CRAIG FULTON IMPLICATED JUDGE GEORGE F. SCULLY, JR. CONSPIRING WITH HIM ALLOWING CORRUPT FORGED ORDERS IN CHICAGO
THESES ARE ALL THE PARTIES WHO RECEIVED KNOWLEDGE OF THE FOLLOWING:
:scully.judge@gmail.com <scully.judge@gmail.com>;
1.) SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 AS PER JUDGE SCULLY'S DIRECTIVE THE CASE WAS NOT ON THE CALL SHEET CRAIG FULTON NEVER SHOWED UP FOR THE 11:00AM CALL, IT WAS THIS DATE ATTORNEYS APPEARED BEFORE THE JUDGE ON ANOTHER CALL AND THE JUDGE ADMONIHSED ONE OF THE ATTORNEYS FOR NOT SUBMITTING HIM A COURTESY COPY;
COUNSEL EXPLAINED HE LEFT A COURTESY COPY FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 OPPOSSING COUNSEL ACKNOWLEDGED HE RECEIVED HIS COURTESY COPY SATURDAY, JUDGE SCULLY GAVE OUT HIS EMAIL AND DIRECTED THE ATTORNEYS TO FORWARD THEIR BRIEFS VIA EMAIL scully.judge@gmail.com THIS INFORMATION WAS RECORDED IN SAID NOTES AND IS HOW THE JUDGE RECEIVED THE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS RECORDED WITHIN;
2.) IT WAS NOW WELL AFTER 12:00NOON, THE DEPUTY APPROACHED ME ASKED FOR THE CASE NUMBER OF THE CASE A COPY OF THE COURTESY COPY WITH THE CASE NUMBER WAS PRESENTED TO THE CLERK AND SHE INDICATED THE CASE WAS RESCHEDULED TO OCTOBER 2, AT 11:00AM, IT WAS SHOCKING BECAUSE COURT ORDER SAID (SEPTEMBER 24, 2012, @11:00AM) NO ONE FROM THE JUDGES CLERKS OR DOROTHY BROWN EVER FORWARDED NOTICES OF THE CASE BEING RESCHEDULED;
3.) OCTOBER 2, 2012, APPEARED FOR THE 11:00AM CALL CASE WAS NOT ON THE CALL SHEET AND DEPUTY CHECKED WITH THE CLERK, SHE SAID THE CASE WAS SET FOR THE 2:00PM CALL AGAIN NO ONE INFORMED ME OF THE SCHEDULE CHANGE;
4.) OCTOBER 2, 2012, DEFENDANT OPENED UP WITH HIS ARGUMENT JUDGE SCULLY STATED HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT DEFENDANT WAS ASSERTING IN HIS DOCUMENTS AND A ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY SHOWED UP THE JUDGES DEMEANOR WAS SOME WHAT IRATE----STATED "
DEFENDANT WAS NOT RECEIVING ANY RECORDS FROM THE CITY PER SUBPOENA AND WAS NOT ORDERING CHA TO COMPLY WITH THEIR AUTHORITY TO HELP HIM MOVE"!
A- CRAIG FULTON STATED TO THE JUDGE HE APPEARED BEFORE HIM SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 AND THE JUDGE TOLD TO HIM "THE DEFENDANT IS ALLUDING THE SHERIFF AND APPEARED IN COURT BECAUSE HE WAS ABLE TO VACATE THE ORDER SEND HIM CERTIFIED MAIL" THE JUDGES REPLY, I DON'T REMEMBER THAT AND REQUESTED THE CLERK TO PULL UP THE CASE ON THE COMPUTER CAUCASIAN CLERK PULLED UP THE CASE INFORMED THE JUDGE ALL SHE HAS IS A DUMMY FILE AND DEFENDANT WAS NEVER SERVED;
B-- JUDGE REQUESTED CRAIG IF HE HAD ANY DOCUMENTS HE PRESENTED A SOME TYPE OF 30 DAY NOTICE THAT WAS NEVER PRESENTED OR FILED AND SOME PAPERS THAT HAD NO FILE STAMP ON THEM--!
C-- A COPY OF THE ORDER (SEPTEMBER 11, 2012) WAS GIVEN TO THE JUDGE BY DEFENDANT WHERE HE WAS SEEKING TO ADMONISH ME FOR SERVING THE CITY A SUBPOENA HE SAID
"IN THIS COURT THAT PART OF DISCOVERY IS NOT PERMITTED YOU HAVE TO GET PERMISSION FROM ME"! FURTHER "THE PLEADINGS ARE A LITTLE OVER THE TOP AND YOU BETTER BE CAREFUL"
D-- THE DEFENDANT WAS ATTEMPTING TO PRESENT A COPY OF EMAIL SENT TO HIM ALONG WITH THE SHERIFF COPY WHERE THEY WAS ATTEMPTING TO EVICT UNLAWFULLY-THE JUDGE SAID "HE DID NOT WANT TO SEE ANY MORE PAPERS FROM HIM"
E-- THE JUDGE ASKED CRAIG,
IF HE HAD PAPERS WHERE SUBSTITUTE SUMMONS HAD BEEN SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT INITIALLY HE SAID YES YOU SAID FOR ME TO GO AND GET THE NAME OF A SHERIFF, I HAVE THE RECEIPT WHERE I PAID $60.00, THE JUDGE WAS PISSED TURNED RED (IT WAS VERY CONFUSING AT THIS POINT BECAUSE IT WAS CLEAR SOME TYPE OF SECRET RELATIONSHIP WAS HAD BETWEEN THESE TWO) ASKED THE CLERK TO CHECK AGAIN THE JUDGE REITERATED HE DON'T REMEMBER HOW HE ENTERED AN ORDER FOR POSSESSION ASKED CRAIG IF HE HAD ANY PROOF, HE SAID NO! THE JUDGE SAID HE HAD NO JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QWASH IS GRANTED!
F-- DEFENDANT NEVER FILED ANY MOTION TO QWASH ONLY A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ET AL JUDGE ACTED AS IF HE NEVER SEEN ME OR REMEMBERED SIGNING MY ORDER---EARLIER HE SNAPPED ON AN EARLIER ASIAN OR HISPANIC MAN TOLD THEM IF HIS AFRICAN AMERICAN CLERK IS CAUGHT GIVING LEGAL ADVICE SHE WILL LOSE HER JOB!
5.) THE COOK COUNTY SHERIFF HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT CRAIG FULTON HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO FALSIFY NUMEROUS DOCUMENTS AND IS BEING PROTECTED BY SERIOUS CORRUPT POLITICIANS HAD DEFENDANT TO CERTIFY THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 ORDER, (PAID $9.00)
Your Honor please find a copy of the ORDER CRAIG FULTON HAS NOW FORGED obtaining DOROTHY BROWN STAMP you VACATED September 11, 2012;
Prior
to the above a copy of the September EMERGENCY PETITION FOR RULE TO
SHOW CAUSE ET AL was mailed to him that weekend he did not come to
court;
1.)
September 11, 2012, you VACATED THE unsigned COURT ORDER;
2.) September 13, 2012, CRAIG FULTON IGNORED YOUR AUTHORITY AND
DIRECTIVE and had a CLERK to FILE STAMP the VACATED COURT ORDER for
September 13 and presented that FORGED ORDER TO THE COOK COUNTY
SHERIFF;
3.) Because my youngest son is in a splint
sustained a fracture running in Dan Ryan woods (fell in a hole twisted
his ankle) as a Freshman playing football for Leo High School, I am
unable to file any legal papers to avert any action Monday because I
will be at Rush pediatrics for my sons physical and follow-up on his
ankle injury;
4.) I am scheduled to appear October 2, 2012 on the 11:00am call;
5.) Due to the DIABOLICAL BRAZEN CONTEMPTUOUS ACTS PERPETRATED BY SAID
CRAIG FULTON IT IS CLEAR HE HAS DEMONSTRATED IN THESE ACTIONS AN
"UNTOUCHABLE ARROGANCE" SURPASSING HUMAN IMAGINATION DUE IN PART TO THE
NUMBER OF PERSONS HE HAS IN HIS BACK POCKET.
THANK YOU
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
JOE LOUIS LAWRENCE
