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
Civil
Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled. That
all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United
States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same
right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce
contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease,
sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit
of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is
enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and
penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or
custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14
Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
Wherefore the foregoing stated
within Petitioner Respectfully Prays for the Relief:
1.) That
this Most Honorable accept this motion and supplement it to the June 27, 2013
Petition for Rule to show cause et al;
2.) Order
the FBI to invoke jurisdiction Instanter to ascertain judges participation on
the August 27, 2013 court order et al;
3.) Order
the Removal of every Public Official named and ignored the Oath and
Constitution of their duties as an elected/appointed official;
4.) Issue
an Injunction Prohibiting said judges from presiding over any more cases to
determine additional cases being fixed by members of the democratic political
machine;
5.) Let
the Gavel and Jurisdiction of this Honorable Court Invoke any other remedy this
courts deems just;
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro se
PO Box 490075
Chicago,
Ill 60649-0075
