See how the elements in Sanford Florida is still prevalent in Chicago? Racism
How does a person of color receive justice in a society where racism still rules and is the majority in the very systems that which supposedly affords everyone Equal Protection under the laws of the United States Constitution?
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 12 M 718911
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No.
13-0058
) Division No. 1
V. )
)
Craig Fulton ) Hon. Leonard Murray
)
Defendants- Appellee )
NOTICE OF FILING
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that on March
14, 2013, Plaintiff-Appellant has filed a Motion to Vacate Court Order of Aug.
14, 2013 w/Affidavit due to Judges Admitting Corroborating their roles acting
outside their Judicial Authority “Fraud”/Civil Rights Violations et al.
United States Secret Service
Dir. Mueller
FBI Washington D.C. Most Hon. Edmond E. Chang 13 CV 2852
TO: AAG Tyler Roland
Chief Judge Timothy Evans, Daley Center, Chg., Ill. 60601
General Law
Bureau Presiding Judge Jacobius,
Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
100 West
Randolph Street Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill.
60601 Clerk of Circuit Court
Dorothy Brown, Suite 1001, Chg. Ill.
States
Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601
Atty Gen Lisa
Madigan 100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Hon. Mary Lane Mikva Amalgamated Transit Union,
Daley Center,
Room 2508 20 S. Clark Suites 850
Chg. Ill. 60603
Sec of State
Asst Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel
Terrence McConville 60 East Van
Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
CHA Mobility
CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir. Tracey Robinson/Joann
Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd. 4859 S.
Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor
Chicago, Ill 60604
Chicago, Ill. 60615
CHA Mobility, Real
Estate Specialist Recorder
of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel
Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash
118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615
Chicago, Ill. 60602
City of Chicago,
Department of Buildings Sabre
Investments
Christopher
Lynch
120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900 Chicago, Ill
60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Craig
Fulton
Courtesy Copies:
3505 Golfview Drive
Hazel Crest Ill. 60429-2403
Acting US Atty
FBI Corey B. Nelson.
Gary S. Shapiro 2111
West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Mayor
Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel Beverly
E. Bishop
City Hall
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601 Chicago, Ill.
60604
Cook County
President
Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle
Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517 Richard J. Daley
Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Chicago, Ill. 60602
Illinois State Police
Director Hiram Grau
801 South 7th Ave
Springfield, Ill. 62703
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on August 19, 2013
said motion with the attachments was mailed, emailed hand delivered to all
parties recorded in said notice via regular mail.
_________________________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se
Name Joe
Louis Lawrence
Attorney for Pro Se
Address P.O.
Box 490075
City, State
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
Phone (312)
927-4210
Email joelouislaw@yahoo.com
Twitter
@joelouis7
APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 12 M 718911
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No. 13-0058
) Division No.
1
V. )
)
Craig Fulton ) Hon.
Leonard Murray
)
)
Defendant- Appellee )
)
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER (AUGUST 14, 2014) DUE
TO CERTAIN JUDGES ADMITTING CORROBORATING THEIR ROLES ACTING OUTSIDE OF
JUDICIAL AUTHORITY FRAUD/CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RACIST RETALIATORY CONSPIRACY
W/AFFIDAVIT
Now comes
Plaintiff-Appellant, Joe Louis Lawrence respectfully moves this court to grant
motion in its entirety et al., in the above entitled cause.
Reasons in
support of this motion are set forth in the attached affidavit.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
By:____________________________
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
)
COUNTY OF COOK
)
AFFIDAVIT
Joe Louis Lawrence being first duly sworn on oath deposes
and states as follows:
1 I
am Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se.
2 That
on March 14, 2013, Judge Thomas Hoffman admitted and corroborated his role in
an organized chain conspiracy acted outside his judicial immunity authority by
denying said motion accompanied with an affidavit;
A-
Pursuant to Supreme court Rule 137 Brubakker v. Morrison, No.
1-9-1670, 1992 Ill. App. Lexis 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992).
Additionally, the fact that a false statement or omission is the result to an
honest mistake is no defense to entry of a sanction. Et al.
B-
In furtherance to the above rule he recruited two other
judges who harbors the same racial animas hatred to dismiss said case for Want
of Prosecution, Judges Mary K. Rochford, Mathias W. Delort, in that Carter v Mueller 457
N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme Court of Illinois has
held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation
(sometimes referred to as “fraud and deceit” or deceit) are (1) False statement
of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by party making it; (3)
intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other party in
reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other party
resulting from such reliance;
C- Judges
Thomas Hoffman Mary K. Rochford and Mathias W. Delort have taken part in an
organized CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and
collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation
of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances
preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp,
1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.
Conspirators to be guilty of offense need
not have entered into conspiracy at
same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911
Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied
upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed;
Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People
V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
1 Said
judges have mistaken Chicago, Illinois with Sanford Florida in that it is
permissible to kill an unarmed kid and claim self-defense but here in Chicago
judges demonstrate how to engage in criminal acts and the necessary methods
exhausted to violate the Civil Rights of innocent United States citizens;
2 That
the racial hatred spewed from said judges is likened to their understanding
that technology has changed so much rotary telephones are now obsolete many are
using wireless technology cell phones etc., but said judges are still enforcing
practices outlawed by the United States Supreme Court;
A-
That because Appellant has litigiously presented briefs
and motions before every attorney, States Attorney, Attorney Generals, City
attorneys, CTA attorneys and law professors deployed under the authority
allegedly of Alderman Edward Burke Judges have been systematically appointed in
every court where Appellant’s cases are presented never objected to or
challenged but denied;
B- That
because Alderman Edward Burke is the puppet master behind the scenes pulling
everyone’s strings a special technique in the laws was allowed to ascertain
corroboration necessary in proving judicial corruption with the CTA paternity
and IBC Wonder bread cases, FBI made it clear to Appellant “they don’t want some judges they want all of them”
C- That
said judges have used the United States Post office in which to further amplify
their crimes which is a Federal offense mail fraud; in that Al Capone did not
get caught for the criminal acts inflicted on United States citizens but for
tax fraud.
D- That
said objective is to trap every corrupt racist judge under Ed Burke’s control
and power likened to Charleston Heston’s portrayal in the Ten Commandments
Pharaoh’s army drowned in the Red Sea in this case, Justice will be the Red
Sea.
3 That
on March 5, 2013, Appellant’s Affidavit recorded “That Appellant has been many times denied and ignored by the likes
of judge Thomas Hoffman et al., see unlawful1.blogspot.com April 11, 2012 Post
how certain judges ignore the laws and act outside their jurisdiction”.
A.) Appellant filed an unchallenged Emergency Petition for Rule to
Show cause et al (March 5, 2013) before 1st District Illinois Appellate Court,
Judge Thomas Hoffman DENIED it entirely.
B.) The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court
to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re
Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83,
783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
Seminar Consultants Inc., 136
ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453
N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
D.) The above is Basic State Law-- no Judge in the State Circuit seems to have a comprehensible
understanding of legal procedures in a simple manner; thereby, engaging in a
plethora of corrupt legal practices so as to compensate and cover-up where they
are intellectually challenged in the law AND OPPRESS THE INNOCENT AS
DEMONSTRATED IN THIS CASE DUE TO ETHNICITY!
1 That
certain Judges and clerks with malicious contempt for the laws engaged in
diabolical Civil Rights Conspiracies with direct actions of “Terrorism”;
2 That
no judge in the 1st Division ever issued a directive in which to
submit a brief.
3 Judges
George F. Sculley, Jr., Leonard Murray and Thomas Hoffman were cognizant of
Plaintiff never being served and that no Judge had jurisdiction on the
plaintiff ignored the laws of the United States Constitution as they committed “Terrorist Acts” of “Injustice”’ and
is under Rule To Show Cause for
Remand, case #13 CV 2852 before Most Hon. Edmond Chang. Petition has to be amended to include Judges
Mary K. Rochford, Mathias W. Delort.
A- That
Vol 1 of Record, C00007, C00012 and
C00146 Affidavits by Sheriffs state no SERVICE on Plaintiff;
B- That
Vol 1 of Record, C00143, C00183 both
court orders state “Motion to QUASH
SERVICE OF SUMMONS” is granted in favor of Appellant;
C- That
Judge George Sculley, Jr, never recorded on Vol 1 of Record C00221 Judges half-sheet any of the events recorded
in Ex B, thereby demonstrating by
the legal standard of the preponderance of the evidence as a conspirator with
Craig Fulton and others;
D- That Judge George F. Sculley, Jr.,
went against the manifest weight of the evidence acted outside the jurisdiction
of judicial immunity entered Vol 1 of
Record C00206 court order granting Order for Possession in favor of Craig
Fulton.
4 Judges
Thomas Hoffman, George F. Sculley, Jr. and Leonard Murray openly with
vicious arrogance for the laws ignored the United States Constitution violated
all of the following federal Laws of
Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the deprivation of Civil Rights through
the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell
v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually
carried into effect, where an action is for a conspiracy to interfere with
Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3), or for the deprivation of such rights
under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and
plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the United States Constitution and Laws, the gist of the action may be
treated as one for the deprivation of rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v.
Brautigam (CA 5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78
(4 the ed. 1992).
A Jennings
v. Patterson, 488 F. 2d 442, equal access to public facilities. The court found
that the plaintiffs had been “denied the right to hold and enjoy their property
on the same basis as white citizens.” Jennings suggests the potential
usefulness of the equal benefit clause in guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment
of public property and public services.” Developments in the Law section 1981,
15 Harv. Civ. Rts. ---- Civ. Lib. L. Rev 29, 133 (1980).
B Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220
(1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985)
(Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt
power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court
Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized
as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful
misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a
pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.
C That
Judges Thomas Hoffman, George F. Sculley, Jr. and Leonard Murray has further
violated other legal Constitutional citations of the laws, The Supreme Court of
Georgia removed a judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional
rights, including refusing to set appeal bonds for two defendant’s in timely
fashion, issuing bench warrants without probable cause, and forcing a defendant
to enter a guilty plea in the absence of Counsel. The Court stated, that the
judge’s “cavalier disregard of these defendants’ basic and fundamental
constitutional rights exhibits an intolerable degree of judicial incompetence,
and a failure to comprehend and safeguard the very basis of our constitutional
structure Id at 735 See also In re Hammel, 668 N.E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996). (Judge
removed for improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay
fines and make restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the
defendant’s basic constitutional rights).
D That
because Judges George F. Sculley, Jr., Leonard Murray and Thomas Hoffman signed
court orders against the Appellant fell outside their judicial authority and
because they have committed “FRAUD”
the following law is applicable here Adoption of E.L.. “A VOID JUDGMENT OR ORDER” is one that is entered by a court
lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the
inherent power to enter the particular order of judgment or where the ORDER was
procured by “FRAUD”.
1 That
on March 5, 2013, Appellant checked on the record at the civil appeals division
clerks stated the entire case was DELETED
from the system both of them were shocked, they made copies of the Notice of
Appeal filed Jan. 8, 2013, Emergency Petition for Rule to show cause et al.;
A Manager
in the Civil Appeals department said Appellant had to seek an extension of time
because there was no way a record was going to be prepared by the 12th
of March, the Chief Clerk have to be notified;
B That
because Appellant had never been served any summons or any papers in the
Circuit Court he has to prepare a motion before Judge Leonard or any judge in
his stead waiving filing fees so the record can be transmitted to the Appellate
Court provided a record is produced.
C That
because certain Clerks subordinate to Clerk of Circuit Court Dorothy Brown
exercised integrity and because Sheriff Deputies subordinate to Tom Dart
exercised integrity in making sure Affidavits were tendered so as to
demonstrate all parties were not complicit in said unlawful “Terrorist Acts”
D Finally,
Group Exhibit A Motion to Supplement
Record filed May 14, 2013, demonstrates all the reasons why this record was
never prepared or tendered in a timely manner.
E That
Judge Joy V. Cunningham can verify and attest Appellant never requested an
extension of time to submit record frivolously and that she granted every
motion for extension of time to submit record (Judge William O’Maki) said Judge
never signed a final court order against the Appellant; he got a conscience knowing
his children medical records were accessed unlawfully and altered to reflect
Appellant was physically abusing children which was not true. Donald Jonker of
DCFS who assisted the Burkes.
A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court
demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for
violating court rules and procedures. Judged ignored mandated witness order in
attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted,
“[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and
discontent with our justice system. Government cannot demand respect of the
laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)
FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NAUGHT
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 1265 5/1
-109, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this
instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believe the same to be true.
Respectfully submitted,
Joe Louis Lawrence
Counsel Pro Se
APPEAL TO THE
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT
FIRST DISTRICT
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
________________________________________________________________________
)
Joe Louis Lawrence )
) Trial Court
No. 12 M 718911
Plaintiff-Appellant ) General No.
) Division No. 1
V. )
Craig Fulton ) Hon.
Leonard Murray
)
)
Defendant- Appellee )
)
DRAFT ORDER
This matter having come on to be heard on Motion to Vacate
Court Order of Aug. 14, 2013 w/Affidavit due to Judges Admitting Corroborating
their roles acting outside their Judicial Authority “Fraud”/Civil Rights
Violations et al.
Due notice having been given, said judges having no
jurisdiction over the Appellant due to fraud & other criminal acts and the
subject matter, and being fully advised in the premises;
It is HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Vacate
order et al., Order is GRANTED
ENTERED:
_________________________________
Judge Joy V. Cunningham
Joe Louis Lawrence
________________________________
Counsel Pro Se
P.O. Box 490075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
(312) 927-4210
