Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Friday, September 16, 2016

WHAT CHICAGO DEMOCRATS IN THE POLITICAL MACHINE DON'T WANT AMERICA TO KNOW HOW CHICAGO IS GOVERNED UNDER THEIR RULE:

HATE AND RACISM IN THIS CITY WHICH IS SYNONYMOUS TO RACIAL SEGREGATION,, SEXISM VIOLENCE, RACIAL GENOCIDE, HOUSING DISCRIMINATION, MASS INCARCERATION, PUBLIC SCHOOL CLOSINGS,

TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT HOW THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT ALL LAWS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IN VIOLATING PEOPLE OF COLOR CIVIL RIGHTS AS WELL AS INDEPENDENT CAUCASIANS BY APPOINTING AND INSTALLING THE NECESSARY INFERIOR COLORED PERSONS TO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY ABSENT REAL AUTHORITY AS THEY CONTINUE TO ENFORCE #JIMCROWLAWS.

THE DEMOCRATS OF THE POLITICAL MACHINE EMBRACE A HATRED TOWARDS ANY HETEROSEXUAL MAN OR WOMAN THAT STANDS FOR RACIAL EQUALITY OR CIVIL LIBERTIES AND HAVE THE NECESSARY JUDGES IN POSITION TO MAKE SURE NO ONE RISES ABOVE THEIR TERRORISTS DOCTRINES.

DON'T HAVE SOME INTELLIGENCE AND AN INDEPENDENT MIND BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO USE ROPES OR SIC DOGS ON YOU THEY USE THE LAWS AS WEAPONS UNLAWFULLY TO OPPRESS ANYONE SEEKING RESTITUTION OR RELIEF IN ANY COURT.

LEE OTIS LOVE, JR. HAVE BEEN FIGHTING DILIGENTLY TO BE IN HIS DAUGHTERS LIFE BUT BECAUSE OF THE VERY RACISM THAT GOVERNS THIS CITY JUDGES HAVE CRIMINALIZED HIM CAUSING HIM TO LOSE HIS JOBS DUE TO REPEATEDLY GOING BACK AND FORTH TO COURT FIGHTING BASELESS CHARGES OF DOMESTIC ABUSE.

HE IS NOT ALONE MY BLOG DEMONSTRATES IN AN ARTICULATE MANNER THE NECESSARY METHODS RACIST OLD SCHOOL DEMOCRATS ARE WILLING TO EXHAUST TO DEMORALIZE AND DESTROY FAMILIES OF COLOR TO DEMONSTRATE THEIR SUPERIORITY OVER ALL ETHNIC GROUPS.

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN CHICAGO.

UPDATE: THE CHIEF JUDGE (DIANE P. WOOD) SEPT. 27, 2016 ALLEGEDLY ISSUED A ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT ON IRISH JUDGE JOHN W. DARRAH PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.352 (b) (1) (A) (iii) ACCORDING TO THE MEMORANDUM OF CHIEF JUDGE THAT IS NOT SIGNED "THE COMPLAINT IS THAT THE JUDGE IS BIASED AGAINST THE COMPLAINANT. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY BIAS BY THE JUDGE". 

THE COURT IGNORED ALL OF THE FACTS NOT REBUTTED BY ANY OPPOSING COUNSEL IN THE SEPTEMBER 2, 2016 POST.

THIS IS NOT #DONALDTRUMP IN OFFICE PERPETRATING THESE AREAS OF INJUSTICE AND GOVERNOR RAUNER SENT A LETTER STATING THESE ARE MATTERS FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THAT HIS OFFICE HAS NO JURISDICTION ON THESE ISSUES.

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF HOW DEMOCRATS REALLY FEEL TOWARDS PEOPLE OF COLOR BUT DURING ELECTIONS #BLACKANDBROWNLIVES ONLY MATTER FOR THEIR VOTES.


                                                           IN THE
                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604



 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                    Civil Action #16 CV 7434

                                                                                       Hon:    John W.Darrah
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                           
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants



                MOTION DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE--PERSONAL BIAS OR PREJUDICE{28 USCA 144, 455 (B) (1)} VACATE ORDER OF JULY 21, 2016 & SEPTEMBER 9, DUE TO FRAUD/ERROR
                                                     
To the Honorable Justices of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals:

    Complainant a United States Citizen, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be within this Court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and LR40.1 (b) (d) (e3)} with Affidavit.


   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se Appellant in this cause  files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144, to show that the Honorable John Darrah, has a personal bias with compelling evidence or prejudice against him because of his skin color and where legally sufficient Complaint stating a cause how and why this court has jurisdiction; motions corroborating judicial corruption “fraud” “perjury” and a plethora of “Terrorist Civil Rights Acts” put before the court that the District Court ignored and described them as moot upholding Racism and Terrorism in the courts.
That said judge is demonstrating unequivocally this is how traditional Democrats of the Political Machine in his era and beyond feels towards persons of color and the necessary steps he and his brethren are willing to enforce keeping persons of color like the Plaintiff oppressed and treated as a criminal non United States Citizen; and is attempting to cover up the systemic legal applications of racism that Appellant has diligently put before the courts, where judges and lawyers have participated in said conspiracies and have admitted it pursuant to all laws recorded.    

   Based thereon, Plaintiff-Appellant respectfully moves that the Honorable John Darrah proceed no further herein and that this Honorable Seventh Circuit invoke jurisdiction; due to members of the Democratic Political Machine seizing control over all courts and certain judges politically appointed because of their racist hatred of ethnic groups they deem inferior to them so as to  enforce the laws pursuant to the United States Constitution who is not Bias and understands how to enforce the laws in accordance to the United States Constitution and according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to hear this proceeding who is not intimidated or fear reprisals from these individuals.

   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, attesting the veracity and accuracy of all statements recorded within.      



                                                             



















                                                           IN THE
                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I  Joe Louis Lawrence, certify that I have on this day filed said Notice of Motion for Disqualification of judge et al. Before the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals and noted parties.


To: Dir. James Comey, FBI Washington D.C.
          FBI Michael J. Anderson 2111 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Ill. 60612
          US Attorney, Zachary T. Fardon 219 S. Dearborn, Suite 500

Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Loretta Lynch
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chief Judge Timothy Evans                              Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600                           50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601                                          Chicago, Ill. 60601

Judge Mary Lane Mikva                                   Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite                                    50 West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan                            Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200                 100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601

States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

Sec of State                                                  Patricia Rios, CHA Chief Adm. Officer
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                           Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601       

CHA Housing Choice Partners                          CHA   
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.                     Kathryn Ludwig, Chief HCV Officer
401 S. La Salle, Suite 1105                                    60 East Van Buren  
Chicago, Ill 60605                                               Chicago, Ill. 60605     
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Eugene Jones, Jr. CEO
Jessie McDaniel                                                    CHA
401 S. La Salle, Suite 1105                                     60 East Van Buren
Chicago, Ill. 60605                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60605

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       
Christopher Lynch                                               
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber Fowler Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King, James Bebley, 
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy        Rahimi Goli
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606


Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos, S. Atty. Martha Diaz
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay                                            Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800                 Christian Novay
Chicago, Ill. 60603                                           550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
                                                                        Chicago, IL. 60661

Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA                    Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren                                                  420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611





Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant                                 Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio                                                        420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611   

John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio                                                         Father Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                      St. Sabina
                                                                                  1210 West 78th Pl.                                                                                                                
Courtesy Copies:                                           Chg. Il 60620
US Attorney                                            FBI Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary T. Fardon                                2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
                                                         Leo High School President/Sun Times  
                                                           Columnist Dan McGrath                                                
Hon Judge Neil Cohen                             7901 S. Sangamon
50 West Washington, Suite 2308                  Chicago, Il 60620
Chicago, Ill 60601

Mayor                                             Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       ANTONIO R. RILEY
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                 Hon Mark Kirk                                 
525 South 8th St.                                       607 East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               Springfield, Ill. 62701
                                                                   
Bruce Rauner                                             Alderman David Moore
100 West Randolph                                      Alderman Ed Burke  
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                     Alderwoman Emma Mitts

Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hon Dick Durbin                                       Hon Judge
525 South 8th St.                                       Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                           50 West Washington
                                                               Chicago, Ill. 60601



  

                PLEASE BE ADVISED that on September 15, 2016, A Motion to Disqualify et al has been filed before the United States Court of Appeals. 

                                                             Respectfully Submitted


                                                                 Joe Louis Lawrence Counsel Pro Se
                                                                           PO Box 490075
                                                                      Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075
                                                                          312 -965-6455
                                                                      joelouislaw@yahoo.com
                                                                         @joelouis7                    


































                                                             IN THE
                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                         FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                            CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

                                                     AFFIDAVIT

                              In support of Motion to Disqualify et al.                                 

                                                In support of Motion
To Disqualify John W. Darrah, Judge of the Northern District of Illinois for Personal Bias or Prejudice “FRAUD” pursuant to 28 USCA 144, 455 (b) (1)


{Pursuant to the Rules of Federal Civil Procedure & U.S. Constitution}
         Section 1983 of U.S.C.S., S.H.A. Criminal Ch. 38, 33-3, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Canon 3D (1) Reporting Judicial Misconduct, 3D (2) Reporting Lawyer Misconduct;


I am Joe Louis Lawrence, Heterosexual Man Born and Raised a Free MAN Counsel Pro Se, HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES DENIED IN ALL COURTS BUT NEVER TRIED being duly sworn on oath states:  


1.)     That on July 21, 2016,  Plaintiff filed his Complaint stating all claims why the Federal Court had jurisdiction on said matter and it was assigned to Judge Darrah;

2.)    That Judge Darrah purportedly erred in his original interpretation of the Complaint being properly filed with claims being clearly articulated;

3.)    That said errors culminated into a pattern of consistent Bias Acts when the proper Motion for Reconsideration et al. was filed August 31, 2016 demonstrating his errors, hereto attached as Gr Ex A
Judge Darrah has history with the Plaintiff and has attacked his Pleadings in a prior case involving government corruption:

A-     That judge Darrah had a vexatious Bias and Racial Hatred at the Plaintiff on case 2011 CV 6887 where then he recorded false entries, 1.) said judge stated Plaintiff filed a Complaint Oct. 7, 2011 when in fact the Complaint was filed September 30, 2011, 2.) the judge stated, John W. Darrah made gross fabrications about the Appellant’s documents filed before the court which are unfounded, he says “it is impossible to discern from Plaintiff’s rambling” et al  

B-     That during this time judge Darrah refused to honor Plaintiff’s Informa Pauperis Petition whereby the United States Court of Appeals ordered him to rule on said petition;

C-    Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify said judge 10-27-2011, Judge Darrah denied  the motion about himself did not have said motion reassigned;

D-    That judge Darrah exhausted every method possible using his robe as a Klansmen making sure he did not access the jurisdiction of the Federal Court by ruling on said orders prior keeping him presenting himself before the court on the motion call, so as to demonstrate his articulation of all legal applications germane to said matter.

Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 FLa) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505

4.)     That Gr Ex A was scheduled for September 15, at 9:30 only because said judge was not entertaining any motions for August;


5.)      Plaintiff was prepared to present this Motion on July 25, 2016 when the case was assigned anticipating he was going to unlawfully dismiss said Complaint for “Fraudulent” reasons,  but was advised to allow him to “Hang” himself but to file the matter before the Court of appeals not the Executive –Committee;

6.)      That Gr Ex A on its face met the legal burden Preponderance of the evidence demonstrating Judge Darrah had no legal grounds not granting Plaintiff’s Petition to proceed informa pauperis and order the United States Marshall’s to effect service on all noted parties because the  Complaint met the burden of having a claim ;  
A-  That Page 5 Par A, “Plaintiff was already informed by credible intel no Irish, Polish and Black male judges were going to rule in his favor etal.”

B-    That in furtherance to the aforementioned, Plaintiff appeared before Politically Appointed Cook County Associate judge Valderrama given the circumstances intimately connected to both judges, in that Valderrama violated the oath of his duties engaged in a plethora of Criminal Terrorists Acts ref as Gr Ex B knowing that he had no jurisdiction over the Plaintiff in any State Court ignored the fact he was under Federal jurisdiction made it clear to the attorney preparing the order, Page 2 Par D, “The court finds there is no just reason for delay”  

C-   That judge Darrah has demonstrated in his actions conspiring with judge Valderrama when he expeditiously Denied, (Ref as Ex C) both Gr Ex A and Gr Ex B only after Plaintiff filed Gr Ex B;

D-   One can infer that Valderrama’s untouchable arrogance is of the flair he has because of his intimate relations with certain racist white men “Organized in said Conspiracy”,

E-      That there is a particular mindset of the noted conspirators involved in these matters is that, they share a deep  seeded hate for certain women especially men of color and independent Caucasians who are Heterosexual;

U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

  Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
  Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.

CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

     Conspirators to be guilty of offense need not have entered into conspiracy at same time or have taken part in all its actions. People V. Hardison, 1985, 911 Dec. 162, 108. Requisite mens rea elements of conspiracy are satisfied upon showings of agreement of offense with intent that offense be committed; Actus reas element is satisfied of act in furtherance of agreement People V. Mordick, 1981, 50 ILL, Dec. 63

Vaughn 462 S. E. 2d 728 (Ga.1995), The Supreme Court of Georgia removed a Judge from office for disregarding defendant’s Constitutional rights; Hammel, 668 N. E. 2d 390 (N.Y. 1996) (Judge removed for improperly jailing defendants for their alleged failure to pay fines and make restitution which the judge had imposed, disregarding the defendants basic constitutional rights;

F-        That Ex C demonstrates the need for the Justices of the United Court States ofAppeals to invoke jurisdiction in this matter because the present legal system is in the hands of Domestic Terrorists who have infiltrated the Democratic Political Machine and is enforcing Jim Crow laws with their appointed brethren also known as “Good ol Boys” using Afro American Negroes who have allowed themselves to be whored out as prostitutes upholding the criminal acts of said Terrorists while everyone in responsible authority turn their heads and close their eyes to the crimes perpetrated on innocent persons of color and independent whites  as demonstrated in this case and it is alleged many have secret intimate relations with said individuals and will never open their mouths about whatever injustices being perpetrated on innocent persons of color;

G-   That the sad reality is that many in power who could have effected a change long time ago is not at all what they purportedly presented themselves to be to the public when in fact no Real Man or Woman would be caught up in this mess;

H-   That most importantly, there has not been one attorney to stand in any court and object to any judge or in any legal document that the Plaintiff is in error in his pleadings in that a former Assistant States Attorney now deceased who repeatedly threatened the Plaintiff;

I-           That Par 2 Page 18 Petition for Rule to Show Cause (filed Oct. 12, 2011) ignored by Judge Darrah and Denied That Lawyers were forewarned by certain judges not to challenge the Pro Se Plaintiff, in that Judges were to handle anything and everything he filed in the courts because they deemed themselves “untouchable”, for example, Assistant States Attorney Brian Volkman told Judge David Haracz, “Your honor, we have tried everything on him (Plaintiff) and nothing seems to work, I have never seen a person from the public prepare pleadings like him, I don’t know what else to do”    

7.)       That Judge Darrah and Valderrama were so busy leveling frivolous attacks at his character and pleadings neither judge took the time out to deny any of the facts properly asserted in all affidavits attesting to the veracity of everything properly plead; thereby, trapping themselves as Terrorist best described as Weapons of Mass destruction;
A-  That Plaintiff had an objective that was to perfect the record and Complaint so that it can be perfectly presented to the Court of Appeals and United States Supreme Court, there is not one attorney under Rahm Emanuel’s administration or the States authority who can come before this court or any court and impeach the merits of this document or the complaint;

B-    That because the FBI didn’t want the Plaintiff wearing a wire because everyone talks and shares with him so it was necessary to exercise creativity using affidavits from there traps within the laws became so effective trapping attorneys the next step was to try it on judges.

C-   The reason why this operation was so successful because Racist White Men Gay and otherwise don’t either know the law but they are appointed to the bench, they don’t  read the laws when it involves persons of color because their lives don’t matter and in some instances don’t feel the need to know the laws because when the “FIX” is in there is no need to know the law because that is the Chicago way whatever a white man does or says is right even when he is wrong or they simply deny anything  and everything a great attorney may present before their court wearing down anyone economically or by intimidating attorneys;

D-   Plaintiff’s Complaint is the Blue Print on how cases are fixed and how the government can effectively prosecute every person complicit in overthrowing the courts using their legal expertise as a weapon against the indigent, the weak on ethnic groups they feel superior to as demonstrated in said pleadings;

E-      Finally, Plaintiff was informed that there were judges in the Court of Appeals who surprisingly believed in him dispatched word to his attention via court personnel if he wanted to change the existing laws in Illinois and the Courts, he had to present a Brief not a Motion who ever this person is or was they played chess.

Plaintiff has labored tirelessly perfecting this Complaint so as to avenge his brother’s death a Chicago City employee who everyone loved was slain in a Terrorist manner shot up and body set on fire in (Morgan Park ) an attempt to cover-up the crime while it is my strongest opinion Valderrama had something to do with my brother Man was fatally shot before Morgan Park home exploded in suspicious fire http://fw.to/MohLP5Y Timothy David Lawrence being killed (September 14, 2015) Thomas B. King of the CHA shared condolences and a host of others in the Daley Center after seeing my interview on the news.

That with a surveillance camera in the back of the house capturing the identities of the murderer’s, police have no suspects!

8.)      That this Honorable seventh Circuit will be able to see unequivocally, that said complaint filed July 21, 2016 met and satisfied all legal standards being before this Federal Jurisdiction;
A-  That if this case remained before Judge John Darrah he would deny this complaint and exhaust the same errors as demonstrated in the prior case because Black and Brown lives don’t matter under his jurisdiction. 

Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, Ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a).
 In the 20th century, the Supreme Court began to overturn Jim Crow laws on constitutional grounds. In Buchanan v. Warley 245 US 60 (1917), the court held that a Kentucky law could not require residential segregation. The Supreme Court in 1946, in Irene Morgan v. Virginia ruled segregation in interstate transportation to be unconstitutional, in an application of the commerce clause of the Constitution. It was not until 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 that the court held that separate facilities were inherently unequal in the area of public schools, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, and outlawing Jim Crow in other areas of society as well. This landmark case consisted of complaints filed in the states of Delaware (Gebhart v. Belton); South Carolina (Briggs v. Elliott); Virginia (Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County); and Washington, D.C. (Spottswode Bolling v. C. Melvin Sharpe). These decisions, along with other cases such as McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents 339 US 637 (1950), NAACP v. Alabama 357 US 449 (1958), and Boynton v. Virginia 364 US 454 (1960), slowly dismantled the state-sponsored segregation imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As the color line itself solidified at the turn of the nineteenth century, Jim Crow imposed on black people clear tactical disadvantages: restricted economic possibilities, narrow educational opportunities, inadequate housing options, high rates of death and disablement, persistent unemployment, and unrelenting poverty. Inasmuch as Jim Crow represented the race problem described by Gunnar Myrdal (18981987) in his 1944 treatise The American Dilemma, it was Jim Crow that created the race quandary; whites constructed the obstacles African Americans confronted, while also blaming them for their conditions, denying them access to the resources of problem solving, and daring themunder threat of violenceto complain, protest, or advance.
Finally, protests or challenges to Jim Crow often proved futile, given law enforcements complicity in the structure. From emancipation to the turn of the century, the Ku Klux Klan operated as a paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party in the South. The Klan, nightriders, red shirts, and other white terrorists intimidated African Americans with personal attacks, school burnings, and lynching’s. African Americans rarely served as policemen, sheriffs, or deputies before the late 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, the connections between municipal and state governments, law enforcement, and racial violence were well known by officials and citizens alike. White officers were known to harass black people, disrupt black neighborhoods, and assault black women. Arrested for inflated charges, denied satisfactory counsel, and serving harsh sentences, African Americans were further disadvantaged in the courtroom. Rarely did they receive good counsel, nor could they serve on juries. When black lawyers could appear in the courtroom to argue cases, white judges and juries rarely listened. All-white juries decided against black defendants, even in the most obvious cases of innocence, but rarely convicted white defendants, despite evidence of guilt. African Americansincluding the innocentsuffered the harsher punishments of extended jail time, forced farm labor, and peonage. Even women could be placed on the chain gangs working the roads and tracks across the South.

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   

Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) The “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws.

9.)      That said case demonstrates multiple acts of systemic applications of constitutional violations, in that judges and State Agencies acted as decision makers possessing final authority, Brown v. Bryan County, OKL., 67 F. 3d 1174 (1995), Stokes v. Bullins, 844 F. 2d 269, 275 (5th Cir. 1988), Wassum v. City of Bellaire, Texas, 861 F. 2d 453, 456 (5th Cir. 1988), Benavides v. County of Wilson, 955 F. 2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.) cert. denied,__ U.S.__, 113 S.Ct. 79, 121 L. Ed. 2d 43 (1992), “Liability will accrue for the acts of a municipal official when the official possess “final policymaking authority” to establish municipal policy with respect to the conduct that resulted in a violation of constitutional rights. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 483, 106 S. Ct. 1292, 1300, 89 L.Ed. 2d 452
A-    That not one African American, Negroe or anyone in competent authority opened their mouths to admonish anyone associated in these deliberate heinous acts perpetrated by members of the Democratic Political Machine, due to them only being figureheads. 
    
10.)                        That all Defendants have properly admitted to all facts and pleadings recorded in said complaint.

11.)                        A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)



          

                                                                       CANON 1
    A judge should uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
The integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with the law, as well as provisions of this code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.       
  

Wherefore the Foregoing Reasons, Plaintiff Prays for the following relief:

1.)   Plaintiff requests that this Honorable Court of Appeals accept Jurisdiction of this matter and Invoke authority Instanter and reassign this matter accordingly and or due to the unprecedented Terrorist Civil Rights said attorneys and judges are complicit in, Order a Rule to Show Cause for Remands and Indictments on all parties associated in said conspiracies;

2.)    Impose Sanctions/Remands against and all parties for Contempt of the United States Constitution for their crimes against the Plaintiff/Government and the immediate housing of Plaintiff where said Defendants who took his Deposit money 420 East Ohio and K2 Apartments and never returned it because he was the wrong skin color to live in their buildings;
A-    Judge Frederick Bates can testify to this he was the Hearing Officer who ruled in his favor twice returning his voucher (9727767) he is now a County judge CHA ignored his authority because of his skin color retaliated upon Plaintiff for complaining rescinded his voucher again keeping him homeless.

B-    In furtherance to the above, Crain’s Business article Poor families use 'supervouchers' to rent in city's priciest buildings http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140726/ISSUE01/307269984 via @crainschicago This applied only to Caucasians with political clout and money;

C-    The CHA’s ‘supervoucher’ program: a desegregation strategy that never was http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/cha-supervoucher-program-fair-housing-integration-controversy/Content?oid=21891804

3.)   Issue an Injunction on the Chicago Housing Authority prohibiting from allowing anyone from accessing or authorizing the distribution of any vouchers because they were complicit in obstructing Plaintiff’s accessibility in living in Mobility Housing areas because of his skin color and the fact he did not pay $1000-$1500 for his voucher, that CHA unlawfully took his voucher because he did not move in Englewood or Auburn Gresham when his 716 credit scored qualified him to live anyplace he desired as a former resident of Cabrini Greens;  

4.)   Issue an Order authorizing an Audit of the CHA Mobility of all ethnic individuals living in exclusive units where the CHA is paying rents and the what portion of rents being absorbed by African Americans and Caucasians;
        

Finally, this Affidavit is best closed by a jurist who has stated”; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

Federal Court FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.”            

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Wednesday April 26, 2006, Page 1, Illinois Political Machines help breed corruption, Associated Press writer Deanna Bellandi states, “Illinois is apparently a Petri dish for corruption. It is a real breeding ground”.         

That Chicago is the most Corrupt City in America, Huffington Post, Internet Newspaper, February 23, 2012; University of Illinois Professor Dick Simpson, “The two worst crime zones in Illinois are the governor’s mansion…..and the City Council Chambers in Chicago.” Simpson a former Chicago Alderman told the AP “no other State can match us.”   
                                         

                                      FURTHER AFFIANTH SAYETH NOT





  NOTARY                                                                    Respectfully Submitted

                                                                                          Counsel Pro Se                                                                                          
                                                                                       Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                                         312 965-6455
                                                                                        PO Box 490075
                                                                                  Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
                                                                                    joelouislaw@yahoo.com

                                                                                     @joelouis7

No comments:

Post a Comment