It is a sad day in history for any man to concoct a hoax about racism blaming or implying the #Trump Administration had something to do with a Hate Crime in Chicago is ridiculous.
Chicago is full of Hate and infamous racism on it's own without anyone adding or fabricating racial events.
As a Heterosexual man, Racist White men and Submissive inferior black and Brown men in the court system have collectively followed their alleged leader Alderman Edward Burke in seeing to it no Democratic Judge afford me Equal access to the laws so as to vindicate me from the injustices perpetrated at me by his Irish Brethren.
Because a number of white men do not embrace some of the old school racist practices of Edward Burke and some of his cronies, he has recruited colored men and women who harbors a self-hatred for themselves who inflicts diabolical hate on their own ethnic groups.
Most of this hate could have been averted had the legal system in my opinion had more alleged Heterosexual men in authority with a backbone manning up to the injustices and genocidal treatment to people disenfranchised by the Bullies in the Democratic Machine hiding in the closet.
The Democratic Machine has recruited men of color to protect them and the doctrines of Jim Crow Laws.
Read how Black judges act like racist white men Bully men of color protecting whites guilty of horrific crimes within the laws and violate their oaths becoming "Private Citizens" engaging in"Treason Offenses"
What is sad because some of these judges are in alleged relationships with white judges figure they are immune from any prosecutions because some of the men have wives and children.
Any woman married to a Judge in Illinois needs to read this.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISION
)
IN RE MARRIAGE
OF )
)
Cazembe Oboi
Kabir )
Petitioner )
) Cal
C
VS )
) No. 2018
D 003208
Bernadette
Kabir )
Respondent ) Room
1605
)
)
______________________________________________________________________
Now comes Petitioner
Cazembe Oboi Kabir Pro Se in this cause, files herewith her affidavit,
factually establishing the Bias “Fraud” (Civil Rights Violations) Prejudice
alleged herein, with exhibits, in accordance to Supreme Court of Illinois and
Canon rules in accordance to the American Jurisprudence and pleadings (rev.) to
show that the now “Private Citizen” William S. Boyd has
a Personal Bias and Prejudice against
the Petitioner and has satisfied the preponderance of the evidence standards by
engaging in a criminal conspiracy assisting the Respondents attorney allowing
her to commit “fraud” on the court.
Said judge treated
Petitioner as if he was an Illegal Immigrant or non U.S. citizen ignored all
documents demonstrating the Respondent was in Default and Ignored Petitioners
Motion (MOTION OBJECTING &
STRIKING RESPONDENT’S COUNTER-PETITION DUE TO “FRAUDULENT” MISREPRESENTATIONS
& ISSUANCE OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE FOR SANCTIONS AND OR REMAND PURSUANT TO
SUPREME COURT RULE 137) properly
filed and recorded in the computer and served upon the court as a Courtesy Copy
but enforced jurisdiction on said matter where he had no jurisdiction by “Trespassing
upon the Laws” and engaged in overt “Fraud Bias and
Prejudice” acting as a private individual on the bench not as a Honorable judge
with any integrity;
1.)
FACT Respondent’s attorney (Joan S. Colen) filed a Motion
for Default and or Sanctions et al. (filed Feb. 8, 2019) corroborating and
admitting to Petitioners legal claims that the court ignored due to Bias and a hateful
demeanor of the Petitioner presenting himself to the court with integrity and a
well-versed articulation to the laws;
2.) FACT Respondent’s attorney admitted
corroborated and concurred Petitioners pleadings sustaining veracity, stated
pursuant to Par 3 of her motion, “On July 20, 2018, Cazembe filed a Motion for Default Prove-Up,
based on the fact that Bernadette had not filed an
Answer to his Petition for
Dissolution”
Answer to his Petition for
Dissolution”
A-
That Judge Boyd acted as a “Private Citizen” denied
Petitioners Motion for Default.
3.) Fact Respondent’s
attorney admitted corroborated and concurred Petitioners pleadings sustaining
veracity, stated pursuant to Par 5 of
her motion, “Cazembe filed a Motion Objecting
and Striking to Bernadette's Counter -Petition for Dissolution of Marriage Due
to " Fraudulent" Misrepresentations. The Objection was based on the
assertedly " fraudulent admission" in Bernadette 's Counter-Petition
that "With the exception of Cazembe's Petition for Dissolution of Marriage
in the instant case, Bernadette is unaware of any Petition for Dissolution of
Marriage pending in this or any other county or
state. "
A-
That judge Boyd corroborated his role as the Chief
Ruffian in this “Organized Conspiracy” lost jurisdiction when he unlawfully
denied said motion.
4.)
That pursuant to Par 6 of Respondent’s motion, the attempted Extortion was
disguised as Maintenance filed July 26, 2018;
5.)
That Respondent never ask leave of the court to
answer the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage or for additional time to
respond, Respondent was 50 days late and never responded.
Pursuant to Illinois Civil Procedure Rules,
failure to file an answer, where an answer is required, results in the
admission of the allegations of the complaint, Ill. S. Ct. R. 286 (a)
Pinnacle Corp. v. Village of Lake in the Hills, 258 Ill. App 3d 205, 196 Ill.
Dec 567, 630 N.E. 2d 502 (2d Dist. 1994)
That because Petitioner properly plead to all facts correctly in
said complaint negates any extension of time for the Defendant to respond, due
to there not being “Good Cause Shown” Bright v.
Dicke, 166 Ill. 2d 204, 209 Ill. Dec. 735 652 N.E. 2d 275 (1995)
Justice
Harrison delivered the opinion of the court:
The issue in this case
is whether a circuit court may permit a party to respond to a request for the
admission of facts or the genuineness of documents once the 28-day time limit
specified by Rule 216 (c)
(134 Ill. 2d R. 216 (c) has expired. For the reasons that follow,
we hold that the court may allow an untimely response where the delinquent
party has shown good cause for the delay in accordance with Rule
183 (134 Ill. 2d R. 183) Because No Good Cause was shown here,
permission to make a late response was properly denied. The circuit court’s
order denying such permission and the judgment of the appellate court affirming
the circuit court’s order are therefore affirmed
6.)
That
on July 26, 2018, judge Boyd acted like other Black judges became a law
unto himself DENIED Petitioners motion, pursuant to Page 3 last Par of
(Motion for Reconsideration to Reinstate case 88 D 079012 et al.) before Cal 41
demonstrates how Black Negroe judges engage in Terrorist Acts helping Corrupt
Racist parties in the Democratic Party destroy their own ethnic groups Fraud admissibility great latitude is permitted in proving fraud C.J.S.
Fraud 104 ET Seg. Fraud 51-57. where a question of fraud and deceit is the
issue involved in a case, great latitude is ordinarily permitted in the
introduction of evidence, and courts allow the greatest liberality in the
method of examination and in the scope of inquiry Vigus V. O’Bannon, 1886 8
N.E 788, 118 ILL 334. Hazelton V. Carolus, 1907 132 ILL. App. 512.
7.)
That
on July 30, 2018, Boyd became a law unto himself Denied Petitioners Motion and he denied Petitioner’s
Motion for Default and gave him 21 days to respond to the unlawful Motion to
Dismiss, setting it for hearing on August 27, 2018. The Court also gave Respondent
leave to file her unlawful Counter -Petition, and gave Petitioner 21 days to
respond to Respondent’s “Fraudulent” Motion for Temporary Maintenance, and
ordered Petitioner to provide his financial affidavit and supporting documents
within 14 days to her attorney.
8.)
That on August 16, 2018, Petitioner filed a "Motion
for
Disqualification
of Judge (Edward A. Arce) for Cause Due to “Fraud” (Civil Rights
Violations) and or Prejudice pursuant to S. H. A. 735 ILCS 5/2-1001 (a) (2, 3)
and to Vacate all Orders due to Trespassing upon the Laws' Court never had
Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” a “
Nullity" in that Judge
Arce became complicit in an “Organized
Conspiracy” violated his oath stated to the Petitioner he saw no “Fraud”
Nullity" in that Judge
Arce became complicit in an “Organized
Conspiracy” violated his oath stated to the Petitioner he saw no “Fraud”
That pursuant to Carter
V. Mueller 457 N.E. 2d 1335 Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1983, The Supreme court
has held that: “The elements of a cause of action for fraudulent
misrepresentation (sometimes referred to as “(fraud and deceit)”are: (1) False
statement of material fact; (2) known or believed to be false by the party
making it; (3) intent to induce the other party to act; (4) action by the other
party in reliance on the truth of the statement; and (5) damage to the other
party resulting from such reliance., the attorneys for the Defendants satisfied
this requirement by committing PERJURY and engaging in a
plethora of other Terrorists Acts;
Conspirators
to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or
have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985,
911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are
satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be
committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of
agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63
In Re Marriage
of O’Brien 912 N.E. 2d 729 (Ill App. 2 Dist. 2009),
When a party moves for
substitution of the trial judge for cause based upon an alleged violation of
rule setting forth mandatory bases for recusal, the movant need only show the
existence of that factor and that an objective, reasonable person would
conclude that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and need
not show actual prejudice. S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2-----1001 (a) (3); Sup. Ct. Rule
63 (C) (1).
735
ILCS 5/2—1001(a) (3) (West 2006). Although the statute does not define
“cause”, Illinois courts have held that in such circumstances, actual prejudice
has been required to FORCE REMOVAL of a judge from a case, that is, either
prejudicial trial conduct or personal bias. Rosewood Corp. n Transamerica
Insurance Co., 57 Ill 2d 247, 311 N.E. 2d 673 (1974; In re Marriage of Kozloff,
101 Ill 2d 526, 532, 79 Ill. Dec 165 463 N.E. 2d 719 (1984); see also People v.
Vance, 76 Ill. 2d 171, 181, 28 Ill. Dec. 508, 390 N.E. 2d 867 (1979).Moreover,
in construing the term “cause” for purposes of a substitution once a
substantial ruling has been made in a case, Illinois courts have consistently
required actual prejudice to be established, not just under the current
statute, but under every former version of the statute
9.)
That on August 27, 2018, Judge Arce became a law
unto himself Denied Petitioners Motion making him a “Private Citizen”
That due to the judges Bias and
or Prejudice conduct pursuant
to Sup Ct Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not
constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the Judicial
Canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.),
cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
Said judge demonstrated Bias and Prejudice conduct when
he acted outside of his jurisdiction as he engaged in “Treason” “Trespassing
upon the Laws”; “Judges, of course are presumed impartial, and the
burden of overcoming the presumption by showing prejudicial trial conduct or
personal bias rests on the party making the charge. Eychaner v. Gross,
202 Ill. 2d 228, 280, 269 Ill. Dec. 80, 779 N. E. 2d 1115 (2002).
Said Judge violated
all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct Rule Scott, 377
Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order
No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent
pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the
findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the
judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law
and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office
into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or
indifference, which warrant discipline.
That Petitioner
has demonstrated beyond the Preponderance of Evidence that said acts
demonstrates how Section 1983 of U.S.C.S. contemplates the depravation of
Civil Rights through the Unconstitutional Application of a Law by conspiracy or
otherwise. Mansell v. Saunders (CA 5 F 1A) 372 F 573,
especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect, where an action
is for a conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1985 (3),
or for the depravation of such rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, if the conspiracy
was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution and
Laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of
rights under 42 U.S.C.S. 1983, Lewis v. Brautigan (CA
5 F 1a) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505, John W. Strong, 185, 777-78 (4 the
ed. 1992).
10.)
That on September 11, 2018, the Court ignored
the merits of Petitioners pleadings and unlawfully granted Respondent's Motion
to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition for Dissolution and gave him 21 days to file
an Amended Petition for Dissolution. The Court also ordered Petitioner’s wages to
be unlawfully Extorted upon him in
the guise as temporary maintenance based on statutory guidelines and continued
the case to October 15, 2018 for status.
A-
Judge Boyd Ordered Respondent to #3 “shall complete a job search diary with 5
applications per week to be reported to the Petitioner every 14 days beginning September
15, 2018”.
B-
Respondent has not in any way complied
with the court order and giving her history of not wanting to work did not
comply with this court because her attorney has control over Boyd’s court and
his rulings.
C-
Respondent became Guilty of willful vexatious
contempt for the laws for failure to comply with his directive.
The U.S. Supreme Court,
in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683,
1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with
the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of
his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to
the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to
him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United
States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a
state officer as in this case.
The judge then acts not
as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
The Illinois Supreme
Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional
paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its
authority, - it, had no authority to make that finding." The
People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below
had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before
them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when
they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order
issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law,
and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates
v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D.
Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his
judicial function. ... It is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an
intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."
When a judge acts as a
trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses
subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no
legal force or effect.
11.)
That
pursuant to the aforementioned laws stated above on
September 26, 2018, Petitioner filed a Motion to Reconsider Judge Arce s Order
et al. Because judge Arce has become an
active participant in said “Organized
Conspiracy” was cognizant nothing was going to happen to him due to his
intimate relationship in trying to protect Boyd and reiterated to the
Petitioner, Arce said, “they want me to
rule on this today” “Petitioner asked
the judge if he wanted to take the time to read the merits of what is being
said because if you don’t read it how can you understand what, I am pleading”?
Judge Arce asked Joan, “if she had a
reply” Her reply was “no”. Arce Denied Petitioner’s Motion saying “judge Boyd had discretion he saw no “Fraud” (Oct 9, 2018)
A-
Petitioner has filed numerous unchallenged Motions
accompanied with affidavits were DENIED in it’s entirely.
B- The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert
the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their
correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336
Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.
C- Properly alleged facts within an affidavit
that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the
existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional
Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d
1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129
et al.
D- The above is Basic State Law-- no Judge in the State
Circuit seems to have a comprehensible understanding of legal procedures in a
simple manner; thereby, engaging in a plethora of corrupt legal practices so as
to compensate and cover-up where they are intellectually challenged in the law
AND OPPRESS THE INNOCENT AS DEMONSTRATED IN THIS CASE DUE TO ETHNICITY!
E- How can a man wearing a robe
try another man by the laws and not know or understand what he is trying the
man for in the laws? Deny that man justice for what he is seeking when the man
knows the laws better than the man wearing the robe?
12.)
That on
September 27, 2018, Respondent colluded with her attorney (which is why Petitioner is Divorcing her due
to her criminal aspirations and promiscuous violent episodes) and filed a
Petition for a Rule to Show Cause alleging that Petitioner had failed to pay
any maintenance which was an attempted Extortion.
13.)
That on October 15, 2018, Petitioner experienced
and felt anxiety from the blatant hostility coming from Boyd refused to go to
court. The Court set a hearing on Respondent 's unlawful and Terrorist Motion
to Compel and Petition for Rule to Show Cause for December 18, 2018. The Order
further stated that Petitioner's failure to appear would result in a default
order being entered against him.
14.)
That on October 29, 2018, Respondent
colluded with her attorney to now take his property from his father filed a Motion
for Exclusive Possession of Marital Property, set for Hearing December 18,
2018. Petitioner was not in court on November 8, 2018 due to stress and
anxiety.
15.)
That on November 26, 2018, Petitioner
filed a Motion to Reinstate his Petition for Dissolution of Marriage et al.
Reiterating all of the factual acts of “Fraud” and Civil Rights Violations and
noticed it for December 10, on which date the motion was set for Hearing for
December 18, 2018.
16.)
That on December 18, 2018, Judge Boyd
acted like a racist white man or puppet accommodating every request Joan
demanded Denied Petitioner 's Motion to Reinstate his Petition for Dissolution
et al, and ordered him an additional 14 days to file an Amended Petition for
Dissolution of Marriage. Judge Boyd unlawfully placed Petitioner in contempt of
court (judge was in obvious rage) which has now become confirmed Extortion, for failure to pay
court-ordered maintenance and ordered that he be taken into custody, with a
purge of posting $6855.24, The judge continued the case to December 21, 2018
for status on the purge. Respondent's pending Motion to Compel and Motion for
Exclusive Possession of Marital Property were continued.
17.)
That on December 21, 2018, Petitioner due
to stress and anxiety did not go to court but posted bond and was released from
custody missing work at the Post Office. Respondent’ s pending Motion to Compel
and Motion for Exclusive Possession of Marital Property was continued to January
18, 2019 for Hearing.
18.)
FACT That Joan
S. Colen has corroborated and admitted receiving on January 13, 2019, Petitioner’s
emailed Financial Affidavit and copies of various bills and other statements.
Moreover, On January 15, 2019, Petitioner emailed her an amended Financial
Affidavit including additional debts and expenses inadvertently omitted.
19.)
That on January 18, 2019, due to stress
and anxiety, Petitioner did not go to court. The judge unlawfully granted Respondent
exclusive possession of 13140 S. Eberhart and ordered him to respond to the
Interrogatories and Request to Produce Documents that was given to him on
August 28. 2018 in court within 14 days, or by February 1, 2019. The case was
continued to February 8, 2019 for status, Petitioner was ordered to appear in
court on that date.
20.)
Additionally, on January 18, 2019,
Respondent demonstrated hatred that could be gleaned as racial filed a Second
Petition for Rule to Show Cause because Petitioner could not pay the Extortion
fee in the guise of maintenance where said attorney received Notice and
knowledge Petitioner could not pay the Extortion Fee.
A- That as
a result to the Terrorist Act of Judge Boyd’s “Void” Order being a “Nullity”
Petitioner has agreed to pay back the following persons who lend him money to
immediately help him to be released from Custody so he can return to work and
resume with his life;
B- That
each and every payday, Petitioner have to pay back each of the four
individuals, $500.00 to Scott, K.; Craig K.; Mike S. and A.
Kabir until the $7000.00 is paid off that was borrowed to get out of the
Cook County Prison Complex.
C- That
because of the Terrorist Act perpetrated by Judge Boyd using his robe and
judicial authority to Bully and intimidate the Petitioner created another
hardship on him, in that his mortgage electric bill and gas payments have to be
paid late where he will incur stiff late charges and threatening Notices of
Disconnection of gas and electricity services which would affect his two
grandbabies whom visits him frequently;
21.)
That on February 5, 2019, Petitioner filed
a Motion Objecting &
Striking
Defendant 's Petition for Rule to Show Cause Due to
“Fraud” on the Court, Court Having No
Jurisdiction Orders are a
“Nullity”
Extension of Time to Submit Interrogatories & Counter
Issuance
for Rule To Show Cause and Impose Sanctions Pursuant to
Supreme
Court Rule 137". Said Motion was noticed for February 8, 2019.
22.)
That
on February 8, 2019, Petitioner appeared in court with Motion Objecting et al
filed Feb. 5, 2019, Joan explained to the judge what the document alleged and
the judge asked the Petitioner what do you mean by fraud? He explained that judge
Boyd has demonstrated Bias behavior and Prejudicial Conduct in that you have
denied every Motion and Pleadings with affidavits including my Petition for
Dissolution of marriage for no reason and granted Bernadette and her attorney
everything they have filed not questioning anything.
A- Judge said Motion denied Counsel never objected
or responded to any of the pleadings accompanied with affidavit.
B- Counsel stated to the judge that Petitioner had
not paid any Temporary Maintenance up until this point” Judge Boyd asked
Petitioner asked him for his reply, he explained that he forwarded his
financial affidavit demonstrating his inability to pay what the court was
ordering and it was attached with his Motion, Judge Boyd stated, You know if I
find you in Contempt of Court again you know what is going to happen to you?
C- Petitioners Reply, “You are going to lock me up again”? Judge Boyd stated, “You know what, I am going to do to you”,
don’t you”? Boyd repeated himself and said, “you know what I am going to do to you, if I find you in Contempt of
court again”? “Do you understand”?
D- Boyd appeared agitated waiting for Petitioner to
say something wrong only shook his head as Boyd stated again in a loud
intimidating Bullying manner “Do You
Understand?”
E- Judge Boyd told the Petitioner he had to make
some “Good Faith” payments even if he was not able to pay the $1700.00.
F- That Joan S. Colen circumvented the judge’s
directive to the Petitioner about paying whatever he could provided false
documents to the Federal Government further increasing the criminal counts of
Extortion of the aforementioned parties in said “Organized Conspiracy.”
23.)
That
pursuant to MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION TO REINSTATE CASE 88 D 079012 & VACATE et al number 11
from the Exhibit List Re
Notice of Respondent’s Motion for Disqualification of Judge et al. against
Freddrenna Lyle, case was reassigned to judge Simko unlike Judge Edward Arce
said white man demonstrated not being a party to the Terrorist Acts perpetrated
by Black Brown Negroe judges ordered said prominent alleged politically connected
law firm to respond to the Pro Se Litigants.
A- Petitioner appeared in court to witness several
lawyers fighting his Brother Joe Louis on case CH 01670 as Valderrama demonstrated his hatred at the Petitioner
because all of the attorneys had Defaulted on said Complaint and was served by
the Cook County Sheriffs and Clerk of the Circuit Court but most importantly
said judge had no jurisdiction, the case belonged to Hon Cecelia Gamrath.
B- Petitioner out maneuvered every attorney
articulating the laws said judge smiled at all of the white attorneys one was Hispanic,
said judge demonstrated rage agitation as if Petitioner was wrong for speaking up
for himself in the court, the same thing Petitioner is doing in his own divorce
matter before Boyd, in that Boyd and Valderrama is sharing the same fraternal
intimacy at each man for standing perpendicular on a superficial flat
articulating the injustices lodged at them by racist individuals.
C- That said Black Brown Negroe judges seems to
harbor a delusional perspective as long as they are violating the Civil Rights
of colored people the Democratic Machine operatives were not going to admonish
them provided said judges maintain Terrorist Acts on their own ethnic groups.
D- That on February 13, 2019, Respondent’s attorney
advanced her criminal behavior to another hierarchy by notifying and mailing to
the United States Postal Service Manager in Payroll an unlawful Notice of
Income Withholding for Support using the postal mail service engaging in now
mail fraud to the address 2825 Lone Oak Parkway, Egan Dakota, MN 55121-9650
E- That Joan S. Colen cognizant Judge Boyd had no
authority or jurisdiction she being a white woman was able to violate any and
every law necessary to achieve her goals in said “Organized Terrorist Criminal
Conspiracy”
“The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that
the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal
enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d
1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985)”.
24.)
To further
amplify the veracity of the Seventh Circuits precedent, Counsel for the
Respondent is not only unlawfully seeking to have the Petitioner Remanded into
Custody because he is not able to finance the Extortionists but is asking the
court to honor their “Fraudulent” actions before the court by finding him in
Default for not Amending his Petition for Dissolution that was valid before the
court, that Respondent Defaulted on;
25.)
That in
furtherance to the above, is asking the court to further accommodate their “Fraudulent”
requests is asking the court to Default the Petitioner because he failed to file
any response to the Counter -Petition, but admitted he filed a response
"Motion Objecting & Striking Respondent 's Counter -Petition Due to “Fraudulent”
Misrepresentations & Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause for Sanctions and or
Remand Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137" which he subsequently re-filed.
BRUBAKKEN v. Morrison, No. 1-9-1670, 1992 Ill
App. LEXIS 2144 (1st Dist. Dec. 30, 1992). Additionally, the
fact that a false statement or omission is the result of an honest mistake is
no defense to entry of a sanction. ID. To the extent that an individual lawyer
has engaged in sanction able conduct, that lawyer’s firm can also be jointly
and severally liable with the lawyer.
26.)
That judge Boyd is likened to being a fraternal Brethren of former
disgraced Chicago police Sgt. Ronald Watts and his crew of high
ranking Chicago Police Officers supervisors, pursuant to Chicago Tribune Feb.
15, 2019, (E. Jason Wambsgans/Chicago Tribune).
27.)
That
judge Boyd is likened to being a fraternal Brethren to Cook County Judge
Stanley Hill lowered Burnell Johnson's bond to $400 who Burnell Johnson, 60, has been indicted
on 20 felony counts for the alleged sexual assault of a disabled woman who
suffers from cerebral palsy, (Chicago, Sun Times)
28.)
That
Alderman Edward Burke cognizant Black and Brown judges have tremendous
self-hatred for themselves, pursuant to the Exhibit List #8 of Motion for
Reconsideration to Reinstate case 88 D 079012 et al. A letter from Karyn
Mehringer, MA Forensic Psychology, Request for Investigation of justice Anne
Burke, Alderman Ed Burke, Jan 22, 2008 said document states, Page 4 Par 1, Herbert
Cammon’s case was a murder case in which it was alleged that Herbert Cammon, a
gay black man, murdered his wife with the help of his gay lover by stabbing her
over 40 times and leaving the knife sticking out of her mouth. It
was alleged that he murdered his wife to obtain the proceeds of a $250,000 life
insurance policy. The case was originally assigned to Judge Arthur
Ceilsik. After a mistrial because of a hung jury, Ed Burke approached
Judge Cieslik and told him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to
withdraw from the case, he told the judge, “What’s the big deal. It’s
only a fucking nigger.”[1] Ed
Burke’s wife, Anne, had filed an appearance in the case as co-counsel with Pat
Tuite. Anne Burke also requested that the judge withdraw from the
case saying, “My husband was the one who put you on the
bench.” [Judge Cieslek lived in the 14th ward.] When
the judge finally withdrew from the case due to media pressure initiated by the
attorneys, the case was assigned to Judge Tom Maloney. Judge Maloney
dismissed the case in a bench trial. Said document is not only scanned in
Cook County database and unlawful1.blogspot.com June 20, 2015 Post.
29.)
That
it is apparent Black Brown Negroid judges appointed by Alderman Edward Burke
are the new Breed of Domestic Terrorist that are used by the Democratic
Political Machine who are allegedly intimate or submissive to his directives
and has demonstrated a willingness to “FIX” any case involving any person of
color;
30.)
That
any corrupt attorney likened to Joan S. Colen before said Burke appointed Black
Brown Negroid men will accommodated any and every false document presented in
their courts to grant false victories to members connected within the
Democratic Party guilty to a Plethora of “Terrorist Acts”
31.)
That
every Caucasian judge cognizant of the “Terrorist Acts” of colored judges
engaging in or who kept their mouths became complicit in all of the Acts.
Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. stated, “The
ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the
silence over that by the good people”
As a Masonic Brethren (Boyd) has violated every
creed of the fraternal order of the Brotherhood.
That Petitioner whom have never had troubles with the laws and never been locked up for any reasons until he went before Judge Boyd who works at the United States Post office downtown Chicago as a Personal Assistant for over 31 years to the Postmaster Chicago District for the United States Postal Service with very near perfect attendance. One of his primary responsibilities is to make sure that all mailboxes are cleared by seeing to it the mail has arrived at the post office for the next day delivery.
He studied at Morehouse College for 4 years School of Medicine, Master Mason, Past Master, Current Worshipful Master, Officer in Royal Arch Chapter, Officer in Knights Kadosh Consistory, Officer in 32nd Degree Consistory, Prominent member of Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, OES Degree, Queen of the South Degree, and AMARANTH Degree, Prominent member of the Lions Club of America. Director of Lodge "Feed the Homeless Program" in conjunction with the Salvation Army, Director of Lodge Coat Drive for Kids Program in conjunction with The Chicago Public Schools, every year Petitioner and members of his Lodge take coats and food to the homeless near Canal and 18th Street and Lower Wacker.
That Petitioner whom have never had troubles with the laws and never been locked up for any reasons until he went before Judge Boyd who works at the United States Post office downtown Chicago as a Personal Assistant for over 31 years to the Postmaster Chicago District for the United States Postal Service with very near perfect attendance. One of his primary responsibilities is to make sure that all mailboxes are cleared by seeing to it the mail has arrived at the post office for the next day delivery.
He studied at Morehouse College for 4 years School of Medicine, Master Mason, Past Master, Current Worshipful Master, Officer in Royal Arch Chapter, Officer in Knights Kadosh Consistory, Officer in 32nd Degree Consistory, Prominent member of Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, OES Degree, Queen of the South Degree, and AMARANTH Degree, Prominent member of the Lions Club of America. Director of Lodge "Feed the Homeless Program" in conjunction with the Salvation Army, Director of Lodge Coat Drive for Kids Program in conjunction with The Chicago Public Schools, every year Petitioner and members of his Lodge take coats and food to the homeless near Canal and 18th Street and Lower Wacker.
32.)
That said Facts recorded within validate the
veracity within the Preponderance of the evidence legal standard that “Jim Crow
Laws” outlawed by the United States Supreme Court is still being enforced in
Chicago by the Democratic Political Machine as his perfect “Niggers” he
affectionately references men of color, as the laws of Racism, Racial
Discrimination, Housing Discrimination, “Treason” “Trespassing upon the Laws”
and other Civil Rights Violations are meticulously circumvented using Colored
judges as “Terrorist” shielding the Caucasians from initiating their hatred;
moreover, it is apparent absent any scintilla of doubt said judges have limited
or no jurisdiction over Caucasians guilty of any wrongs or criminal acts only the
authority to punish, ridicule, incarcerate any person of color by any means
necessary keeping their mouths shut about injustices.
That no Afro American,
Negroe, Black or Brown judge or Politician male will step up and
admonish whites complicit in said acts, they go along with wrong so as to get
along with the wrong doers which is why Chicago is in the apathetic state it is
in today can’t blame the white man for everything too many blacks have sold out
participating in the genocide and mass incarceration of their own race so as to
continuously fulfill the doctrines of the Democratic Party;
The
Mis education of the Negroe, Carter G. Woodson 1933
History shows that it does not matter who is
in power... those who have not learned to do for themselves and must depend
solely on others never obtain any more rights or privileges in the end than
they did in the beginning.
Here is a quote from the book:
"When you control a man's thinking you do not have to worry
about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder.
He will find his 'proper place' and will stay in it. You do not need to send
him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no
back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it
necessary.”
WHEREFORE the
aforementioned reasons Respondent Respectfully prays:
That
the court orders entered by Judge Boyd as a result to “Fraud” be VACATED
INSTANTER due to it being a NULLITY based upon the reasons cited in this
document and noted in the Affidavits and appropriate Sanctions be imposed
pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137:
2.) That
the Chief Judge or Presiding Judge summons Federal authorities to ascertain other
criminal allegations noted to determine what prosecutorial remedies are afforded
in this matter;
3.) That this court
collaborate and transfer certain parts of these issues where they may not have
jurisdiction on parties complicit in said conspiracies be charged with
terrorist acts to the Federal tribunal;
4.) That Cook County Sheriffs along
with Federal Officials be present until this matter is properly adjudicated.
For
an Order Pursuant to Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 35 103 S. Ct.
1625, 1629, 75 L Ed 2d 632 (1983) Justice Brennen “The threshold standard for
allowing punitive damages for reckless or callous indifference applies even in
a case, such as here, where the underlying standard of liability for
compensatory damages because is also one of recklessness. There is no merit to
petitioner’s contention that actual malicious intent should be the standard for
punitive damages because the deterrent purposes of such damages would be served
only if the threshold for those damages is higher in every case than the
underlying standard for liability in the first instance. The common-law rule is
otherwise, and there is no reason to depart from the common-law rule in the
context of {1983} of $1.5 Million Dollars for being Remanded into
Custody unlawfully;
5.) For an Order reimbursing all fees and costs to
the Defendant for the enforcement of this matter;
6.) For Sanctions Remands and Disbarments of Joan S.
Colen.
7.) That the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause for
Remand for Perjury and “Fraud” for all parties complicit in these matters.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS
DIVISION
)
IN RE MARRIAGE
OF )
)
Cazembe Oboi
Kabir )
Petitioner )
) Cal
C
VS )
) No. 2018
D 003208
Bernadette
Kabir )
Respondent ) Room
1605
)
)
______________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF
Motion Objecting Respondent’s Motion for Default
et al. Petition for Rule to Show Cause et al. due “Fraud” (Civil Rights
Violations) and Prejudice pursuant to S.H.A. 735 ILCS 5/2 ---1001 (a) (2, 3) “Extortion”
Petitioner being a Victim of an “Organized Conspiracy” Judge Trespassing upon
the Laws” Court never had Jurisdiction Orders are “Void” a “Nullity”
COURTESY COPIES
TO: Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans 50 West Washington, Room 2600 Chg IL. 60602
TO: Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans 50 West Washington, Room 2600 Chg IL. 60602
Presiding Judge Grace Dickler, Daley Center, #1901, Chicago, Il 60601
Joan S.
Colen FBI Dir. Jeffrey S. Sallet
77 West Washington,
#1712 2111 West Roosevelt Road
Chicago, Il 60602 Chicago,
Ill. 60612
Email jsc@joancolenlaw.com
Hon
Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Case 93 CV
01609 219 S. Dearborn, #2341
United States
Attorney States
Attorney
John R. Laush, Jr Kim Foxx
5th Floor
219 S. Dearborn Daley Center
Chicago, Il 60604 Chicago,
Il 60601
Cook County Sheriff Cook
County President
Thomas J. Dart Toni Preckwinkle
Daley Center, Room 701 118 N. Clark, Room 517
Chicago, Ill. 60602 Chicago,
Ill. 60602
Please be advised that on Feb 21,
2019 Plaintiff has filed before this Circuit Court, his Motion Objecting Respondent’s
Motion et al. and will present said legally sufficient instrument before the Judge Boyd, or any Judge presiding in his
stead, March 10. 8 9:30, in room 1605.
Respectfully
Submitted
------------------------------------
Certificate
of Service Cazembe Oboi. Kabir
The undersigned hereby certifies
that the above Motion and attachments were caused to be delivered/ personal delivery/regular
mail to said parties.
___________________________
Cazembe Oboi Kabir
______________________________________________________________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION
)
IN RE MARRIAGE
OF )
)
Cazembe Oboi
Kabir )
Petitioner )
) Cal
C
VS )
) No. 2018
D 003208
Bernadette
Kabir )
Respondent ) Room
1605
)
)
______________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF
COOK )
I Cazembe Oboi Kabir Pro
Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated
within said motion pursuant to 735 1265 5/1-109, the undersigned certifies that
the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on
information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as
aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Respectfully
Submitted Notary
____________________
Cazembe Oboi Kabir
9429 S. Ada
Chicago, Il 60620
773 983-9521
No comments:
Post a Comment