Wikipedia Racial Injustice in Chicago Courts

Search results

Friday, September 2, 2016

PROOF DEMOCRATS HATE PEOPLE OF COLOR AND MANY NEGROE BLACKS OR BROWN PEOPLE IN POLITICAL POSITIONS OR ARE JUDGES HATE THEIR OWN RACE AND DEMONSTRATE SELF-HATRED IGNORING THE RACIAL INJUSTICES PERPETRATED PERSONS OF COLOR.

 WHITE MEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE BEEN LYING FALSIFYING POLICE REPORTS DESTROYING RECORDS KILLING AND DESTROYING INNOCENT LIVES FRAMING INNOCENT PEOPLE OF COLOR AND ONLY EMPLOYED THOSE BLACK AND BROWN PERSONS WHO WERE INFERIOR WITH A POST SLAVE MENTALITY TO CONTINUE TO ENFORCE THEIR DEMOCRATIC DOCTRINES ON THEIR OWN RACE.

IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE LAQUAN MCDONALD KILLING WHERE WHITE MEN ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE FALSIFICATION OF A POLICE REPORT SUPPORTING THE KILLING OF AN INNOCENT MAN.

TYPICALLY A BLACK PERSON IN AUTHORITY IN CHICAGO DO NOT HELP PEOPLE OF COLOR WILL NOT HELP A PERSON OF COLOR IF RACISM IS INVOLVED SO AS TO BE ACCEPTED BY RACIST WHITE MEN IN THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL MACHINE THEY EMULATE WHAT THEIR WHITE MASTERS INSTRUCT THEM TO DO.

OTIS LEE LOVE, JR. +RedBilla HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SEEK AND HAVE CUSTODY OF HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER JUDGE LOZA REALIZING HOW THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FEELS TOWARDS INTELLIGENT OUTSPOKEN MEN OF COLOR HAVE INSTALLED HER PERSONAL HATRED AGAINST AN INNOCENT MAN KEEPING HIM FROM HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIS NATURAL BIOLOGICAL CHILD AS IF THIS IS A CONTROLLED PLANTATION.

CORRUPT RACIST OR INCOMPETENT JUDGES WILL ALLOW VIOLENT GANG BANGERS BACK ON THE STREET SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO TERRORIZE THE COMMUNITIES.

THE SAME BLACK AND BROWN JUDGES WHO ARE NOT IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS KILLING INNOCENT PERSONS OF COLOR ARE IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, JUDGES OR POLICE OFFICERS ARE USING THEIR INFLUENCE AND POWER INFLICTING GENOCIDE ON THEIR OWN RACE IN THE NAME OF SUPPORTING THE RACIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU VOTE DEMOCRATIC IN #CHIRAQ AND NEGROES AND RACIST WHITES IN CHICAGO DON'T WANT AMERICA TO READ HOW #BLACKANDBROWNLIVESDONTMATTER IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS.

THIS CASE WAS FILED AUGUST 31, 2016.    


 IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16-cv-7434

                                                                                       Hon:    John W. Darrah
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 Of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                       
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants
                            MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 8TH DUE TO DELIBERATE ERROR BIAS/AND OR PREJUDICE 

Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se a United States Citizen born and raised a freeman by all governing laws of the United States Constitution, Appellant in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 144 to show that the Honorable John W. Darrah has erred considerably or has a personal bias against the Plaintiff with compelling evidence in an attempt to prevent him “equal access” to the Federal Court’s jurisdiction;

Based thereon Plaintiff respectfully moves that the Honorable John W. Darrah Reconsider said Motion and have the United States Marshall’s to effect service on all parties herein Vacate the August 8, 2016 order.   

  
1.)  That the Court Order states Par. 2 STATEMENT  “The court views the complaint’s allegations in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, and takes as true all well- pleaded facts and allegations in the complaint. Reger Dev., LLC v. Nat’l City Bank, 592 F. 3d 759, 764 (7th Cir. 2010). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 (a) (2) requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” in order to provide the defendant with fair notice of the plaintiff’s claims and the grounds upon which they rest. Bell Atl. V. Twombly, 550, U.S. 544, 555 (2007). To survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s claim must be plausible, and the factual allegations of the complaint must be “enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Brooks v. Ross, 578 F. 3d 574, 581 (7th Cir. 2009) (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555)

2.)  That in reference to the above legal citation and judge’s order, Plaintiff has satisfied the aforementioned within the Complaint
A-   Complainant a United States Citizen, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby
 Respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with corroboration/admissions and affidavit the noted reasons why this matter should be within this court’s Jurisdiction; {Pursuant to (A) Color (Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
         (B) Race (Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981)
   Racial Discrimination, Racial Retaliation, Racial Hatred, Racial Oppression, Civil Rights Violations, Unequal Applications of the Laws, and Disparate Treatment on the basis of race, color or national origin (42 U.S.C. 1981).

 This court has Jurisdiction over the statutory violation alleged as conferred as follows: over Title V11 claims by U.S.C. {1331, 28 U.S.C. {1343 (a) (3), and 42 U.S.C. {2000e-5 (F) (3); over 42 U.S.C. {1981 and {1983 by 42 U.S.C. {1988; over the A.D.E.A. by 42 U.S.C. {12117}.

In addition, alleged violations of the noted Sections of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 all noted Public Officials with authority closed their eyes to the enumerated crimes within.
B-   That Par 1, of the affidavit unequivocally within the preponderance of the evidence legal standard addresses the legal standard why said Complaint should not have been dismissed due to judges error;

C-   In furtherance to the above, Vol 1, Gr Ex A, Motion for Reconsideration & Vacate June 1, 2016 Order Absent Certification Due to “Fraud” Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 272 with Affidavit filed before the Illinois Supreme Court;

3.)  Said judge demonstrated an incredible egregious error by ignoring the very complaint that provided various claims as to why the Federal Court have jurisdiction in this matter, he  literately turned his back on the complaint, closed his eyes to the plethora of Racists Civil Rights violations perpetrated at the plaintiff; The judge erred by demonstrating an act of culpability and or Conspiracy in an attempt to aid and assist certain Defendant’s named in the Suit, In Re Judge No. 93-154, 440 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. 1994), And Deception by falsifying reasons for preventing a legally sufficient Complaint, from being served on the Defendant’s, In re Ferrara, 582 N.W. 2d 817 (Mich. 1998),In re Renfer, 493 S.E. 2d 434 (N.C. 1997), In re Kroger, 702 A. 2d 64 (Vt. 1997), Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 33 Cal. 3d 359, 657 P. 2d 372, 377, 188 Cal. Rptr. 880 (1983);

4.)  That because of the number of Racist Corrupt Judges fraternally  connected to the Democratic Political Machine, Plaintiff had to construct a Complaint that was Federally approved pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Procedure, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (d)(1) (“No technical form is required”), While there is ample room for creativity in drafting the complaint, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require the inclusion of a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, the case number, and a designation of the nature of the pleading. Form 1, in the Appendix to the Rules, is the model for case caption. A complaint also must include the names of the parties to the suit, jurisdictional statement, a plain and concise statement of the claim, and a prayer for relief.
A-    Par 4 of Gr Ex A states, “That Ex B, is a court order purportedly from the Illinois Supreme Court without certification acknowledging any judges involvement but is the modis operandi when cases are being “FIXED” judges never sign their names to court orders”.

B-    Plaintiff is up against 6 law firms with personnel surpassing 20+attorneys the same methodology the Democrats of the Ku Klux Klan exercised in the past “Lynching” innocent men of color hiding their faces behind white robes is now blatantly demonstrating the same hatred in this manner using Terrorist tactics with no fear of any laws expecting their brethren to uphold them in these criminal episodes;

C-    That Par 5B “Ed Burke approached Judge Cieslik and told him to withdraw from the case. When the judge refused to withdraw from the case, he told the judge. What’s the big deal? It’s only a Fucking Nigger.” and Par C, Anne Burke  also requested that the judge withdraw from the case saying “My husband was the one who put you on the bench.” is plain and concise no attorney or judges denied or objected to said factual pleadings;

D-    Motions for Reconsideration are designed to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence that was unavailable at time of original hearing, changes in existing law, or errors in court’s application of law. Continental Cas. Co. v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, App. 1 Dist. 1996, 216 Ill. Dec. 314, 279 Ill. App. 3d 815, 665 N.E. 2d 374, appeal dismissed, et al.;

E-    The purpose of a Motion to Vacate is to alert the trial court to errors it has made and to afford an opportunity for their correction. In re Marriage of King, App. 1 Dist. 2002, 270 Ill. Dec. 540, 336 Ill. App. 3d 83, 783 N.E. 2d 115, rehearing denied pending appeal; et al.

5.)   That Irish and certain Polish judges rule along racist fraternal guidelines and as far as certain Negroe judges with Post era slavery mentalities, they rule how they are told with no backbone or integrity; said hate is so strong it is likened to the same hatred Hitler had towards Jews, likened to the same hatred demonstrated at Native Americans forcing them off the United States soil sending them to reservations now in this era Racist Democrats of the Political Machine are destroying persons of color in the same aforementioned manner ignoring the very laws designed by the United States Constitution to protect them using the laws as weapons against the innocent to destroy them;

6.) That said Terrorist have demonstrated taking seize of the legal system as demonstrated in said Complaint ignoring Equal Protection of Laws for all United States citizens, in that Chief Judge Negroe Timothy Calvin Evans ordered the removal of Judge Valerie E. Turner, hereto attached, Chicago Tribune article August 17, 2016 veteran Cook County Circuit Court judge allegedly allowed a lawyer who is running for election to the bench this fall to wear a robe and hear cases at the Markham courthouse late last week, a breach of judicial ethics as well as a potential violation of the law.
The move prompted the county's chief judge, Timothy Evans, to remove the judge from the bench Wednesday until further notice.
The incident occurred in the Markham courtroom of Judge Valarie Turner, who allegedly allowed lawyer Rhonda Crawford to take her place on the bench, Evans said in a statement. Crawford, an employee in Evans' office, presided over at least two cases Aug. 11, both of them traffic cases. One involved a ticket for driving without insurance, the other for driving on the median.
7.)  That the Chief Judge nor any prosecutors ordered the removal of any Judge in Springfield or any law clerks for committing a felonies offense mailing out a blank court orders Ex B et al.
.
8.)  Because said women are African American with no political clout it is easier going after them instead of white men politically connected;

9.)  Pursuant to Vol II, Gr Ex C, Page 9 of 18, Par. 6, “That Plaintiff has prepared said pleadings so as to trap any judge under Alderman Edward Burkes authority and control it was expected a top Irish or Good ol Boy personnel judge would be presiding over this matter trying to “FIX” this case, so as to demonstrate to the most racist or hated judges on the bench they can be caught within the law.”
A-   “Plaintiff was already informed by credible Intel no Irish, Polish and Black male judges were going to Rule in his favor where this matter was concerned for example when this case appeared on Judge David Atkins call he had Dismissed the case calling it an Order of Protection and got off after he was allegedly admonished;"

10.)                        To further amplify how judges are forum-shopped to “FIX” cases unless you’ve got the clout to get a prestigious courtroom assignment, Pethers says, being a judge in this county is “demoralizing” and often leaves you “bored out of your mind.” In an email last month titled “Hanging Up the Robe,” Pethers announced her plan to retire at the end of her term in December and said she’ll leave the $187,000-a-year job with few regrets.

The email reads a bit like a law-and-order version of chef Anthony Bourdain’s “Kitchen Confidential,” with accusations that unnamed colleagues in the Cook County judiciary are often mailing it in.

Sure, there are “real upsides” to being a judge here, Pethers says.
“Good pay, great benefits, lots of vacation,” wrote Pethers, 58.
She says she also enjoyed working with some of her fellow judges, resolving disputes and explaining the legal system to non-lawyers who file cases without an attorney.
But Pethers found it particularly depressing that “there are judges who regularly don’t even come to work, but get to choose their courtrooms,” according to the email sent to friends and colleagues.

Pethers came to realize she never had a shot at presiding over a courtroom in the Law Division. She worked almost her entire career as an attorney in the Law Division and aspired to sit in judgment there, she says.

“For years, I have watched folks elected long after me get assignments I wanted,” says Pethers, who became the county’s first openly lesbian judge when she was elected in 2004. “Some of them, although not on the bench as long as me, were at least as qualified for the positions. Others, not so much.”

Pethers clearly blames her failure to enjoy upward career mobility on a lack of political influence: “Being ‘nobody who nobody sent’ doesn’t cut it. And because of that, qualification and experience don’t either.”

She doesn’t name any of the allegedly better-clouted colleagues who were promoted unfairly over her. But Pethers put the blame for the situation squarely on longtime Chief Judge Timothy Evans.
The rest apparently is a distasteful snore: “I have spent 12 years throwing people out of their homes in evictions, placing judgments against poor people who cannot pay their credit card and student loan debts and dealing with lousy insurance companies in fender-bender car accident cases. And the occasional breach of contract, slip and fall or dog bite.”

Now, she sees she had been “so naïve” when striving for a judgeship.

“A well-known ‘mover and shaker’ told me when I was campaigning that, if I thought an election was political, ‘Wait until you’re a judge — there’s no place in Chicago more political than that,'” Pethers says. “I didn’t understand that then, but I sure do now.” Chicago Sun Times August 2, 2016


11.)                That Par, 3, STATEMENT “Plaintiff alleges that he was unable to secure housing and maintain employment because of actions by the Defendants. He alleges that this occurred because individuals, state agencies and the court system have committed terrorist acts, conspired against and oppressed the Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s bare assertions of constitutional and civil rights violations are conclusory and are not assumed to be true. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 681 (2009). Plaintiff does not assert facts supporting his claims.”

Black’s Law definition Conclusory- An inference that has no proof but is stated none the less.

     If Plaintiff made assertions that said black male judges were intimate with racist white men in the Democratic Political Machine and has sold out destroying their own race, due to self-hatred is all the reasons why the communities and court system is in this pitiful corrupt state is deemed Conclusory;

     Plaintiff’s Complaint is corroborated with Affidavits, Admissions and Facts:
    
      A-     Pursuant to Par. 4, Page 11 from the Complaint
Plaintiff’s license was never suspended because there was never a signed court order stating he owed any child support but was locked up 5 times for allegedly owing child support, Secretary of State Jesse White and Assistant General Counsel Terrance Mc Conville will attest to the veracity of this assertion;

A.    Plaintiff Lost his job with Sheriff Department in the Administrative capacity because of the Bogus Paternity case;

B.     Despite scoring in the top 5-10% on the Police Exam a Commander with the Police Department could not bring him on the Police department because of some integrity issues that had to be resolved with the Bogus Paternity case;

C.    Plaintiff lost his job driving a School bus (Reliable who later went out of business) because someone was forcing them to accept bogus court orders for wage garnishees where Plaintiff was forced to get on Welfare because of all of the money extorted from his salary;

D.    Plaintiff was rear ended by drunk Police Officer standing still driving a CTA bus Officer totaled his van, Plaintiff sustained a back injury while off work injured on duty allegedly City hall officials and CTA personnel stole his wages and tried to destroy said personnel records saying Plaintiff was never a CTA employee.

E.     Despite filing a grievance the Union never acted on the matter even up to this date, but the union Javier Perez called the Plaintiff in 2015 telling him they never received a letter from his physician stating he was fit to return to return to work, if he had that letter we could do something about getting you reinstated, what he did not realize Plaintiff had the information faxed it to him never heard from him again;

F.     Plaintiff got accepted to Northwestern Law School scored very high on LSAT could not attend school because of the plethora of Racist Diabolical Obstructions no white man have to endure living in Chicago, Illinois  

G.    They have retaliated on Plaintiff’s children along with a plethora of other “Fraudulent Acts, that Vol. 1 Gr Ex H Plaintiffs son wrote a College Essay (Hardest Challenge) detailing the mental effects these legal matters had on him and the family as we are Homeless, as white men and some men of color sat by and allowed some coaches and Public School administrators incite Terrorist Acts at son keeping him off the field so college scouts would not see his talents earning a scholarship going to a University of his choosing because his father stood up to Racism, Niggercism and Terrorism;

          H-That Plaintiff is on Welfare and Homeless formerly with a Section 8 voucher because members of the Political Democratic Machine have deployed every method feasible to keep him and any other persons like himself oppressed enforcing Jim Crow laws;

I-                                   That Pars 2, 3, 4 (a) (b) (c) (d) most important (e) of Vol. III  “That Ex 1 of the aforementioned affidavit emails and hand written notes establishing the fact if Plaintiff was making over $100,000.00 he could live in their complex with his section 8 voucher at 345 East Ohio, due to his skin color”    

                   J-      That Pars (F) (G) unequivocally articulates corruption in the HUD Section 8 voucher et al. (H) “That CHA is still today violating a Federal Court Order et al. Order entered program, that Mayor Rahm Emmanuel blasted the CHA voucher program Mar. 15, 2016;

K-    That Pars 5 and 6 et al. demonstrates how said judge retaliated on minor son in a cowardly fashion trying to keep him from graduating from High School and innocent City employee brother was murdered in a Terrorist Manner;

  
Properly alleged facts within an affidavit that are not contradicted by counter affidavit are taken as true, despite the existence of contrary averments in the adverse party’s pleadings. Professional Group Travel, Ltd. v. Professional Seminar Consultants Inc., 136 ILL App 3d 1084, 483 N.E. 2d 1291; Buzzard v. Bolger, 117 ILL App 3d 887, 453 N.E. 2d 1129 et al.
 
Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-612 Counsel never Objected to the sufficiency of Petitioners pleadings, Objections to sufficiency of pleadings either in form or substance must be made In trial court, and if not so made, they will be considered waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People ex rel. Deynes v. Harris, App. 1948, 77 N.E. 2d 439, 333 Ill. App. 280.
  
12.)               Pursuant to Sup Ct. Rule 71, Sufficient for Removal, conduct which does not constitute a criminal offense may be sufficiently violative of the judicial canons to warrant removal for cause. Napolitano v. Ward, 457 F 2d 279 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1037, 93 S. Ct. 512, 34 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1972).
    
13.)               That the aforementioned Court Order is fabricated entirely said Judge committed “Fraud” on the Court;
A-   Said Judge’s legal entries for dismissing said complaint have been Unconstitutionally recorded and frivolously applied and questions the judges motives as a Federal Judge for his criminal actions in this matter;  the judge erred in abusing the adversarial process, a fundamental aspect of the adversarial system is that proceedings are to be conducted in open court. Judges have been disciplined for disposing of cases without an adversarial proceeding, In re Fitzgerald, Unreported Determination (Ky. Comm’n 1986); Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A. 2d 220 (1977);

That the Judge erred considerably when it received notice and knowledge of other Judges complicit in a Criminal Conspiracy failed to follow Canon Ethics Leslie W. Abramson, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 751 (1997). The Judges Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its effect on Judicial Independence.

14.)               Said Judge concocted unlawful Unequal Protection of the Laws violations in Dismissing Plaintiff’s valid certified legal complaint: The judge    erred by engaging in a conspiracy citing a case in the law that is of no merit in this matter and constitutes a failure to follow the Canon laws, Matter of Markey, 696 N.E. 2d 523 (Mass.1998), Mississippi Comm’n on Judicial Performance v. Byers, 757 So. 2d 961 (Miss. 2000)
Judge Darrah stated, “Plaintiff’s Complaint has failed to state a claim under Rule (12)(b)(6) and is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Consequently, Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Application [4] is denied. “[T]he court should grant leave to amend after dismissal of the first complaint ‘unless it is certain from the face of the complaint that any amendment would be futile or otherwise unwarranted.” Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the case will be dismissed.

15.)                      Said Complaint was captioned Complaint of Civil Rights Violations (with over 500 pages of Admissions, Exhibits and Facts)
                            Unequal Protection of the Laws Violations
                                Jim Crow Violations
                                 Judicial Corruption/Public Corruption Conspiracy
                                    Public Officials/Fraud/Conspiracy  
  
  Civil Rights Act of 1866- first section, enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of the laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinances, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding, Act of April 9, 1866, ch. 31, 1, 14 Stat. 27, 42 U.S.C.A. 1981 (a)                 

16.)               That Plaintiff never received Equal Applications of the Laws by the State Judges, State Agencies, City Agencies now this Federal Court pursuant to the “Equal Benefit Clause”   Turner 24 F. Cas. 337 (No. 14247) C.C.D. Md. 1867) the “equal benefit” clause is cited in what would appear to be the earliest reported case enforcing the section. The plaintiff was an emancipated slave who was indentured as an apprentice to her former master. Although both whites and blacks could be indentured as an apprentice, under the law of Maryland, indentured blacks were not accorded the same educational benefits as whites and, unlike whites, were subject to being transferred to any other person in the same county. Circuit Judge Chase granted a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the purported apprenticeship was in fact involuntary servitude and a denial under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 of the “full and equal benefit of all laws

17.)               That Judge Darrah has acted outside of the provisions of the immunity clause when he exercised the duties of his authority outside the laws of the United States Constitution when he sided with the conspirators DISMISSING Plaintiff’s legal Complaint unlawfully, ignoring all sorts of “fraud” and “Criminal Civil Rights Violations of all parties noted in said Affidavits and Complaint most importantly noted is Criminal mail fraud of an alleged judge or law clerk in Springfield pursuant to Section 1983 of USCS contemplates the depravation of Civil Rights through the unconstitutional application of a law by conspiracy or otherwise. Mansell V. Saunders (CA 5 Fla) 372 F 2d 573, especially if the conspiracy was actually carried into effect and plaintiff was thereby deprived of any rights privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the gist of the action may be treated as one for the depravation of rights under 42 USCS 1983 Lewis V. Brautigam (CA 5 Fla) 227 F 2d 124, 55 Alr 2d 505;
a.      Said Judge violated all Rules of law Canon Ethics, Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 62  Scott, 377 Mass. 364, 386 N.E. 2d 218, 220 (1979) See Lopez-Alexander, Unreported Order No. 85-279 (Colo. May 3, 1985) (Judge removed for, inter alia, a persistent pattern of abuse of the contempt power. The Mayor of Denver accepted the findings of the Denver County Court Judicial Qualification Commission that the judge’s conduct could not be characterized as mere mistakes or errors of law and that the conduct constituted willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute). Canon Ethics where there is a pattern of disregard or indifference, which warrant discipline.

A judge’s disrespect for the rules of court demonstrates disrespect for the law. Judges are disciplined under Canon 2A for violating court rules and procedures. Judge ignored mandated witness order in attempt to accommodate witnesses’ schedules; Citing Canon 2A the court noted, “[a] court’s indifference to clearly stated rules breeds disrespect for and discontent with our justice system. Government can not demand respect of the laws by its citizens when its tribunals ignore those very same laws”)

18.)                        That Judge Darrah attempted to save a group of Racist Terrorists by violating the oath of his office doing whatever is necessary to further undermine, oppress, psychologically torture the Counsel Pro Se Plaintiff as far as his robe would allow him by dismissing any and all claims he put before the courts, demonstrating the Racial Hatred Irishmen have against men of color as in the Plaintiff’s case; Bozarth, 604 A. 2d 100 (N.J. 1992) See also Public Admonishment of Drew (Cal. Comm’n on Judicial Performance, July 1996) (judge admonished for numerous violations including denying a defendant his right to appointed counsel on the grounds of the ability of others to pay for legal representation and the possibility of future employment 
   Dash, 564 S.E. 2d 672 (S.C. 2002). The District Court failed to follow and apply said laws in an applicable legal manner;

19.)                     CHICAGO — A federal judge (Zagel) refused Tuesday to lighten Rod Blagojevich’s original 14-year prison sentence for corruption, rejecting pleas for lenience by the now white-haired former Illinois governor who attended the resentencing hearing by video from a Colorado prison a thousand miles away.
Blagojevich, 59, was eligible for resentencing after an appeals court last year threw out several convictions related to his alleged attempt to sell or trade an appointment to President Barack Obama’s old Senate seat. Washington Post August 9, 2016
20.)               That said crimes perpetrated in the aforementioned Complaint is far worse than what Blagojevich did trying to sell President Obama’s Senate seat and Judge Zagel upheld the integrity of the laws and did not yield to public or political pressure sustained his sentence;

21.)               U. S Sup Court Digest 24(1) General Conspiracy

U.S. 2003. Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.—U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S. Ct. 819, 537 U.S. 270, 154 L.Ed.2d 744, on remand 371F.3d 1093

            Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that exist and be punished whether or not the substantive crime ensues.-Id.
            Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the part from their path of criminality.-Id.
 
CONSPIRACY
Fraud maybe inferred from nature of acts complained of, individual and collective interest of alleged conspirators, situation, intimacy, and relation of parties at time of commission of acts, and generally all circumstances preceding and attending culmination of claimed conspiracy Illinois Rockford Corp. V. Kulp, 1968, 242 N.E. 2d 228, 41 ILL. 2d 215.

                                             CANON 1
    A Judge should uphold the INTEGRITY and independence of the JUDICIARY.
      The integrity and independence of judges depend in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they should comply with the law, as well as the provisions of this code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.

22.)                        That because of the horrendous unprecedented acts of “draconian” criminal acts of conspiracies, the members of the Terrorist cell Democratic Political Machine have met the legal burden within the Preponderance of the Evidence Pursuant   the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (was enacted) - Section 1 (42 U.S.C.) 1983.
       “Of all the Civil Rights legislation enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War, none has had a greater contemporary impact than the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The Act grew out of a special one-paragraph message sent to the 42d Congress on March 23, 1871, by President Ulysses S. Grant, urgently requesting the enactment of legislation”.

Section 2 (42 U.S.C.) In the House of Representatives.
        “Congressional Debate of the second section of the Ku Klux Klan Act was more extensive and enduring than that of Section 1; As originally presented, Sec. 2 made it a felony for any “two or more persons” to conspire to commit certain enumerated crimes “in violation of the rights and privileges, or immunities of any person, to which he is entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
           “Throughout the debates, supporters of the Act made repeated references to the depredations of the Ku Klux Klan; Victims of these atrocities included not only blacks but white Republicans as well. The crimes that were perpetrated, therefore, were not viewed as isolated occurrences, but as part of an “Organized Conspiracy….Political in its origin and aims”, “crimes perpetrated by concert and agreement, by men in large numbers acting with a common purpose for the injury of a certain class of citizens entertaining certain political principles, id, at 457 (remarks of Rep. Coburn). See also e.g., id. At 437 (remarks of Rep. Cobb) (“None but Democrats belong or can belong to these societies”) et al.,
           “Where these gangs of Assassins show themselves the rest of the people look on, if not with sympathy, at least with forbearance. The boasted courage of the South is not courage in their presence. Sheriffs, having eyes to see, see not; judges, having ears to hear, hear not; witnesses conceal the truth or falsify it; grand or petit juries act as if they might be accomplices. In the presence of these gangs all the apparatus and machinery of civil government, all the processes of justice, skulk away as if government and justice were crimes and feared detection. Among the most dangerous things an injured party can do is to appeal to justice. Of the uncounted scores and hundreds of atrocious mutilations and murders it is credibly stated that not one has been punished. Cong. Globe, supra note 2, app. At 78 (remarks of Rep. Perry). (“While murder is stalking abroad in disguise, while whippings and lynching’s and banishment have been visited upon unoffending American citizens, the local administrations have been found inadequate or unwilling to apply the proper corrective”) et al., …. And the State made no successful effort to bring the guilty to punishment or afford protection or redress to the outraged and innocent.”)   

794 S.W. 2d 692 (Mo. App. 1990) “No system of justice can function at its best or maintain broad public confidence if a litigant can be compelled to submit his case in a court where the litigant sincerely believes the judge is incompetent or prejudicial…… {T}hat is the price to be paid for a judicial system that seeks to free a litigant from a feeling of oppression”. State ex Rel. McNary v. Jones, 472 S.W. 2d. 637, 639-640 (Mo. App. 1971) Indeed, the right to disqualify a judge is “one of the keystones of our legal administration edifice“State ex Rel. Campbell v. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d 399-401(Mo. App. 1980). It is vital to public confidence in the legal system that the decisions of the court are not only fair, but also appear fair. Thus whether the disqualification of a judge hinges on a statute or rule in favor of the right to disqualify. A liberal construction is necessary if we wish to promote and maintain public confidence in the judicial system. Kohn, 606 S.W. 2d at 401; State ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Hess S.W. 2d 147, 148 (Mo. App. 1987).


 FEDERAL JUDGE GETTLEMAN: stated, Tuesday March 10, 2009, where he found Superintendent of police Jody Weiss in Contempt of Court and Ordered the City to Pay $100,000.00, “No one is above the Law”, he cited a 1928 decision by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, that said, “If the Government becomes the law breaker, it breeds Contempt for the Law, It invites everyman to become a law unto himself. It invites Anarchy.” 























  WHEREFORE the aforementioned reasons Plaintiff respectfully Prays for the Relief

  
1.    For an Order Vacating the August 8, 2016 Court Order;

2.    Due to the Noted Deliberate Errors an Order Reassigning this matter to another Judge;

3.    For an Order effecting the United States Marshalls to Cause Service to be had on all of the noted Defendants;

4.    For an Order on the Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause Instanter on the Chief Judge of Cook County, States Attorney and Attorney General of Illinois for Contempt/Remand for not investigating or initiating charges against the unnamed subjects responsible for mailing out court orders absent a judges signature;

5.    For an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Informa Pauperis Motion;

6.    For the entry of an Order awarding to your Petitioner for such other relief and any other relief necessary as equity may require of which this court may deem overwhelmingly just;
                                  
         


                                                                         Respectfully Submitted

                                                               Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                 PO Box 490075
                                                             Chicago, Ill. 60649-0075 
                                                                        Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com                                                                                                 
                                                                            Phone:  312 927-4210 
















 IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16-cv-7434

                                                                                       Hon:    John W. Darrah
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 Of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                      
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants                                       NOTICE OF   
                           MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION VACATE ORDER OF AUGUST 8TH DUE TO DELIBERATE ERROR BIAS/AND OR PREJUDICE 

                                                
To the Honorable Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District:

Moving Party, Joe Louis Lawrence, hereby respectfully represents as Counsel Pro Se shows this court with an affidavit the noted reasons why Order should be Vacated Pursuant to Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure; {Pursuant to the provisions of the United States Constitution}

Please be advised that on September 1, 2016, Plaintiff has filed before this Honorable District Court, Motion for Reconsideration et al; and will present said legally sufficient instrument before Judge Darrah September 15, at 9:30 am in room 1203
  
Commander & Chief                            Attorney General of United States
President Barack Obama                                 Loretta Lynch
The White House                           U.S. Department of Justice
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW            950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500                         Washington, DC 20530-0001

Chief Judge Timothy Evans                              Judge Moshe Jacobius
50 West Washington, Suite 2600                           50 West Washington, Suite 2403
Chicago, Illinois 60601                                          Chicago, Ill. 60601

Judge Mary Lane Mikva                                   Clerk of Circuit Court, Dorothy Brown
50 West Washington, Suite                                    50 West Washington, Suite 1000
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                 Chicago, Ill. 60601

Atty. Gen, Lisa Madigan                            Asst. Atty. Gen Tyler Roland
100 West Randolph, Suite 1200                 100 West Randolph, Suite 1200
Chicago, Ill. 60601                                     Chicago, Ill. 60601
States Attorney, Anita Alvarez, Daley Center, Chg. Ill. 60601

Sec of State                                                  Asst Deputy Dir. Candace Cheffin
Asst Gen Counsel Terrence McConville     60 East Van Buren, 8th floor
100 West Randolph, Suite 500                       Chicago, Ill. 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601       

CHA Mobility                                             CHA Mobility, HCP Counselors
Chris Klepper, Executive Dir.                     Tracey Robinson/Joann Harris
28 East Jackson Blvd.                                    4859 S. Wabash, Suite 2nd Floor  
Chicago, Ill 60604                                          Chicago, Ill. 60615     
                                                                   
CHA Mobility, Real Estate Specialist               Recorder of Deeds
Jessie McDaniel                                                    Karen Yarbrough
4859 S. Wabash                                                     118 N. Clark, Room 120
Chicago, Ill. 60615                                                  Chicago, Ill. 60602

City of Chicago, Department of Buildings       Sabre Investments
Christopher Lynch                                               120 West Madison Street
121 North LaSalle, Room 900                                Chicago, Ill 60601
Chicago, Ill. 60601

Seyfarth & Shaw
Anne D. Harris, Jeffrey K. Ross, Kyle A. Petersen, Sara Eber Fowler Suite 2400
131 South Dearborn
Chicago, IL. 60603

Chicago Housing Authority
Office of the General Counsel, Maria Sewell Joseph, Thomas B. King
60 East Van Buren
Chicago, IL. 60605

Cary G. Schiff & Associates                   Gordon & Rees LLP
Christopher R. Johnson, Yuleida Joy        Lindsay Watson, Christian T. Novay
134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1720             1 North Franklin, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                    Chicago, Illinois 60606


Stephan R. Patton, Mary E. Reuther, Rey A. Phillip Santos
Corp Counsel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Asst Corp Counsel
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 800
Chicago, Ill 60602

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Christian Novay                                            Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
55 West Monroe, Street, Suite 3800                 Christian Novay
Chicago, Ill. 60603                                           550 West Adams Street, Suite 300
                                                                        Chicago, IL. 60661

Jessica Mallon, Gen Counsel CHA                    Roy Martinez Manager 420 East Ohio
60 East Van Buren                                                  420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill 60601                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611

Eve Aywaz, Sales Consultant                                   Sarah Aredia, Leasing Consultant
345 East Ohio                                                        420 East Ohio
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                   Chicago, Ill. 60611   

John-Paul Loseto, Executive Manager
345 East Ohio                                                         Father Michael Pfleger
Chicago, Ill. 60611                                                      St. Sabina
                                                                                  1210 West 78th Pl.                                                                                                                
Courtesy Copies:                                           Chg. Il 60620
US Attorney                                            FBI  Dir. Michael J. Anderson
Zachary T. Fardon                                2111 West Roosevelt Road
219 S. Dearborn, 5th floor                         Chicago, Ill. 60612
Chicago, Ill 60604
                                                         Leo High School Principal Philip Messina
Hon Judge Neil Cohen                             7901 S. Sangamon
50 West Washington, Suite 2308                  Chicago, Il 60620
Chicago, Ill 60601

Mayor                                            Deputy Regional Adm., Field Office Dir.
Rahm Emanuel                                       Beverly E. Bishop
City Hall                                              77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Ill. 60601                              Chicago, Ill. 60604

Governor                                                 Hon Mark Kirk                                 
525 South 8th St.                                       607 East Adams, Suite 1520
Springfield, Ill. 62703                               Springfield, Ill. 62701
                                                                   


Bruce Rauner                                             Alderman David Moore
100 West Randolph                                      Alderman Ed Burke  
Chicago, Ill. 60601




Cook County President                               Cook County Sheriff
Toni Preckwinkle                                            Thomas J. Dart
118 N. Clark, Room 517                         Richard J. Daley Center, Room 701
Chicago, Ill. 60602                                        Chicago, Ill. 60602

Hon Dick Durbin                                       Hon Judge
525 South 8th St.                                       Frederick Bates
Springfield, Ill. 62703                           50 West Washington
                                                               Chicago, Ill. 60601



























                                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Joe Louis Lawrence Plaintiff-Counsel Pro Se, certify that I have on this day filed said Motion for Reconsideration et al.  with the Clerk of the United States District Court with all attachments;






















Dated September 1, 2016

                                    
                                                                             Respectfully Submitted
                                                                             
                                                                             Joe Louis Lawrence
                                                                             Counsel Pro Se              
                                                                             P. O. Box 490075 
                                                                      Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
                                                                                          Email: joelouislaw@yahoo.com                                                                                                 
                                                                                          Phone:  312 927-4210
  



IN THE 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

 Joe Louis Lawrence                                                      Civil Action #16-cv-7434

                                                                                       Hon:    John W. Darrah
  Plaintiff

    V

420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority  
345 East Ohio, K2 Apartments, City of Chicago,
Commission on Human Relations Supreme Court
 Of Illinois, Alderman Edward Burke,                      
 Franklin U. Valderrama, Mary Lane Mikva                                    

 Defendants          

                                                     AFFIDAVIT


   Now comes Joe Louis Lawrence, Attorney Pro Se Plaintiff in this cause files herewith his affidavit as required by Title 28, United States Code:

I Joe Louis Lawrence, Counsel Pro Se being duly sworn on oath states the aforementioned pleadings enumerated within said motion the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.


Joe Louis Lawrence                                                                  NOTARY

P.O. Box 490075-0075
Chicago, Illinois 60649-0075
@joelouis7

312 927-4210

No comments:

Post a Comment