ANGLO SAXON MEN FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE WITH THE ASSISTANCE FROM COLORED SPINELESS MEN AIDED AND ASSISTED IN THE GENOCIDAL OPPRESSION AND APARTHEID TREATMENT ON THEIR OWN ETHNIC GROUPS.
READ HOW PUPPET BLACK COURT OF APPEAL JUDGE ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS WENT ALONG WITH RACIST HATEFUL ANGLO SAXON JUDGES KENNETH RIPPLE AND DIANE SYKES CONCOCTED A VICIOUS LIE AGAINST ME SAYING MY LICENSE WAS SUSPENDED WHICH WAS SIMPLY NOT TRUE.
THIS IS WHY DEMOCRATS DO NOT FEAR THE FBI OR BEING INDICTED BECAUSE SO MANY JUDGES ARE FILLED WITH RACIST HATE THEY INITIATE RULINGS BASED ON TRUE HATE UPHOLDING JIM CROW LAWS OUTLAWED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
READ FOR YOURSELF HOW SO MANY UNQUALIFIED JUDGES AS ANGLO SAXONS CIRCUMVENT THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND ENFORCE INJUSTICE IN ILLINOIS COURTS.
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN
DIVISION
) No. 19 CV 2668
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Thomas M. Durkin
Petitioner )
)
VS )
)
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent )
NOTICE OF APPEAL
To: Cook
County States Attorney Chief
Judge Timothy C. Evans
Kim Foxx
50 West Washington, Suite 2600
50 West Washington, Suite 500 Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Presiding Judge Grace Dickler
Chicago Transit Authority Legal Dept. 50
West Washington, Suite
General Counsel Chicago, Ill. 60601
567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL. 60603
Chicago,
Ill. 60661-1498
Clerk of the
Circuit Court
Dorothy
Brown Attorney
General
50 West Washington,
Suite 1001 Kwame Raoul
Chicago, Ill.
60601 100 West Randolph, Suite 1300
Chicago, Ill. 60601
Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sec. of State Amalgamated Transit Union, 241
Terrence McConville President/Vice-President
100 West Randolph, Suite 500 1613 S. Michigan
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Chicago, Il. 60616
Francoise L.B.
Hightower
Francoise L.B. Hightower
1152 West 102nd
Street
7709 South Cornell
Chicago, Il.
60643-2353 Chicago, Il.
60649-4577
COURTESY COPIES
TO THE FOLLOWING:
Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Case 93
CV01609 Hon Mayor Lori Lightfoot
219 S. Dearborn, Room 2341 City Hall 7th
floor
Chicago, Ill. 60604
Chicago, IL. 60601
Dir. FBI,
Jeffrey S. Sallet U.S. Atty John R.
Laush, Jr.
2111 West
Roosevelt Road 219 South
Dearborn, Suite 500
Chicago, Ill. 60612 Chicago, Ill. 60604
Said case
demonstrates within the parameter of the laws how the Illinois legal system is
under siege, as stated in earlier affidavits, the Ku Klux Klan, pursuant to the
act of 1871 Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) Remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats
belong or can belong to these societies”)
How said judges
criminalized the Appellant making sure he remained oppressed and not employed
with the CTA or any employer so as to keep him from possibly affording legal
representation in “Blowing the Whistle” on the names of all associated
participants in said “Organized Terrorist Criminal Conspiracy”
PLEASE BE ADVISED that on May
28, 2019, A Notice of Appeal has been
filed before the Northern District of Illinois .
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
312 965-6455
Email joelouis565@yahoo.com
Dated
May 28, 2019
_____________________
Joe
Louis Lawrence
Counsel
Pro Se
IN
THE
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN
DIVISION
) No. 19 CV 2668
Francoise Hightower ) Judge Thomas M. Durkin
Petitioner )
)
VS )
)
Joe Louis Lawrence )
Respondent )
Jurisdictional
Statement
Order entered: May 20, 2019
Notice of Appeal filed: May 28, 2019
Statutes: Democratic Judges violating
United States Supreme Court Rulings Enforcing “Jim Crow Laws” “Trespassing upon
the Laws” “No Jurisdiction on the Appellant” Committing Fraud, Engaging in
Treason Like Offenses, Judges Committing Perjury, Judges aiding and abetting in
a Criminal Conspiracy, Judge committing Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations,
Judge acting outside of the Immunity provisions of his Oath, as “Private
Citizens” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court as they used their robes and jurisdiction to
aid and assist Terrorist Democratic Judges and Public Officials in covering-up
Criminal Civil Rights Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws,
Racial Hate Crimes, Slander and Defamation of Character, Civil Rights
Violations, Racial Terrorism Conspiracy, Public, Political, Fraternal
Corruption Conspiracies by Democrats, and other Un-Constitutional Lawless
Violations.
Plaintiff is appealing
to the Court of Appeals, for a Reversal
Sanctions and Remand with instructions notifying Federal authorities based on
the foregoing stated above:
Plaintiff has Due-Diligently been fighting this
matter before the District and Court of
Appeals for over 31 years racist political judges appointed by Alderman Edward
Burke have systematically “Trespassed
upon the Laws” entering Orders that are “VOID” a “NULLITY” pursuant to the laws
of the United States Supreme Court as judges used their robes and unlawful
authority to maintain a Democratic “Lynching” of the laws on the Appellant framing
him for a paternity matter where a Police Officer father allegedly impregnated
his daughters but was protected by the Democratic Machine on a “Bogus case
fixed by the Democratic members of a racist hateful ethnicity, in that
every Black and Brown person in the Democratic Party kept their mouths shut
because they are powerless over Anglo Saxon men in the Democratic Party and they
are only figureheads.
Plaintiff has been forced to live in
homelessness in lieu of being remanded behind bars unlawfully and existing on
welfare not working as they profit off the unlawful injustices; moreover,
keeping him from providing for himself and family as Anglo Saxon men in the
Democratic party have killed black or brown men and have not been subjected to
31+ years of criminalization imposed on them as demonstrated on Appellant.
Plaintiff is appealing
to the Court of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon
judges in the Democratic party have systematically ignored that Appellant
was the victim of an “Organized Conspiracy” perpetrated by Democratic judges
acting as “Private Citizens” controlling the Criminal Enterprise in all of the
courts controlled by Democrats.
That under 18 U.S.C. 242 and
42 U.S.C. 1985 (3) (b). A judge does not have the discretion on whether or
not to follow Supreme Ct. Rules, but a duty to follow. People v. Gersh, 135
Ill. 2d 384 (1990).
That Gr
Ex A , Ex 6 Feb. 1988 Court Transcript, Page 4 Lines 8-14, Judge Rivers stated, “Based upon the circumstances, if you have any difficulty serving the
defendant in this case, you may want to file the appropriate motion to vacate
the non-suit order, based upon the fact there were misrepresentations to the
Court with reference to the plaintiff appearing and cooperating with the
State’s Attorney’s Office”.
A- That because Democrats in the Political
Machine don’t honor any Equal Protection Laws of the United States
Constitution, they systematically band together and enforce Jim Crow Laws
corroborating the veracity the Democratic Party is just as Racist and Hateful
today as they were years ago as people of color were hosed and dogs sent to
attack them and lynched.
That
Gr Ex A. Ex 7 Affidavit Rock Detective Agency states, “On 2/23/88 This investigator made a second
attempt to serve Mr. Lawrence. Service was executed on Mrs., Allen who stated
that she was the grandmother of Mr. Lawrence and that he was not home but did
reside at the address. The time was approximately 4:30 pm.”
“Mrs. Allen is a Black female, about 70-75 years of age with white hair.”
A-
Defendant’s
Grandmother never had white hair and was 63 years old and did not look her age;
furthermore, there was no 3rd floor rear apartment and she kept her
gate locked, never answered her door for anyone not even family you had to call
her first; otherwise, you would be sitting downstairs in the cold or rain.
B-
To validate the verity of the above, when she passed in
her 3rd floor unit the firemen had to enter the unit by entering the
third-floor window they were not able to enter the unit due to the gate being
padlocked.
C-
That said Exhibit within the Preponderance of the
Evidence establishes "Fraud" that said orders entered against the Defendant
were a “Nullity” pursuant to
State and Federal Laws and all legal precedents.
D-
That the court
became
a law unto
themselves
denied
said
motion
and
became “Private Citizens” not having any jurisdiction over the Defendant making
all Orders a “Nullity”.
E- To show fraud upon
the court, the complaining party must establish that the alleged misconduct
affected the integrity of the judicial process, either because the court itself
was defrauded or because the misconduct was perpetrated by officers of the
court. Alexander v. Robertson, 882, F. 2d 421,424 (9th Cir.
1989);
C-
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation.
Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L, Ed 370.
Plaintiff is appealing to the Court
of Appeals, because Anglo Saxon judges in the Democratic party have
systematically ignored the legal issues that has been unimpeached by any and
all States Attorneys, Attorney Generals or Corporation Council Attorneys or
General Counsels in every venue Plaintiff was litigation before.
In that certain Court of Appeals Democratic Judges have demonstrated their Hate of
the Appellant and overt participation in the “Organized Conspiracy” Criminal
Enterprise have rendered Orders of a complete “Nullity” “Void” in its entirety, in that JUDGES KENNETH RIPPLE, DIANE SYKES ANN
C. WILLIAMS HAVE DEMONSTRATED UNBELIEVABLE CONTEMPT FOR THE LAWS as they acted as “Private
Citizens” they prepared said order fabricated in its entirety, In 1987 the State of Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence
to pay child support. He did not comply, and
consequently the state revoked his driver's license. He appealed the revocation
to the Secretary of State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also
unsuccessfully sued his former
employers, International Brands Corporation and the Chicago Transit Authority,
in state and federal court for embezzlement and theft.
A-
Plaintiff never had his Commercial Driver’s
License Suspended which can be verified by the Secretary of State.
B-
Plaintiff was never Terminated or Suspended
from the Chicago Transit authority he was off work due to a work-related injury
Judge Norgle is in receipt of all actual records that has been destroyed in Cook
County that validates the veracity he was never ever DISCHARGED.
C-
Plaintiff was never Terminated from
IBC/Wonder bread, he tore his rotator cuff falling back off the truck and had
surgery repairing it he had to receive welfare and food stamps because someone
was collecting his workman’s compensation, but he had Blue Cross Blue Shield
medical coverage and a medical card for his then wife and children.
That because the Court of Appeals is controlled by
Democrats of a Terrorist nature is all
the reasons this matter should be transferred to another Circuit.
That Appellant filed
the aforementioned Petition/Complaint in that said Democrats obstructed this document
from ever being investigated due to the terrorist control Democrats have over
the legal venues in Illinois is all the reasons why this case should be
transferred to another Circuit within the United States that honors the Laws
and precedents of the United States Constitution.
JUDICIAL
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL AND DISABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES
ONE COLUMBUS
CIRCLE, NE
WASHINGTON D. C.
20544
Joe Louis Lawrence
Petitioner
V.
Case # 07-16-90074
John W. Darrah, Diane P. Wood, Ann C. Williams,
Diane Sykes, Kenneth Ripple, Frank H. Easterbrook et al.
Respondents
PETITION TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER JUDICIAL
COUNCIL
I
Joe Louis Lawrence, Petitioner Pro se Counsel, Heterosexual Native/African
American “Free Man” Born & Raised hereby petitions the Honorable Judicial
Council of the aforementioned statutes of violations ignored by Judge John W.
Darrah and all of his colleagues complicit in said foregoing acts to transfer
said matter Pursuant to Rule 26.
Statute: Unequal Protection of the Laws
Violations, Disparate Unequal Protection of the Laws, Civil Rights Violations,
Housing Discrimination, Judicial Bias,
Judges Acting outside of their immunity provisions, Jim Crow Violations,
Violations of the provisions of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, Judicial Abuse
of Discretion, Racial Terrorism
Conspiracy, Perjury, Admission of all facts by all Defendants, No Objections by
any Defendants, Public, Political, Fraternal Corruption Conspiracies, Fraud on
the Courts and other Un-Constitutional Lawless Violations.
The request for
a transfer may be made at any stage of the proceeding before a reference to the
Judicial Conference under Rule 20 (b)
(1) (C) or 20 (b) (2) or a Petition for Review is filed under Rule 22:
Rule 26 is new; it implements the Breyer Committee’s
recommended use of transfers. Breyer
Committee Report, 239 F.R.D. at 214-15.
Rule 26 authorizes the transfer of a complaint proceeding
to another judicial council selected by the Chief Justice. Such transfers may
be appropriate, for example, in the case of a serious complaint where there are
multiple disqualifications among the original council, where the issues are
highly visible and a local disposition may weaken public confidence in the
process, where internal tensions arising in the council as a result of the
complaint render disposition by a less involved council appropriate, or where a
complaint calls into question policies or governance of the home court of
appeals et al.
That the present judges in the Seventh Circuit read evidence of Cook
County judges violating the RICO ACT,
the 7th Cir. Held that
the Cook County Courts were a Criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F. 2d 1518, 1531 where precedent was enacted by
Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Richard D. Cudahy and former Chief judge Luther
Merritt Swygert;
That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes
to every complaint said Petitioner put before them on appeal in affidavits
validating the verity of judges committing Treason Trespassing upon the laws of
the United States Constitution engaging in “WAR”
against the United States Constitution making every order rendered against the
Petitioner. If a judge does not fully
comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S.
200 (1888), he or she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act
or acts of treason;
That every judge in the Seventh Circuit closed their eyes
to the fact Petitioner was locked up unlawfully 5 times for allegedly owing
child support on a case Alderman Edward Burke and his Democratic Terrorist in
the Political Machine orchestrated (88 D 079012) to unlawfully extort money,
hereto attached, Gr Ex A, falsified
document Monthly Billing Statement of Child Support Account from the Il Dept.
of Healthcare and Family Services, against Petitioner in the name of child
support where the case was dismissed September 17, 1987 85 D 068185;
That
every judge in the Seventh Circuit were
aware Judge Kenneth Ripple, African American Ann Claire Williams, and Diane
Sykes Trespassed upon the laws and committed Treason lied on court
documents saying, “In 1987 the State of Illinois ordered Joe Lawrence to pay
child support. He did not comply, and consequently
the state revoked his driver's license. He appealed the revocation to the
Secretary of State, but his appeal was denied. Lawrence also unsuccessfully
sued his former employers, International
Brands Corporation and the Chicago Transit Authority, in state and federal
court for embezzlement and theft”.
That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit were aware Petitioner was
homeless and the Nazi style acts perpetrated at him with a Section 8 voucher
was denied access to live within the city using said voucher, due to ethnicity
and complaining blowing the whistle on many of the powerfully connected judges
engaging criminal terrorist acts;
That certain judges in the Seventh Circuit
were aware African American Associate Political Appointed judge Franklin
Ulylesses Valderrama acting as a Puppet for his white masters, “Fixed” the case Trespassed upon the Laws and committed Treason
threatened the Petitioner in open court in front of many white attorneys
who openly stated, “Hell naw, I don’t
want no part of this shit! This judge is crazy”
That
Judge Valderrama ignored the fact the 6 or 7 law firms admitted to Petitioner’s
claims of Housing and Racial Discrimination regarding Source Income violations DEFAULTED on $25 Million Dollars,
said judge stated, “he does not accept certified mail or an affidavit printout
from the clerk’s office (Dorothy Brown) showing the parties were served and
never replied timely;
Judges
Mary Lane Mikva and Neil Cohen have asked said attorneys to respond or rebut
the Petitioners argument all have declined and never have any attorney ever
objected or denied any of the facts Petitioner has put before any courts, so
said judges have to step outside their jurisdiction and commit Treason to keep
the Petitioner from having Equal Protection of the Laws from any courts
where they have control.
That
it is apparent no judge in the Seventh
Circuit were aware they had become Trespassers of the laws and committed
Treason pursuant to the aforementioned acts and are the new “Weapons of Mass Destruction”
and a dangerous Threat to National Security due to their abuse of Power;
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes,
416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state
officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal
Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative
character and is subjected in his person to the consequences
of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
[Emphasis supplied in original].
Under
Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are
regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar
to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They
constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such
judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot
v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
I affirm the
above as being true.
Respectfully Submitted
Joe Louis Lawrence
Appellant-Counsel
Pro Se
No comments:
Post a Comment